Strengthening Defense Capabilities: China's Provocative Actions Cannot be Ignored
Strengthening defense capabilities in light of the worsening security environment is an urgent issue. The ruling and opposition parties must discuss concrete measures for that purpose.
On July 9 and 10, a fighter-bomber of the Chinese military came as close as 70 meters to an Air Self-Defense Force intelligence-gathering aircraft over the high seas in the East China Sea. The ASDF aircraft was engaged in surveillance operations.
China's National Defense Ministry issued a statement claiming that the approach was due to the ASDF aircraft having intruded several times into the air defense identification zone set by China. It asserted that the response by the Chinese aircraft was completely legitimate and reasonable.
The site was over the high seas, where free flights are allowed under international law. There was no flaw in the operations of the ASDF aircraft. It is inexcusable to make assertions as if the ASDF aircraft was in violation of international law.
Last month, too, a Chinese military aircraft flew abnormally close to a Maritime Self-Defense Force patrol plane over the western Pacific Ocean. Japan has expressed 'grave concerns' to China over each of these incidents, but the response of the Chinese side lacks sincerity. It is necessary for Japan to strongly protest and demand an apology, not just express concerns.
China has engaged in a series of provocative activities around the Senkaku Islands in Okinawa Prefecture. Its recent military operations likely indicate that Beijing is attempting to make its effective control of the region an established fact.
This perception is reflected in the 2025 edition of Japan's Defense White Paper, released on July 15.
The white paper indicates a strong sense of caution for the first time, as it analyzes that the China Coast Guard and the Chinese military have been conducting joint drills in a drive to improve their operational capabilities in gray-zone situations, where the boundary between peacetime and contingency is unclear.
If a remote island is occupied by armed fishermen from another country, the Japanese government will be forced to make a difficult decision as to whether the Japan Coast Guard will respond to the situation or the Self-Defense Forces will be mobilized. The JCG and the SDF should maintain close communication to deal with all possible situations.
Despite the various issues to be addressed, it is hard to say that strengthening defense capabilities has become a point of contention during the ongoing House of Councillors election campaign.
The United States has been demanding that its allies and other countries significantly increase their defense spending. Japan may also be pressed to enhance its defense budget in the future.
Japan must strengthen its defense capabilities at its own discretion and work to deepen the alliance. It is important for the ruling and opposition parties to discuss what a defense burden commensurate with national power should be like.
(From The Yomiuri Shimbun, July 16, 2025)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
an hour ago
- The Diplomat
Mahathir Mohamad, the Father of Modern Malaysia, at 100
Mahathir reshaped Malaysia's politics and modernized its economy. He is also the source of many of the contradictions that continue to define the country today. Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, who turned 100 on July 10, stands as a political titan who casts a long shadow over Malaysia's modern history. A physician from a modest background, he joined politics in the 1960s, and thereby embarked on an extraordinary trajectory. Mahathir was the founding father of modern Malaysia, its most enduring political figure, and, arguably, the architect of many of the contradictions that continue to define – and divide – the country. From his first stint as prime minister from 1981 until 2003, and again in a stunning political comeback from 2018 to 2020, Mahathir reshaped Malaysia's economy, identity, and politics. His legacy is both vertiginous and deeply contested. Central to Mahathir's worldview is the 'Malay Dilemma,' an idea that he articulated in his 1970 book of the same name. Drawing from colonial narratives – notably those later critiqued by sociologist Syed Hussein Alatas in his study 'The Myth of The Lazy Native' – Mahathir internalized and reinterpreted British stereotypes of the 'lazy' or 'nonchalant' Malay. Rather than rejecting these views outright, he reframed them as an urgent national problem: the Malays, the 'sons of the soil,' were being left behind by the economically dominant Chinese minority, highlighting that the traditions of 'forced marriage of the unfit' and 'inbreeding' which, according to Mahathir, had produced 'a much greater percentage of human failures among the Malay as compared with other races.' This book aimed to explain the ethnic tensions between Malays and Chinese during the politically orchestrated ethnic riots of May 1969. In a preface to a new edition of 'The Malay Dilemma' published in 2008, Mahathir revised his view over the extent to which hereditary factors had contributed to the socio-economic status of the Malay, but the idea continues to haunt the Malaysian national psyche to the present. Mahathir's diagnosis of Malay social pathologies laid the groundwork for Malaysia's affirmative action policies, most notably the New Economic Policy (NEP), which privileged Malays in areas ranging from education to business and the civil service. Under Mahathir, these policies were not only expanded but entrenched in the country's corporate, social, and political cultures. During this time, Mahathir's management of the economy was widely praised. He prioritized fiscal discipline, maintained a relatively open market, focused on infrastructure development, and actively encouraged foreign direct investment. These efforts contributed to a consistent annual growth rate of around 6-7 percent during most of his tenure. His rule also cultivated a new confident Malay urban elite, who benefited greatly from his state-sponsored contracts and quotas. But in doing so, he also locked the Malay community into a framework of entitlement and dependency. What began as protectionism morphed into institutionalized favoritism, with political patronage and crony capitalism feeding a system that ultimately undermined the very self-reliance Mahathir hoped to