logo
OPINION: Far-left Mélenchon could yet prove decisive (and disastrous) for France

OPINION: Far-left Mélenchon could yet prove decisive (and disastrous) for France

Local France07-05-2025

Jean-Luc Mélenchon does not like journalists, especially British or American journalists. Interviews with him have a habit of exploding into insults after a few minutes.
All credit then to Leila Abboud, the Paris bureau chief of the FT, who lasted more than three hours with the bad-tempered old fox in an
interview published last weekend.
She even managed to make the hard-left veteran appear likeable. Mélenchon, one of the most detested men in French politics, can be likeable, or at least compelling, when he wants to be.
In several ways,
Mélenchon
, 73, resembles the late, unlamented Jean-Marie Le Pen. He is a great orator; he is funny; he is passionate. He is brilliant, populist politician fighting for a destructive cause.
Here lies a paradox which could decide the fate of France at the Presidential election two years' from now. Mélenchon is, in two senses, going nowhere. He is unelectable but he will remain, at least until 2027, one of the most decisive figures in French politics.
He has more charisma than most of the other likely contenders of the Left and the Centre. He all but reached the second-round run-off last time. It is not very likely that he will do so in 2027 – but it is not impossible.
The consequences for France if he did so would be catastrophic. His presence in Round Two would ensure that France elected a far-right, anti-European head of state.
Two years from now we will be between the rounds of the French Presidential election. We can be pretty sure (unfortunately) who will occupy one of the two places in Round Two. It will be Marine Le Pen or, if she is still banned from seeking office, it will be her smooth and shallow understudy, Jordan Bardella.
READ MORE:
Appeals and rallies: What next for Marine Le Pen and the French far right?
A deep dive opinion poll by Ipsos this week suggested that a run-off between Le Pen/Bardella and a centrist candidate, either Edouard Philippe or Gabriel Attal, would be too close to call. A run-off between Mélenchon and the Far Right would be a massacre. Almost two thirds of the vote would go to the Rassemblement National.
Advertisement
In his lunch interview with the FT, Mélenchon gloried in the possibilities of such a confrontation. 'Life requires us to make stark choices,' he said. 'The bourgeoisie will have their backs to the wall – a fascist or Mélenchon.'
Polls two years before the event may be of limited value but much of the French 'bourgeoisie' appears to have made up its mind about this 'stark choice'.
They would rather risk a President Le Pen/Bardella than a President Mélenchon. In the Paris Match monthly league table of political popularity last month, Mélenchon came 47th out of the 50 best-known politicians in France with an approval rating of 28 percent.
And yet Mélenchon continues to bestride the Left. If he runs in 2027 (and he will), it will be difficult for left-wing voters to coalesce behind a more consensual candidate. He remains immensely popular with left-leaning young people and in the multi-racial inner suburbs – two of the last remaining bastions of the much-splintered
Gauche
.
Mélenchon was on his best behaviour in the FT interview partly because he is promoting the English-language version of his book:
Now, the People!: Revolution in the 21st Century
.
The book bombed in France in 2023. Small wonder. It is an odd blend of dense, academic argument on the nature of revolution through the ages and a one-sided retelling of recent, French political history. 'The people' of the title exist mostly in Mélenchon's imagination.
He is eloquent on the hypocrisies and contradictions of Centrism. He has nothing much to say about the greatest challenge facing the Left in the democratic West - the defection of a large part of the working classes to the Right and Far Right.
Advertisement
This is one of the main criticisms of Mélenchon within his movement, La France Insoumise (LFI), or it would be the criticism if criticism was allowed. Another book published this week – 'La Meute' (the pack) by Charlotte Belaïch and Olivier Pérou - describes the sect-like nature of LFI, which has no members in the normal sense and no internal elections.
The book details the purges over the last three years of several senior figures who challenged the Mélenchonist disdain for the white, working classes and rural France.
One of Mélenchon's main rivals for the Left vote in 2027, the journalist and film-maker François Ruffin, cut his loose ties with the LFI last year for this reason.
Any future for the Left must include 'church towers as well as tower blocks', he said. Concentrating on the middle-class, youth vote and the inner-suburbs, leaving the white, blue-collar vote to Le Pen, is a guarantee of moral and political failure.
Ruffin, witty and warm, may be one of Mélenchon's main challengers on the Left in 2027. The Socialist Party, marginalised by Macron and Mélenchon since 2017, also hopes its party congress next month will produce a leader capable of restoring its past glories.
None of the contenders – the present first secretary Olivier Faure, the Socialist leader in the National Assembly, Boris Vallaud and the mayor of Rouen, Nicolas Mayer-Rossignol – are likely to set the campaign alight. A much better candidate for a revived Centre-left would be Raphael Glucksmann, who performed so well in the European elections a year ago but he has the handicap of being a Socialist ally and not a Socialist.
Unless some kind of primary can be organised on the Left (very doubtful), it will be the public opinion polls which decide once again where the bulk of the remaining left-wing votes assemble in the final days of the first- round campaign.
Advertisement
There is a strong chance that the winner of this 'opinion poll primary' will, once again, be Mélenchon. Can he reach Round Two? I doubt it but the choices facing floating or undecided voters will be nightmarish next time.
The Far Right appears to be guaranteed to top the poll in Round One. The Left will therefore dispute the other place in the run-off with the Centre or Centre-right.
By preventing a more electable Leftie from emerging, Mélenchon could help the Macronist centre that he detests so much. To avoid a Hard Left v Far Right populist final many moderate Left votes may emigrate in Round One to the best-placed Centrist – possibly the former PM, Edouard Philippe.
Advertisement
But what if they don't?
And what if a crowd of centre and centre-right candidates split the anti-populist vote and Mélenchon reaches the run-off by a few thousand votes?
It is my opinion that, whatever the polls may say, a majority of French people do not want a Far Right, anti-European, pro-Russian President of the Republic.
But one certain way that they would elect one is if the 'stark' alternative two years from now is Jean-Luc Mélenchon.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump to flex muscle with huge military parade
Trump to flex muscle with huge military parade

