logo
There's a spending split between Americans, and it's popping up from McDonald's to Uber

There's a spending split between Americans, and it's popping up from McDonald's to Uber

If you've been waiting for the shoe to drop on the US consumer economy, keep waiting.
Strong results from some retail brands during the first half of this year are defying the economic warning bells that have been ringing for several quarters now.
Recent earnings calls have revealed a pattern that points to a continued split in Americans' spending, and some CEOs are approaching the gap with caution.
2 types of spending
Looking at brands across the consumer economy, a tale of two shoppers emerges.
While consumers with annual earnings of at least $100,000 increased their spending in the first six months of 2025, those making less than $50,000 a year did almost the exact opposite, pulling back on spending each month, Morning Consult's lead economist, Kayla Bruun, wrote last week.
"The story is inconsistent across income groups," Bruun wrote.
Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said last week that the e-commerce juggernaut saw the biggest-ever Prime Day event and that tariffs haven't caused much of a dent in the retail business.
"In the first half of the year, in the first half, we just haven't seen diminished demand," he said.
And Costco said said Wednesday that fiscal year comparable sales in the US are up 6.2% from the prior year, with visits up 4.3% in the US.
Those results might be hiding a more complicated picture, and the state of the US consumer will become clearer in the coming weeks when companies including Walmart and Target report their financials.
For now, though, companies are highlighting this growing divide between the wealthy and the less affluent.
While McDonald's reported same-store sales growth of 3.8% on Wednesday, CEO Chris Kempczinski said the industry continues to see a decline in visits from low-income customers.
It's a big focus for McDonald's because low-income customers are more frequent buyers than those in higher income brackets, he said.
"This bifurcated consumer base is why we remain cautious about the overall near-term health of the US consumer. In this environment, we will continue to remain agile with respect to our value offerings to ensure the US strengthens its leadership in value and affordability," Kempczinski said.
Kempczinski said that reintroducing menu items at the $2.99 price point was essential in improving customer perception of the burger chain's value, especially as lower-income household budgets tighten.
Executives at Yum Brands and Chipotle have echoed the same sentiment in recent earnings calls. Both have launched value-driven promotions and limited-time menu offerings to drive foot traffic as quick-service restaurants see fewer customers coming through their doors.
Hotels are seeing a similar trend, Booking Holdings' chief financial officer, Ewout Steenbergen, said on an earnings call last week.
"We see generally, top end of the US consumer market will be a little stronger, spending more in the 5-star hotel category, spending more on international travel," he said.
"We see at the lower end, more careful behavior," the CFO added. "Pressure on the domestic travel, on the lower-star rated hotels, so there is definitely a little bit more of the negative behavior that we see in terms of impact to the US consumer."
Consumers are spending, but the devil is in the details
Another company that's seeing a consumer split is Uber.
Uber's ride-hailing business grew in the late spring, notching a 16% increase in revenue during the company's latest quarter. Two groups of riders appear to be driving that growth. The company cited lifts from both its higher-priced rides, such as its Comfort and Black offerings, and from some options that generally carry cheaper fares, such as its wait-and-save option.
"Different parts of our demographic are sensitive to price, and then there are other parts of our demographic who want a premium product," CEO Dara Khosrowshahi said. "So what you're seeing from us is actually a barbell strategy."
People also continue to spend on Uber's services, especially for food delivery. The company's delivery revenue rose 20%, beating analysts' expectations in its second-quarter earnings report on Wednesday.
"At this point, we're not seeing weakness in the consumer," Khosrowshahi told CNBC on Wednesday.
Foot traffic data from Placer.ai and Colliers indicates that while retail visits were up compared to the same period a year earlier, customers favored more affordable brands and experiences — like Chili's, Crunch Fitness, Ollie's Bargain Outlet, and HomeGoods — over bigger-ticket discretionary purchases, like home improvement and electronics.
The analysis also found that brands with middle- and upper-income consumers, like Nordstrom, Staples, LA Fitness, and Barnes & Noble, saw the most significant gains in the first half of the year.
"This suggests that while value matters, brands don't need the lowest prices to win customers," Colliers' national research manager for retail services, Nicole Larson, wrote about the chains that target more affluent shoppers. "Brands that effectively communicate their value proposition can thrive, no matter the final price point."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick threatens Harvard University's patent authority
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick threatens Harvard University's patent authority

