Federal judge in Boston says prior ruling preserves Venezuelan deportation protections
The Boston case is among four suits filed across the country by immigrant advocates who allege the Trump administration lacked the authority to revoke
Advertisement
Although Stearns declined to issue a stay of Noem's order ending TPS, he allowed the Boston lawsuit to go forward.
On Monday, California US District Judge Edward Chen ruled that Noem's plan to end TPS for Venezuelans on April 7 threatens to 'inflict irreparable harm on hundreds of thousands of persons whose lives, families, and livelihoods will be severely disrupted' and cost the United States billions in economic activity.'
Advertisement
He found the government failed to identify any real, countervailing harm in continuing TPS for Venezuelans.
'Plaintiffs have also shown they will likely succeed in demonstrating that the actions taken by the secretary are unauthorized by law, arbitrary and capricious, and motivated by unconstitutional animus,' Chen wrote in a 78-page opinion.
He issued a nationwide stay that prevents Noem from ending TPS for Venezuelans while legal challenges are pending. Immigration advocates are preparing to seek a similar court order preventing Noem from ending TPS for Haitians in August.
Lawyers for Civil Rights filed the suit in Boston last month on behalf of Haitian Americans United Inc., the Venezuelan Association of Massachusetts, and the UndocuBlack Network, arguing that the administration's plan to revoke TPS is driven by racial and ethnic bias.
Outside the federal courthouse in Boston on Tuesday, Oren Sellstrom of Lawyers for Civil Rightssaid the impact of the California ruling is 'dramatic' and means that Venezuelans who were about to lose deportation protections may continue to legally live and work in the United States.
A couple of dozen demonstrators from various immigrant groups gathered on the sidewalk with signs supporting deportation protections for Venezuelans and Haitians.
'Regardless of who you are in this country you have rights,' said Patrice Lawrence, executive director of the UndocuBlack Network, vowing to continue fighting for TPS as the legal challenges unfold in Boston, San Francisco, Maryland and New York.
'Justice prevailed,' said Ciro Valiente, a spokesperson for the Venezuelan Association of Massachusetts, referring to the California ruling.
Advertisement
However, he said as the
government continues to aggressively move on deportations, 'The fear is still there.'
TPS, which was created in 1990, is a humanitarian program that gives immigrants from 17 countries facing violence, political upheaval or natural disasters legal authority to temporarily stay and work in the United States.
TPS was first granted to Haiti in 2010 following a devastating earthquake and has been repeatedly extended since then. Last year, the Biden administration extended TPS until Feb. 3, 2026 for Haitians in the program.
The Biden administration first granted TPS to Venezuelans in 2021, citing political and economic instability in the country under President Nicolas Maduro. In January, it extended the protections to Oct. 2, 2026.
Days after Noem's appointment in February, she announced that she was ending TPS for roughly 350,000 Venezuelan immigrants in April and another 250,000 in September, and for all Haitians by Aug. 3.
Those actions will impact 600,000 Venezuelan immigrants and 521,000 Haitians who will no longer be able to work and may face deportation.
The Justice Department argued in a court filing that Noem has 'clear authority' and discretion to terminate TPS for Haiti and Venezuela and that the statute creating the program 'broadly prohibits judicial review' of the secretary's decision.
Noem vacated TPS extensions granted by the previous administration after reviewing conditions in Haiti and Venezuela, and conculding it was
'contrary to the national interest' to permit immigrants from those countries to remain temporarily in the United States, the government wrote.
'Plaintiffs' analysis fails to acknowledge that the secretary's determinations are rooted in foreign policy considerations,' the government wrote in its opposition to the request for a stay of Noem's termination of TPS.
Advertisement
The Boston lawsuit describes TPS as 'a critical lifeline in the United States for immigrants who have fled their home countries due to extreme violence, political upheaval, and natural disasters.'
The suit says there is overwhelming evidence, based on remarks made by Trump and Noem, that the action was racially motivated.
'The list of dehumanizing and disparaging statements that Defendant Trump has made against Haitian and Venezuelan immigrants is unfortunately long: ranging from racist tropes that Haitians 'all have AIDS' and eat dogs and cats, to routinely describing Venezuelans and other Latino immigrants as sub-human 'animals,'' the suit says.
