
NASA misses its representation at the space summit in Delhi; here's why
The
Global Space Exploration Conference 2025
, which was conducted in New Delhi on Wednesday, saw a record attendance, with representatives from thirty-five nations, top space agency officials such as China, Japan, Canada, and Europe, more than 1,700 representatives, and ten astronauts representing different countries or agencies. Yet, something highly crucial was absent from the event—presence from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
Operation Sindoor
Pahalgam payback continues: Operation Sindoor Day 2 keeps Pakistan on edge
Military attack by Pakistan will be met with 'very firm response': S Jaishankar
Fake news alert: Government fact checks 'Pak propaganda' on Operation Sindoor
The non-attendance by NASA to this prestigious event was under question, particularly in light of the agency's participation history in such events.
NASA's missing representation at GLEX 2025 in Delhi
The lack of NASA's participation at GLEX 2025, according to the official account, was due to budget reasons. Committee organizers, interviewed anonymously, confirmed that at least a dozen scientists and astronauts from NASA were supposed to participate in the conference. But the failure of the agency to raise funds for accommodation and travel made them unable to attend. This is a big departure from earlier GLEX editions, where NASA had a leading role in deliberations on international space exploration.
The failure of NASA to attend can also be attributed to larger political and fiscal changes in the United States. Not long after the swearing-in of Donald Trump this year, his government rolled out a series of budget reductions which have been quite tough on NASA. The proposed budget outlines a 24% reduction in NASA's overall funding, decreasing it from $24.8 billion to $18.8 billion.
One aspect of the cuts was the harsh slashing of the fiscal year 2026 budget, and cancelling or delaying certain current space missions, such as the Mars Sample Return mission. These economic challenges have challenged NASA's future and made the agency unable to offer its staff the chance to attend global events such as GLEX.
India's historic GLEX 2025 and the consequences of NASA's absence
The 2025 GLEX was a historic conference for India as it hosted the conference for the first time ever. The conference had a record number of participants and countries involved, making the record for the global conference. Hosting the event, India, in conjunction with the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), was a demonstration of how far the country has climbed in stature in the world of space exploration. Not having NASA only stifled the conference from being less of a forum for discussion, collaboration, and innovation in space exploration. NASA Transition Period: Representation Impact
One of the insiders from the International Astronautical Federation (IAF) who participated in the planning observed that the no-show by NASA was also attributed to the agency being in a state of transition. This accounted for leadership change and absence of some of the department heads, and thus representation of NASA to the conference was not maximized. These internal reorganizations, along with budgetary issues, caused the agency's failure to attend what would otherwise have been a significant international meeting.
NASA's role in space exploration and the consequences of missing GLEX 2025
NASA has been at the forefront of
space exploration
for a long time, and it has placed itself at the forefront of pathfinder missions and planetary exploration for over a half-century.
The agency's involvement in Moon, Mars, and beyond missions has placed it on a high level of prestige within the global space community. Though its absence from
GLEX 2025
could have been a financial and logistical burden, NASA's heritage continues to be a critical factor in the future of space exploration. The current fiscal constraints, however, underscore the necessity of continued investment and support for the agency's continued efforts toward global space activities. NASA's no-show at GLEX 2025 is a chilling reminder of prevailing financial and political troubles that affect prime space agencies.
Although the success of India in organizing the conference speaks well of India's growing position in space exploration, NASA's absence says volumes about maintaining sustained support and funding towards global space collaborations. With the age of space exploration continuing to unfold, it will become important to tackle the financial and institutional issues that threaten to discourage large space agencies' participation in international discussion forums.