New York Post

time38 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick threatens Harvard University's patent authority

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration is threatening to take over hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of Harvard University patents and other inventions whose creation was funded by taxpayers, according to a Friday letter reviewed by The Post. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick fired off the missive to Harvard President Alan Garber, demanding a full accounting of the federal money that went to the Ivy League school's patents by Sept. 5. Lutnick is threatening to reclaim hundreds of millions of dollars worth of Harvard patents for the taxpayers. AP Advertisement 'The Department is also initiating the 'march-in' process under the Bayh-Dole Act pursuant to which the U.S. government intends to to grant third-party licenses to Harvard's patents or take title where Harvard has failed timely to disclose or elect title to inventions,' the letter stated. The law forces inventors to disclose which federal grants resulted in patents and submit timely reports about how the patents are being used — with some provisions for 'products based on the inventions' to ensure the items are 'manufactured substantially within the US,' a senior administration official said, adding that the 1980 law also states that Americans should reap the benefits from such inventions. The law forces inventors to disclose which federal grants resulted in patents. AP Lutnick accused the Cambridge, Mass., university of having 'failed to live up to its obligations to the American taxpayer' with its patent authority. Advertisement A failure to comply with the Act's terms allows the federal government to take ownership of a university's patents and/or issue third-party licenses. The Post reached out to Harvard reps for comment.

Inside the White House Energy Dominance Council
Inside the White House Energy Dominance Council

