Penzance aims to make town more pedestrian friendly
Penzance will spend some of the £21.5m awarded from central government on changing Market Jew Street with works starting in July.Penzance Town Fund (PTF) said it aimed to improve accessibility for pedestrians, people with reduced mobility, cyclists and public transport.Other investments would include a climbing centre in a former supermarket and a street food hall in the town's historic Market House, it said.The PTF boss said some people had complained "because everyone romanticises the past" and asked residents to "bear with us" while the changes were made.
'People hate change'
Business owner and Business Improvement District (BID) manager Sarah Shaw works with the Penzance Town Fund and she said: "The ultimate goal is to have a user friendly, highly populated, busy thriving town of Penzance."There's certainly plenty of people grumbling about it but in fact Penzance has always been quite hostile to pedestrians."I think people romanticise the past - 'the old days were always better, the town was busier and we all took more money'."I think people hate change but we ask them to bear with us."
Following a trial period the banning of cars in the town between 11:00 and 16:00 has been made permanent. Morgan Lewis who works at Ride on E-Bikes in the centre of the town said: "Local Facebook groups have plenty of moaning about it, but there will always be lovers and haters."We need to reinforce pedestrianisation and calm the traffic coming up and down Market Jew Street."I think it will help fill the empty shops with new businesses and bring more people into Penzance."
There are three different projects to transform the town planned to take place between July this year through to early 2026 and these will be combined with upgrades to the gas pipework.Wales and West Utilities programme controller Abby Smith said: "We know that working in areas like this is not ideal, which is why we're working collaboratively to agree the best way to get this important work done while causing the least disruption to the community."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
21 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Robbie Williams, Murrayfield Stadium, review: The most spectacular end-of-the-pier show ever seen
'Allow me to reintroduce myself!' yelled the squat, muscular, tattooed, silver haired 51-year-old, standing on a runway in the centre of the vast Murrayfield Stadium in Edinburgh, Scotland, a tiny, isolated figure in the midst of a 70,000 strong crowd. 'My name is ROBBIE! F______! WILLIAMS!' And the crowd roared back with a gusty, noisy delight to match the star's own. He's back, folks. To be fair, I am not sure how far he ever really went away, but Britain's self-proclaimed 'King of Entertainment' is on the march, determined to reclaim his crown. Oasis mania is about to be unleashed once more in the UK, as the biggest band in Britpop returns to the stage next month. Cheekily stealing their thunder, they are being preceded around Britain's stadiums by the biggest British hitmaker of the 1990s and 2000s in a show mischievously entitled Britpop, filled with buzzing guitars and mighty singalongs. Mind you, that's where any resemblance to the fiercely dour and belligerently stationary Oasis ends. Because Williams throws everything he's got at his audience – special effects, jokes, choreography, stunts and, mainly, himself – in a relentless, almost desperate desire to please. His spectacular show opened with a gasp-inducing high dive from a giant winged platform suspended above the stage and ended two hours later with fans singing the choruses of Williams's beloved ballad Angels louder than the giant PA, whilst the star of the occasion looked on beaming with emotional delight. I am not sure who was more moved by Williams's relentless antics – the woman named Debbie from Dundee openly weeping as Williams clambered into the crowd to serenade her with a version of She's The One, or Williams himself as he basked in the glow of love and acceptance. A neurotic neediness is at the heart of Williams's appeal but is crucially wrapped up in songs with meaningful lyrics, flowing melodies, snappy hooks and huge choruses that the audience seem even more eager to sing than the performer. Indeed, it is not really a criticism, but Williams talks as much as he sings, frequently interrupting his own emotional performances with silly jokes and overexcited chatter. 'I'm s_______ hits all over the place!' he shouts in the middle of an otherwise gorgeous A Love Supreme and makes a lewd penis joke during his most vulnerable anthem Come Undone. A Robbie Williams show is a lot to take in. It's an end of the pier cabaret routine staged with the firepower of a Hollywood blockbuster; a cheesy pop extravaganza infused with darkly witty postmodern irony; an exposed bundle of raw human neuroses transposed into monster pop anthems interlaced with old fashioned showbiz comedy patter and interrupted by scatological stream of consciousness babble. He makes unscripted comments about age ('I'm 51,' he repeatedly shouted in self-amazement), anxiety ('I've been s_______ myself for weeks, old feelings from Take That, PTSD'), his family ('my mum has dementia, and my dad has Parkinson's, I feel like I'm in sniper's alley'), and sings the showbiz standard My Way in a pink suit and boa with all the feeling of a man who can't quite believe he's made it this far. He's 51, you know. There is a theme to proceedings, roughly hovering around the question of 'what is entertainment?'. Williams offers himself as the answer to his own question, to which the crowd offer noisy validation. From the riotous bombast of Let Me Entertain You to the vulnerability of anthemic ballad Feel, Williams arrived fully armed with the singalong hits that his massive audience have already taken to heart. In his natural element on stage, he put them across with a combination of ridiculous humour, raw humanity and powerful musicality that proved irresistible. We let him entertain us. I suspect from his gurning delight that the experience was mutual.
