
‘Tories are not listening': Ed Davey sure Lib Dems can woo more disgruntled voters
In a converted shed near Stratford-upon-Avon, the Liberal Democrat leader was joking with photographers as he made chocolate truffles alongside Manuela Perteghella, his party's MP for the formerly true-blue constituency.
The council, Warwickshire, is also about as Conservative as it gets, and currently has 41 Tory councillors out of 57. But privately, Lib Dem activists say it could move into no overall control next week.
'I think it feels even better than the general election,' Davey said, truffles cooling in a fridge before he headed off for some door-knocking. And this, remember, was the Lib Dems' best general election for a century, in which – helped in part by Davey's succession of camera-friendly stunts – the party won 72 seats, mostly from the Conservatives.
With much of the focus before the local elections on Reform UK's rise and the impact this could have on Labour, the Lib Dems have just been, as one party strategist called it, 'getting on with the job'.
Part of this is the sheer graft so admired by Farage that he wants to use it as a model for Reform, with 500,000 doors knocked on during March, and 1m leaflets delivered before election spending limits kicked in.
But also to the Lib Dems' advantage is that many of next Thursday's battles take place in traditionally Conservative counties, where the Tories won heavily amid the brief if spectacular Boris Johnson vaccine bounce of 2021, the last time they were contested.
According to Davey, the general election trend of less ideologically minded Conservative voters fleeing a party they see as overly weighted towards populism and culture wars has shown no signs of slowing under Badenoch.
'People who were lifelong Conservatives haven't forgiven them, they're not impressed by the leader, and some are put off by this talk of some sort of arrangement with Reform,' he said.
Things are not entirely the same as they were last July, however. One paradox of the spectacular general election result is that in some places, including Warwickshire, the Lib Dems have reversed their usual tactic of patiently building up a mass of councillors before making a tilt at the parliamentary seat.
Instead, as in Warwickshire, they hope to use a surprise parliamentary win – Perteghella overcame a 20,000 Conservative majority to win by 7,000 votes – to create momentum for the council.
Plus there is the advent of some early Lib Dem-Reform battles, notably for the new mayoralty in Hull and East Yorkshire. While Davey is making no predictions, he is scornful about Farage's success thus far in building up a Lib Dem-style on-the-ground army.
'This is just anecdotal, but Reform have tried door-knocking one or two places, and they got such a hostile reception from quite a lot of doors, they quickly give up. So they're not fighting the campaign that we do.'
But the bulk of the party's targets of councils to potentially win – Oxfordshire, Cambridgeshire, Devon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire – or to make gains, such as Warwickshire, Buckinghamshire and Hertfordshire, are still mainly in the once Tory-loyal commuter belt areas loosely known as the 'blue wall'.
Davey, who gets recognised more regularly on doorsteps after his bungee jumping and water sliding of the general election, faces a Conservative party that seems vastly more focused on tackling Reform than trying to win back the voters and seats taken by the Lib Dems.
Asked if he is surprised at this, Davey said: 'Well, not really, given the MPs they've got. All the moderate Conservatives, the liberal conservatives, one-nation Conservatives, pro-European Conservatives, they've all gone.'
In their place are people such as Badenoch, who memorably dismissed the Lib Dems as people who spurn social media to instead focus on 'fixing their church roof', a quote party insiders delightedly say could not have been phrased better if they had written it themselves.
'The Conservatives are in a bit of a bubble, aren't they?' Davey said. 'They're talking to themselves. They're certainly not listening to the public. It's the fact that they inhabit an X-sphere, if you like, a Twitter-sphere.'
While some Tories argue that a pact with Reform would instantly give this new rightwing block a combined vote share well over 40%, Lib Dem insiders say they are unworried, saying any deal would make the Conservatives even more toxic to many voters, and inspire fervent tactical voting to keep them out.
