What Is Relationship Anarchy? Psychologists Explain This Non-Traditional Relationship Style
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links."
It's about to be a Relationship Anarchy Summer. Or at least according to Feeld, that is. The once niche, now arguably mainstream dating app best known as a platform for kinky and non-monogamously minded daters just released its latest State of Dating report, and it seems anarchy is in the air—relationship anarchy (RA), that is. Per the report, this non-traditional relationship style—which rejects societal norms and encourages practitioners to forge custom-created relationships on their own terms—is on the rise. In fact, you may be a relationship anarchist without even knowing it.
Well, not exactly. RA is a unique, intricate philosophy of relationship-building with which practitioners engage actively and intentionally, one that has origins in politically anarchist principles. But Feeld found that after learning the definition of relationship anarchy, 50 percent of the app's users and 20 percent of non-Feeld members reported they were already practicing it before becoming aware there was a term for it.
So what is relationship anarchy, really? And have you maybe already adopted it into your own life without realizing it? Read on for your complete guide to RA.
Coined by Andie Nordgren in a pamphlet in 2006 (later published online), relationship anarchy—or RA— is a relationship style in which there are no rules or expectations other than the ones the people in the relationship decide upon. Basically, it's tossing traditional societal ideas of what relationships 'should be' and defining them for yourself, with your partner(s).
'RA is a philosophy where people follow their own core values to create individualized relationship agreements rather than relying on social norms,' says Dr. Heath Schechinger, co-chair of the American Psychological Association Division 44 Committee on Consensual Non-Monogamy. 'People who embrace this approach to relationships tend to value autonomy and non-hierarchical relationship practices.'
Nordgren's original relationship anarchy manifesto includes nine tenets that outline the values of relationship anarchy, all meant to be customized by the people who practice it. These tenets include things like, 'Love and respect instead of entitlement,' which states that your feelings for or history with someone don't entitle you to control them or their actions, and 'Trust is better,' which states that instead of needing validation from your partner to feel confident in their feelings for you, you should choose 'to assume that your partner does not wish you harm,' and let that be enough.
One big principle of relationship anarchy is shedding any type of hierarchy, aka, the belief that a romantic relationship is more important than any other type of relationship. 'It is based on the idea that love is abundant and not a finite resource that needs to be carefully doled out to the people around you,' says Dr. Donna Oriowo, sex and relationship therapist at AnnodRight. 'Relationships are experienced as being more on a spectrum instead of a hierarchy.'
Relationship anarchy and polyamory are both types of ethical (sometimes also called consensual) non-monogamy, but they differ in that RA does not have to be non-monogamous if you and your partner don't want it to be. Although most relationship anarchists are non-monogamous, you can choose to eschew every other traditional relationship norm but still be each other's only partner if that's what you and your partner want. Polyamory, on the other hand, does involve having intimate, sometimes emotional relationships with more than one partner.
Polyamory can also involve hierarchies (like having a primary partner). RA rejects that concept entirely unless those involved decide otherwise.
Like with all types of non-monogamy, relationship anarchy isn't for everyone and requires lots of time, effort, and communication.
'Anyone who wants be in relationships outside of our cultural expectations around them [is suited for relationship anarchy],' says Elise Schuster, MPH, co-founder and executive director of OkaySo. 'Beyond that, relationship anarchy requires skills that really are fundamental for any healthy relationship or relationships (but are often lacking), like good communication skills, awareness of one's own needs and desires, and healthy boundaries.'
And because RA may include several other partners, relationship anarchists should be 'able to work through issues related to jealousy,' says Kristen Lilla, certified sex therapist and author.
'People who engage in relationship anarchy reject societal standards of how relationships 'should' be, so it works for them because they get to engage in relationships that work for them, not that work because others told them how it has to work.'
Communication is key in any relationship, no matter what it looks like. But because relationship anarchy is all about creating a relationship that works for you basically from scratch, all parties need to be willing to express their needs, boundaries, and expectations. And, as Dr. Schechinger points out, as the number of people involved increases, 'so does the need for clear and healthy communication.'
'I've talked to thousands of people about their relationships, and I can say with confidence that the ability to communicate well with a partner or partners is the most important thing in relationships,' says Schuster. 'In traditional relationships, we often allow those expectations to become assumptions, which become resentments and hurt, which become breakups, which we then repeat. So really, communication is important for everyone, but people who are relationship anarchists might need to use these skills more often.'