Politico

time39 minutes ago

  • Politico

Inside the White House Energy Dominance Council

Welcome to POLITICO's West Wing Playbook: Remaking Government, your guide to Donald Trump's unprecedented overhaul of the federal government — the key decisions, the critical characters and the power dynamics that are upending Washington and beyond. Send tips | Subscribe | Email Sophia | Email Irie | Email Ben In the months since President DONALD TRUMP returned to office, a little-known but deeply influential body inside the White House has been quietly driving one of Trump's biggest policy ambitions: Making the United States 'energy dominant' by providing affordable, reliable energy to Americans while still generating enough electricity to power the boom in artificial intelligence. This Energy Dominance Council, first announced in November with Interior Secretary DOUG BURGUM as director and Energy Secretary CHRIS WRIGHT as deputy, is modeled after the national security and economic councils. It is tasked with coordinating the federal government — from the Department of Energy to the Department of Agriculture to the State Department — toward achieving those goals. The goal is to expedite projects, said RICHARD GOLDBERG, the senior counselor who helped conceive of and stood up the council. The council has been working with private enterprise to dramatically reduce the time it takes to get a project off the ground — from years, he said, to days. It's part of a larger administration drive to cut the red tape it believes stymies innovation. But environmental groups and renewable energy executives have taken the White House to task for refusing to include wind and solar power projects, two of the fastest and cheapest ways to increase energy production, in their energy dominance plans. That approach could haunt the administration, critics warn, as electricity prices rise, in part because of the high demand for power from the data centers used to fuel AI. Trump's focus on keeping oil prices down could also cause the White House to stumble on the president's promise to boost production — oil companies are laying off employees and the number of barrels the United States is producing is starting to fall after reaching a record high in March. West Wing Playbook sat down with Goldberg to discuss the council's mission, structure, and how it's navigating the challenge of meeting America's growing energy demand. He just wrapped up his service as a special government employee. This conversation has been edited for length and clarity. Let's start with the big picture. What is the Energy Dominance Council, and how does it work inside the White House? It's the first time in history that we've created a dedicated energy dominance council that is tasked with carrying out the president's objectives to make America energy dominant. That means everything that is required to have enough energy to provide reliable and affordable energy for all Americans, have enough energy to win the AI arms race against China, have a US-led energy supply chain that hooks allies to the United States and unhooks people from our adversaries, and having enough energy to promote peace stability while managing threats and having maximum flexibility in times of conflict. How is the council structured? Who's actually doing the day-to-day work? The council is less than 10 very committed patriotic Americans working out of the Eisenhower Executive Office Building. It's run by an executive director who's a deputy assistant to the president, and supported by two deputies who are special assistants to the president. They are managing projects on a daily basis. We have a dedicated policy lead just working oil and gas issues all day long. There's a policy lead working on power issues and all that power encompasses, and that includes nuclear power, coal power and electricity to power AI and what that means as far as maintaining and preserving, strengthening the grid today. A policy lead on mining and critical minerals was a very important addition that the president made to the council's mandate. How are you executing on that vision for the president? The message is the Energy Dominance Council is open for business. You just have to call and say, you have a project, you have something that we're working on that is a new build, a new mine, a new dig, a new connection, a new pipeline, a new export terminal, you name it, and that it will contribute to energy dominance in the following ways. It will make sure we are adding reliable baseload energy to our grid in the following ways. This is the focal point of the entire U.S. government to say, what do you need from the U.S. government to make your project happen in 14 or 28 days instead of five or 10 years or 30 years? Is it permitting assistance? Is it financing assistance? Is it other regulatory reviews that have become so burdensome over many years? What financing tools are available to companies seeking federal support? The Energy Department's loan program is well known, but there's also the Department of Defense's defense production authorities, the Export-Import Bank, the Development Finance Corporation and others. The council helps projects navigate this web. We've also ramped up investment in critical minerals, including taking the unprecedented step of having the U.S. government take equity in strategic mining projects like Mountain Pass [the only operating rare-earth mine in the United States]. What's the Council's emergency plan if we do see energy prices spike or grid failures this summer? We're working to prevent that from happening in the first place. There are only two major reasons why that might happen right now. One is you keep closing down coal plants that are keeping the grid stable in certain areas of high demand, you have states that just keep pushing forward on wind and solar with state support of some kind and connecting it to the grid and making their grid over reliant on it. Or you have one of these hyper scalers try to connect into an existing grid with just more power needs than you know could possibly happen. But the president is not going to allow that to happen, I'm very confident. If he sees any knuckleheads getting in the way that could cause it to happen, he's going to look at any possible authority that he has to break the log jam. In the event that energy prices do spike, do you think the administration would review its stance on wind and solar? I think it's important to understand that we have been put on a trajectory, on the grid and on prices by policy decisions made for many years embracing intermittent and unreliable sources of energy. And so when we start seeing stress in the grid today, this is a grid that the president inherited. I understand the political strategy from the wind and solar industry to look at an immediate moment