Secret North Korea base uncovered which can strike US with nuclear ballistic missiles
A secret military base has popped up on North Korea's border with China - which could harbour its world-ending ballistic missiles.
The base, which is in North Pyongan Province, is 17 miles from the Chinese border. The existence of the structure was exposed by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in a paper published on Wednesday.
It's thought the covert site was built in 2004, but was used as an operational military site around 10 years later. Using a mix of satellite imagery and declassified documents, CSIS was able to expose the site as a military base, which is thought to harbour six to nine warhead-wielding ICBMs.
The site, which is around the size of JFK airport in New York, could also hold launchers and the trucks that have been adapted to transport them. Analysts have warned the site is especially dangerous because there are no launch pads or air-defence systems.
They believe this means the site contains solid-fuel ICBMs which can be launched far more quickly than their counterparts. It means they're difficult to detect and even harder to carry out a pre-emptive strike.
The CSIS has gone so far to say the weapons "pose a potential nuclear threat to East Asia and the continental United States". There are at least 15 undeclared missile sites across the country, according to reports, including missile bases and warhead depots. CSIS analysts say this is the first confirmation of the site in Sinpung-dong.
Current estimates suggest North Korea has an arsenal of 50 nuclear warheads and enough material to build 50 more. The fear is that this base could deploy the warheads to other parts of the country from where they would be fired.
Victor Cha, co-author of the report, said North Korea chose the location, which is close to the Chinese border, to make it more difficult for US planes to destroy it.
Kim Jong-un has recently called for a "rapid expansion" of North Korea's nuclear program. The study says the discovery of the base is part of the country's evolving strategy regarding ballistic missiles.
It comes a week after Russian President Vladimir Putin did a deal with North Korean despot Kim Jong-un to recruit another 6,000 troops for his war in Ukraine.
Ukrainian intelligence believes Kim Jong-un agreed to sell Putin another 100 tanks and even more armoured personnel carriers to bolster his assault on the frontline.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
JD Vance admits provocative words he said to Volodymyr Zelensky at tense White House visit
JD Vance says his words to Volodymyr Zelensky were merely an "ice breaker" - but they could be seen as extremely provocative JD Vance has admitted he greeted Volodymyr Zelensky with a provocative greeting when he arrived for his second visit to the White House this week. The second visit to Washington by Ukraine's president on Monday cleared the low bar of not ending up in a complete Oval Office meltdown. His first visit, back in February, saw Vance angrily berating him in front of the media, demanding he be more grateful for American support in the conflict. But it all could have gone very wrong, if Zelensky had risen to the implicit threat in Vance's "icebreaker" moment. "So President Zelensky walked into the oval office," he told Fox News. "I was chatting with him, with the President, with some of the senior Ukrainian delegation. "I said: 'Mr President, so long as you behave, I won't say anything.'" Vance added that Zelensky had "sort of chuckled a little bit and it was a good little ice breaker." While Vance insists it was merely an ice breaker, given the unprecedented blowup in the Oval Office - provoked largely by himself - during Zelensky's previous visit, his words could easily have been seen as provocative or threatening. Vance went on to say Europe should "carry the burden" and take the "lion's share" of the responsibility for safeguarding Ukraine. And Defence Undersecretary for Policy, Eldridge Colby said last night that American involvement in future peacekeeping missions would be "minimal." Following March's unpleasant spectacle, Vance and Donald Trump were branded "Putin's useful idiots" by the Vice President's own cousin. Nate Vance, the vice-president's cousin, who has reportedly fought for Ukraine in the conflict with Russia, accused Trump and Vance of 'ambushing' Zelensky in order to "placate" Putin. Get Donald Trump updates straight to your WhatsApp! As the world attempts to keep up with Trump's antics, the Mirror has launched its very own US Politics WhatsApp community where you'll get all the latest news from across the pond. We'll send you the latest breaking updates and exclusives all directly to your phone. Users must download or already have WhatsApp on their phones to join in. All you have to do to join is click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! We may also send you stories from other titles across the Reach group. We will also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose Exit group. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Speaking to Le Figaro, Vance said: ' Donald Trump and my cousin clearly believe they can placate Vladimir Putin. They are wrong. The Russians are not about to forget our support for Ukraine." Nate, who returned to the United States in January, continued: 'We are Vladimir Putin's useful idiots." The Vice President's cousin apparently travelled to Ukraine just three weeks after the country was invaded in February 2022 and enlisted in the 'Da Vinci Wolves' battalion, which saw action in some of the conflict's bloodiest battles to date.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Putin stalls peace talks as Russia pounds Ukrainian targets
