logo
Maria Gomes feeds over 300 stray dogs. She challenges the popular image of a dog lover

Maria Gomes feeds over 300 stray dogs. She challenges the popular image of a dog lover

The Print3 days ago
In housing societies and neighbourhoods across urban India, feeding community dogs has been a battleground for years. Despite several rulings in favour of community feeders, residents damage food and water bowls, threaten feeders, and hit the dogs at sight. Anyone who chooses to challenge this behaviour is routinely told to take their compassion—and community dogs—inside their own houses, rather than shared spaces.
Instead, she's here in Goa, where I'm trailing her to understand what drives someone to dedicate their entire existence to feeding animals that half the country wants eliminated. The answer, though, isn't as tidy and straightforward as what you'd expect from someone the law could soon consider a public nuisance.
Last week, while India's top court was busy criminalising Delhi-NCR's community dogs, 55-year-old Maria Gomes was being a busybody on Panjim's streets. Like every evening, Gomes loaded 30 kilos of rice and chicken onto her bicycle, checked her stoves one last time, and set off on her evening round to feed over 300 street dogs she knows by name. If the order had come into force and were she in the capital, Gomes would have been held in contempt of court.
The 2023 Animal Birth Control Rules attempt to tread the fine line between animal welfare and concern for people by designating feeding areas away from staircases and playgrounds, but the underlying tension never seems to disappear. According to the ABC rules, a dispute resolution mechanism must involve 'the chief veterinary officer, representatives of the police, the district Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, organisations conducting animal birth control, and the RWA.'
That baby went out with the bathwater as soon as the Supreme Court's observations came in. Despite the almost instantaneous stay on the order, reports of its misuse have already begun to filter in from across India. In a country that constitutionally mandates kindness to animals, practising it is treated as a crime.
Also read: Dogs were adored in medieval India. They saved cows from asuras, fought boars & tigers
The origin story
A pervasive notion about these debates is that these are middle-class and elite concerns, as if a love for street animals is the preserve of the affluent alone. That notion crumbles the moment you step into Maria Gomes' world.
When I arrive in the evening at her two-room rented home in Miramar, she's already in motion. Gomes is diminutive and missing a few teeth, but doesn't miss a beat, shuttling between her kitchen and bedroom, dodging a menagerie of cats, chickens, and turkeys crawling around the yard. After all, she's been doing this for 12 years.
The only modern conveniences I can find in Gomes' home are the spick and span deep freezers and fridges that line the walls of both rooms. Inside, the air is thick with the smell of turmeric, rice, and boiled chicken. Gomes cooks all day long for her furry friends, and undertakes two rounds: The first at 5 am, when she takes an autorickshaw around and makes 22 stops; the second at 5 pm, on her little bicycle. Thirty kilos of chicken and rice are apportioned into multiple packets. Some of the dogs, she told me, eat only chicken, some only rice, some can only eat liver and rice, while some are just plain choosy. She also packs a portion of nibbles that she can throw the way of dogs that follow along.
In a different life, Gomes' skills could have easily helped run a military kitchen or a restaurant. Instead, here she is, orchestrating a daily operation reliant completely on donations from well-wishers.
Gomes learnt the unspoken rules of coexistence on the streets. She was born an orphan, and from the age of six, she worked as a domestic worker. In her twenties, Gomes went on to work in a food factory for 17 years, followed by six years in a shop and later at a shelter. By 2011, however, despite having worked her entire life, Gomes found herself sleeping on Panjim's streets.
It was during those three years of homelessness that her relationship with the city's dogs began. The strays would bark at her in the darkness, so she started feeding them biscuits so they wouldn't attack her. After multiple Covid-19 lockdowns, when employment became increasingly elusive, Gomes decided to take the leap and dedicate her life entirely to feeding community animals. 'I have been bitten by dogs four times,' she told me. 'That doesn't mean I hate them. They are also part of this planet. You cannot get rid of them. It is their land also.'
This origin story cuts through every comfortable opinion about animal welfare. Gomes wasn't—and isn't—extending compassion from a position of middle-class stability. Instead, it emerges from the intimate knowledge of what it means to exist at society's margins, to understand abandonment not as a concept but as lived experience.
Gomes loads her bike, and sets off, bidding goodbye to a couple of dogs that hang around her street. She whizzes past cars and bikes at a steady clip, expertly negotiating the potholes, while throwing pieces of chicken at the dogs that fall between her stops. Wherever Gomes goes, the dogs seem to find her, emerging from doorways and alleys. Her first stop is at a schoolyard, where the watchman sweeps up a portion of the ground, clearing space for her to feed the dogs. The second is in a clearing by the side of Panjim's main road, away from pedestrian and motor traffic. That doesn't stop the passing walkers from staring and shooing at her.