'They will decide what they want to do about a pact, but I think there would be a huge number of traditional Conservatives who would be appalled at that process,' Davey said. 'I think they would look round for a different home, and see the Liberal Democrats as that home.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
Rayner claims Reform will ‘fail women' as she weighs in on online safety row
Nigel Farage and Reform UK risk 'failing a generation of young women' if they scrap online safety laws aimed at preventing revenge porn, Angela Rayner has said. The Deputy Prime Minister demanded Mr Farage explain how his party would keep young women safe when they use the internet, after Reform vowed to repeal the Online Safety Act. Her warning is the latest intervention in a row between senior Labour figures and Mr Farage's party over the Act. Under new rules introduced through the legislation at the end of July, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children from accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. Reform has vowed to repeal the law and replace it with a different means of protecting children online, though the party has not said how it would do this. Among their criticisms of the Act, Mr Farage and his colleagues have cited freedom of speech concerns and claimed the Act is an example of overreach by the Government. This prompted backlash from Technology Secretary Peter Kyle, who claimed people like Jimmy Savile would use the internet to exploit children if he was still alive, and insisted anyone against the Act – like Mr Farage – was 'on their side'. The Reform leader demanded an apology, but ministers have been trenchant in their defence of the Act. Now, the Deputy Prime Minister has questioned how Mr Farage would seek to prevent the 'devastating crime' of intimate image abuse, also known as 'revenge porn', without the Online Safety Act's protections. Ms Rayner claimed: 'Nigel Farage risks failing a generation of young women with his dangerous and irresponsible plans to scrap online safety laws. 'Scrapping safeguards and having no viable alternative plan in place to halt the floodgates of abuse that could open is an appalling dereliction of duty. It's time for Farage to tell women and girls across Britain how he would keep them safe online.' Under the Online Safety Act, revenge porn is classified among the 'most severe online offences', the Deputy PM added. Citing figures from the charity Refuge, the Labour Party claimed a million young women had been subject to revenge porn: either intimate images being shared, or the threat of this. Some 3.4 million adults in total, both men and women, have been affected, Labour also said. Ministers have previously had to defend the Online Safety Act against accusations from Elon Musk's X social media site that it is threatening free speech. In a post at the start of August titled 'What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach', the platform formerly known as Twitter outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK regulators. The Government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate. Mr Farage has meanwhile suggested there is a 'tech answer' for protecting children online, but neither he nor the Government have outlined one. He also suggested children are too easily able to avoid new online age verification rules by using VPNs (virtual private networks), which allow them to circumvent the rules by masking their identity and location. When Reform UK was approached for comment, its Westminster councillor Laila Cunningham said: 'Women are more unsafe than ever before thanks to Labour. Starmer has released thousands of criminals back onto the streets early with no regard for women's safety. 'I am calling on Jess Phillips to debate me on women's safety – she ignored the grooming gangs scandal and now she's wilfully deceiving voters on this issue. 'Reform will always prioritise prosecuting abuse but will never let women's safety be hijacked to justify censorship. 'You don't protect women by silencing speech. You protect them by securing borders, enforcing the law, and locking up actual criminals, and that is exactly what a Reform government would do.'


Daily Record
6 hours ago
- Daily Record
Brexit spin doctor 'among MSPs who made Gnasher jibe' about Nicola Sturgeon
SUNDAY MAIL EXCLUSIVE: Monteith is claimed to have made comments about the former First Minister's teeth after rumours of her nickname circulated in Holyrood. Former Tory MSP and Brexit spin doctor Brian Monteith was among the MSPs making jibes about the Nicola Sturgeon 'Gnasher' rumour it is claimed. Sources told the Sunday Mail Monteith was 'the most prominent' of those remarking on the nickname in the Holyrood corridors during Sturgeon 's first term. The former First Minister revealed in her memoir that she ended up crying in the toilet after learning of a derogatory rumour about her injuring a former boyfriend. The gossip led to her being referred to as 'Gnasher' by some in parliament and the media, with Sturgeon revealing an MSP repeatedly made reference to the nickname, her teeth and dentists when she was around. A former journalist who covered parliament at the time and was based at Holyrood said: 'Monteith was the most prominent MSP I remember who was saying things about this rumour and seemed to enjoy making remarks about Sturgeon's teeth and mouth. 'Most people would accept he was quite aggressive as a politician and I can see why Sturgeon could have felt intimidated or bullied by him. 'At the time I think many people just took the comments as the nature of politics even if it was a particularly disgusting rumour, but looking back on it it was sexist and wrong.' Several former MSPs said they also recalled Monteith mentioning the rumour in parliament or commenting on Sturgeon's teeth. Monteith was the MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife between 1999 and 2007. In 2005 he was ousted from the Tories after plotting the downfall of then-leader David McLetchie, who he referred to as "The Letch". He later went to work as a spin doctor for Nigel Farage's campaign and became a Member of the European Parliament for the Brexit Party in 2019. In her book Sturgeon wrote of an unnamed MSP: 'I was subjected to some nasty bullying by a male MSP of another party. 