‘I didn't like the attitude': Thomas Tuchel lays into England squad after drab 1-0 win over Andorra
Thomas Tuchel had some choice words for his side after a listless win over Andorra (AFP via Getty Images)
England manager Thomas Tuchel made his displeasure clear after his side laboured to a dull and dispiriting 1-0 win over Andorra, the world's 173rd-ranked side.
England had several chances, particularly in the first half, but failed to break down a dogged Andorran defence, only making a breakthrough as Noni Madueke - a rare bright spark - teed up Harry Kane in the 50th minute.
Advertisement
The captain's 72nd international goal spared England's blushes but they could not build on their lead, with jeers accompanying their exit at half-time and a smattering of boos at the final whistle.
A visibly cross Tuchel told ITV after the game, 'We're not happy with the performance, of course. We started quite well in the first 20 or 25 minutes, but that was the only time it felt like it was only a matter of time.
'We created a lot of chances, half-chances and set pieces. But we completely lost our momentum and couldn't get it back from the whole of the first half.
'There was a lack of urgency, quality and energy.'
Advertisement
The game was held at the RCDE Stadium in Barcelona, with Andorra's home ground not deemed ready to host, and England appeared sluggish in the heat as the match wore on.
Asked about his debrief to the squad, Tuchel replied, 'It's what I've said to you just now. I told them I was most worried in the last 20 minutes because I did not like the attitude with which we ended this game. It felt almost like [he shrugged dismissively], 'We have to play it until the 93rd minute.'
'It's still a World Cup qualifier away from home. I didn't like it at all. The players know all this because I said it in the dressing-room.
'It's also necessary to have a look in detail, watch the match again, and we will let them know tomorrow what we want from them.
Advertisement
'We can just admit it that it's not what we expect from us,' Tuchel continued. 'We need to look at it in detail and do better on Tuesday.'
England face Senegal in a friendly next Tuesday, a significantly tougher test against potential opposition at next summer's World Cup.
He offered some praise for Madueke, who had the chance to double England's lead late on, but his back-line pass drifted across the front of goal and was then not turned in by substitute Anthony Gordon.
Asked whether the Chelsea player had advanced his cause to feature in next summer's squad, the German said, 'He was maybe over the course of the match the most dangerous, the most active. I could feel his hunger and desire to [follow the plan]. Yeah, he was one of the few [to follow it].'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
31 minutes ago
- Axios
FIFA monitoring stadium upgrades in Dallas-Fort Worth for 2026 World Cup
The 2026 FIFA Men's World Cup is just one year away and organizers feel like they're having a "giant panic attack." Why it matters: Our region's reputation is on the line. The latest: FC Dallas president Dan Hunt shared everything organizers must finish to be ready. "The shot clock is on … it's going to go really fast now," he said during a transportation summit Thursday in Hurst. Hunt is a co-chair of the North Texas FIFA World Cup Organizing Committee. The big picture: North Texas will host nine matches, the most of any city. The region will have to arrange for security, transportation and lodging for athletes and spectators traveling to the region. 700,000 tickets will be sold for the nine matches at AT&T Stadium, Hunt said. What they're doing: Organizers will have to ensure the stadium meets FIFA's requirements for World Cup venues, including having real grass. They plan to remove the stadium's artificial grass, raise the field and create a new platform on it with sod, sand and soil. The task will require using grow lights and preparing backup fields in case more grass is needed, Hunt said. FC Dallas is renovating Toyota Stadium in Frisco for use as a base camp during the 2026 World Cup. The intrigue: The North Texas FIFA committee has also been helping the World Cup's European organizers understand Texans and their love of tailgating. Between the lines: Organizers in North Texas haven't said much about how they will get athletes, journalists, fans and workers to and from AT&T Stadium in Arlington, a suburban city without mass transit. The tournament's international broadcast center is in downtown Dallas and the fan festival will be at Fair Park. Teams could be stationed as far away as Denton. What they're saying: "My message to FIFA has been very simple: We're going to show you that you made a mistake not picking North Texas for the final," Hunt said.
Fox Sports
an hour ago
- Fox Sports
What if ... the USMNT was awarded the handball against Germany in the 2002 World Cup?
