Bangladesh interim govt bans former PMs party
Dhaka has said the disqualification of Sheikh Hasinas Awami League is necessary to protect national security and sovereignty
Bangladesh's interim government has decided to ban former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina's Awami League party and bar it from running in the next general election, saying it is necessary to protect national security and sovereignty, according to local media.
The ban was imposed under a revised anti-terrorism law, which was introduced overnight on Monday.
Shafiqul Alam, press secretary to Interim Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus, defended the ban and told state-run news agency Bangladesh Sangbad Sangstha (BSS) that elections in the country were an internal matter and that other countries should respect the sovereign will of the Bangladeshi people.
Alam's remarks on Tuesday were aimed at neighboring India, which has backed the Awami League for years.
Indian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal had described the ban as a "concerning development" that was imposed without due process.
The Awami League, led by former Prime Minister Hasina, was ousted from power on August 5 last year in a student-led uprising. Hasinafledto India, and Nobel Peace Laureate Muhammad Yunus took charge of an interim government. Ties between the two South Asian neighbors have been tense since that time.
New Delhi has repeatedly called for the early holding of free, fair and inclusive elections in Bangladesh.
No date has been finalized for the next general election in Bangladesh, which could take place anytime between December 2025 and June 2026.
On the sidelines of the sixth BIMSTEC (Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation) Summit in Bangkok in April, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi met with Yunus and conveyed New Delhi's desire "to forge a positive and constructive relationship with Bangladesh based on pragmatism." He highlighted, however, that "rhetoric that vitiates the environment is best avoided."
At the meeting with Modi, Yunus broached the issue of extraditing the former prime minister.
The interim government has been seeking the extradition of Hasina and members of her government to face trial on charges including murder, torture, abduction, crimes against humanity, and genocide. New Delhi has not publicly commented on the request.
(RT.com)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
35 minutes ago
- Hans India
We exposed Pakistan, showcased India's unity against terrorism: IUML MP
New Delhi : Members of the all-party parliamentary delegation, led by Shiv Sena MP Shrikant Shinde, have expressed satisfaction over the success of their multi-nation diplomatic outreach after returning to India. IUML MP ET Mohammed Basheer said the delegation effectively projected India's unified stance against terrorism and exposed Pakistan's role in fostering it. 'I am happy to say that the assignment given to us was wonderfully completed and we are fully satisfied with it. Wherever we went, we exposed Pakistan and showcased India's unity against terrorism. Our delegation's leader Shrikant Shinde was very cordial, coordinated the entire thing, and performed well. We feel that we did our work marvelously. The purpose of the delegations was served,' Basheer said. Echoing similar sentiments, BJP Rajya Sabha MP and senior advocate Manan Kumar Mishra thanked Prime Minister Narendra Modi for the opportunity and hailed the solidarity expressed by various nations during the visit.' We thank Prime Minister Narendra Modi for giving us this opportunity. We have fully achieved our delegation's purpose. You would not believe the solidarity that the UAE, an Islamic country, showed India. In two Parliaments (Sierra Leone and Liberia), a moment of silence was observed for the departed souls of the Pahalagam attack. In Liberia, our delegation got to address the parliamentarians in the Upper House, the Senate... We have been able to convey that Pakistan is a terrorist country. It is a breeding ground for terrorists, that dispatches terrorists to India and the rest of the World,' Mishra said. The delegation's tour, which included visits to multiple countries, aimed at bolstering India's diplomatic engagement and counterterrorism narrative on the global stage. As part of the visit, the delegation travelled to the UAE, Liberia, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Sierra Leone, engaging in high-level meetings to strengthen bilateral relations and promote India's global outreach. The delegation, led by Shinde, included BJP MPs Bansuri Swaraj, Atul Garg, Manan Kumar Mishra, Indian Union Muslim League's ET Mohammed Basheer, Biju Janata Dal's Sasmit Patra, BJP leader SS Ahluwalia, and former Ambassador Sujan Chinoy. During the visit, in a notable diplomatic milestone, Shrikant Shinde became the only Indian Member of Parliament to address the national parliaments of both Liberia and Sierra Leone. A statement from his office highlighted this historic outreach, calling it a step forward in deepening India's parliamentary and diplomatic ties with West Africa. The Shinde-led delegation's visit strengthened bilateral ties between India and Liberia, with the Indian delegation receiving a warm welcome and ceremonial honours. The delegation also interacted with the Indian diaspora and visited the Gurudwara in Monrovia.