'At some stage over this first term in Parliament he started calling me 'Gnasher' both to other people and occasionally to my face. Whether he was the instigator of the story or just enjoyed referencing it to make me feel uncomfortable I don't know. 'His behaviour got steadily worse. He would often make 'jokes' about teeth or dentists when I was within earshot. He seemed to revel in my discomfort and I became quite scared of him.' Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Sturgeon said she chose not to identify the MSP who bullied her, concerned about the 'backlash he might whip up against me'. A trawl of Holyrood's official report from the first term of the Scottish Parliament shows Monteith was the only MSP who commented publicly on Sturgeon's teeth. During an education debate on September 30, 1999, in which there had been no mention of teeth previously, Monteith said: 'Nicola Sturgeon may have perfect teeth, but she does not give me the ring of confidence when it comes to education policy.' MSP Fiona Hyslop immediately interjected and asked if he would say the same thing 'about a male member of this chamber' Monteith replied: 'Yes—if the SNP passes the brief to a male member, I would be happy to make that statement in the future. I say that as someone who does not have perfect teeth.' Lib Dem MSP Jamie Stone said that the session was turning into a 'dental debate'. Stone said he remembered Monteith's comments at the time and that they caused 'quite an uproar, particularly with female MSPs in the chamber.' Sturgeon ally and former SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford said: 'This was appalling behaviour by Monteith. It is not acceptable, offensive and bullying. 'We rightly call out all forms of abuse and it is the case that attacks on women in public life seem to be more prevalent than those on men. He should have been called to account. 'There is no place for such behaviour in our public life. We ought to think of those who can be traumatised by such unacceptable behaviour.' A spokeswoman for Sturgeon said she would be making no further comment other than what is in her book.


North Wales Live
7 hours ago
- North Wales Live
DWP explains how it will stop people fraudulently claiming £749 monthly payment
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has recently confirmed it remains "committed" to combating fraud and error within the benefits system, including recouping debts arising from Personal Independence Payments (PIP). Conservative MP Sir John Hayes questioned the DWP about what measures it is implementing to "tackle people fraudulently claiming PIP". In a written reply, DWP Minister Andrew Western outlined fresh measures being rolled out to "prevent fraud entering the system based on the types of cases and trends we have seen". This encompasses "introducing more rigorous checks for customers changing personal details, including bank accounts". Mr Western stated: " DWP is committed to tackling fraud and error in the benefits system and to the recovery of debts, including those generated by Personal Independent Payments. Working closely with counter fraud experts, the DWP has introduced measures to prevent fraud entering the system based on the types of cases and trends we have seen," reports the Daily Record. New DWP measures to tackle benefit fraud These include: Strengthening the Identity and Verification Process to prevent fraudulent cases entering the system Introducing more rigorous checks for customers changing personal details, including bank accounts Delivering awareness sessions for Case Managers and Healthcare Professionals, reinforcing action to take when suspicious cases are identified - for example, fake documents The Minister continued: 'DWP is delivering against key counter fraud activity, including investing in counter fraud professionals and building data analytical capabilities. The new Fraud, Error and Debt Bill will bring forward new measures to tackle fraud in the system. 'Details on the measures the Government will be legislating will be presented to Parliament in due course.' The DWP pays benefits to nearly 24 million people across Great Britain, including 3.7m on PIP. The latest DWP report shows £330m was lost to fraud and error in the PIP system last year, up from £90m in 2023/24. Fraud and error in the welfare system cost the taxpayer £9.5bn in overpayments last year, compared to £9.7bn in 2023/24. Fraud This guidance on explains that this relates to claims where all three of the following conditions apply: the conditions for receipt of benefit, or the rate of benefit in payment, are not met the claimant can reasonably be expected to be aware of the effect on their entitlement benefit payment stops or reduces as a result of a review of the claim. Claimant error These are overpayments where claimants have provided inaccurate or incomplete information, or failed to report a change in their circumstances which has led to an overpayment, but there is no evidence of fraudulent intent on the claimant's part. Official error This is where benefits have been paid incorrectly due to a failure to act, a delay or a mistaken assessment by the Department, a local authority or His Majesty's Revenue and Customs, to which no one outside of that department has materially contributed, regardless of whether the business unit has processed the information. PIP changes in circumstances There are several changes in circumstances people receiving PIP must tell the DWP about or risk losing their benefit entitlement and having regular payments paused or stopped. It's important to be aware that