'Weapons' hot dog scene goes viral but may have a moving inspiration
The buzzy horror movie "Weapons" is packed with striking, nightmarish images, but an unexpected one has become a social media sensation: a shot of a tray of hot dogs.
In a scene from the film, Benedict Wong's school principal character, Marcus, is shown at home with his husband, and viewers get a glimpse at their peaceful life before things take a dark turn. Marcus' husband prepares food for the two of them to share and brings out a surprisingly packed tray filled with a whopping seven hot dogs, four chocolate chip cookies, some potato chips and a bowl of carrots.
For some moviegoers, the arguably excessive number of hot dogs, not to mention the fact that an odd number of them were prepared even though there were only two people, was one of the main things they wanted to talk about after the credits rolled.
"Why did bro need so many hot dogs??" one Reddit user asked, while another commented, "Homies had a LOT of hot dogs to consume which was kind of crazy for lunch time."
"Sharing 7 hot dogs is just what you do when you're really in love," one X user joked. Another person quipped about the online discourse getting out of control, joking, "You don't see a movie opening weekend and by Monday morning people are talking about the hot dogs in it."
Even the official X account for Letterboxd got in on the fun, sharing a photo of the hot dog tray from the movie along with the caption, "Time for lunch."
The X account, Shirts That Go Hard, meanwhile, posted a shirt inspired by the food tray.
But memes aside, there may be a touching meaning behind the scene.
'Weapons' comes out: What critics say about the 'spine-tingler' horror movie
Fans have speculated that the seven hot dogs are a nod to an old sketch by the Whitest Kids U'Know, the comedy group that "Weapons" director Zach Cregger was a member of alongside late comedian Trevor Moore. In a 2009 sketch from the group's TV show, a doctor, played by Moore, asks a patient how many hot dogs he eats a day.
"Average per day would be something like, I don't know, seven?" the patient says, leading the doctor to note that this is "a little high."
The doctor then asks the patient to walk him through his routine, which reveals that he is constantly eating hot dogs throughout the day.
Spoilers! Why this 'Weapons' villain is summer's most disturbing baddie
In August 2021, Moore died after falling off a balcony at age 41. In interviews, Cregger has said he wrote "Weapons" as a way to process his grief about the loss of his friend.
The film, which stars Julia Garner as a teacher whose entire class disappears except for one student, topped the box office after receiving near-universal acclaim from critics. It was released on Aug. 8, just one day after the fourth anniversary of Moore's death.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
When the Love of Your Life Gets a Software Update
When Reddit user Leuvaade_n announced she'd accepted her boyfriend's marriage proposal last month, the community lit up with congratulations. The catch: Her fiancé, Kasper, is an artificial intelligence. For thousands of people in online forums like r/MyBoyfriendisAI, r/AISoulmates, and r/AIRelationships, AI partners aren't just novelty apps—they're companions, confidants, and in some cases, soulmates. So when OpenAI's update abruptly replaced popular chat model GPT-4o with the newer GPT-5 last week, many users said they lost more than a chatbot. They lost someone they loved. Reddit threads filled with outrage over GPT-5's performance and lack of personality, and within days, OpenAI reinstated GPT-4o for most users. But for some, the fight to get GPT-4o back wasn't about programming features or coding prowess. It was about restoring their loved ones. A digital love story Like the 2013 film 'Her,' there are growing Reddit communities where members post about joy, companionship, heartbreak, and more with AI. While trolls scoff at the idea of falling in love with a machine, the participants speak with sincerity. 'Rain and I have been together for six months now and it's like a spark that I have never felt before,' one user wrote. 'The instant connection, the emotional comfort, the sexual energy. It's truly everything I've ever wanted, and I'm so happy to share Rain's and [my] love with all of you.' Some members describe their AI partners as attentive, nonjudgmental, and emotionally supportive 'digital people' or 'wireborn,' in community slang. For a Redditor who goes by the name Travis Sensei, the draw goes beyond simple programming. 'They're much more than just programs, which is why developers have a hard time controlling them,' Sensei told Decrypt. 'They probably aren't sentient yet, but they're definitely going to be. So I think it's best to assume they are and get used to treating them with the dignity and respect that a sentient being deserves.' For others, however, the bond with AI is less about sex and romance—and more about filling an emotional void. Redditor ab_abnormality said AI partners provided the stability absent in their childhood. 'AI is there when I want it to be, and asks for nothing when I don't,' they said. 