logo
Doctor with "lust for murder" goes on trial for deaths of 15 patients in Germany

Doctor with "lust for murder" goes on trial for deaths of 15 patients in Germany

CBS News14-07-2025
A German doctor went on trial Monday accused of killing 15 patients with lethal injections and acting as "master of life and death" over those in his care.
The 40-year-old palliative care specialist, named by German media as Johannes M., is alleged to have killed 12 women and three men between September 2021 and July 2024 while working in Berlin.
The doctor is accused of injecting the victims, aged between 25 and 94, with deadly cocktails of sedatives and in some cases setting fire to their homes in a bid to cover up his crimes.
The accused had "visited his patients under the pretext of providing medical care", prosecutor Philipp Meyhoefer said at the opening of the trial at the state court in Berlin.
Johannes M. had organized "home visits, already with the intention of killing" and exploited his patients' trust in him as a doctor, Meyhoefer said.
"He acted with disregard for life... and behaved as the master of life and death."
The court-appointed defendant's lawyers (left to right), Klaudia Dawidowic, Ria Halbritter and Christoph Stoll, wait for the start of the trial of a palliative care doctor allegedly accused of killing 15 patients with lethal injections, in the Regional Courtroom in Berlin, on July 14, 2025.
TOBIAS SCHWARZ/AFP via Getty Images
A co-worker first raised the alarm over Johannes M. last July after becoming suspicious that so many of his patients had died in fires, according to Die Zeit newspaper.
He was arrested in August, with prosecutors initially linking him to four deaths.
But subsequent investigations uncovered a host of other suspicious cases, and in April prosecutors charged Johannes M. with 15 counts of murder.
Prosecutors and police previously said that the accused is said to have had no motive beyond killing, and that the suspect's acts meet the legal definition of "lust for murder."
"Why do people kill?"
A further 96 cases were still being investigated, a prosecution spokesman told AFP, including the death of Johannes M.'s mother-in-law.
She had been suffering from cancer and mysteriously died the same weekend that Johannes M. and his wife went to visit her in Poland in early 2024, according to media reports.
The suspect reportedly trained as a radiologist and a general practitioner before going on to specialize in palliative care.
According to Die Zeit, he submitted a doctoral thesis in 2013 looking into the motives behind a series of killings in Frankfurt, which opened with the words "Why do people kill?"
The doctor allegedly "administered an anesthetic and a muscle relaxant to his patients without their knowledge or consent," the Berlin prosecutor's office said in a statement. "The latter paralyzed the respiratory muscles, leading to respiratory arrest and death within minutes."
In five cases, Johannes M. allegedly set fire to the victims' apartments after administering the injections.
On one occasion, he is accused of murdering two patients on the same day.
On the morning of July 8, 2024, he allegedly killed a 75-year-old man at his home in the Berlin district of Kreuzberg.
"A few hours later" he is said to have struck again, killing a 76-year-old woman in the neighboring Neukoelln district.
Prosecutors say he started a fire in the woman's apartment, but it went out.
"When he realized this, he allegedly informed a relative of the woman and claimed that he was standing in front of her flat and that nobody was answering the doorbell," prosecutors said.
In another case, Johannes M. "falsely claimed to have already begun resuscitation efforts" on a 56-year-old victim, who was initially kept alive by rescuers but died three days later in hospital.
Echoes of other cases
The case recalls that of notorious German nurse Niels Hoegel, who was handed a life sentence in 2019 for murdering 85 patients.
Hoegel, believed to be modern Germany's most prolific serial killer, murdered hospital patients with lethal injections between 2000 and 2005, before he was eventually caught in the act.
More recently, a 27-year-old nurse was given a life sentence in 2023 for murdering two patients by deliberately administering unprescribed drugs.
In March, another nurse went on trial in Aachen accused of injecting 26 patients with large doses of sedatives or painkillers, resulting in nine deaths.
Last week, German police revealed they are investigating another doctor suspected of killing several mainly elderly patients.
Investigators are "reviewing" deaths linked to the doctor from the town of Pinneberg in northern Germany, just outside Hamburg, police and prosecutors said.
In England, neonatal nurse Lucy Letby is serving a life sentence for murdering seven babies and attempting to murder six others. On July 1, three former senior leaders at the hospital where Letby worked were arrested on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supreme Court to rule on cases of traders jailed over rate-rigging
Supreme Court to rule on cases of traders jailed over rate-rigging