Editor's note: Throughout the history of sports, there have been countless moments that have made us wonder how things would differ if just one circumstance or decision had been changed. "What if" is a series in which we will examine how the trajectory of several athletes and teams could have looked had major moments gone in a different direction. While it's impossible to predict how these outcomes would have played out, that doesn't make it any less fascinating to discuss. Previously: What if … Drew Bledsoe never got hurt? What if… the 49ers drafted Aaron Rodgers instead of Alex Smith in the 2005 NFL Draft What if the USMNT was awarded the handball against Germany in the 2002 World Cup quarterfinal? The 2002 World Cup was the first to have multiple hosts, and also the first to take place in Asia— with the tournament being held in Japan and South Korea. After being eliminated in the Round of 16 in 1994 and not making it out of the group stage in 1998, the USMNT was primed for a run in 2002. They were able to finish as runners-up in their group, most notably defeating Portugal 3-2 and drawing with group winner South Korea. In the Round of 16, they faced Mexico for the first time at a World Cup— and recorded a 2-0 victory behind goals from Brian McBride and Landon Donovan. Next, it was on to the quarterfinal against powerhouse Germany. Michael Ballack got the Germans out to an early 1-0 lead in the 39th minute, but the Americans responded with several attacking plays to start the second half. But in the 50th minute, everything changed. Off a USMNT corner kick by Donovan, a German player attempted to head the ball away from goal— only to have it find a wide open Gregg Berhalter, who took a shot at goal from just a few yards out. German keeper Oliver Kahn was able to barely save the shot, but the ball would bounce off the arm of midfielder Torsten Frings who was defending the post. Immediately, U.S. players began clamoring for a handball, and when the replay was shown— it was clear as day. However, referee Hugh Dallas didn't call it. And with VAR not yet in existence, the call was irreversible. Had it been called, the U.S. would have been awarded a penalty kick, and Frings would have been given a red card. As mentioned, the USMNT were dominating the first 10 minutes of the half, and surely would have taken advantage of 10-men German side. Below, we dive into several outcomes that could have resulted from a U.S. victory in that match. Does the USMNT reach the 2002 World Cup final? If the handball had been called, the best-case scenario would have resulted in Claudio Reyna scoring the game-tying penalty— and Germany would have had to fend off a momentum-driven American attack with just 10 men. So many of the legendary Americans could have subsequently scored the game-winning goal— with Donovan, McBride, Reyna, Cobi Jones, Eddie Pope, and several others headlining the squad. Had they advanced, they would have faced South Korea in the semifinal, whom they had drawn with in the group stage. A win against the co-hosts would pit the USMNT against Brazil, and the U.S. would have made its first men's World Cup final ever. While the Brazilian squad was filled with superstars like Ronaldo, Ronaldinho and Rivaldo— the exposure from such a massive stage could have changed the landscape of American soccer for the next two decades— regardless of the result. Would the men's team see similar growth to the women's team following their first final? Few can forget the dominant fashion in which the USWNT won the World Cup in 1991 and 1999. This sort of success undoubtedly influenced young American girls watching the tournament, leading to the likes of Carli Lloyd, Alex Morgan, Abby Wambach— and current stars like Sophia Wilson, Trinity Rodman, and Naomi Girma. Such an emphasis on women's soccer in the United States has led to them winning four of the nine World Cups ever held. So what would a win over Germany in 2002 have resulted in for the men? Just imagine all the young boys who would have participated in soccer during the early 2000s instead of the usual suspects— Pop Warner football, little league baseball, and AAU (Amateur Athletic Union) basketball. For perspective, in a study done by the National Federation of State High Schools in 2022, there were 374,773 participants in girls soccer for that school year— the third-highest of all sports. On the boy's side? Soccer participants ranked fifth, behind football, track & field, basketball, and baseball. Would Bruce Arena have gotten a shot at coaching in Europe? No USMNT coach has coached or won more matches in the team's history than Bruce Arena, with 148 and 81 respectively. He was inducted into the National Soccer Hall of Fame in 2010, but what would his career have looked like if he had taken down Germany in that 2002 World Cup quarterfinal? Arena had already won two MLS titles with D.C. United in 1996 and 1997 before spearheading the 2002 national team past the Round of 16 for the first time ever. Considering that two Arena's successors – Bob Bradley and Gregg Berhalter – were able to coach abroad, it's not unreasonable to think he could have done so as well. Had he taken a potential offer in Europe, that could have also changed the team's fortunes at the 2006 World Cup. The USMNT did not make it out of the group stage in 2006, finishing last in their group and ultimately leading to Arena's exit three weeks after the tournament. He'd go on to win three more MLS titles with the Galaxy in 2011, 2012 and 2014 and was again hired by the national team in 2016. In his second stint, the U.S. failed to qualify for the 2018 World Cup— the first time that had happened since 1986. One can't help but wonder how all of this would have changed if the handball was called in 2002. Do we see even more interest in MLS and American academies? It's incredible to think about how a win over Germany would have changed the landscape of the MLS and American youth academies. Such an upset could have sparked massive national interest in soccer, leading to unprecedented investment in the U.S. youth soccer system. With never-before-seen pressure from both public and corporate entities, we could have seen high-level sponsorship in the MLS and a complete overhaul of youth academies— which has often been faulted for its pay-to-play model. The next five to ten years could have allowed for a network of talent aggregation modeled after the European youth system, emphasizing technical development and scouting in underserved communities. In turn, it's possible that an entire generation of world-class players would have emerged— with players like Christian Pulisic appearing in much greater numbers. Just imagine what the 2014, 2018, and 2022 World Cup results would have looked like for the U.S. had this occurred after 2002. It's totally in the realm of possibilities that the USMNT would be a consistent soccer powerhouse had this foundation been set. How big does men's soccer become in the U.S.? Possibly the biggest question of all that arises from this hypothetical exercise, is just how much bigger soccer would be in this country had the U.S. taken down Germany with the correct call. It's hard to imagine that Landon Donovan wouldn't have become even more of an icon than he already is, and that he would have inspired several people to become fans of the sport. While it's hard to say that this single result would have propelled soccer as the top sport among Americans, there's little doubt that the millions of potential viewers a final or semifinal match would have generated would have changed the trajectory of the sport. For perspective, 26.7 million people watched the USWNT take down Japan in the 2015 World Cup final. The 2022 men's final between France and Argentina had over 25 million viewers. Just imagine a world in which the four-and five-star high school basketball and football recruits that colleges fight over grew up playing soccer instead. We'll never know. Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account and follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily! recommended Get more from United States Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more in this topic
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Has Tottenham Hotspur's appointment of Thomas Frank changed their 2025/26 top four odds?