Communication with those outside of your relationship can also be important if you ever feel the need to explain your relationship to those who might not understand it. Remember: 'You may be going against the societal grain of what is deemed 'appropriate' in building the relationship you want,' says Oriowo. 'This can cause a lot of feelings and have family members feel it's their place to tell you about what you're doing wrong, relationship-wise.'
Ultimately, how much you share about your relationship with others is up to you. But you shouldn't let anyone make you feel like your relationship is less valid or important just because it looks different.
Anyone who's curious about relationship anarchy is capable of practicing it if they feel they have the skills and qualities to do so. But if you're already in a relationship and you're interested in moving toward relationship anarchy, there are a few important things to remember. Namely: talk, talk, and talk some more. Abandoning all relationship expectations and starting from scratch can be tricky, and it's going to require lots of communication.
What do you want your relationship to look like? What are your expectations? Do you want to be monogamous, or non-monogamous? Do you want to have an open relationship? Do you want to live together? Get married one day? Have children? These are all things to be thinking about, and your answers can evolve as you move through your relationship. 'Couples should expect the relationship to change and acknowledge change isn't a bad thing,' says Lillia.
And remember: Take your time. You don't have to have it all figured out from the start. 'Go slow and be realistic,' says Dr. Schechinger. 'It can be exciting to move closer to what you want, but there are challenges that come when you deviate from social norms. Make sure you are both fully on board and have a support system before you make this leap.'
Relationship anarchy can be an incredibly difficult style to adopt, especially if you've always been in traditionally monogamous relationships. If it's harder than you expected, be patient with yourself and your partner(s).
'Take a moment to consider what you're struggling with and why,' says Oriowo. 'Trying something new can be hard, give yourself time to learn more and adjust.'
If you and your partner(s) are committed to making RA work, supporting each other is essential, but seeking support outside of the relationship can also be hugely beneficial too. 'Read available resources, engage in self-introspection and self-awareness to help determine personal values, and seek a therapist who is competent with this model,' says Lilla.
Oriowo also stresses the importance of finding community. 'We're often told we have to do so much alone and figure it out for ourselves,' they say. 'It can be really helpful to find a group of like-minded folks who can support you through the transition and even give you some pointers on how they were able to make it happen and work for themselves.'
Ultimately, the impact RA will have on you and your partner(s) depends on how aligned you are in your values, and communication when you're feeling less than 100% about any of it.
'The beauty, and sometimes frustration, of RA is there are few implicit agreements that you can rest on— you get to co-create them with your partner or partners,' says Dr. Schechinger. 'We're not robots—we're humans with real feelings and attachment needs. Be compassionate, realistic, and flexible with yourself and your partner(s) as you navigate the RA waters.'
You Might Also Like
Here's What NOT to Wear to a Wedding
Meet the Laziest, Easiest Acne Routine You'll Ever Try
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Are Pesticides in Your Food Harmful?
Credit - iStockphoto—Getty Images Various chemicals, from those in plastics to food additives, have made headlines lately for their potential roles in triggering diseases. Pesticides are unique among chemicals, though, says Melissa Perry, an environmental epidemiologist and dean of George Mason's College of Public Health. 'They're deliberately manufactured to kill things.' By poisoning weeds, pesticides clear the way for farmers' crops to thrive. But their deadly design may undermine human health, too. A recent report by a new federal advisory board, the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Commission chaired by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., calls for further investigation of pesticides' effects to determine if their use should be limited. Some evidence does suggest that long-term exposure could lead to cancer and several other serious health problems. More research is needed to better understand these risks, but in the meantime, experts recommend simple, practical steps to reduce intake. Here's what we know about the risks of pesticides and how to lower your exposure. The MAHA report assesses 'root causes' of poor health in U.S. children. It describes pesticides as one of eight types of chemicals giving rise to chronic diseases. The report specifically takes issue with two weed killers, glyphosate and atrazine. They're the most commonly used pesticides by American farmers, and research has focused on them in lab experiments on animals, with several concerning findings. Other studies have drawn links between glyphosate exposure—mainly by consuming trace amounts in food—and health problems, including earlier death. In 2019, a