France 24

timean hour ago

  • France 24

Trump to flex muscle with huge military parade

Long fascinated with military pomp, Trump has openly envied the military spectaculars seen in cities from Paris to Moscow and Pyongyang ever since his first term as president. The $45 million parade is officially being held to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the US army, which commander-in-chief Trump this week called the "greatest fighting force ever to walk the face of the Earth." But critics say the parade is more about Trump than the army. Protesters have pledged to rally on Saturday against what they call Trump's growing authoritarianism, at a time when he just ordered troops into Los Angeles after demonstrations against his immigration policy. So-called "No Kings" rallies -- named after the idea that America's Revolutionary War against the British was to free the country from monarchs and autocrats -- are planned in dozens of cities, including just outside Washington. But Trump is unrepentant. The president said on a visit to the Fort Bragg army base on Tuesday that "we want to show off a little bit" with the parade, and vowed "very big force" if protesters try to disrupt it. He made the comments in an extraordinary speech that breached the usual separation of politics and the military and saw Trump goad troops into jeering his opponents. 'Big birthday party' Trump's long-cherished parade plans are also rare for a country which has traditionally preferred to avoid displays of military might on its own soil. The parade will be the biggest in Washington since 1991 after the first Gulf War -- and before that for the inauguration of President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1949, the army said. Nearly 7,000 army soldiers will march past historic landmarks including the Lincoln Memorial, the Washington Monument and the White House. Roaring overhead will be a fleet of more than 50 helicopters including Apache gunships, giant twin-rotor Chinook transport choppers and sleek Black Hawks. Around 150 military vehicles -- including 28 M1A1 Abrams battle tanks, 28 Bradley armored vehicles and 28 Stryker vehicles -- will rumble along the route. Following the parade, the army's Golden Knights parachute team will jump in and present Trump with a US flag. Troops have been moving tanks and other hardware into place throughout the week. "I think the reception here is going to be very warm," US army Colonel Kamil Sztalkoper told AFP during a media preview. "Who doesn't like a big birthday party when you're 250 years old?" 'Believe in democracy' But the display of American muscle is also a flex of Trump's own strongman image as commander-in-chief, at the start of a second term when he has been pushing US presidential power further than ever before. Trump has been obsessed with having a parade since his first term as president when he attended France's annual Bastille Day parade in Paris at the invitation of Emmanuel Macron in 2017. Back then he was put off by the huge cost, then estimated at $92 million, and warnings that heavy tanks could damage Washington's streets. This time, the army says metal plates will protect the roads. At the time it also sparked comparisons to similar events in autocratic countries like Russia, China and North Korea -- comparisons which have resurfaced in his second term. Peter Loge, director of George Washington University's School of Media, said the American aversion to such displays went back to the earliest days of US independence. "We were founded by a group of merchants and farmers who were tired of a standing army invading their streets in the name of keeping them safe," Loge told AFP. "We've always looked down on grand military parades in Russia across Red Square or in North Korea, because we're not like that. We're Americans, and we believe in democracy, not in military shows of force." Trump's show of US military might does however come at a time of mounting international tensions.

