logo
Macron and le slap! What does it really mean?

Macron and le slap! What does it really mean?

Times6 days ago

There can now be few people who aren't aware that Brigitte Macron, the wife of President Emmanuel Macron of France, has been caught on film striking or pushing her husband.
The video was taken on the tarmac at Hanoi airport on Sunday night, moments after the presidential plane landed on Vietnamese soil and the door was opened. In the Airbus's interior Brigitte, just out of view — only her outstretched arm is visible — can be seen raising her hand to her husband's face and shoving him. The slap (although it's really more of a one-handed shunt) went around the world within hours, and now we're all calling it Le Slapgate.
Members of the president's entourage were quick to play it down. 'A moment when the president and his wife were decompressing … a moment of togetherness,' was their somewhat implausible explanation. Macron himself claims he was 'simply joking with my wife, as we do quite often'. But anyone who has watched the video can see him visibly recoil, and that red-jacketed arm meant business. It's hard to spin the incident as mere horseplay.
In any case, however much they protest, this glimpse behind the curtain will not be so easily dismissed. The real issue here is that the Macrons have fascinated onlookers from the moment in 2017 he became France's youngest president at 39 when his wife was 64, and now the world has been thrown a titbit, a morsel of something sinister or not, that's sent the slumbering rumour mill into overdrive.
The quarter-of-a-century age gap is intriguing, but more controversial is the circumstances of their meeting. He was a schoolboy of 15 and she was his drama teacher, a 39-year-old mother of three, one of whom, her middle child Laurence, was his classmate. Her eldest son, Sebastien, is two years older than Macron.
History does not relate at what point their relationship became public, but Macron's parents removed him from the school in Amiens and sent him to Paris to finish his education in the hope that the separation would end their liaison. They hoped in vain, and the couple married in 2007 when he was 29 and she was 54. So far so weird.
• I waited ten years to marry Emmanuel Macron, says Brigitte
On top of that unusual beginning, or because of it, there have been rumours about Macron's sexuality. ('To say that it is not possible for a man living with an older woman to be anything other than a homosexual or a hidden gigolo is misogynous. And it's also homophobia,' Macron has said.) But the gossip that, perhaps inevitably, has gained the most traction is that their relationship is more like that of a mother and son than a husband and wife. She is said to organise everything from his diary to his clothes, and it is not unusual for her to 'scold him for doing something wrong'.
There are many theories about what goes on in this marriage, and now we've all got a theory about Slapgate and what's behind it. These are the top nine conversations we've had since.
1. To be fair it wasn't a slap, it was more of a chin push, and we've all been there haven't we?
Not to say that normal happy couples lash out at each other, except for, they occasionally do. We're not talking about taking a swing, to be clear, but if you are inclined to playfully push someone who is amusing/annoying you, or give them a light jab to the upper arm (No! You cannot be serious!), or push their face away when sitting next to them on the sofa (Why aren't you listening!), then you are also capable of the less frequent shunt of exasperation, the barge past, or the most French of them all, now we come to think of it, the hand-off.
If aimed at the head (as Brigitte's was) this is pretty full-on but also not astonishing. It looks a lot like a 'No I am still furious with you … Va-t-en!' move. Or maybe 'Don't come near me, I hate your job!' Or there could be an element of 'Don't speak to me' going on there too. We've all clapped a hand over our partner's mouth to stop them talking, haven't we? Usually when they were saying 'and just when I thought you'd finally stopped, you poured yourself another drink and started to tell Geoff he needed to lose three stone'.
2. This proves they're a regular couple