large research review identified a 'compelling link' between glyphosate intake and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in humans, though in 2024 a federal judge criticized this study's design and approach. Additional research points to a range of diseases potentially related to glyphosate, but a recent review by Italian researchers on glyphosate was inconclusive and called for further research. Read More: Seed Oils Don't Deserve Their Bad Reputation Based on the evidence, the World Health Organization (WHO) has described glyphosate as 'probably carcinogenic to humans,' whereas the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) found 'no evidence that glyphosate causes cancer in humans,' citing a dataset the agency considered more thorough than WHO's. The second widespread pesticide highlighted by the MAHA report is atrazine. Like glyphosate, it's been used by farmers since the 1960s, but research on animals in the 1990s began to show it could disrupt reproductive health and hormone regulation. Tyrone B. Hayes, a biologist at the University of California, Berkeley, found that atrazine interfered with the sexual development of frogs. Subsequent studies showed similar effects, as well as weight gain, in mice. Researchers have also observed that women in certain agricultural communities experience higher rates of abnormal menstrual cycles, compared to places with fewer farms. Other human studies show increases in several kinds of birth defects. Still more research links atrazine to breast cancer, but researchers at the National Institutes of Health have concluded 'no evidence of an association' with cancer. The EPA estimated that atrazine adversely affects 54% of all species and 50% of all critical habitats. 'I don't know how an Environmental Protection Agency can make a statement like that and then re-register the chemical,' Hayes says. In 2023, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) data showed that 99% of food samples tested below the EPA's safety limit for pesticides. However, U.S. limits are considerably higher than what's allowed in the European Union, where atrazine has been effectively banned. Read More: The Best Longevity Habit You're Not Thinking About Pesticides called organophosphates have been studied by the EPA and others for links to neurological disorders such as ADHD. 'Research clearly shows that children exposed to higher levels did have more neurobehavioral problems,' says Jason Richardson, professor of physiology and pharmacology at the University of Georgia's Isakson Center for Neurological Disease Research. Overall, uncertainty and debate about pesticides continues partly due to research challenges. People are typically exposed to multiple types of chemicals, so it's 'hard to attribute disease to one pesticide or pinpoint the definitive dose or exposure time' that makes people sick, Perry says. 'Just because a chemical is present doesn't mean it's doing anything bad, but in combination with other chemicals, it may be,' Richardson says. 'Efforts are underway to measure these combinations.' 'The country's agricultural policy follows science, not fear, speculation, and fringe narratives,' says Becky Langer-Curry, director of innovation at the National Corn Growers Association. The Corn Growers were 'perplexed' by the MAHA report, she adds. 'We need faith in the EPA's regulatory system to review the science. They're ensuring our food is safe, well below human risk.' In an email to EPA spokesperson Mike Bastasch said the EPA'typically regulates pesticides at least 100 times lower than where no adverse effects are seen in safety studies.' The agency is 'confident that the fruits and vegetables our children are eating are safer than ever,' Bastasch wrote. However, he added that the EPA is updating its evaluation of glyphosate's cancer-causing potential, and it's currently working on an Updated Mitigation Proposal for atrazine. In the meantime, researchers including Perry, Richardson, and Hayes think pesticides are dangerous enough that people should take precautions—but especially young kids, people who are pregnant, those who live close to farms, agricultural workers, and seniors. The first step is to become aware of pesticides in your environment. They're more common than people think, Perry says. 'Exposures happen routinely for most members of the American public.' Experts recommend contacting the environmental office of your county or city to learn whether you're close to a food production facility that uses pesticides. In 2017, kids and teachers at a Hawaii middle school reported unusual throat irritation and dizziness. They suspected the symptoms were caused by pesticides applied in nearby fields, and researchers found residues in the school's indoor and outdoor air samples. Read More: What to Do If Fluoride Is Removed From Your Water The detected levels were deemed below concerning thresholds. Bastasch says that, for communities near farms, the EPA studies potential exposure through the air and other pathways to make sure safety levels are based on sound science. Still, Hayes worries about the long-term effects of pesticide contact and absorption. 