For more stories like this click here to follow The Athletic's sports betting section and have them added to your feed. Thomas Frank has been announced as Tottenham Hotspur's new manager, bringing a brief search for Ange Postecoglou's successor to a close. Spurs moved quickly to secure the Dane, who has a long list of admirers throughout the Premier League. This article from The Athletic details many of his strong points, making it clear why Spurs were willing to part with around £10m to secure him and his support staff. Advertisement But a quick look at the betting markets would suggest that, at least in the bookmakers' eyes, this appointment barely moves the needle in terms of Spurs' chances of success. Their odds to win the 2025-26 Premier League title haven't budged, while their chances of making the top four have been shortened ever so slightly, from around 11/2 to 5/1. The persona of Frank is moving the public – but it's not swaying the markets. Why? We are delighted to announce the appointment of Thomas Frank as our new Head Coach on a contract that runs until 2028. Welcome, Thomas! 🤍 — Tottenham Hotspur (@SpursOfficial) June 12, 2025 Sam Tighe Despite Frank's four years of experience and strong reputation within the game, this managerial appointment is a (relative) step into the unknown for Spurs. Frank might even say that himself, given this season, he reportedly quipped, 'I'd love to play like this' when discussing Brighton & Hove Albion's swashbuckling playing style. He then admitted 'I'd need another £100m, though,' per The Independent. He did a phenomenal job not only keeping Brentford in the league but, at times, in the hunt for Europe, too. He did so by playing realistic football: reactive, counter-attacking and physical, with a focus on set pieces. In all four of his campaigns, the team averaged between 43.3 per cent and 47.7 per cent of possession per game. Their PPDA (passes allowed per defensive action; a statistic used to measure how aggressive teams press) always stayed between 10 and 12, indicating relative passiveness off the ball. This is not only very different from the way his predecessor, Postecoglou, typically operated, but also quite antithetical to how the current top six operate: focused on possession, control and structured attack. Based on his comments, the higher calibre of player he will now coach and the enhanced budget, he's set to roll out a more Brighton-esque style. He gets all summer to plot it out, with no disruptions caused by missing superstars on international duty. I'm excited to see what it looks like because, quite literally, I have no idea what it will look like. We have nothing to point to and say 'that's what Spurs are getting,' aside from perhaps some scraps left on the cutting room floor from his promotion season in 2021. Brett Koremenos As I mentioned earlier, evaluating a manager working for a club that excels at player recruitment is challenging. Very few head coaches possess the skills to add value to their teams; most are often just a direct reflection of the talent at hand. Spurs' existing pool, however, isn't among England's elite. It's easy to point to this season's 17th-placed finish and conclude that the Lillywhites significantly underperformed across the board. But Postecoglou's dishevelled cohort were quite unfortunate. Advertisement Though the team tied for 15th place in expected goal (xG) differential per 90 minutes, they were far more unlucky than bad at the start of the year. Then, as injuries started to mount and the UEFA Europa League became the sole focus, there was a noticeable decline in output – which is why Frank is now at the helm. Postecoglou may have been a bit rigid in his tactical approach, but he wasn't entirely to blame for Spurs' forgettable domestic campaign. Son Heung-min is about to turn 33, having played over 33,000 league minutes. James Maddison is an excellent player but was only able to start 21 matches in the league this season. For most teams, the midfield is the engine and Spurs have been sputtering in that area for a while. Yves Bissouma was hailed as the next big thing upon his arrival in North London. Spoiler alert: he's not. The rest of Spurs' midfield this past season were either injured, too young or below a Champions League-level side. Frank might be a good manager, but there's only so much a head coach can do when forced to deploy Rodrigo Bentancur in 26/38 league games. Attackers Brennan Johnson and Dominic Solanke ranked 23rd and 28th in non-penalty expected goals + expected assists (xG+xA) in the league this year. That's a solid foundation, but the club needs more proven stars to consistently compete in Europe. Frank could refine a few rough edges in training, but by and large, his impact on Spurs' odds for success will be dwarfed by more important elements, such as summer transfer business and avoiding injuries. Betting/Odds links in this article are provided by partners of The Athletic. Restrictions may apply. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication. (Photo of Thomas Frank: Alex Davidson / Getty Images)