.
Shelley Murphy can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
4 hours ago
- New York Times
China Revoked My Visa, and Came to Regret It
President Trump's first term gave us the 'China Initiative,' a government program intended to root out Chinese espionage. The result was ethnic profiling of Chinese and Asian American researchers, flimsy cases that were eventually dropped and no prosecutions of scholars for spying or theft of secrets. President Joe Biden wisely eliminated it. Mr. Trump's current administration is back at it, however, demonizing Chinese citizens once again with Secretary of State Marco Rubio's announcement on May 28 that the United States would 'aggressively revoke' the visas of Chinese students. While it appears that Mr. Trump's team may have backed off on that measure for now after trade negotiations last week, the threat lingers and damage may have been done already. Targeting Chinese students, researchers and academics was a horrible idea the first time around and still is. It would harm America academically, economically and strategically. It will leave us more ignorant about our biggest rival and fuel paranoia while doing little to safeguard sensitive information. We should of course be concerned about China's wide-ranging espionage efforts. Much of this is focused on the U.S. government or corporations. But universities are targets too. Chinese government tactics are known to include pressuring students from China to gather information on American know-how and innovation from their U.S. colleges, coupled with threats against their families in China if they don't comply. Innocent students like these are China's victims, too. We should be devising ways to protect their academic freedom and safety while on U.S. soil. Excluding them en masse blames the victim and throws the baby out with the bath water. Very little of the research that happens on American campuses is classified, anyway. Many universities forbid it under the principle that academic research should be openly available. Some areas of study are more sensitive than others, but U.S. restrictions and screening procedures already block or restrict visas for Chinese researchers in certain fields. A 2020 Trump executive order, for example, limits entry by graduate students with past or present links to Chinese entities that the United States determines are involved with technologies that have potential military use. Mr. Rubio's announcement added worryingly vague new criteria to these already robust standards. He singled out students 'with connections to the Chinese Communist Party,' which is almost meaningless for a country where the party runs everything. Just as every American is connected to the U.S. government in some way — getting a driver's license, paying taxes, going to public schools — dealing with the Communist Party is a fact of life for Chinese citizens, not an ideological commitment. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump alleges Biden autopen misuse: whoever 'used it was the president'
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump has long focused on his predecessor's use of the autopen during his presidency to sign official documents. Now he has called for an investigation into former President Joe Biden's reliance on the mechanical device. Presidential use of the autopen has not been outlawed or ruled unconstitutional. And Trump himself has acknowledged allowing his staff to use it to sign letters on his behalf. Yet the president has come down repeatedly on Biden for using an autopen amid fresh allegations that the ex-president's health was in decline while he was in office. He has accused former White House aides, without evidence, of signing documents, including presidential pardons, without Biden's knowledge. "Whoever used the autopen was the president," he told reporters on June 5, implying aides were assuming the role of commander-in-chief. "And that is wrong, it's illegal, it's so bad." Presidents are thought to have employed the autopen for more than 200 years, since the time of Thomas Jefferson, who obtained one of the machines after it came under patent in 1803, according to the Shapell Manuscript Foundation. Gerald Ford, Lyndon B. Johnson, George W. Bush and Barack Obama are all known to have made use of the device. Obama became the first president to rely on an autopen to sign a piece of legislation in 2011, in order to push through a bill extending the Patriot Act that arrived on his desk while he was on a trip to France. Trump orders investigation of Joe Biden's alleged 'cognitive decline' and use of autopen The dispute with Biden goes further: Trump and his aides have accused Biden's staff of illegal activity. "It's whether or not the president of the United States knew it was being used, and if not, who was using it in his name, which is clearly illegal behavior," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said at a June 3 briefing. The former president knocked down the allegations, calling them a "distraction," in a June 4 statement in response to Trump's latest assault on him. Biden said he "made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations" during his presidency. The Justice Department in 2005 determined that