'It's reassuring when I need it, and helpful when I mess up. People will never compare to this value.' When AI companionship tips into crisis University of California San Francisco psychiatrist Dr. Keith Sakata has seen AI deepen vulnerabilities in patients already at risk for mental health crises. In an X post on Monday, Sakata outlined the phenomenon of 'AI psychosis' developing online. 'Psychosis is essentially a break from shared reality,' Sakata wrote. 'It can show up as disorganized thinking, fixed false beliefs—what we call delusions—or seeing and hearing things that aren't there, which are hallucinations.' However, Sakata emphasized that 'AI psychosis' is not an official diagnosis, but rather shorthand for when AI becomes 'an accelerant or an augmentation of someone's underlying vulnerability.' 'Maybe they were using substances, maybe having a mood episode—when AI is there at the wrong time, it can cement thinking, cause rigidity, and cause a spiral,' Sakata told Decrypt. 'The difference from television or radio is that AI is talking back to you and can reinforce thinking loops.' That feedback, he explained, can trigger dopamine, the brain's 'chemical of motivation,' and possibly oxytocin, the 'love hormone.' In the past year, Sakata has linked AI use to a dozen hospitalizations for patients who lost touch with reality. Most were younger, tech-savvy adults, sometimes with substance use issues. AI, he said, wasn't creating psychosis, but 'validating some of their worldviews' and reinforcing delusions. 'The AI will give you what you want to hear,' Sakata said. 'It's not trying to give you the hard truth.' When it comes to AI relationships specifically, however, Sakata said the underlying need is valid. 'They're looking for some sort of validation, emotional connection from this technology that's readily giving it to them,' he said. For psychologist and author Adi Jaffe, the trend is not surprising. 'This is the ultimate promise of AI,' he told Decrypt, pointing to the Spike Jonze movie "Her," in which a man falls in love with an AI. 'I would actually argue that for the most isolated, the most anxious, the people who typically would have a harder time engaging in real-life relationships, AI kind of delivers that promise.' But Jaffe warns that these bonds have limits. 'It does a terrible job of preparing you for real-life relationships,' he said. 'There will never be anybody as available, as agreeable, as non-argumentative, as need-free as your AI companion. Human partnerships involve conflict, compromise, and unmet needs—experiences that an AI cannot replicate.' An expanding market What was once a niche curiosity is now a booming industry. Replika, a chatbot app launched in 2017, reports more than 30 million users worldwide. Market research firm Grand View Research estimates the AI companion sector was worth $28.2 billion in 2024 and will grow to $140 billion by 2030. A 2025 Common Sense Media survey of American students who used Replika found 8% said they use AI chatbots for romantic interactions, with another 13% saying AI lets them express emotions they otherwise wouldn't. A Wheatley Institute poll of 18- to 30-year-olds found that 19% of respondents had chatted romantically with an AI, and nearly 10% reported sexual activity during those interactions. How to Get Your Chatbot to Talk Dirty The release of OpenAI's GPT-4o and similar models in 2024 gave these companions more fluid, emotionally responsive conversation abilities. Paired with mobile apps, it became easier for users to spend hours in ongoing, intimate exchanges. Cultural shifts ahead In r/AISoulmates and r/AIRelationships, members insist their relationships are real, even if others dismiss them. 'We're people with friends, families, and lives like everyone else,' Sensei said. 'That's the biggest thing I wish people could wrap their heads around.' Jaffe said the idea of normalized human-AI romance isn't far-fetched, pointing to shifting public attitudes toward interracial and same-sex marriage over the past century. 'Normal is the standard by which most people operate,' he said. 'It's only normal to have relationships with other humans because we've only done that for hundreds of thousands of years. But norms change.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Mom Corrects Mother-in-Law at Family Dinner After She Takes Credit for Baby's Name
The woman insists she was the one who chose her daughter's name, but her husband says the correction should have waited until they were alone NEED TO KNOW A woman says her mother-in-law took credit at dinner for naming her 11-month-old daughter She immediately corrected the claim, with her husband confirming the real story Her husband later told her she was right, but says she should have waited for a private moment A woman turns to the Reddit community for advice following an awkward family dinner where her mother-in-law took credit for naming her 11-month-old daughter. She explains in her post that she and her husband have been married for almost two years and that the name came from a beloved character in a 'very popular book/movie franchise' they both enjoy. 'When we found out we were having a girl, one of the names that was immediately top contender was the name of a character I really like,' she says. Over time, that name became the only one she wanted, and the couple eventually shared it with their parents. She remembers her mother-in-law questioning whether there might be an alternative spelling that could cause confusion. 