logo
Australia can't just let Trump do what he wants

Australia can't just let Trump do what he wants

The Agea day ago

But there's also a chance Trump's tariffs will be waved through on appeal, further worsening worldwide economic growth. As Kennedy points out, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) recently slashed its forecast for global economic growth from 3.3 per cent to 2.8 per cent this year.
While its forecasts for the Chinese and US economies both took an especially large hit (the tariff escalation is most intense between these two, after all), it's actually China, not the US, that will have a bigger knock-on effect on other countries if the trade war continues.
'Outside of the years affected by COVID-19, China has contributed more to world growth than the G7 since 2006, and more than the US since 2001,' Kennedy says.
Australia, which does a third of its trade with China, would, of course, be especially vulnerable. Less growth in China, and thus less demand for Australia's exports (things such as iron ore, beef and coal) from our biggest trading partner, would weaken domestic growth. That's on top of the dampening effect of uncertainty on Australian household spending and business investment spending.
A weaker Australian economy would mean less hiring by businesses, fewer Australians holding down jobs, and slower wage growth.
One glimmer of hope is that price increases would probably slow a little. Wouldn't tariffs wreak havoc on supply chains and push up inflation? Well, probably. But Kennedy says that's likely to be offset by more low-cost output from China making its way to us as its trade is redirected from the US.
While Australia is caught in the crosshairs of a fight it didn't start – or want to participate in – we don't have to let Trump's unpredictability take our economy off track.
Since Australia trades very little with the US, Trump's tariffs on Australia – if they resumed – wouldn't be a huge worry. 'The indirect impact [of tariffs] is nearly four times as large as the direct effect,' Kennedy says.
So, what can we do? Well, Australia's decision not to hit back with our own tariffs is a good start. There's very little point in stoking Trump's ire when we have little to gain (and plenty to lose) from imposing tariffs. The main effect would be to make American imports costlier for Australians, which would just end up hurting our hip pocket.
Another thing we can do is make the most of the chaos by positioning ourselves as a safe, stable and attractive place to invest in as people pull their money out of the US. A 'pick me' strategy? Perhaps, but it's a good idea.
The Trump administration has made it clear that it wants to reshape the economic order and kick China down a few rungs. US imports from China have fallen steadily from their peak of about one-fifth of total imports in 2017 during Trump's first term to just over one-tenth in 2024.
But Trump has also made it obvious he doesn't care who he hurts in doing so.
Kennedy says Australians will have to adjust to this reality through policy changes.
While the US seems to be raising its walls (after failing to build a physical one on its southern border some years ago) and trying to become more self-reliant, Kennedy says following the same strategy is a mistake for smaller countries including Australia that benefit greatly from trade.
Loading
'It is not in our self-interest to respond by also raising barriers,' he says. Instead, we should be going the opposite way: removing barriers to trade, and turning to a wider array of trade partners.
Kennedy points to the Australian government's renewed negotiations with the European Union on a free trade agreement, and efforts to expand existing compacts such as the Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership – both of which make it easier to trade.
Striking new trade agreements and looking to our neighbours, too, in countries such as Indonesia and India will be hugely beneficial, especially as these countries continue to grow and themselves look for reliable trade partners outside the US.
As Kennedy says, we're facing more than the usual degree of uncertainty, but it may be time to stop saying that and accept that, for the foreseeable future, the world will be characterised by it. While Australia is caught in the crosshairs of a fight it didn't start – or want to participate in – we don't have to let Trump's unpredictability take our economy off track.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The obscene priorities in education funding
The obscene priorities in education funding