'For someone living in a farming community that's constantly exposed to estrogen mimics like atrazine, you're more likely to develop adverse effects,' he says. People take in atrazine mainly through their drinking water, after farm runoff carries the pesticide into local water systems. But some utilities are more effective than others at removing pesticide residues. The Environmental Working Group rates local water utilities. For people on well water, the federal government provides guidelines for testing it. Pesticide use is widespread enough—and disperses at such distances—that everyone should probably use a high-quality water filter, experts say. Atrazine can travel as far as 600 miles, Hayes says. As far back as 1999, USGS noticed that pesticides, including atrazine, were detected in places where farmers hadn't applied them. Even for residents of areas where a water treatment plant removes the chemicals, buying a filter certified to the NSF/ANSI Standards 42 and 53 provides some additional assurance of water safety. Look for filters in refrigerators and water pitchers that meet this certification. Eating organic foods can also help to reduce intake of pesticides, especially glyphosate. About 90% of pregnant women have detectable amounts of glyphosate in their bodies, according to one study. 'But when you put people on organic diets, you start to see that they no longer have pesticides in their urine,' Perry says. Research in 2020 found that eating an organic diet dropped glyphosate levels by 70% in children and their parents. In 2023, researchers put pregnant women on an organic diet for one week. Those who went all-organic decreased glyphosate in their urine by 43%. A 2019 study found a 95% reduction in organophosphates. Richardson calls these studies on organic foods 'intriguing' while noting that natural compounds used in organic farming may also be toxic beyond certain thresholds. Even when eating organic, 'make sure you wash your fruits and vegetables very well,' he says. Read More: Dermatologists Have a Dirty Little Secret One study found that soaking apples in baking soda mixed with water for 12-15 minutes eliminated more residue than water alone. However, according to another study, washing produce with running water is superior to baking soda, sitting water, and vinegar. Other research shows a gentle rubbing action during washing is effective. Aim for 20-30 seconds or longer if you have time. Peeling the skin and outer pulp will get rid of additional residue that penetrates into some produce. There's a major downside, though: you lose a portion of the beneficial nutrients and compounds, like fiber and vitamins, that help protect against pesticide toxicity. Some research suggests that replacing processed foods with diverse whole foods can reduce how many pesticides you ingest (but some research suggests there may be fewer benefits if they're not organic). Aside from nutrition, other lifestyle behaviors such as exercise, stress management, and good sleep may build a baseline of health that helps thwart the cumulative effects of pesticides and other pollutants. Overall, they influence how someone's body responds to their 'exposome,' Richardson explains—your total environmental exposures and how they interact with lifestyle behaviors and risk factors like age and genetics. Bastasch says the EPA assesses the combined risks of groups of pesticides that affect the body in similar ways, adding that the agency is continuing to advance research in this area. The exposome probably matters more than any one chemical type, but 'we're really just breaking the surface of understanding these interactions,' Richardson says. Until more definitive science emerges, maintain smart practices like scrubbing produce and striving for a healthy lifestyle. Contact us at letters@
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Not All Lip Plumpers Will Actually Make Your Lips Fuller—Look for This Specific Ingredient
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." 'Did you just get lip filler?' In my world, this isn't an absurd question—I'm a beauty writer who regularly tests new aesthetic treatments for work—yet there's always a look of surprise when I respond 'no.' I promise I'm not being sketchy or secretive about the work I've gotten done. I'm an open book when it comes to Botox, chemical peels, and other pro treatments. That said, multiple peers and friends have consistently made comments on how full my lips appear, even when they're bare. At first, I thought they were talking nonsense, but after pulling up old pictures of myself and taking a closer look in the mirror, I realized they were right: My lips sure do look bigger. My lips are, well, the exact opposite of naturally full. My upper lip is basically non-existent. And while I've never considered getting lip filler, I do swipe on lip-plumping gloss multiple times a day for a little boost. Over the past two years, I've fine-tuned the plumpers I keep on rotation—tossing everything that stings or burns and only applying formulas that coat my lips in plush comfort. Upon further research, I discovered that the plumping products I toggle between daily share one specific ingredient: Maxi-Lip. Could Maxi-Lip be the reason my lip volume has increased without any filler? I set out on a mission to find out. After consulting with dermatologists, plastic surgeons, and cosmetic chemists, I finally have an answer—and honestly, it shocked me (and the world needs to know!!). But before we get into whether or not Maxi-Lip can produce permanent results, it's important to understand what the ingredient is and how it works. In true ~journalistic fashion~, I