We're slightly surprised to find Petit Macron and Mrs Macron exhibiting marital frustration because we rather assumed this was more of a slick arrangement involving two people who support each other professionally, whose union is mutually desirable, but who are not (how shall we put it) passionate about each other. We thought they were a team, not so much a fighty couple who sometimes really get on each other's nerves.
3. It's Melania and Donald all over again
There's a private plane, a hand-hold rejected, two stony-faced people standing on foreign tarmac looking as if they want to be anywhere but there with each other. It is all familiar. But Melania Trump (others might venture) would never raise a hand to Donald because she would go quite a long way not to have to touch him. And there's something about this moment that suggests a passionate argument not yet resolved to Mrs Macron's liking, whereas with M and D it's more like 'you booked me for three publics and two foreign trips and this was not in the pre-Flotus document'.
'The job demands upbeat smiles and flesh pressing and endless meet and greets'
NHAC NGUYEN / AFP/GETTY IMAGES
4. She's fed up with the job
Never mind the packed tour of southeast Asia stretching ahead, the job demands upbeat smiles and flesh pressing and endless meet and greets and wardrobe changes and long, long dinners sitting next to minor dignitaries, and she might just have been expressing her wish that he could do all this on his own for once.
5. They are French
They are French, and the French, as all Brits have been brought up to believe, do things differently, especially when it comes to men and women. We're a bit blurry about the details but we know this much: French men are rogues and philanderers and all have a bit of cinq à sept on the side and they don't like feminism and are very much not on board with égalité. Your basic nightmare. French women are long-suffering but also the older ones (Brigitte?) quite like the old-style 'dance' (see the established French actresses coming out against MeToo and the tacit support for Gérard Depardieu and the like) and they all believe man-pleasing to be a basic feminine duty. They also will happily slap that man hard across the face if he transgresses and then all hell will break loose and there will be shouting, extravagant gesturing, lots of storming about (her wearing his shirt, him smoking a Gitane). We're not sure if any of this is true IRL but it's part of the French myth and there is no doubt that we expect fireworks from this lot. Slaps at the very least.
• So the 'French paradox' was actually a fallacy
6. If it was the other way around and he'd pushed her you'd be horrified
You would. Absolutely fair.
7. Things happen on planes, don't they?
Well they do if you drink all your duty-free allocation, you are delayed on the runway for four hours and then the airline tells you they have been unable to load the meals and the loos are locked. Not so much on the French equivalent of Air Force One. But also it is true that 16-hour overnight flights do not bring out the best in people, especially people who need to be on parade the second they hit the tarmac.
8. Maybe it was 'horseplay'
We've all got an actual horseplay story that didn't end well. The time you threw a potato (raw) at him and it chipped his tooth, for example. But look, if it genuinely was horseplay, we know how this goes: he would have grabbed her wrists and she'd have lurched forwards, they'd both have lost their balance and ended up sprawling on the floor and then we'd all be asking: is Macron the new Biden? So no point trying that one.
9. Is she the (very) scary power behind the throne?
Macron did look taken aback, but did he maybe also look a bit like someone who was used to getting a clip around the ear if he displeased his handler? Very hard to say, of course, but factor in the mother-son stuff and bear in mind that middle-class French mamans are absolute tyrants, and you might be onto something.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How the hasty planning of Edward VIII and Wallis Simpson's calamitous wedding made it so miserable - marked by the 'sad' looks in the wedding photos
How the hasty planning of Edward VIII and Wallis Simpson's calamitous wedding made it so miserable - marked by the 'sad' looks in the wedding photos