Also Read |
ISRO performs space 'dogfight' with twin satellites 500km above Earth, showcasing advanced orbital control
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Such ingratitude': Elon Musk claims Trump would've lose election without him
Elon Musk on Thursday claimed that President Donald Trump would've lose the 2024 election 'without me', in his latest rant against the administration and the 'Big Beautiful Bill'. The billionaire further accused Trump of 'such ingratitude'.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
The free filing IRS software TurboTax wanted to kill is now open source for all Americans
IRS Direct File software just took a bold step forward—its code is now open source on GitHub, even as the future of the free tax filing tool faces serious threats from TurboTax maker Intuit and Donald Trump's new budget bill. The program, used by over 300,000 Americans, received strong reviews for being fast, free, and user-friendly. Now, with developers leaving the government to continue this mission privately, the battle over free tax software heats up. This story reveals what's at stake, who's fighting for taxpayers, and why corporate lobbying wants it shut down. IRS Direct File open sourced as TurboTax and Trump bill threaten its future, pushing developers to launch a new private effort to save free tax filing tools for Americans. Explore how the IRS code release could reshape tax season ahead. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why is Direct File under threat from Intuit and Donald Trump's new bill? What does it mean that the IRS open sourced Direct File's code? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Who are the former IRS developers now shaping the future of tax filing? Why is the fight over free tax software such a big deal for Americans? What happens next for Direct File and taxpayers? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs: The IRS just made a major move to protect its free tax filing software—Direct File—by releasing most of its code publicly on GitHub. This decision comes at a crucial moment. As pressure mounts from Intuit, the maker of TurboTax, and political threats from Donald Trump's budget bill, the future of free, government-backed tax filing could be in real move to open source the code not only gives developers a peek into how the IRS built a modern, user-friendly filing tool—it's also a clear message: the work will live on, even if Washington politics try to shut it Direct File program, developed by teams from the US Digital Service (USDS) and 18F, was part of a pilot launched by the IRS in 2024. About 300,000 Americans used the tool, and according to Federal News Network, users gave it rave reviews for being free, fast, and simple. The idea was straightforward—make tax filing easy and accessible, directly through the not everyone is happy about this. Companies like Intuit, whose TurboTax software dominates the paid tax prep market, have lobbied heavily against Direct File. Now, Trump's budget reconciliation bill includes language that could shut down Direct File entirely. According to policy experts, ending the program 'is a gift to the tax-prep industry that will cost taxpayers time and money.'On GitHub, the IRS released much of the source code that powers Direct File. This is a big deal for transparency, accountability, and future development. It means anyone—from independent developers to watchdog groups—can now examine, improve, or even build upon the free move is especially significant because many believe the program is at risk of being dismantled for political reasons. By putting the code in the public domain, the IRS is essentially giving the project a second life—even if the federal government walks core developers of Direct File—Chris Given, Jen Thomas, and Merici Vinton—have left their government roles. They've now joined the Economic Security Project's 'Future of Tax Filing Fellowship,' an initiative dedicated to exploring better ways for Americans to file taxes without paying high not alone. Gabriel Zucker, who helped build Direct File while working at Code for America, is also joining the fellowship. Their goal? Find new, more efficient, and less expensive models of tax filing—keeping the spirit of Direct File alive in the private years, the IRS Free File program—offering no-cost filing options for low- and moderate-income Americans—has been plagued by private sector interference. Intuit and other companies have pushed hard to keep the government from creating a fully free and easy system, because it would directly threaten their like Direct File show that a simple, free tax filing solution can work. And not only that—it's popular. With over 300,000 users in its pilot year and overwhelmingly positive feedback, the public appetite for such a service is as corporate lobbying ramps up and Trump's bill threatens its existence, it's a reminder of how political power can override public benefit—unless the public speaks now, the fate of Direct File rests in the hands of Congress and policymakers. If the Trump-backed bill passes as written, the program could be killed despite its success. However, by releasing the code to the public and rallying around the cause of free tax tools, developers and citizens are making it harder to erase the program the fellowship led by Given, Thomas, Vinton, and Zucker is pushing forward. They're building something new—maybe even better—by applying the lessons learned from Direct short, this isn't just a tech story—it's a fight over who controls tax filing in America: the people or the a free IRS tax filing tool that helps Americans file their taxes easily without using paid services like it threatens their profits by offering a government-backed free tax filing option for the public.


New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
NATO's chief says the alliance is on the cusp of accepting Trump's 5 per cent defense investment demand
BRUSSELS: Most U.S. allies at NATO endorse President Donald Trump's demand that they invest 5% of gross domestic product on their defense needs and are ready to ramp up security spending even more, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said Thursday. 'There's broad support,' Rutte told reporters after chairing a meeting of NATO defense ministers at the alliance's Brussels headquarters. 'We are really close,' he said, and added that he has 'total confidence that we will get there' by the next NATO summit in three weeks. European allies and Canada have already been investing heavily in their armed forces, as well as on weapons and ammunition, since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. At the same time, some have balked at U.S. demands to invest 5% of GDP on defense — 3.5% on core military spending and 1.5% on the roads, bridges, airfields and sea ports needed to deploy armies more quickly. Still struggling to meet the old goal In 2023, as Russia's full-scale war on Ukraine entered its second year, NATO leaders agreed to spend at least 2% of GDP on national defense budgets. So far, 22 of the 32 member countries have done so, and others still struggle to do so. Trump and his NATO counterparts appear likely to endorse the new goal at a summit in The Hague on June 24-25. Trump insists that U.S. allies should spend at least 5% so America can focus on security priorities elsewhere, mostly in the Indo-Pacific and its own borders. He has gained important leverage over the other NATO countries by casting doubt over whether the United States would defend allies that spend too little. At the same time, Trump has imposed tariffs on ally and foe alike, citing U.S. security concerns. The new goal would involve a 1.5% increase over the current 2% goal for defense budgets. It means that all 32 countries would be investing the same percentage.