logo
Overturned court ruling clears way for WA to inspect immigrant detention center

Overturned court ruling clears way for WA to inspect immigrant detention center

Yahoo18 hours ago
A 'no trespassing' sign outside of Northwest ICE Processing Center. (Photo by Grace Deng/Washington State Standard)
Washington state should be allowed to enforce health and safety standards at the embattled immigrant detention center in Tacoma, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday.
The decision overturns a lower court order blocking a 2023 state law that sought to provide greater oversight of conditions at the facility, including through unannounced state inspections. The detention center is run by the Florida-based GEO Group under a contract with the federal government.
With the state law, Democratic lawmakers looked to impose numerous new regulations on the facility, known as the Northwest ICE Processing Center. Among other requirements, the law mandated the detention center provide fresh fruits and vegetables, air conditioning and heat, free telecommunication services, weekly mental health evaluations and rooms with windows.
Failure to comply could result in fines of up to $10,000 per violation. GEO says these standards go beyond requirements the company must follow under its contract.
The law also required the state departments of Health and Labor and Industries to conduct routine, unannounced inspections of the for-profit detention center, which holds immigrant detainees before deportation or release back into the United States. Labor and Industries inspected the site last summer with authority under a separate state law, and found no violations.
The policy followed an earlier effort to ban private detention facilities entirely statewide, but that statute was deemed unenforceable. So lawmakers turned to increasing oversight.
The 1,575-bed facility has a history of allegations of mistreatment, abuse and neglect of detainees. Seven potential cases of tuberculosis were recently reported there, according to state health officials. Access to medical care has long been a concern inside the facility.
It has come under renewed scrutiny as more detainees have been sent there with President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. The state and GEO, one of the biggest private detention center companies in the nation, have been enmeshed for years in various legal battles over the facility.
GEO's 2015 contract with the federal government awarded the company at least $700 million to operate the facility over the following decade.
The state Department of Health celebrated the ruling from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, saying it allows the agency to investigate complaints of mistreatment and 'work toward safer, healthier conditions for everyone in these facilities.'
'We applaud the Ninth Circuit's decision affirming the Washington State Department of Health's authority to uphold basic health and safety standards in private detention facilities like the Northwest ICE Processing Center,' spokesperson Kara Kostanich said in an email.
Kostanich didn't say if the agency now has imminent plans to inspect the facility.
GEO and its attorney didn't respond to a request for comment.
The case served as a test of state versus federal power. The legal doctrine of 'intergovernmental immunity' holds that state laws can't unduly regulate federal activities.
One of the major controversies in whether the state had overstepped was determining the correct comparison for the Tacoma facility, the only private, for-profit detention center in Washington.
GEO said prisons are an apt comparison. U.S. District Court Judge Benjamin Settle agreed, finding the law imposed an economic burden on GEO through standards the state doesn't apply to its own Department of Corrections.
The state countered that involuntary treatment facilities are a better parallel, as they also hold people in civil, not criminal, proceedings.
The three-judge appeals court panel sided with the state. The requirements Washington seeks to impose on GEO and these civil facilities are 'almost identical,' the judges found. But the judges will leave the comparison of mandated standards to the lower court.
Washington has also run into legal roadblocks because the law only applied to the Tacoma facility. Lawmakers sought to address this problem this year by expanding the definition of private detention centers to include ones run by nonprofits. So state law now also covers the Martin Hall Juvenile Detention Facility, near Spokane.
GEO moved to get the appeal dismissed in light of the new law, which took effect in May. The judges declined that request.
The appeals court judges note states can treat contractors more stringently than if facilities are run by the federal government.
'A state has greater ability to regulate a contractor of the federal government than to regulate the government itself,' Judge William Fletcher wrote in the opinion.
All three of the judges making Tuesday's decision were appointed by Democratic presidents, two by Bill Clinton and one by Barack Obama.
The Department of Justice, which has sided with GEO under both former President Joe Biden and Trump, declined to comment on the ruling.
The ruling is the second loss in as many weeks for GEO at the 9th Circuit.
Last week, the court declined to reconsider an earlier decision affirming that the company needed to pay more than $23 million for violating Washington's minimum wage law. GEO plans to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in on that case.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

32,000 pounds of meat products recalled due to false USDA inspection marks
32,000 pounds of meat products recalled due to false USDA inspection marks