Daily Mail​

time36 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

How the hasty planning of Edward VIII and Wallis Simpson's calamitous wedding made it so miserable - marked by the 'sad' looks in the wedding photos

Throughout British history, royal weddings have been extravagant affairs full of pomp and grandeur, but there has been one major exception to this tradition. Hundreds of miles away from the Royal Family, King Edward VIII and Wallis Simpson were married in a low-key wedding ceremony 88 years ago today. It was highly unusual, taking place in the shadow of Edward's abdication crisis, less than a month after the coronation of King George VI. The wedding was hastily planned, taking place a month and a day after Wallis's divorce from Ernest Simpson was finalised. Straying further from tradition, Wallis opted for a long, finger-hugging white wedding dress in the style of the period while Edward wore a civilian suit instead of a military uniform. Despite the opulent setting of the wedding in the Chateau de Cande in France, the couple looked far from happy in their official pictures. Royal photographer Cecil Beaton, who was behind the camera for the event, remarked that Edward had an 'essentially sad' look in his eyes. Meanwhile, royal author Jane Marguerite Tippett, in The Lost Memoir Of Edward VIII, wrote that Wallis and Edward looked back on the wedding without much fondness. The Duke and Duchess are seen on their wedding day alongside Edward's best man, Edward 'Fruity' Metcalfe (right) and businessman Hermann Rogers, whom Wallis later had an affair with In the memoir it was revealed that Wallis said that preparations for the wedding 'were not very gay'. Which is unsurprising considering the royal wedding was in stark contrast to those before it, taking place in a small ceremony with no one from the Royal Family present. Among the guests were Edward's best man, Major Edward 'Fruity' Metcalfe, along with his chauffeur and equerry. Businessman Hermann Rogers, whom Wallis fell in love with and had hoped to marry, also attended. Reverend J.A. Jardine officiated in defiance of Church of England rules surrounding divorcees with living former spouses. He was later defrocked and would go on to open the tacky 'Windsor Cathedral' in Hollywood. Edward had also been left furious by King George's refusal to grant Wallis the status of Her Royal Highness. He bitterly joked that it was a 'nice wedding present'. When his mother, Queen Mary, did not send him an actual gift, he told her that he was 'bitterly hurt and disappointed that you virtually ignored the most important event in my life.' The royal wedding was in stark contrast to those before it, consisting of a small ceremony with no one from the Royal Family present A Faberge box that was sent as a gift by his younger brother Prince George, the Duke of Kent, was rejected by Edward, on the basis that his sibling had not shown any desire to deviate from the family's official stance towards him. Edward and Wallis's wedding venue was owned by millionaire Charles Bedaux, who was later frowned upon by the British and French intelligence services. The chateau boasted modern comforts that included a pipe organ costing $40,000 and a $15,000 telephone system. On the day itself, Wallis wore a blue wedding gown which she twinned with silk gloves made from the same material and a straw hat. She also wore an impressive diamond and sapphire brooch alongside a glittering sapphire wristband and earrings. Her second divorce - from shipbroker Ernest Aldrich Simpson - had been finalised only a month earlier. The Duke had originally wanted a royal chaplain to officiate at his wedding, but this desire was rapidly torpedoed by his brother, the King. His second choice had been the Reverend Martin Andrews, who presided over a parish in the Duchy of Cornwall. The couple looked less than jolly in the official photos that were taken to mark their wedding In the end he had little choice but to go with Reverend Jardine, who was described as 'turbulent' by Edward's biographer Philip Ziegler and later stripped of his duties. Archbishop of Canterbury Cosmo Lang - who had been instrumental in sealing Edward's abdication - described Jardine as a 'seeker of notoriety'. He questioned how Edward - who had been King of England just months before - could have 'lost his dignity' to the extent that he asked 'a man of this sort to celebrate his marriage'. Jardine officiated in defiance of the Church of England, which until 2002 would not perform weddings of rulers to divorcees who had living former spouses. While Edward believed that in Jardine he had chosen well, this idea was somewhat punctured by the priest's subsequent tour of the United States, where he revealed all about the ceremony. The altar was what Ziegler described as a 'bogus renaissance chest adorned with plum caryatids'. Beaton took official photographs of the couple after they tied the knot. In his diary he described Edward's expression when his photo was taken as 'essentially sad, tragic eyes belied by impertinent tilt of nose.' He added that the former King had 'common hands - like a mechanic - weather-beaten and rather scaly and one thumbnail is disfigured.' Beaton had talked to Wallis at length and decided that she was a 'strong force', and 'intelligent within her vast limitations'. 'She has obviously a tremendous admiration for the Duke and considers him one of the greatest brains… of our times. 'She admires his character, his vitality and is determined to love him, though I feel she is not in love with him.' As well as his best man, chauffeur and equerry, guests also included the Duke's hairdresser Charles Topper and Mrs Buchanan Merryman, Wallis's aunt. The service itself was composed of a French civil ceremony and then an Anglican counterpart conducted by Reverend Jardine was carried out ten minutes later. In both versions, Wallis promised to obey her husband. Incredibly, the Duke failed to kiss his bride in either the civil or religious ceremony, although there were tears in his eyes when he put Wallis's ring on her finger. Despite the controversy that surrounded the wedding at the time, the Duke and Duchess received more than 3,000 telegrams and 30,000 letters of good wishes after their wedding. In a statement, the Duke said: 'The Duchess and I would like to thank all those who have so kindly sent us presents and good wishes on the occasion of our wedding. 'We shall never forget their friendly messages, which mean so much to us on this day.' Following their wedding the couple eventually settled in France in the so-called Villa Windsor on the outskirts of Paris. Here they led the life of the idle rich, attending parties in France and America and going on lavish holidays with close friends. Though she lacked the status of an actual queen, it was the kind of high life that American Duchess had always sought. But when the Duke died aged 77 in 1972, Wallis was left alone, bereft of the man who had worshipped her. The Queen, with whom she had had minimal contact in the decades since her husband's abdication, hosted her at Buckingham Palace when she arrived for his funeral. The two had previously met when Queen Elizabeth and her husband Prince Philip visited the Duke in Paris in his final days. Wallis was buried next to her husband at the Royal Burial Ground, Frogmore. The burial was attended by only the Queen, the Duke of Edinburgh, Prince Charles and Princess Diana and eight of Wallis's aides and friends It was a sign of the Queen's willingness to put differences to one side for the sake of the greater good. When Wallis died over a decade later, her funeral service at Windsor's St George's Chapel was attended by senior royals including the Queen, Prince Philip and the Queen Mother. Her name was not mentioned during the service. The service lasted for less than half an hour and, in scenes strikingly similar to her wedding, it was stripped of nearly all the pomp and ceremony that usually marks a royal death.