went right to the source to uncover what exactly Maxi-Lip is. This ingredient was created by Croda Beauty, a beauty innovation company that develops new ingredient blends and sells them to brands to include in their formulas (many of which, btw, use biotech—but more on that later). According to cosmetic chemist Krupa Koestline, Maxi-Lip is 'a patented, biomimetic peptide complex designed to enhance lip volume, hydration, and contour.' It's comprised of emollient-rich ethylhexyl palmitate and tribehenin, as well as emulsifying sorbitan osostearate—but the hero is palmitoyl tripeptide-1, a synthetic peptide which firms, conditions, and increases cellular turnover. Guaranteed you already know about peptides if you're into skincare. It's lauded as one of the best anti-aging ingredients because it encourages collagen production in your skin to help plump up skin to reduce the look of fine lines and wrinkles and increases elasticity so your skin is plump and bouncy. When incorporated into lip-care products—remember, your lips are skin—peptides work to improve the same concerns, all while producing a plumping effect over time. But let's get into the science-y details... 'Maxi-Lip works by mimicking the body's own peptide signals to stimulate the synthesis of collagen and glycosaminoglycans in the lips,' explains Koestline. (Glycosaminoglycans—also known as GAG—are sugar molecules that enhance collagen synthesis and bind water to your skin, FYI.) 'This not only increases lip volume but also improves the lip texture and moisture retention," she adds. Plumping agents from years past usually contained bee venom, chili pepper, or menthol. These additives would create an inflammatory reaction which momentarily plumped lips (while drying out your skin in the process), explains plastic surgeon Melissa Doft, MD. On the contrary, "Maxi-Lip plumps by drawing in hydration and increasing collagen so that the lips appear firmer,' she explains. So instead of a "short-lived tingle" as Koestline puts it, products with Maxi-Lip actually do make your lips a bit fuller over time. Does it actually work? According to Croma Beauty's clinical trials, Maxi-Lip helped increase lip volume by 40 percent, improved hydration, reduced fine lines, and made lips softer. But keep in mind: These trails were completed by applying the product three times a day for 29 days straight, which isn't how most people are gonna use a lip plumper. However, I have been, unknowingly, applying lip products that contain Maxi-Lip daily for about two years. Reading over the results of the trials made me believe that my initial suspicion about Maxi-Lip permanently plumping my lips was correct—and every expert I spoke with confirmed it. 'Yes, Maxi-Lip can create a long-lasting visible enhancement that persists beyond each use, especially if you are applying it several times a day,' says dermatologist Maryam Saffaee, MD. Take my before-and-after as proof: Dr. Saffaee mentions that she regularly recommends products made with Maxi-Lip to patients who are seeking lip-filler alternatives as well as those hoping to reduce signs of aging on their lips. 'With regular application, Maxi-Lip can offer visible improvements in softness, shape, and fullness—making it an excellent anti-aging lip solution for daily use,' she says. Keep in mind that Maxi-Lip 'does not change the anatomy of the lip, but it allows you to maintain a steady collagen boosted state that can mimic a permanent look,' Dr. Saffaee adds. This means that regular Maxi-Lip application helps your lips continuously produce collagen, which results in a fuller, more voluminous appearance long term. Buuut if you want to make your cupid's bow look like Lana Del Rey's or make your lips more symmetrical, you'll need to make an appointment with a derm or plastic surgeon for filler unfortch. Now that I know that Maxi-Lip is pretty much a pain- and needle-free lip filler substitute, I'll never stop swiping on my favorite formulas. If you've been wanting fuller lips without spending a ton of money or, you know, getting jabbed, check out some of my go-to plumpers made with Maxi-Lip:$22.00 at at at at at at is a clean cosmetic chemist and founder of KKT Labs. She has developed formulas for brands like Peach & Lily, Kopari, Tower28, and more. Melissa Doft, MD, is a board-certified plastic surgeon and founder of Doft Plastic Surgery in New York. She specializes in surgical procedures as well as non-invasive treatments like Botox, lasers, and chemical peels. , MD, is a board-certified dermatologist based in Los Angeles. She takes a holistic approach to skincare, marrying skin health with internal wellness. Mary Honkus is a contributing beauty editor at Cosmopolitan with over seven years of experience researching, writing, and editing beauty stories, including rounding up the best wedding perfumes and testing out the most innovative at-home skin tools. She's an authority in all beauty categories, and particularly enjoys researching buzzy ingredients. After suspecting that Maxi-Lip may be the reason for her enhanced lip volume, she consulted with leading industry experts to learn all about the ingredient and give you a comprehensive understanding of how the ingredient functions. You Might Also Like Here's What NOT to Wear to a Wedding Meet the Laziest, Easiest Acne Routine You'll Ever Try
Time Magazine
2 hours ago
- Time Magazine
Are Pesticides in Your Food Harmful?