The Dulcie September case exposes France's troubling ties with South Africa during apartheid
The Dulcie September case exposes France's troubling ties with South Africa during apartheid

LeMonde

timean hour ago

  • LeMonde

The Dulcie September case exposes France's troubling ties with South Africa during apartheid

Five bullets to the head, fired point-blank. A .22 caliber pistol fitted with a silencer. And a pool of blood staining the landing on the fourth floor of a Parisian building. On the morning of March 29, 1988, a woman collapsed at 28 Rue des Petites-Ecuries. Dulcie September, 52, was the African National Congress (ANC) representative in the city, the face of the anti-apartheid movement there. She had just put her key in the lock of her office door when the killers struck. It was a professional job. Thirty-seven years on, her murder remains a mystery. On Tuesday, June 10, the court of appeal rejected the activist family's complaint against the French state for "denial of justice" and "gross negligence." "Impunity seems to have prevailed," said September's family lawyer, Yves Laurin, who criticized what he called a "botched investigation" after her death. In 2019, the family had already tried to have the case reopened by filing a complaint for "apartheid crime," which is not subject to a statute of limitations. That attempt failed as well.

Trump orders US personnel out of 'dangerous' Middle East as Iran tensions escalate
Trump orders US personnel out of 'dangerous' Middle East as Iran tensions escalate

France 24

timean hour ago

  • France 24

Trump orders US personnel out of 'dangerous' Middle East as Iran tensions escalate

President Donald Trump said US personnel were being moved from the potentially "dangerous" Middle East on Wednesday as nuclear talks with Iran faltered and fears grew of a regional conflict. Trump also reiterated that he would not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon, amid mounting speculation that Israel could strike Tehran's facilities. Iran threatened Wednesday to target US military bases in the region if conflict breaks out. A US official had earlier said that staff levels at the embassy in Iraq were being reduced over security concerns, while there were reports that personnel were also being moved from Kuwait and Bahrain. "Well they are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place," Trump told reporters in Washington when asked about the reports of personnel being moved. "We've given notice to move out and we'll see what happens." Trump then added: "They can't have a nuclear weapon, very simple. We're not going to allow that." Tehran and Washington have held five rounds of talks since April to thrash out a new nuclear deal to replace the 2015 accord that Trump abandoned during his first term in 2018. The two sides were due to meet again in coming days. Trump had until recently expressed optimism about the talks, but said in an interview published Wednesday that he was "less confident" about reaching a nuclear deal. Since returning to office in January, Trump has revived his "maximum pressure" campaign on Tehran, backing nuclear diplomacy but warning of military action if it fails. The US president says he has pressed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to hold off striking Iran's nuclear facilities to give the talks a chance, but has increasingly signaled that he is losing patience. Iran however warned it would respond to any attack. "All its bases are within our reach, we have access to them, and without hesitation we will target all of them in the host countries," Iran's Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said in response to US threats of military action if the talks fail. 'Suffer more losses' "God willing, things won't reach that point, and the talks will succeed," the minister said, adding that the US side "will suffer more losses" if it came to conflict. The United States has multiple bases in the Middle East, with the largest located in Qatar. In January 2020, Iran fired missiles at bases in Iraq housing American troops in retaliation for the US strike that killed top Iranian general Qassem Soleimani days before at the Baghdad airport. Dozens of US soldiers suffered traumatic brain injuries. Amid the escalating tensions, the UK Maritime Trade Operations, run by the British navy, also advised ships to transit the Gulf with caution. Iran and the United States have recently been locked in a diplomatic standoff over Iran's uranium enrichment, with Tehran defending it as a "non-negotiable" right and Washington calling it a "red line." Iran currently enriches uranium to 60 percent, far above the 3.67-percent limit set in the 2015 deal and close though still short of the 90 percent needed for a nuclear warhead. Western countries have long accused Iran of seeking to acquire atomic weapons, while Tehran insists its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes. Last week, Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said enrichment is "key" to Iran's nuclear program and that Washington "cannot have a say" on the issue. During an interview with the New York Post's podcast "Pod Force One," which was recorded on Monday, Trump said he was losing hope a deal could be reached. "I don't know. I did think so, and I'm getting more and more -- less confident about it. They seem to be delaying and I think that's a shame. I am less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago," he said. Iran has said it will present a counter-proposal to the latest draft from Washington, which it had criticised for failing to offer relief from sanctions -- a key demand for Tehran, which has been reeling under their weight for years.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store