Yahoo

timea few seconds ago

  • Yahoo

32,000 pounds of meat products recalled due to false USDA inspection marks

A New Jersey-based company, Sabrositos Hondurenos, LLC, is recalling about 32,000 pounds of various meat products with a false USDA mark of inspection, meaning the meats didn't go through proper federal examination, according to federal officials. In an alert shared Thursday, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service said the recalled products are falsely labeled with establishment number "EST. 1785," which "does not exist," they said. The items, which include chorizo (sausage), pork chops and ribs, were shipped to retail locations and restaurants nationwide and were produced with various dates before Aug. 20, 2025. The recall includes the following: Homestyle chorizo labeled "OLANCHO Chorizo Suelto Olanchano SABROCITOS HONDUREÑOS" (14-oz. vacuum-sealed packages)Smoked pork chops labeled "OLANCHO Chuleta Ahumada Olanchana SABROCITOS HONDUREÑOS" (14-oz. vacuum-sealed packages)Smoked chorizo labeled "OLANCHO Chorizo Ahumado Olanchano SABROCITOS HONDUREÑOS" (14-oz. vacuum-sealed packages)Cased homestyle chorizo labeled "OLANCHO Chorizo Olanchano Criollo SABROCITOS HONDUREÑOS" (14-oz. vacuum-sealed packages)Smoked BBQ spicy chorizo labeled "OLANCHO Chorizo Parrillero SABROCITOS HONDUREÑOS" (14-oz. vacuum-sealed packages)Smoked ribs labeled "OLANCHO Costilla Ahumada Olanchana SABROCITOS HONDUREÑOS" (14-oz. vacuum-sealed packages) As more information becomes available, FSIS said it may add more items to the recalled product list, so consumers should keep an eye on the website for updates. So far, there have been no confirmed reports of adverse reactions due to these products, but the USDA says they should be considered "misbranded and unsafe to eat." Anyone concerned about a reaction should contact a healthcare provider, the agency added. Consumers can contact Diego Funez Garrido, owner of Sabrositos Hondurenos, LLC at 908-274-4206 for any questions regarding the recall, the alert added. Trump sounds off on potential security guarantees for Ukraine Man advocates for school zone and driver safety after personal tragedy What to know about the Menendez brothers' parole hearings Solve the daily Crossword

I'm worried about my friends on the other side of the aisle
I'm worried about my friends on the other side of the aisle

USA Today

time2 minutes ago

  • USA Today

I'm worried about my friends on the other side of the aisle

I'm worried about my friends on the other side of the political aisle. Two weeks ago in this newsletter, I wrote about how Texas House Democrats were making fools of themselves, fleeing to states like Illinois, to protest Republicans' efforts to redraw voting district maps to gain five more seats in Congress. To be clear, Republicans looked silly too. But Democrats continue to escalate the matter, and the whole thing has become a farce for Republicans, Democrats and the state. Texas Rep. Nicole Collier spent two nights on the Texas House floor after refusing to consent to a law enforcement escort. House Speaker Dustin Burrows announced Aug. 18 that Democrats who fled the state to protest redistricting would be required to have a police escort to leave the floor. Collier refused to submit, saying she was the victim of 'illegal confinement.' 'This is the fight that all of us have in resisting, you know, the end of our democracy, basically,' Collier said. The whole thing is nonsense, but Texas Democrats in particular look more unhinged than ever. They're not the only ones. California Gov. Gavin Newsom's press office has started trolling President Donald Trump on X by posting in all caps to mimic Trump's unique communication style. In a post Aug. 19, Newsom slammed Fox News' Dana Perino – whose show I was on last week – ending with 'THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER,' Trump's signature sign off. The account has also mocked Vice President JD Vance's physical appearance. Real classy. Perhaps Newsom's office is trying to be witty, but their messaging falls flat. Trump posts comments on social media like a middle school kid, but he also is brokering peace between warring nations, improving trade policy and bolstering the economy. Newsom's California, meanwhile, is in rapid decline. Americans have noticed that Democratic leaders are increasingly unhinged. The Real Clear Politics polling average shows Democrats with an unfavorable rating of about 60%. Only a third of Americans have a favorable view of the Democratic Party. The party's future looks grim, and dashing out of state to avoid a legislative vote or posting obnoxious messages on social media won't help. Read more from me and my colleagues:

Americans worry democracy in danger amid gerrymandering fights, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds
Americans worry democracy in danger amid gerrymandering fights, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds

USA Today

time2 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Americans worry democracy in danger amid gerrymandering fights, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds

WASHINGTON, Aug 21 (Reuters) - Most Americans believe that efforts to redraw U.S. House of Representatives districts to maximize partisan gains, like those under way in Texas and California, are bad for democracy, a new Reuters/Ipsos poll found. More than half of respondents -- 57% -- said they feared that American democracy itself was in danger, a view held by eight in 10 Democrats and four in 10 in President Donald Trump's Republican Party. The six-day survey of 4,446 U.S. adults, which closed on Monday, showed deep unease with the growing political divisions in Washington -- where Republicans control both chambers of Congress -- and state capitals. The poll found that 55% of respondents, including 71% of Democrats and 46% of Republicans, agreed that ongoing redistricting plans- such as those hatched by governors in Texas and California in a process known as gerrymandering - were "bad for democracy." At Trump's urging, Republican Texas Governor Greg Abbott has called a special session of the state legislature to redraw the state's congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, aiming to help Republicans defend their 219-212 U.S. House majority. Incumbent presidents' parties typically lose House seats in midterms, which can block their legislative agendas and in Trump's first term led to two impeachment probes. California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, a White House hopeful in 2028, has threatened to try to redraw his state's district map in response, adding five Democratic seats to offset Republicans' expected Texas gains. The practice is not new but has gained attention because it is happening mid-decade rather than following a census. It has meant that the vast majority of House races are not competitive in general elections; in recent decades about two-thirds of them were won by more than 20 percentage points. As president, Trump has flouted democratic norms with steps including directing the U.S. Justice Department to pursue his political adversaries, pressuring the independent Federal Reserve to lower rates and seizing control of Washington, D.C.'s police force. In interviews, Texas Republicans who participated in the poll largely supported the state's potential redistricting, while Democrats described it as 'cheating' but supported the idea of Democratic states trying to respond in kind. The poll had a margin of error of about 2 percentage points when describing the views of all Americans and about 3 points for the views of Republicans and Democrats. 'Shady Business' Amanda Kelley, 51, an insurance fraud investigator in Dallas, was the rare Republican to criticize the Texas effort. "I don't like it when either side tries to do that. I think that's shady business," Kelley said. "The optics of it happening in the middle of the term when you would draw district lines, that leaves kind of a bad taste in my mouth." Paul Wehrmann, 57, an attorney in Dallas who described himself as an independent voter, also opposed it. "It's unfair, and it sets a bad precedent," said Wehrmann, who worries it could spiral into states redrawing maps every election cycle instead of every decade. Partisan gerrymandering "is bad all around, but I think that it is fair for Democrats to try to counterbalance what Republicans are doing. "They need to stop bringing a knife to a gunfight.' Americans of both parties have long disliked elected leaders of the rival party, but the Reuters/Ipsos poll found that they also distrust regular people who align with the opposing party. Some 55% of Democrats agreed with a statement that "people who are Republican are NOT to be trusted," while 32% disagreed. Republicans were split, with 43% agreeing that Democrats were untrustworthy and 44% saying they disagreed. The poll also showed politics weighing more on people's everyday lives than in past years, particularly among Democrats. Some 27% of Democrats said last year's presidential election has negatively affected their friendships. A Reuters/Ipsos poll in April 2017, early in Trump's first term, showed a smaller share of Democrats - 18% - reported fraying friendships because of the election. Only 10% of Republicans said this month that politics weighed on their friendships, largely unchanged from 2017. Jeffrey Larson, a 64-year-old toxicologist and Republican voter in Seabrook, Texas, said he and his wife, a Democrat, agreed not to discuss politics. 'I might not agree with what the Democrats are doing, but I don't think that they're trying to specifically destroy my life or destroy America,' Larson said. Close to half of Democrats - or 46% - said their party had lost its way, compared to 19% of Republicans who said the same of their party. Sandy Ogden, 71, a tech executive from Sunnyvale, California and self-described Democrat, said she faulted her party's leaders. 'I think the Democratic Party members are united in what we believe, but the leaders are ineffective in mounting an opposition that works,' Ogden said. Analysts said that ordinary Democrats' greater mistrust of Republicans and friction with friends suggests a reluctance among Democrats to engage with Republicans that could harm the party's chances at regaining political standing. 'Democracy involves a willingness to allow people with differing views to express those views,' said Whit Ayres, a veteran Republican pollster. Michael Ceraso, a longtime Democratic operative, found the poll results frustrating. "The majority of Democrats believe our democracy is failing and nearly half of them don't want to talk to the opposition party," Ceraso said. "We have to be better." (Reporting by Jason Lange, Nolan D. McCaskill and James Oliphant; Editing by Scott Malone and Cynthia Osterman)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store