Various chemicals, from those in plastics to food additives, have made headlines lately for their potential roles in triggering diseases. Pesticides are unique among chemicals, though, says Melissa Perry, an environmental epidemiologist and dean of George Mason's College of Public Health. 'They're deliberately manufactured to kill things.' By poisoning weeds, pesticides clear the way for farmers' crops to thrive. But their deadly design may undermine human health, too. A recent report by a new federal advisory board, the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Commission chaired by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., calls for further investigation of pesticides' effects to determine if their use should be limited. Some evidence does suggest that long-term exposure could lead to cancer and several other serious health problems. More research is needed to better understand these risks, but in the meantime, experts recommend simple, practical steps to reduce intake. Here's what we know about the risks of pesticides and how to lower your exposure. Research on pesticide risks The MAHA report assesses 'root causes' of poor health in U.S. children. It describes pesticides as one of eight types of chemicals giving rise to chronic diseases. The report specifically takes issue with two weed killers, glyphosate and atrazine. They're the most commonly used pesticides by American farmers, and research has focused on them in lab experiments on animals, with several concerning findings. Other studies have drawn links between glyphosate exposure—mainly by consuming trace amounts in food—and health problems, including earlier death. In 2019, a large research review identified a 'compelling link' between glyphosate intake and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in humans, though in 2024 a federal judge criticized this study's design and approach. Additional research points to a range of diseases potentially related to glyphosate, but a recent review by Italian researchers on glyphosate was inconclusive and called for further research. Based on the evidence, the World Health Organization (WHO) has described glyphosate as 'probably carcinogenic to humans,' whereas the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) found 'no evidence that glyphosate causes cancer in humans,' citing a dataset the agency considered more thorough than WHO's. The second widespread pesticide highlighted by the MAHA report is atrazine. Like glyphosate, it's been used by farmers since the 1960s, but research on animals in the 1990s began to show it could disrupt reproductive health and hormone regulation. Tyrone B. Hayes, a biologist at the University of California, Berkeley, found that atrazine interfered with the sexual development of frogs. Subsequent studies showed similar effects, as well as weight gain, in mice. Researchers have also observed that women in certain agricultural communities experience higher rates of abnormal menstrual cycles, compared to places with fewer farms. Other human studies show increases in several kinds of birth defects. Still more research links atrazine to breast cancer, but researchers at the National Institutes of Health have concluded 'no evidence of an association' with cancer. The EPA estimated that atrazine adversely affects 54% of all species and 50% of all critical habitats. 'I don't know how an Environmental Protection Agency can make a statement like that and then re-register the chemical,' Hayes says. In 2023, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) data showed that 99% of food samples tested below the EPA's safety limit for pesticides. However, U.S. limits are considerably higher than what's allowed in the European Union, where atrazine has been effectively banned. Pesticides called organophosphates have been studied by the EPA and others for links to neurological disorders such as ADHD. 'Research clearly shows that children exposed to higher levels did have more neurobehavioral problems,' says Jason Richardson, professor of physiology and pharmacology at the University of Georgia's Isakson Center for Neurological Disease Research. Overall, uncertainty and debate about pesticides continues partly due to research challenges. People are typically exposed to multiple types of chemicals, so it's 'hard to attribute disease to one pesticide or pinpoint the definitive dose or exposure time' that makes people sick, Perry says. 'Just because a chemical is present doesn't mean it's doing anything bad, but in combination with other chemicals, it may be,' Richardson says. 'Efforts are underway to measure these combinations.' 'The country's agricultural policy follows science, not fear, speculation, and fringe narratives,' says Becky Langer-Curry, director of innovation at the National Corn Growers Association. The Corn Growers were 'perplexed' by the MAHA report, she adds. 