Longtime NBC News host reveals severe act of retribution after he criticized Trump during first term
Longtime NBC News host reveals severe act of retribution after he criticized Trump during first term

Daily Mail​

time39 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Longtime NBC News host reveals severe act of retribution after he criticized Trump during first term

Chuck Todd has revealed how he was the target of a serious act of retaliation shortly after drawing the ire of President Trump during his first term. Speaking during a wide-ranging interview with Times Radio, the NBC News anchor said he walked outside his Arlington, Virginia home to discover his tires were slashed on his vehicle. He said the incident was directly connected to the fact he was publicly called out by Trump during the early years of his administration. The disturbing disclosure is just the latest reminder of how volatile the political climate can be for journalists who find themselves on the receiving end of Trump's notorious public rebukes. Todd, a veteran anchor and former moderator of NBC's Meet the Press and who quietly left the network earlier this year said he addressed the fallout directly with the president at the time. According to Todd, Trump shrugged off the consequences, brushing aside concerns about security threats. Todd's comments come amid growing concern over the security risks faced by public officials, journalists, and even judges who have been publicly criticized by Trump. He noted how the number of people in Washington DC now requiring personal security details is higher than at any point in his three decades of covering politics. Todd's account underscores the danger that can accompany the president's signature practice of singling out perceived enemies, a tactic critics have long warned could inflame supporters and provoke harassment or worse. While Todd stopped short of directly blaming Trump for inciting violence, the implication was clear - and that presidential rhetoric has real-world consequences. The broader conversation with Times Radio touched on Trump's ongoing influence over the Republican Party, his controversial use of tariffs, and his combative approach to governing - all themes that dovetailed with Todd's reflections on the precarious state of political discourse. Todd's experience is not an isolated one. In recent years, threats against journalists, judges, lawmakers, and even election workers have surged. For Todd, the slashed tires were a stark reminder of a reality where being publicly criticized by the president could translate into personal danger at one's own front door. In his second term, Trump has continued to deploy fiery rhetoric against opponents, critics, and institutions alike. Todd, who left NBC to launch his independent Chuck Toddcast podcast, has remained a vocal critic of the former president, frequently calling out what he sees as the erosion of democratic norms and the corrosion of political civility. On his new platform, Todd has warned that the risks journalists face today are more severe than at any point in recent history - not simply because of the increasingly polarized political climate, but because powerful figures have normalized the targeting of individuals in ways that endanger their personal safety. During his tenure at the helm of Meet The Press, Todd frequently clashed with President-elect Donald Trump. Trump frequently called Todd 'Sleepy Eyes' on social media and dubbed the show 'Meet the Depressed.' In 2020, Trump called for Todd to be fired, complaining 'Meet the Press' performed a 'sleazy hit job' on Attorney General William Barr. Trump let loose after the program admitted to 'inadvertently cutting short' a sound bite from Barr when he was responding to a question about the dismissal of charges against former national security adviser Michael Flynn. 'He should be FIRED by Concast. If done by a Republican, would be 'prosecuted,"' Trump said on X. During a campaign rally near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in 2018, Trump called Todd a 'son of a b***h.' Trump dubbed the show 'Meet the Depressed' after Todd accused loyalist senator John Kennedy of 'spreading Vladimir Putin's lies' in a heated on-air clash in 2019. The loss of Todd is undoubtedly a big one for NBC, as he appeared on many of its channels to provide political expertise. He joined NBC News in 2007 as a political director, before being named the network's chief White House corresponded in 2008. Six years later, he was promoted to lead Meet the Press, succeeding fellow fixture David Gregory in doing so. He expanded the program by doing a regular daytime hour on MSNBC called 'MTP Daily,' a program that was eventually moved over to the live-streaming service NBC News Now. The ended when he was replaced by Welker in June of 2023 after such time he had a far less prominent role.