The Age

time41 minutes ago

  • The Age

The obscene priorities in education funding

Heartbreak high I am both heartbroken and furious to learn that the Labor Allan government is choosing to short-change Victorian state school students. The reality at the coalface of under-resourced schools is heartbreaking. Parents might be wondering why their child has a shared class or doesn't have a school nurse or librarian. This is the reality of schools working under a decade-long funding deficit. Teachers are pushed to teach their maximum face-to-face allotment (making up any extra time by moonlighting as a nurse, librarian or team teaching to ensure no minute is left idle). When these overworked teachers are sick, schools are routinely redistributing students to other teachers, pushing class sizes into the 30s. Teachers are being pressed to 'volunteer' to take extra classes to cover absences, anything, to reduce the school's spend on casual teachers. Jacinta Allan pointing to increases in capital funding is a furphy. The building of a hall (projects green lit to help COVID recovery) does nothing to help the tired teachers and undersupported students sitting down to Monday morning assembly. The added insult is watching students walk to the campuses of private schools carrying their full funding allocation to pre-class swimming training in an Olympic-sized pool. Kate Rose, teacher, Rosanna Electoral favours That the Victorian government will provide, as part of an extended drought package, a $5000 grant to Victorian farmers to help their family businesses pull through the temporary drought is laudable. I look forward to similar benevolence to the family-owned milk bars and local butcher businesses facing competition from their local mega-supermarket rivals; or the local family-owned hardware stores and nursery businesses facing challenges from the encroaching DIY megastores; or the family-owned gift shops, florists, clothing and toy shops facing devastation from the expanding big box chains. Why do farming small businesses get favourable government attention? I suspect it's all about electoral politics. Dennis Richards, Cockatoo What's the point? I wish to add my voice to the letters in The Age (30/5) despairing the decision to extend the North West Shelf project. So many of us are trying our hardest to reduce plastic, compost, save water, live sustainably in every way we can with future generations in mind, and it is a huge slap in the face that makes one feel 'what is the point?' Goodness knows what the despair of Indigenous communities is like. Libby Gillingham, Outtrim Yesterday's man It may have escaped Tony Abbott's notice that he is a ″⁣yesterday's man″⁣, which is a nice way of saying he is living in the past. Sussan Ley should ignore him. He is one of the cadre of Liberals, mostly ex-PMs, who are becoming more out of touch with ordinary Australians. Victoria is showing the effects of a poor opposition and listening to conservative Liberals won't improve matters. Adrian Tabor, Point Lonsdale Heed the regions Waleed Aly (Comment, 30/5) has a vision where the National Party becomes a bit teal, and therefore enables the Coalition to compete politically with Labor. It won't happen. Urban Australia needs regional Australia more than vice versa. They feed Australia's cities. They dig the coal and minerals that keep the economy ticking over and Australia's export income high. We repay them with second-rate healthcare, a food market that is stacked against producers, and a steady flow of city refugees who make regional housing unaffordable to locals. If we urbanites occupy their minds at all, what they would see is a bunch of hypocrites who ramble on about the post-carbon economy but in international terms are heavy carbon polluters. Maybe the teals and other city-driven politicians could pay a great deal more attention to regional Australia. Then they might listen to us. Alun Breward, Malvern East Changing Australia Waleed Aly is spot on, especially with the changing demographic of Melbourne's regions. George Megalogenis also noted in his Foreign Affairs essay 'Changing Face of Australia″⁣ that the children of Chinese and Indian migrants are also better educated than those from an Anglo background and this has allowed them to be part of the middle class too. These skilled migrants are a dilemma for some in the major parties who don't acknowledge and understand the nation's changing identity and are still stuck in that Anglo past with a lack of diversity in their candidates. This class divide between the white working classes was reflected in voting patterns as well, especially in the outer suburbs. Mel Smith, Brighton Soul of humanity As a non-religious person, I was moved by Sunday's Faith column (25/5) by Warwick McFadyen where he discussed the virtues of the The Piano. I agree with everything he said and I congratulate the ABC for having produced it. My view, which I believe coincides well with McFadyen's, is 'that music is the soul of humanity'.

Universities cannot shirk responsibility for international student welfare
Universities cannot shirk responsibility for international student welfare

The Age

timean hour ago

  • The Age

Universities cannot shirk responsibility for international student welfare

On Friday, financial results for NSW's universities were tabled in parliament. They painted a damning picture for many of the state's institutions, but strong investment returns, philanthropy and international student revenue delivered the University of Sydney a $545 million surplus. The University of NSW also pocketed a surplus – of just over $200 million – this year, thanks to better-than-expected international and domestic student enrolments. International education was worth $51 billion to the Australian economy in 2024. At the University of Sydney, international students are 47 per cent of total enrolments. At UNSW, it is 41 per cent. International students are providing an invaluable source of income to our city's academic institutions, such that concerns have been raised that they are treated as 'cash cows': an easy solution for an otherwise financially precarious, if not just struggling, system. An auditor-general's report published last year found universities earned almost double from a foreign student compared with a domestic one. In 2023, the average revenue from a domestic full-time equivalent student was $22,996 compared with $41,117 for an international student, the report found. One only needs to think back to the sector's panic when the federal government contemplated placing a cap on their numbers to understand the integral role international students are playing to balance universities' budgets. But what do they receive in return? A qualification from a prestigious university, sure. The same student experience as their domestic peers? Hardly. As Christopher Harris reports in today's Sun-Herald, inner Sydney social services are concerned by the growing number of international students who move here with the promise of life in our beautiful city only to find themselves unable to afford housing.

Universities cannot shirk responsibility for international student welfare
Universities cannot shirk responsibility for international student welfare

Sydney Morning Herald

timean hour ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Universities cannot shirk responsibility for international student welfare

On Friday, financial results for NSW's universities were tabled in parliament. They painted a damning picture for many of the state's institutions, but strong investment returns, philanthropy and international student revenue delivered the University of Sydney a $545 million surplus. The University of NSW also pocketed a surplus – of just over $200 million – this year, thanks to better-than-expected international and domestic student enrolments. International education was worth $51 billion to the Australian economy in 2024. At the University of Sydney, international students are 47 per cent of total enrolments. At UNSW, it is 41 per cent. International students are providing an invaluable source of income to our city's academic institutions, such that concerns have been raised that they are treated as 'cash cows': an easy solution for an otherwise financially precarious, if not just struggling, system. An auditor-general's report published last year found universities earned almost double from a foreign student compared with a domestic one. In 2023, the average revenue from a domestic full-time equivalent student was $22,996 compared with $41,117 for an international student, the report found. One only needs to think back to the sector's panic when the federal government contemplated placing a cap on their numbers to understand the integral role international students are playing to balance universities' budgets. But what do they receive in return? A qualification from a prestigious university, sure. The same student experience as their domestic peers? Hardly. As Christopher Harris reports in today's Sun-Herald, inner Sydney social services are concerned by the growing number of international students who move here with the promise of life in our beautiful city only to find themselves unable to afford housing.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store