Economic Times
40 minutes ago
- Economic Times
150 trucks from Afghanistan offer a clue on why India is talking to the Taliban
Live Events You Might Also Like: Pakistan takes over chair of UNSC Taliban sanctions committee amid China-backed push in Afghanistan You Might Also Like: India holds talks with Talibans, discusses return of Indians You Might Also Like: Taliban's Chabahar bet signals shift from Islamabad to New Delhi (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The sole checkpoint between India and Pakistan opened again late last week — for one particular, highly symbolic convoy. More than 150 trucks from Afghanistan, carrying dried fruit and nuts, were allowed into Delhi had a point it wanted to make. The border was closed after the April 22 terrorist attack on tourists in Kashmir, as anger against Pakistan's military rulers built in India, concluding in days-long clashes between the two countries last month. But India's leaders wanted to make it clear that this anger did not extend to the army's former allies, the trucks' cargo is a hint that this gesture had more than economic logic behind it. Afghanistan has great cultural resonance in India: One of our most memorable short stories is about a trader in nuts and raisins from Kabul who strikes up a friendship with a family in 19th-century those days, the British ruled both Kabul and Calcutta (as it then was), and trade and traders could move freely across the subcontinent. Since then, borders have been erected across the subcontinent, but Afghan populations have remained a big part of the lives of many Indian cities is particularly true of New Delhi, which became a haven for Afghans when the Taliban seized control of their country in the 1990s. Many from the Kabul and provincial elite were educated in India, and helped staff and support various elected governments in Afghanistan over the past two the Indian government closed its embassy in Kabul once the Taliban stormed back to power in 2021, and visas were no longer available. The connection to Delhi was cut just when it had become most week, however, came news that visas would once again be handed out to Afghan nationals. This reflects a broader policy shift in India: Relations with the Taliban administration are gradually being normalized. There has been a flurry of high-level discussion between India and Afghanistan over the past months. India's chief diplomat met the acting Afghan foreign minister in January, and the foreign minister spoke to his Taliban counterpart last up to the Taliban isn't easy for New Delhi. India was a big backer of the democratic Afghan state the militants overthrew. People here still resent the West for withdrawing its military support to Kabul in 2021, as well as for having looked away while the Pakistani military kept the Taliban alive for its decades in the wilderness. The Taliban conducted multiple attacks on the Indian embassy in Kabul in that the reality of geography always prevails. Pakistan and Afghanistan will always have a testy relationship as long as their border is porous and undefined. The Pakistani army might have supported the Taliban when it was out of power, but once the militants became the Kabul establishment, bilateral ties soon settled into a familiar, antagonistic pattern. In December, 46 Afghans were killed when the Pakistani air force struck across its western border. Relations are particularly tense because Islamabad has already deported tens of thousands of Afghans, and has threatened to expel millions patrons in Beijing have tried to intervene, hosting officials from both sides at talks in China. Pushed by the Chinese, Islamabad last week finally appointed an ambassador in these efforts are unlikely to succeed, as long as the Pakistani state views Afghanistan as its own backyard. Military planners there long assumed that their smaller western neighbor would, willingly or otherwise, provide the Pakistani army with 'strategic depth' in a war. Obviously no Afghan government could ever agree to that. But the Pakistanis also tend to worry, during confrontations with India like the one last month, that whoever is in power in Kabul will permit a second front to open on their reintegration of the Taliban into regional politics — another of its old enemies, Iran, is reaching out as well — was inevitable once it settled into power. But the West should welcome closer relations between India and Afghanistan in particular. It might be the only thing keeping China from taking over the management of the was certainly associated in most Afghans' minds with their deposed state. Most here don't want to dilute India's identification with democracy by embracing the Taliban wholeheartedly. New Delhi's engagement with Afghanistan focused on people-to-people relations, and institution building, not security. This served to preserve and reinvigorate cultural ties dating back to the time when Afghan traders selling dried fruit and preserves were a familiar sight in Indian neighborhoods. Realpolitik matters, but people matter more.
NDTV
41 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Rape, Beheading, Acid Attack": Influencer's Father On Threats She Received
Kolkata: A " sar tan se juda (beheading)" campaign was unleashed against Sharmishta Panoli, said the father of the 22-year-old influencer who was arrested by Kolkata Police over controversial remarks on Operation Sindoor that allegedly hurt religious sentiments. "Sharmishta received threats of beheading, rape, acid attack, and burning," claimed her father Prithvi Panoli in an exclusive interview with NDTV, asserting that the attempt was of "online lynching" and not just to scare his daughter. The family details were all public, said Mr Panoli. The family had to switch their phones off and remove the SIM cards due to the threats, he added. Ms Panoli had allegedly made communally-charged remarks while responding to a user, probably from Pakistan, who had questioned the Indian military action that followed the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. In a now-deleted Instagram video posted on May 14, she had allegedly used abusive language, sparking outrage. She was arrested in Gurugram on May 31. The matter turned political with the BJP alleging that the arrest was unlawful. Kolkata Police denied this and claimed they followed all legal procedures, that they had tried to send them notices, but the accused was on the run. Mr Panoli contested this claim and said it was his duty to protect his family in view of the brutal threats that her daughter received. He said he had been in touch with the Kolkata Police cyber unit and the local police station since May 15, and sent them updates over the threats they were receiving. "Till May 29, we did not receive any FIR. No notice was pasted on our door, nor did we get anything in the mail. So, I don't know on what basis they are saying that we were absconding," he argued. On May 19, Mr Panoli said he found a group of people looking at their tower. Scared, he decided to leave for Delhi with his family. "They tagged our apartment, our tower, her college, and my place of work. Our details were splashed across (social media). In such circumstances, when there is a ' sar tan se juda ' campaign on social media, your details are out, and there is no confirmation from the police, what would a father do to protect the family? I thought the best (option) was to leave and come back when things calm down," said Mr Panoli. Ms Panoli's lawyer has argued that she was arrested in a " harakiri" manner and that there was no prior contact from the police. The Calcutta High Court has ordered the Bengal government to produce the case diary when the accused's interim bail request is taken up for hearing today. The police have remained defiant despite calls from across the country to release the influencer. Among them is BJP MP Kangana Ranaut, who called it wrong to imprison and torture someone who has already apologized and deleted the post. Slamming the West Bengal government, she has demanded that Ms Panoli be released. Leader of the Opposition in the West Bengal Assembly, Suvendu Adhikari, has slammed the Trinamool, alleging that the action against the influencer was aimed at "appeasing a certain votebank". Meanwhile, the person on whose complaint Ms Panoli was arrested also faces an arrest warrant. An Assam Police team is currently in Kolkata to arrest Wajahat Khan, but he is on the run. Kolkata Police, too, has filed a case against him.