Why Britain faces its worst ever summer for migrant crossings
Why Britain faces its worst ever summer for migrant crossings

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Why Britain faces its worst ever summer for migrant crossings

Good summer weather could lead to record Channel migrant crossings this year, Home Office data is expected to show. The number of 'red days' – when Border Force expects a surge in small boats due to calm seas – have been 'unusually high' in 2024-25, according to official figures due to be published on Tuesday. Preliminary data up until the end of March this year showed that there were 182 red days in 2024-25 compared with 108 in 2023-24, 159 in 2022-23 and 164 in 2021-22. Ministers will claim that the figures go some way to explain why the first five months of this year have seen a record 14,812 crossings, up 42 per cent on the same period in 2024. The rising number of 'red days' is also combined with a steady increase in the number of migrants being packed onto the dinghies, from 28 per boat in 2021 to 56 in 2025, up until the end of March. In 2024/25, there were more than 100 boats with more than 80 migrants on board, up from 31 in the previous year and just two in 2021/22. Meanwhile, the Met Office's three-month forecast suggests the UK is heading for a heatwave over the summer with a 45 per cent chance it will be hotter than normal. Rain and wind speeds are predicted to be close to normal over the same period. If the clear weather continues, independent modelling suggests that crossings by migrants are on course to hit a yearly record-equalling total of between 45,000 and 50,000, unless measures planned or already introduced by UK and French Governments can reverse the trend. Based on current weather patterns, the statistical modelling by researcher Dr Richard Wood forecasts that arrivals will hit nearly 46,000 this year – on a par with 2022's record and 20 per cent higher than last year's total. His research shows the weather is so critical that the odds of an unviable day, when there will be no crossings, increase by 11 per cent for every centimetre of wave height, reduce by six per cent for every degree of sea temperature and rise by 10 per cent for each hour of eight to 12 knot westerly winds. It means that migrant arrivals on 'viable' or 'red' days are two per cent lower for every centimetre of wave height, three per cent higher for every degree of sea temperature and four per cent higher for every hour in the day when a medium southerly wind blows the small boats towards the UK coast. The Government does not publish its criteria for determining when it will declare a 'red day,' which acts as an alert to Border Force, coastguards and RNLI to prepare for a surge in crossings. The Telegraph conducted its own analysis based on wind speeds, visibility, rainfall, wave height and sea surface temperature, which showed a lower number of red days than those projected by the Home Office. However, it still suggested Sir Keir Starmer had a higher number of red days in the four months to the end of April this year – at 27 – and a higher average rate of crossings per red day at 141.7. This compared to 24 red days with a rate of 121.6 for Rishi Sunak. Asked if the Government's decision to publish data on the number of red days for the first time was a ploy to blame the weather for crossings, Sir Keir's spokesman said: 'As the Home Secretary has said before, we have to get to a position where the level of crossings is not reliant on the weather. 'That means breaking the hold that these criminal gangs have established over this trade and breaking the link between crossings and the weather, such that we're stopping people from making these dangerous journeys, whatever the weather.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store