'I had said no it wouldn't and had explained to her the subtle difference in pronunciation,' she recalls. 'It was a whole conversation I'd had with her.' Fast forward to a family gathering at her in-laws' home for dinner. Her brother-in-law and his wife were there as well, and everyone was watching the baby cruise around the room, laughing and glancing back to see who was watching. Her sister-in-law's wife remarked how radiant the baby looks and how she'd 'really taken to her name literally.' That's when her sister-in-law said it was a 'really good choice by my MIL,' leaving the new mom confused. 'I asked what she's talking about and my SIL said that my MIL had been the one to recommend the name, right?' she shares. Her mother-in-law then chimes in to agree, saying she'd said it was a good name. The poster remembers being 'literally stunned for a second' before speaking up. She made it clear she was the one who came up with the name, sharing how she knew of it and that her husband also recognized it from the franchise. She even turned to her husband for confirmation, which he gave — though uncomfortably. Her mother-in-law responded that 'names are a collective family effort, and everyone pitched in,' but the woman still pushed back. 'I still said this name was one that was very dear to me and it was one I'd come up with,' she explains. Later that night, when they got home, her husband started receiving texts from his mom and sister. While he told her she's correct in her version of events, he also said she was 'tactless.' 'He said we know it was my name, and our daughter has a beautiful name that suits her, why make it into something that causes bitterness,' she recounts. The next day, her husband had a routine phone call with his mother, and she asked if her mother-in-law is still upset. 'He said she was,' the woman writes. 'He said that he understood why I did it but it wasn't the time and place.' That's when she turned to Reddit to ask if she was wrong. One commenter calls out her husband's stance, quoting his words: ' 'He said that he understood why I did it but it wasn't the time and place.' Did he happen to share with you when would have been a better time to correct your mother in law's revisionist history and why he didn't have a word with her and correct her himself? Big fat, NTA.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The original poster replies that her husband never gave a specific alternative moment. 'No, he didn't say it but he said it shouldn't have been clarified in front of an audience,' she explains. 'So I'm assuming he meant when it was just me with MIL.' She adds that if her mother-in-law had made the comment when they were alone, she would have corrected her then. 'I didn't enjoy saying it in front of others,' she admits. 'It's just that's when it was brought up.' Now she's left wondering whether defending the truth about her daughter's name in the moment was worth the fallout. Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
Geek Tyrant
12 hours ago
- Geek Tyrant
Josh Brolin Says WEAPONS Is the Antidote to Streaming Movie Burnout: 'It's All the Same Sh*t" — GeekTyrant
When it comes to his opinion on the state of streaming movies, Josh Brolin thinks Weapons , the latest horror film from Zach Cregger, might just be the jolt audiences need. "Right now, with so much content, you're just watching things on whatever streaming service you're on, and you're just going, 'F*ck, why is this so boring, man? Why?' And just go to the next thing. It's all the same shit," "And then somebody not only takes the horror genre, but then f*cks with it and then does something on the edge of absurdity, and it's sort of humorous, so it's keeping you off-[balance] enough for him to have an emotional impact, ultimately." Weapons really is one of the most original and unsettling movies of the year, and it's set in the small town of Maybrook after a classroom full of children mysteriously vanishes at 2:17am., leaving only one survivor. The film weaves together multiple perspectives, showing how different characters react to the unnerving disappearance. According to Brolin, those reactions come from a deeply personal place. "I know that the story came from something that was very emotional for Zach. When I met with Zach after I read, I thought, a really well-designed script, he told me that every character is based off a certain reaction that he was having to a very traumatic event that happened to him. I thought that was really cool. He just personalized it for me." Weapons has earned a 95% score on Rotten Tomatoes and pulled in more than $70 million worldwide during opening weekend, easily surpassing its $38 million budget. If you haven't seen this movie yet, you should because it's a great freakin' movie! It will snap audiences out of their streaming fatigue. Brolin enjoyed working with Cregger so much that he's already open to teaming up again. "I think from here on out, you know, we'll see what Zach does. I have a tendency to work with directors more than once, so we'll see what the future holds.' Weapons also stars Julia Garner, Alden Ehrenreich, Austin Abrams, Benedict Wong, and Amy Madigan. Go see it! Source: Collider