'We need faith in the EPA's regulatory system to review the science. They're ensuring our food is safe, well below human risk.' In an email to EPA spokesperson Mike Bastasch said the EPA'typically regulates pesticides at least 100 times lower than where no adverse effects are seen in safety studies.' The agency is 'confident that the fruits and vegetables our children are eating are safer than ever,' Bastasch wrote. However, he added that the EPA is updating its evaluation of glyphosate's cancer-causing potential, and it's currently working on an Updated Mitigation Proposal for atrazine. In the meantime, researchers including Perry, Richardson, and Hayes think pesticides are dangerous enough that people should take precautions—but especially young kids, people who are pregnant, those who live close to farms, agricultural workers, and seniors. How to learn more about your exposure The first step is to become aware of pesticides in your environment. They're more common than people think, Perry says. 'Exposures happen routinely for most members of the American public.' Experts recommend contacting the environmental office of your county or city to learn whether you're close to a food production facility that uses pesticides. In 2017, kids and teachers at a Hawaii middle school reported unusual throat irritation and dizziness. They suspected the symptoms were caused by pesticides applied in nearby fields, and researchers found residues in the school's indoor and outdoor air samples. The detected levels were deemed below concerning thresholds. Bastasch says that, for communities near farms, the EPA studies potential exposure through the air and other pathways to make sure safety levels are based on sound science. Still, Hayes worries about the long-term effects of pesticide contact and absorption. 'For someone living in a farming community that's constantly exposed to estrogen mimics like atrazine, you're more likely to develop adverse effects,' he says. People take in atrazine mainly through their drinking water, after farm runoff carries the pesticide into local water systems. But some utilities are more effective than others at removing pesticide residues. The Environmental Working Group rates local water utilities. For people on well water, the federal government provides guidelines for testing it. Use a water filter Pesticide use is widespread enough—and disperses at such distances—that everyone should probably use a high-quality water filter, experts say. Atrazine can travel as far as 600 miles, Hayes says. As far back as 1999, USGS noticed that pesticides, including atrazine, were detected in places where farmers hadn't applied them. Even for residents of areas where a water treatment plant removes the chemicals, buying a filter certified to the NSF/ANSI Standards 42 and 53 provides some additional assurance of water safety. Look for filters in refrigerators and water pitchers that meet this certification. Buy organic Eating organic foods can also help to reduce intake of pesticides, especially glyphosate. About 90% of pregnant women have detectable amounts of glyphosate in their bodies, according to one study. 'But when you put people on organic diets, you start to see that they no longer have pesticides in their urine,' Perry says. Research in 2020 found that eating an organic diet dropped glyphosate levels by 70% in children and their parents. In 2023, researchers put pregnant women on an organic diet for one week. Those who went all-organic decreased glyphosate in their urine by 43%. A 2019 study found a 95% reduction in organophosphates. Wash and peel Richardson calls these studies on organic foods 'intriguing' while noting that natural compounds used in organic farming may also be toxic beyond certain thresholds. Even when eating organic, 'make sure you wash your fruits and vegetables very well,' he says. One study found that soaking apples in baking soda mixed with water for 12-15 minutes eliminated more residue than water alone. However, according to another study, washing produce with running water is superior to baking soda, sitting water, and vinegar. Other research shows a gentle rubbing action during washing is effective. Aim for 20-30 seconds or longer if you have time. Peeling the skin and outer pulp will get rid of additional residue that penetrates into some produce. There's a major downside, though: you lose a portion of the beneficial nutrients and compounds, like fiber and vitamins, that help protect against pesticide toxicity. Some research suggests that replacing processed foods with diverse whole foods can reduce how many pesticides you ingest (but some research suggests there may be fewer benefits if they're not organic). Exercise and manage stress Aside from nutrition, other lifestyle behaviors such as exercise, stress management, and good sleep may build a baseline of health that helps thwart the cumulative effects of pesticides and other pollutants. Overall, they influence how someone's body responds to their ' exposome,' Richardson explains—your total environmental exposures and how they interact with lifestyle behaviors and risk factors like age and genetics. Bastasch says the EPA assesses the combined risks of groups of pesticides that affect the body in similar ways, adding that the agency is continuing to advance research in this area. The exposome probably matters more than any one chemical type, but 'we're really just breaking the surface of understanding these interactions,' Richardson says. Until more definitive science emerges, maintain smart practices like scrubbing produce and striving for a healthy lifestyle.