of crisis or a rise in price or anything like that that could ever happen and say, 'Oh, it's because you're de-prioritizing wind and solar.' That's not why it's happening, and it's not the solution, we will absolutely see higher prices and grid failures if we reverse course. We need heavy baseload energy pumped into the grid to not just win the air arms race, but keep the lights on today. I've heard some buzz recently on geothermal. Where is the administration on this form of energy? It has potential. DOE is looking at this and working on this. It is absolutely part of the council's mandate and focus. You know, we just finished putting the finishing touches on having a challenge coin for the council and geothermal is represented on the coin. Europe promised to spend $750 billion over three years on purchases of U.S. energy. Does the U.S. have enough oil, gas and other energy commodities to meet that price tag? The answer is we have availability of supply today to increase sales abroad, increase exports across Europe and the Asia Pacific as well. And we have a supply curve that will continue to increase over the years ahead to both provide for the U.S. consumer and the increased demand that we're seeing across the globe for us. We need to continue to build out both the export infrastructure and help our potential customers abroad make sure that they're building out their infrastructure for import facilities and floating regasification units. We have American companies involved in all of that that can help. MESSAGE US — West Wing Playbook is obsessively covering the Trump administration's reshaping of the federal government. Are you a federal worker? A DOGE staffer? Have you picked up on any upcoming DOGE moves? We want to hear from you on how this is playing out. Email us at westwingtips@ Did someone forward this email to you? Subscribe! POTUS PUZZLER Which former president was really weirded out by fish? (Answer at bottom.) Agenda Setting RUIN THE BRUINS: The White House is seeking a $1 billion settlement from the University of California, Los Angeles, our JUAN PEREZ JR. reports. The move comes after the administration last week froze nearly $600 million in funding to the school. University of California President JAMES B. MILLIKEN said in a statement the school was reviewing the proposal but that a settlement of that size would 'devastate' the university. SELL SELL SELL?: Trump is considering selling stock in mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac later this year, our KATHERINE HAPGOOD reports. The details of a potential public offering would value the two companies at around $500 billion and involve selling 5 to 15 percent of their stock. It is unclear whether Fannie and Freddie will remain under government conservatorship. 'The president is weighing all his options,' a senior administration official said today. The Federal Housing Finance Agency and the Treasury Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment. EDITED HISTORY: The Smithsonian's National Museum of American History today revealed an updated version of its impeachment exhibit that now includes context about Trump's impeachments, WaPo's JANAY KINGSBERRY and MAURA JUDKIS report. The change comes after a placard with Trump's name was removed from the exhibit following a Smithsonian review of the museum's content prompted by the White House. 'The updated display now reflects all presidential impeachments,' the Smithsonian said in a statement. 'Adhering to principles foundational to our role as the nation's museum, we take great care to ensure that what we present to the public reflects both intellectual integrity and thoughtful design.' WHO'S IN, WHO'S OUT ANOTHER IRS SHAKEUP: Trump is replacing his Internal Revenue Service commissioner just two months into his tenure, Nicole and our BRIAN FALER report. BILLY LONG is expected to instead be named to an ambassadorship. It is unclear who will next lead the IRS, which has had six different leaders this year. Treasury Secretary SCOTT BESSENT will serve as the agency's acting commissioner, said the White House official, who was granted anonymity to discuss personnel moves. Knives Out EASIER SAID THAN DONE: The MAGA movement is escalating its calls to arrest Trump's opponents, from the Texas Democrats who bolted from the state to derail a redistricting vote to former President BARACK OBAMA. But those screaming the loudest appear likely to wind up disappointed, our KYLE CHENEY reports. It's a familiar refrain for Trump's second term: The far right lusts to see prominent Democrats or Trump adversaries hauled off in handcuffs, only to be let down when their revenge fantasies run into reality. 'They voted for that and now they realize they can't have retribution because it's not legally sound,' said GENE ROSSI, a white collar criminal defense lawyer who spent three decades at the Justice Department. SWISH SWISH, TISH: Speaking of political retribution, the U.S. attorney's office in Albany has issued at least two subpoenas to New York Attorney General LETITIA JAMES in recent days, our NICK REISMAN, JOSH GERSTEIN and ERICA ORDEN report. The subpoenas are an escalation of the Trump administration's scrutiny of James, who has positioned herself as a ferocious opponent of the president. One is focused on James' successful civil fraud case against Trump's businesses. The second stems from her high-profile fraud case against the National Rifle Association. In the Courts NOT SO FAST: A federal appeals court panel today threw out U.S. District Judge JAMES BOASBERG's bid to pursue criminal contempt for Trump administration officials he says defied his orders in March by sending 130 Venezuelan men to a prison in El Salvador, Kyle and Josh report. D.C. Circuit Judges GREGORY KATSAS and NEOMI RAO — both Trump appointees — overturned an order Boasberg issued in April initiating the potential contempt proceedings. The ruling can be appealed further. But if it remains in place, it appears to sharply diminish — but not completely rule out — the possibility that lawyers or other officials in the administration could face contempt charges over their conduct during the high-profile deportation showdown. What We're Reading Nobody Is Making Deals in Trump's Washington (Jim Secreto for POLITICO Magazine) I Helped Bury Stories About Trump. I Regret It. (Cameron Stracher for NYT Opinion) Veterans' Care at Risk Under Trump as Hundreds of Doctors and Nurses Reject Working at VA Hospitals (ProPublica's David Armstrong, Eric Umansky and Vernal Coleman) Could the U.S. Have Saved Navalny? (WSJ's Drew Hinshaw and Joe Parkinson) POTUS PUZZLER Former President GROVER CLEVELAND found fish more mysterious than humans, saying, 'No one has yet been wise enough to explain their ways or account for their conduct.' (Source: White House Historical Association)