Telegraph
21 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Duke of Sussex ‘asked Diana's brother if he should change his family name to Spencer'
Prince Harry asked Princess Diana's brother about changing his family name to Spencer, according to reports. During a rare visit to Britain, Prince Harry is said to have sought advice from his uncle Earl Spencer, about whether to assume his mother's surname. It would have meant dropping his current family name, Mountbatten-Windsor, which is used by his children, Prince Archie, six, and Princess Lilibet, three. The Duke, 40, was advised against the move by the Earl, 61, because of the legal hurdles, according to the Mail on Sunday. 'They had a very amicable conversation and Spencer advised him against taking such a step', a friend of the Duke told the newspaper. Mountbatten-Windsor is the surname available to descendants of the late Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip. It combines the British Royal family's House name of Windsor and Prince Philip's adopted surname of Mountbatten. The Duke's apparent desire to abandon the name speaks to the growing rift with his family. An interview with the BBC last month, in which he made a series of comments about the Royal family, is understood to have deepened the divide between Buckingham Palace and the Duke and his wife, Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex. On their birth certificates, the couple's children are Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor and Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor. However, it was revealed last year, they had started using 'Sussex' as the official surname for their children. The Royal family name of Windsor was confirmed by Queen Elizabeth II following her accession to the throne in 1952. But in 1960, the late Queen and then Duke of Edinburgh elected for their direct descendants to carry the name Mountbatten-Windsor. This meant that when the Queen's children needed to declare a surname, it would be Mountbatten-Windsor. Mountbatten-Windsor first appeared on an official document on Nov 14 1973 upon the marriage of the Princess Royal and Captain Mark Phillips.
Sky News
24 minutes ago
- Sky News
'Transformational' new drug could stop breast cancer tumours before they grow, trial finds
A new drug could stop some breast cancer tumours from using hormones to grow, a trial has found. Results from the Serena-6 trial, carried out with the Institute of Cancer Research in London, suggest that using camizestrant could help patients stay well longer and delay the need for chemotherapy. According to Cancer Research UK, the drug works by blocking oestrogen from getting into the breast cancer cell, which researchers hope can then stop or slow the growth of cancer. Breast cancer patients given the drug in the trial reduced their chances of the disease progressing by 52% compared to standard therapies. Professor Kristian Helin, chief executive of the Institute of Cancer Research, said the results "represent more than a clinical milestone, they represent a transformational shift in how we approach precision medicine". Co-principal investigator Professor Nick Turner also called the development of the drug "a pivotal moment in breast cancer care". 1:48 The study, funded by AstraZeneca, looked at patients with hormone-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer - about 70% of cases. More than 3,000 patients from 23 countries took part in phase three of the trial, which saw doctors use blood tests to detect changes in the cancer's DNA to see which treatments were ineffective. For those taking camizestrant, their cancer stabilised for around 16 months on average, compared with about nine months for other treatments. However, 1% of patients taking the new drug stopped taking it because of side effects. Further results from the Serena-6 trial will be presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting in Chicago on Sunday. Cancer Research UK reports that breast cancer is the most common type of the disease, with around 56,400 women and around 390 men diagnosed in the UK each year. The trial was also the first worldwide study to show that using blood tests to find early signs of cancer resistance to treatment helps patients. Dr Catherine Elliott, director of research at Cancer Research UK, praised the breakthrough as a "clear example of how blood tests are starting to transform cancer treatment". "By tracking tiny traces of tumour DNA in the blood, researchers were able to spot early signs of treatment resistance and switch therapies before cancer had a chance to grow," she added. "It shows how circulating tumour DNA, or ctDNA, could help doctors make smarter, more timely treatment decisions. "This approach could become an important part of how we personalise care for people with advanced breast cancer."