instill. While intended to uplift the Malay majority, these policies deepened Malaysia's racial fractures. By encoding ethnic identity into economic opportunity, Mahathir's policies helped formalize a structural racial divide that persists today. Each election cycle has seen politicians – especially those from the dominant Malay parties – doubling down on the rhetoric of racial entitlement and fear. Instead of fostering national cohesion, the policies seeded mistrust and resentment between communities. Ironically, in his later years, Mahathir seemed to recognize the limitations and unintended consequences of this strategy. In his last term, he tried to reform the system, acknowledging that the quota-based policies no longer gave Malays a real advantage. But rather than blaming the outdated structures he helped build, Mahathir often turned his criticism inward, accusing the Malay community of complacency and failure to seize the opportunities offered to them. Paradoxically, the father of Malay empowerment chastised his own people for not thriving within the very system he contributed to designing. During his brief second term as prime minister, Mahathir took bold steps to tackle corruption, a move many saw as a long-overdue attempt to redeem his legacy. He appointed Latheefa Koya, a respected human rights lawyer and fierce critic of institutional corruption, to head Malaysia's anti-graft agency. Yet, skeptics questioned the sincerity of these reforms. The infamous 1MDB scandal, which exploded under Prime Minister Najib Razak's 2009-2018 tenure, is a symptom of the system that was created during Mahathir's earlier tenure: the building of the new United Malays National Organization (UMNO) and a Malay elite. His critics accused him of using anti-corruption efforts selectively, targeting rivals rather than genuinely dismantling the structures that enabled graft. In 2018, Mahathir's return to power against all odds was historical. At 93, he led the opposition coalition to an unexpected victory, toppling UMNO, the party he once led, for the first time since the country's independence. It was a masterclass in political reinvention: from autocratic strongman to democratic savior. Mahathir managed the impossible feat of rewriting his legacy in real time. But his second act ended in chaos. Misreading the fragile alliances that brought him back to power, Mahathir resigned in 2020, believing, as he often had before, that the nation would call him back to stabilize the government. Instead, his former deputy, Muhyiddin Yassin, seized the moment and formed a new coalition without him. This miscalculation echoed an earlier one. In the late 1990s, Mahathir dismissed Anwar Ibrahim, then his heir apparent, triggering a political crisis that would shape Malaysia for two decades. Mahathir underestimated his allies both times and paid the price. In his last attempt to run for an election, Mahathir's newly formed party, the Parti Pejuang Tanah Air (Homeland Fighter's Party) or Pejuang, had disastrous results; all candidates, including Mahathir, performed so poorly that they lost their election deposits. Mahathir now refers to himself, often sarcastically, as a 'dictator' who resigned twice. His long career has made him both a living relic and a reference point for a generation of strongmen. His friendships with controversial figures like Fidel Castro and Robert Mugabe, and admiration for figures such as Nelson Mandela, whose first political campaign he quietly funded, paint a portrait of a leader who was adept at operating on both the world stage and in the maze of domestic politics. Today, as global politics witnesses a resurgence of autocrats claiming democratic legitimacy, Mahathir offers a cautionary tale. His criticisms of leaders like Donald Trump are laced with irony, given his own long flirtation with authoritarianism. And yet, unlike many of his peers, Mahathir walked away, not once, but twice, from power. Whether that was courage, hubris, or simply miscalculation is a question my academic colleagues will debate. But there's no denying his impact. Mahathir built Malaysia's modern foundation, and created its political fault lines. Understanding his career is not just about understanding one man's journey, but the story of an entire nation navigating the promises and perils of leadership, identity, and ambition.
2 hours ago
Japan Minister Voices Concern over Illegal Residents from Turkey
News from Japan Politics Jul 30, 2025 22:09 (JST) Tokyo, July 30 (Jiji Press)--Japanese Justice Minister Keisuke Suzuki on Wednesday expressed "extremely serious concern" about illegal Turkish residents in Japan. Suzuki conveyed this concern at a meeting with Turkish Ambassador to Japan Oguzhan Ertugrul. The ambassador responded that Turkey is urging its citizens to follow Japanese laws and customs while in Japan. According to Suzuki, there were 1,372 illegal residents of Turkish nationality as of Jan. 1. In some municipalities, friction and trouble between locals and Kurdish residents of Turkish nationality have been reported. "In light of the growing anxiety among the (Japanese) people, we are also moving toward dealing strictly with illegal stays," Suzuki said, requesting cooperation from the Turkish government. END [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.] Jiji Press
3 hours ago
Japan Prefectural Chiefs Seek to Promote Multicultural Society
News from Japan Politics Jul 30, 2025 21:29 (JST) Tokyo, July 30 (Jiji Press)--A group of Japanese prefectural governors called on the central government on Wednesday to work toward a multicultural society in which foreign and Japanese nationals live together. The project team of the National Governors' Association asked the central government to help the country accept more foreigners to address labor shortages in regional areas. The team also urged the government to establish an organization to oversee policies toward a multicultural society. The proposal was handed to Justice Minister Keisuke Suzuki and Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Kazuhiko Aoki by Shizuoka Governor Yasutomo Suzuki. The minister said, "We'll work toward creating a multicultural society." Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said at a press conference that the central government "will continue to work with local governments" toward an inclusive society. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.] Jiji Press