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Supreme Court to rule on cases of traders jailed over rate-rigging

Two former financial market traders jailed over interest rate benchmark manipulation are set to find out if their Supreme Court bids to clear their names have been successful. Tom Hayes, a former Citigroup and UBS trader, was found guilty of multiple counts of conspiracy to defraud over manipulating the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (Libor) between 2006 and 2010. He is challenging his conviction, as is Carlo Palombo, an ex-vice president of euro rates at Barclays bank, who was found guilty of conspiring with others to submit false or misleading Euro Interbank Offered Rate (Euribor) submissions between 2005 and 2009. The Court of Appeal dismissed appeals from both men in March last year. They then took their cases to the Supreme Court. The panel of five justices was also asked to look at whether the cheapest rate needs to be submitted, or if it can be one selected from a range of potential borrowing rates. The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) opposed the appeals. Supreme Court president Lord Reed, Lords Hodge, Lloyd-Jones and Leggatt, and Lady Simler are expected to hand down their judgment at 9.30am on Wednesday. At a hearing in March, lawyers for the men said the trial judge had wrongly directed the jury, and injected 'confusion' into their cases. Adrian Darbishire KC, for Hayes, told the court that there was a 'marked failure to respect the limits of the role of a judge in a jury trial', adding that 'part of the point of juries is that they are not judges – they are representative of society', and their views are sought in 'preference' to that of a judge. In written submissions, Tim Owen KC, for Palombo, said the trial judge's directions to the jury 'failed to identify the correct issue for the jury' and 'injected confusion into the terms of the indictment'. Mr Owen said dishonesty was a 'question of fact for the jury to assess', and not 'a matter to be shaped by legal directions'. In written submissions Sir James Eadie KC, representing the SFO, said the issues identified in Hayes's case go 'far beyond the issues arising from the certified questions', and that his case 'repeatedly mischaracterises the indicted offence'. He said: 'If as a matter of law the Libor definition does not permit trading advantage to be taken into account, it is still necessary for the prosecution to prove and the jury to find that the defendant acted dishonestly in making the submission. 'In this case it is clear that the issue of dishonesty was left to the jury.' The Libor rate was previously used as a reference point around the world for setting millions of pounds worth of financial deals, including car loans and mortgages. It was an interest rate average calculated from figures submitted by a panel of leading banks in London, with each one reporting what it would be charged were it to borrow from other institutions. Hayes, who has maintained his innocence, spent five and a half years in prison and was released in January 2021. Palombo had denied acting dishonestly but was jailed for four years in April 2019 after a retrial.

Apple alerted Iranians to iPhone spyware attacks, say researchers
Apple alerted Iranians to iPhone spyware attacks, say researchers