Vladimir Putin is dusting off his stalling and delaying tactics playbook as peace talks with Ukraine falter and Russia continues to build up troops on the frontline and pound Ukrainian targets. In the space of just a few days, Putin has questioned Volodymyr Zelensky's legitimacy and made, then changed, major demands over Ukraine's security guarantees, all while his forces continue to pound targets and rally on Ukraine's Southern Front. According to Zelensky, Russian forces are building up troops along the southern front line in the Zaporizhzhia region, which Moscow claims as its own. 'Zaporizhzhia: the enemy is reinforcing,' Zelensky said, adding that: 'We can see that they continue transferring part of their troops from the Kursk direction to Zaporizhzhia.' And overnight, Russia launched its biggest barrage of missiles and drones in weeks, killing one and leaving many wounded. The latest cross-border fire follows Trump's flurry of diplomacy this month aimed at ending the war. The US president met Putin in Alaska, before bringing Zelensky and European leaders to Washington for separate talks. Russia has played down the prospect of a summit between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Zelensky any time soon, and has said it wants to be included in discussions on future security guarantees for Ukraine. Putin repeatedly said he is ready to meet Zelensky, but there are some issues that need to be resolved before such a meeting could happen, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said today. Putin has questioned the legitimacy of Zelensky due to the postponement of elections in Ukraine due to the war. Lavrov said the legitimacy issue would have to be resolved before Moscow could sign any document with Kyiv. Just yesterday, Russia also took issue with security guarantees for Ukraine, claiming that any attempt to solve issues of security without Moscow were 'a road to nowhere.' Lavrov said at a press conference: 'We cannot agree with the fact that now it is proposed to resolve questions of security, collective security, without the Russian Federation. This will not work. 'I'm sure that in the West and above all in the United States they understand perfectly well that seriously discussing security issues without the Russian Federation is a utopia, it's a road to nowhere.' To top it off, Lavrov later upped the ante and claimed China also needed a say in the matter , once again moving the goalposts and forcing the West to recalculate its negotiating strategy and tactics. He said Ukraine's security guarantees 'should be provided on an equal basis with the participation of countries such as China, the United States, the UK and France'. He claimed the terms are based on those Moscow tried to force Kyiv into signing in Istanbul in April 2022, two months after their invasion. Those terms effectively meant none of the guarantors would be allowed to defend Ukraine from Russia unless they all agreed, including China and Russia. Zelensky said today in response that he did not want China playing a role in guaranteeing Ukraine's security following Russia's invasion, citing Beijing's support for Moscow. 'First, China did not help us stop this war from the start. Second, China assisted Russia by opening its drone market... We do not need guarantors who do not help Ukraine and did not help Ukraine at the time when we really needed it,' Zelensky said in comments released to reporters including AFP on Thursday. The stalling comes after Russia launched hundreds of drones and missiles against Ukraine overnight in the biggest barrage since mid-July, killing one person and wounding many others. Zelensky said several missiles were aimed at a US-owned business in western Ukraine 'producing everyday items like coffee machines'. Fifteen people were injured in that strike. Ukrainian officials said that the strikes showed Russia was not serious about a peace deal despite intensive diplomatic efforts led by US President Donald Trump. 'The Russians carried out this attack as if nothing has changed at all, as if there are no global efforts to stop this war,' Zelensky said. 'This requires a response. There is still no signal from Moscow that they truly intend to engage in substantive negotiations and end this war,' he said. Ukraine's air force said Russia launched 574 drones and 40 missiles. Air defense units downed 546 drones and 31 missiles. 'One person was killed and two were wounded as a result of the combined UAV and cruise missile strike in Lviv,' said Maksym Kozytskyi, head of the military administration in the western city's region. 'Dozens of residential buildings were damaged,' he added. The 15 people were wounded in the city of Mukachevo, near the border with Hungary and Slovakia, the city council said. 'Five patients are being treated in the hospital, and one more was transferred to the regional hospital,' the council posted. Western Ukraine is less frequently targeted by Russian forces, which have captured swathes of southern and eastern Ukraine in an invasion which began in 2022. Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiga said there was 'no military logic or necessity' to the strikes, saying they were 'just terror against people'. Meanwhile, Russia's defense ministry said it destroyed '49 Ukrainian aircraft-type unmanned aerial vehicles' across multiple regions. The ministry did not detail any casualties or damage. Putin's stalling appears to be just the latest instance of deploying a stalling tactic during talks about the future of Ukraine. Earlier this year, when Russia and Ukraine were set to meet in Turkey, Putin failed to confirm his attendance of the talks that were, at that point, the highest level discussion between the two nations. Instead, he sent a second-tier delegation to Istanbul to speak with Zelensky and his team on his behalf. The highest level official in attendance at the Istanbul talks was Vladimir Medinsky, one of Putin's aides, slowing down the negotiation process. Putin's meeting with Trump in Alaska last week appeared to highlight exactly why he and the Kremlin were keen to use stalling as a diplomatic tactic. The Russian despot said that the 'root causes' of the conflict needed to be addressed in order to achieve lasting peace. These so-called 'root causes' include Ukraine becoming a neutral territory, giving up land in the east, hugely reducing the size and capability of its military and abandoning its aim to join NATO. Analysts slammed Putin for the underhanded tactics seen this week and previously. Philippe Dickinson, a former UK diplomat who works with the Atlantic Council, described last week's Alaska summit as: 'The treading water summit.' He added: 'With little seemingly achieved, this was nobody's worst-case scenario. Putin got to share the stage with the president of the United States and proffer enough flattery and meaningless talk of respecting Ukrainian security to stave off further immediate sanctions and economic pressure.' Tatiana Stanovaya, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Centre, meanwhile said it was unlikely Putin would meet with Zelensky unless he all but gives up. 'Putin will not meet Zelenskyy under the current circumstances. He has repeatedly stated that such a meeting would only be possible if there were well-prepared grounds, which in practice means Zelenskyy's acceptance of Russia's terms for ending the war', she said. Dickinson said that the only way for the West to respond was with 'strength and pressure'.
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
British troops could uphold a ceasefire in Ukraine and keep Europe safe - Alex Cole-Hamilton
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Picture: Carl Court/PA Wire Over Easter this year, at an army base in the forests of Western Ukraine I met a Greek Orthodox Chaplain named Father Taras. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... He has served for 10 years on the eastern front since Russia's initial incursion into Eastern Ukraine and as a man of God, he has never carried a gun. I asked him if many soldiers at the front attended his services, to which he replied, 'Not really, mostly they just want me to hear their confession, because they think they're going to die.' Such is the weary resignation of the armed forces of Ukraine. They are prepared to hold out to the last so that they might preserve the freedom and the territorial integrity of the country that they love. They are fighting for all of us. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad On Monday, I watched Volodymyr Zelensky's artful redux of his Oval Office meeting with Donald Trump. Considering the outrageous way in which he was treated the last time he was given an audience there, he handled himself impeccably. On the horizon, however, is the prospect of a meeting less palatable even than the bullies of the Oval Office. A trilateral sit down with Trump and Vladimir Putin himself. So far Zelensky has greeted that possibility with real poise, but the prospect of being forced to shake hands and sit down with the Butcher of Bucha and Irpin, the man in whose name countless battlefield atrocities have been committed, nightly air raids on civilian targets have been perpetrated and in whose name thousands of Ukrainian children were kidnapped, must be utterly repellent. But if military victory is beyond reach for either side, then this can only be ended through diplomacy. And by necessity, such meetings must take place. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The challenge of finding a deal that is agreeable to each party in terms of where the new Russia-Ukraine border should lie, the prisoner exchanges, the return of kidnapped children, is astronomical. It is when it comes to the maintenance of a just and lasting peace that Britain's role really matters. Ukraine was given security assurances by the West in 1994 when it first became an independent state and was beseeched by the international community to give up its stockpile of nuclear weapons. Those assurances turned to ash on the morning of 24th February 2022 when Russia launched its full scale assault. Zelensky and the Ukrainians can only be expected to stop fighting with a new kind of guarantee. One such proposal would be for a "Coalition of the Willing", made up of Ukraine's allies, to send troops to be garrisoned on the Ukrainian border to uphold the new frontier. This is a long way from sending troops into battle against Russia - the Ukrainians have done an excellent job of that without us - but it would involve us playing a role in keeping the peace, locking in the support of international allies and ensuring that Putin is not minded to chance his arm again. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad All of this feels like a tall order, but given that Ukraine managing to reclaim all its lost territory on the battlefield seems a long shot, it appears that some kind of compromise may regrettably be where we end up. I'm not giving up on outright victory for Ukraine, I would dearly like to see both the EU and America use their full economic might to bring Putin to heel, but short of that, and to secure a reprieve for Father Taras and the brave soldiers of Ukraine, any kind of settlement must be underwritten with the military protection of Britain and her allies.