use of the autopen was legal. "We find that, pursuant to this understanding, a person may sign a document by directing that his signature be affixed to it by another," a DOJ memo said. Legal scholars have further argued that nothing in the Constitution requires presidents to sign pardons, even if Biden did use an autopen. Elaborating on his views, Trump said on June 5 that he believes it's "inappropriate" to use the autopen for documents, even for relatively minor directives such as ambassador appointments. "I think it's very disrespectful to people when they get an autopen signature," he said. Trump admitted in his remarks to reporters that he uses the autopen, too. But he suggested he does not use the device that mimics his signature when he signs important documents. "Autopens, to me, are used when thousands of letters come in from young people all over the country," Trump said. He said the president of the United States receives thousands of letters a week, and it's not possible for him to respond to each one individually. "To me, that's where autopens start and stop," he said. "I'm not a big autopen person," Trump declared. "It's an easy way out." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump accuses Biden of misusing presidential autopen
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Dem senator's viral outburst at DHS presser triggers mixed reactions from lawmakers: 'Disgusting situation'
House lawmakers from both sides of the aisle gave strong reactions shortly after Sen. Alex Padilla's, D-Calif., viral outburst that got him thrown out of a Department of Homeland Security press conference in Los Angeles on Thursday. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York, Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, Anna Paulina Luna of Florida and Jim Jordan of Ohio spoke to Fox News Digital after Padilla was escorted out of the hearing. "That was crazy," Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., said. "It's a disgusting situation," Jeffries said. Senate Shaken: Bipartisan Worry Erupts After Incident Involving California Democrat Many Democrats condemned how the Secret Service handcuffed and removed Padilla from the room during the event, with some even calling on Noem to resign. Padilla and DHS Secretary Kristi Noem ended up holding a meeting afterward, which Padilla's office described as "civil," and Noem described as "cordial" despite the strong disagreements between the two. Read On The Fox News App Luna, a Florida Republican, said the viral incident speaks to a larger optics issue with men in the Democratic Party. "I think optics are pretty bad for Democrat men as a whole," Luna said. "I mean, he aggressively was approaching her. Obviously, security saw that as a threat. I know after the fact, she actually was gracious enough after he pulled that to talk with him for a little bit and then exchange numbers. But the fact is that he's a sitting senator, and he's acting like a weirdo. I don't know how else to describe it, other than you should not act like that, period, and especially not show aggression like that towards women," she continued. Conservatives Erupt After Dem Senator's 'Temper Tantrum' Sends Dhs Presser Off The Rails "I think he was trying to get clickbait, but I don't know about how you were raised, but I was raised that you don't throw temper tantrums, and you certainly don't approach women like that," she continued. Click Here For More Immigration Coverage Jordan, an Ohio Republican, wondered why Padilla was in Los Angeles instead of Washington, D.C., as the Senate was in session on Thursday. "Well, I mean, the first thing that comes to mind is, why isn't he here voting? I – just like, the Senate's in session. I just did a press conference with senators," he said. "I know they're in session, so why is he here doing that? And then. Second, why not just wait and do your own press conference? Like, the press is there. The cameras are microphones are there. If you wait till Secretary Noem is done, and then you tell them you want to say a few things, you cover him, everyone will cover you, journalists, everyone cover him. So, to me, those are the two takeaways. Why not just do it the common-sense way instead of going in and making a scene," the Republican added. Padilla Hopes People Feel 'Outrage' Over His Forcible Removal And Detainment The FBI said that he was let go after he had properly identified himself, as he was not wearing his security pin when he interrupted Noem while trying to ask a question during her remarks. Padilla did state his name and was wearing a shirt that said the U.S. Senate on it. "If this is how this administration responds to a Senator with a question, you can only imagine what they're doing to farmworkers, to cooks, and to day laborers throughout California and throughout the country. We will hold this administration accountable," he said after the incident. Meanwhile, DHS slammed it as "disrespectful political theater." The press conference was focused on anti-ICE civil unrest in Los Angeles as federal immigration authorities continue arrests of illegal immigrants in the article source: Dem senator's viral outburst at DHS presser triggers mixed reactions from lawmakers: 'Disgusting situation'