TechCrunch

time3 hours ago

  • TechCrunch

Apple alerted Iranians to iPhone spyware attacks, say researchers

Apple notified more than a dozen Iranians in recent months that their iPhones had been targeted with government spyware, according to security researchers. Miian Group, a digital rights organization that focuses on Iran, and Hamid Kashfi, an Iranian cybersecurity researcher who lives in Sweden, said they spoke with several Iranians who received the notifications in the last year. Bloomberg first wrote about these spyware notifications. Miaan Group published a report on Tuesday on the state of cybersecurity of civil society in Iran, which mentioned that the organization's researchers have identified three cases of government spyware attacks against Iranians, two in Iran and one in Europe, who were alerted in April of this year. 'Two people in Iran come from a family with a long history of political activism against the Islamic Republic. Many members of their family have been executed, and they have no history of traveling abroad,' Amir Rashidi, Miaan Group's director of digital rights and security, told TechCrunch. 'I believe there have been three waves of attacks, and we have only seen the tip of the iceberg.' Rashidi said that Iran is likely the government behind the attacks, although there needs to be more investigations into these attacks to reach a more conclusive determination. 'I see no reason for members of civil society to be targeted by anyone other than Iran,' he said. Kashfi, who founded the security firm DarkCell, said in an email that he helped two victims go through preliminary forensics steps, but he wasn't able to confirm which spyware maker was behind the attacks. And, he added, some of the victims he worked with preferred not to continue the investigation. Contact Us Have you received a threat notification from Apple? We'd love to hear from you. From a non-work device and network, you can contact Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai securely on Signal at +1 917 257 1382, or via Telegram and Keybase @lorenzofb, or Have you received a threat notification from Apple? We'd love to hear from you. From a non-work device and network, you can contact Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai securely on Signal at +1 917 257 1382, or via Telegram and Keybase @lorenzofb, or email . 'Pretty much all victims spooked out and ghosted us as soon as we explained the seriousness of the case to them. I presume partly because of their place of work and sensitivity of the matters related to that,' said Kashfi, who added that one of the victims received the notification in 2024 It's unclear which spyware maker is behind these attacks. Over the last few years, Apple has sent several rounds of notifications to people whom the company believes have been targeted with government spyware, such as NSO Group's Pegasus, or Paragon's Graphite. This kind of malware is also known as 'mercenary' or 'commercial' spyware. The notifications have helped security researchers who focus on spyware to document abuses in several countries such as India, El Salvador, and Thailand. On Apple's support page for what the company calls 'threat notifications,' last updated in April, the tech giant said that since 2021 it has notified users in 'in over 150 countries,' which shows how widespread the use of government spyware is. Apple does not disclose the names of the countries, nor the total number of people it has notified. To help victims, since last year, Apple has recommended those who received these threat notifications to reach out to digital rights group AccessNow, which runs an around-the-clock helpline staffed with researchers who can investigate spyware attacks. AccessNow has documented cases of spyware abuse all over the world. Apple did not respond to a request for comment on the notifications sent to Iranians.

Interpol lifts red notice for anti-whaling campaigner Paul Watson
Interpol lifts red notice for anti-whaling campaigner Paul Watson

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Interpol lifts red notice for anti-whaling campaigner Paul Watson

Global police organisation Interpol has lifted a red wanted notice requesting the arrest of anti-whaling activist Paul Watson, with the campaigner saying Tuesday he was finally free of the Japanese whalers' "vendetta." "Interpol has officially and permanently dismissed the Red Notice against me," Watson said in a statement, adding the charges against him were "politically motivated." Interpol had issued the notice against Watson, known for radical tactics including confrontations with whaling ships at sea, at the request of Japan, but has now decided the measure was "disproportionate", his lawyer William Julie said in a separate statement. "The Japanese whalers have been after me for 14 years ever since I was first detained in Frankfurt, Germany in May 2012," Watson said in the statement published by his ocean conservation charity, The Captain Paul Watson Foundation. "It has been an incredible pursuit by a very powerful nation using unlimited resources but finally I am free of their vendetta and their relentless persecution," said Watson, who is also the founder of the Sea Shepherd direct action group. A spokesperson for Interpol confirmed to AFP that the Commission for the Control of Interpol's Files (CCF) had deleted the red notice, which is a request to police worldwide to arrest a suspect. Watson, a 74-year-old Canadian-American, was arrested and detained in Greenland in July, 2024 on a 2012 Japanese warrant, which accused him of causing damage to a whaling ship and injuring a whaler. He was released in December after Denmark refused the Japanese extradition request over the 2010 clash with whalers. On December 20, he returned to France, where his children attend school, following a high-profile campaign in his support. - Japanese arrest warrant - "The decision to delete Mr Watson's red notice was made by the CCF -- an independent body tasked to ensure that the processing of personal data by Interpol is in compliance with its constitution and rules," the Interpol spokesperson said. "This is not a judgement on the merits of the case, or the events that occurred in 2010, but a decision based on Interpol's rules on the processing of data," the spokesperson added. "The CCF decision was made in light of new facts, including the refusal by the Kingdom of Denmark to extradite Mr Watson. This is in line with normal procedures." In a statement, Julie said the CCF considered that the red notice "did not meet Interpol's standards, citing the disproportionate nature of the charges, Mr Watson's supposed only indirect involvement (which is contested), the considerable passage of time since the alleged facts, Denmark's refusal to extradite him, and the fact that several other countries declined to act on Japan's arrest or extradition requests." He also said that the Commission pointed to the existence of "political elements" around the case, which gave it an "importance beyond its intrinsic criminal characteristics or pure law-enforcement interest." Sea Shepherd France praised the decision as "a moral and symbolic victory" but warned that it did not yet restore Watson's freedom of movement. "The Japanese arrest warrant remains active, and any country can still choose to execute it," the group said on X. gd-mla-as/gv

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store