3 Growth Stocks to Buy and Hold Forever
3 Growth Stocks to Buy and Hold Forever

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

3 Growth Stocks to Buy and Hold Forever

Key Points Amazon is solidly growing revenue while becoming more efficient. E.l.f. Beauty's acquisition of Rhode looks like a game-changer. Cava has one of the best growth stories in the restaurant space. 10 stocks we like better than Amazon › Outside of the technology sector, some of the best places to find growth are in the consumer space. While the market remains volatile, there are still stocks that have great long-term runways. Let's look at three consumer growth stocks you can buy and hold for the long term. 1. Amazon Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) continues to make its massive e-commerce engine more efficient. The company just keeps getting better with its warehouses and logistics. It's now using artificial intelligence (AI) to optimize warehouse placement, route planning, and inventory management, which is improving delivery speeds and lowering costs. At the same time, it now has more than a million robots in operation, helping move products faster and more efficiently. That showed up clearly last quarter when its North America operating income jumped 47% to $7.5 billion on only an 11% increase in revenue. International results were strong too, with segment profit hitting $1.5 billion. That was a huge improvement from just $300 million a year earlier. It's also seeing strong growth from higher-margin areas like advertising, where revenue surged 23%. While its stock dipped following its Q2 results, the core Amazon story hasn't changed. In addition to its e-commerce business becoming more efficient, the company is still the market leader in cloud computing through AWS, which pulled in more than $10 billion in operating income on 17.5% revenue growth. AWS remains a critical platform for developers and enterprises looking to build and run AI models and apps. Amazon continues to invest heavily in infrastructure, and while that will weigh a bit on near-term margins, it's setting the company up for strong returns over time. Long term, Amazon remains one of the best growth stories in the market. 2. E.l.f. Beauty E.l.f. Beauty (NYSE: ELF) is looking to quickly return to growth mode. The company has dominated the mass cosmetics category for the past few years, but after a surprise slowdown in sales, it made a bold move to enter the prestige skincare and cosmetics market through its $1 billion acquisition of Rhode. The acquisition brings with it a premium skincare line, higher average selling prices, and a strong brand built around Hailey Bieber. She's staying on as chief creative officer, helping guide future product development. Bieber herself also carries a lot of marketing might, and e.l.f. will plug Rhode into its strong influencer network as well. The even bigger opportunity for e.l.f. is increasing Rhode's distribution. The brand already had impressive traction with more than $200 million in annual sales offering just 10 or so products through its website. However, that's about to change, with the brand debuting at Sephora this fall, and e.l.f. likely to use its strong retail connections to expand the brand's presence. That said, this isn't just about one brand -- it's about building a beauty platform with a longer runway. Rhode complements e.l.f.'s core mass-market business and opens up more premium price points. The company also has whitespace internationally, and could expand into adjacent categories like fragrance over time. After a brief slowdown in the fourth quarter, this deal gives e.l.f. another engine for growth. Its track record speaks for itself, as the company has already completely upended the mass cosmetics market. That makes it a stock worth holding for the long term. 3. Cava Cava Group (NYSE: CAVA) is hitting its stride and has one of the largest potential expansion opportunities in the restaurant space. The fast-casual chain has now delivered four straight quarters of double-digit same-store sales gains, including a 10.8% increase last quarter. Just as important, traffic is growing quickly, up 7.5% in fiscal Q1. Cava's menu continues to evolve, which is helping attract new customers and keep its loyal customers coming back. Its introduction of grilled steak was a game-changer, helping drive higher check sizes, while premium add-ons like juices and pita chips are also increasing sales. Cava is also experimenting with new dishes and a loyalty program to improve frequency and retention. The Cava story is still early, but it's very reminiscent of a young Chipotle Mexican Grill, with a similar fresh, fast, customizable, and healthy food vibe. Offering minimal ingredients, just like Chipotle, also creates restaurant efficiencies, such as speeding up customer wait times and eliminating food waste. This leads to a high restaurant-level margin. That said, the real story is still unit growth. Cava ended last quarter with 382 locations and plans to open 64 to 68 new restaurants this year. That's high-teens unit growth. Its long-term goal is 1,000 locations by 2032. The company has been smart with where it expands, starting along the coasts, and now moving into bigger Midwest cities like Detroit, Chicago, and Indianapolis. Its strategy is working, and the brand is now resonating across regions. Taken altogether, Cava looks like a stock to own for the long haul. Should you invest $1,000 in Amazon right now? Before you buy stock in Amazon, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Amazon wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $635,544!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,099,758!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,046% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 181% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Geoffrey Seiler has positions in e.l.f. Beauty. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Chipotle Mexican Grill, and e.l.f. Beauty. The Motley Fool recommends Cava Group and recommends the following options: short September 2025 $60 calls on Chipotle Mexican Grill. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 3 Growth Stocks to Buy and Hold Forever was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store