changing your name, doctor, health professional or address do not need to be reported to the DWP and will have no impact on your payments or your award - but it is worthwhile ensuring the details DWP holds on file is up to date. However, leaving the country or planning to leave the country for a period of more than four weeks - even just for a holiday - may affect entitlement. Guidance in the current edition of the PIP Handbook on states: 'This change may affect the claimant's entitlement to PIP. We will need to know the date the claimant is leaving the country, how long they are planning to be out of the country, which country they are going to and why they are going abroad.' If you're due to travel abroad over the next few weeks, make sure you contact the DWP with the details they have asked for as soon as possible - and keep it in mind when booking for summer holidays this year. How to report a change of circumstances to DWP Contact the PIP enquiry line on 0800 121 4433 to report a change of circumstances - lines are open from 9am to 5pm, Monday to Friday. Changes to daily living or mobility needs You should tell DWP if, for example, you need more or less help or support or the condition will last for a longer or shorter time than you previously told DWP about. This change may affect entitlement to PIP, the amount and the period of the PIP award. Leaving the country or planning to leave the country for a period of more than four weeks - even if this is a holiday This change may affect the claimant's entitlement to PIP. The DWP needs to know the date the claimant is leaving the country, how long they are planning to be out of the country, which country they are going to and why they are going abroad. Stays in hospital or similar institutions DWP guidance states both components of PIP cease to be payable 28 days after the claimant is admitted to an NHS hospital. Privately funded patients are unaffected by these rules and can continue to be paid either component of PIP. If a claimant is in hospital or a similar institution at the date entitlement to PIP starts, PIP is not payable until they are discharged. Care homes The daily living component of PIP ceases to be payable after 28 days of residency in care home where the costs of the accommodation are met from public or local funds. The PIP mobility component can continue to be paid. People who fully self-fund their placement are unaffected by these rules. If a claimant is in a care home at the date of entitlement, the PIP daily living component is not payable until they leave. Linked spells in hospital and a care home Spells in hospital are linked if the gap between them is no more than 28 days. The daily living component for spells in a care home is also linked if the gap between them is no more than 28 days. There is no link for the mobility component because payment is not affected when in a care home. Both components of PIP will stop being paid after a total of 28 days in hospital. The daily living component of PIP will stop being paid after a total of 28 days in a care home. If a claimant moves between a hospital and care home, or the other way around, these periods will also link. Imprisonment or claimant held in legal custody This change may affect the amount of PIP that can be paid to the claimant. The DWP needs to know the date the claimant was taken into prison or legal custody and the length of time they are expected to be there, if known. Detained in legal custody PIP ceases to be payable after 28 days where someone is being detained in legal custody. This applies whether the offence is civil or criminal and whether they have been convicted or are on remand. Suspended payments of benefit are not refunded regardless of the outcome of proceedings against the individual. Two or more separate periods in legal custody link if they are within one year of each other. Change of name This change will not affect payment or eligibility for PIP, but it is important the DWP has the most up-to-date details for the claimant. This change needs to be reported in writing - if the claimant phones to give these details, the DWP will ask for these details to be put in writing. The written notification must contain: full details of their previous name their new name details of any changes made to the bank or building society account into which PIP is paid, such as the name of the account or the account number their signature on the letter Change of account PIP is paid into The DWP needs full details of the of the name and address of the new bank or building society along with details of the new account including the name of the account, the account number and the sort code or roll number. Change of person acting for the claimant This refers to an appointee or someone with power of attorney for the claimant. This change is important so the DWP can make payments to the right person at the right time. They need the full name, address and contact details of the new person who is acting for the claimant. If the person acting for the claimant has moved or has different contact details, the DWP just needs the new details. Change of address This change, providing it is not a hospital or nursing home will not affect eligibility or payment of PIP. It is important the DWP hold the most up-to-date details for the claimant. They need full details of the new address the claimant has moved to, including the postcode and the date they moved. Change of doctor or healthcare professional This change will not affect payment or eligibility for PIP and is not mandatory once a decision on the PIP claim has been made. However, if the change happens during the claiming stage it is essential the DWP have the most up-to-date information. This will make sure the assessment provider has the right contact details to gather any further details they may require. The DWP needs the full name, address and contact details of the new doctor or health care professional. online handbook here.