This is what people miss about the complexity of Gomes' operation. What appears to casual observers as indiscriminate feeding is actually a respectful, careful system. Gomes has built an individual relationship with each dog: They all have names, preferences, and stories. At each feeding spot, Gomes ensures the food is distributed properly, so territorial disputes don't erupt.
Also read: Gurugram dog attack is pet owners' fault. It's cruel to keep Siberian husky in this heat
Disputes in action
The largest troupe of dogs comes bounding to meet Gomes outside Kala Academy. I ask her about her feelings about the Supreme Court order, and she almost erupts. 'This is very wrong. If people complain, they [the authorities] should focus on understanding why and how something adverse happened,' she said. 'You can't make a decision based on complaints from one person.' Gomes insisted that dogs are aggressive because they have been mistreated by people, who throw hot water and stones at them and beat them with sticks.
As the dogs milled about her, Gomes continued: 'At the bus stand, people pee everywhere, even when there are toilets. They spit and throw garbage anywhere. Why doesn't the government do anything about that? Because they don't have the guts to discipline people. If they pull up people, they will ignore them in the next election. We have to teach the citizens of this country how to behave with dogs, especially children who often play the fool, and their parents don't even object.'
Gomes is certain that the fight against the order will continue, via people like her. 'If even one person does the right thing, that's enough. If you know your rights, you should continue doing what is correct,' she told me.
Five minutes later, Gomes' rights are put to the test. At Campal Gardens, her pack includes Babu, a dog blind from birth. As Gomes tries to secure an area for Babu to eat peacefully, without being harassed by other dogs, a watchman comes screaming at her, telling her she is not allowed to feed dogs in a public park.
There's only one family present with two small children in tow, and they all feel emboldened to object to her. As the parents focus on joining forces with the watchman, the child balls his hands into little fists and attempts to charge at Babu.
The watchman's aggression shifts the moment he notices my camera, and that awareness immediately tempers his righteousness. He pivots, claiming this is actually a forest department park. When Gomes claps back that 'the forest is for the dogs too,' he tries a different strategy. Why won't she feed dogs deeper inside the park? When Gomes finally heads further inside, he leans toward me to whisper conspiratorially, 'She's not a good person.' And also, 'Please don't include my video.'
Outside the park, another group of men approach, ready with their own objections. But Gomes has learnt how to project an authority that has nothing to do with her social location. Whatever she said to them in Konkani, they backed down without engaging further.
Maybe that's the most powerful response to hostility: To simply refuse to accept its premise. Maria Gomes' defiance stems from the understanding that some battles are won through sheer doggedness. The legal and social challenges to the SC order will continue… but Maria Gomes will cycle on.
Karanjeet Kaur is a journalist, and a partner at TWO Design. She tweets @Kaju_Katri. Views are personal.
(Edited by Theres Sudeep)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MCD expands drive to capture aggressive stray dogs in public places
MCD expands drive to capture aggressive stray dogs in public places

Time of India

time6 hours ago

  • Time of India

MCD expands drive to capture aggressive stray dogs in public places

New Delhi: As part of its expanded drive to capture strays in public places, MCD's veterinary department Tuesday issued a circular asking all NGOs engaged in dog sterilisation and immunisation to pick up ferocious and aggressive stray dogs on priority from hospitals, schools, parks, govt offices, colonies and institutes. All NGOs must record footage of such dogs and maintain physical records, said the civic body. "In compliance with the Supreme Court order, all NGOs engaged through MoU by MCD for sterilisation and immunisation of stray dogs are directed to pick up all aggressive dogs. Deputy directors of veterinary services of all zones are also directed to take similar action and hand over the stray dogs to the nearest ABC centre. They also need to ensure that records of picked up dogs are recorded through the 311 app. A daily report in this regard, mentioning the area or location, should be submitted to the deputy director of veterinary services of the rabies control programme," stated the directive. An MCD official, on the condition of anonymity, said NGOs and MCD officials are working jointly and captured 63 dogs in the past two days and transferred them to ABC centres. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi | Gold Rates Today in Delhi | Silver Rates Today in Delhi "We have enough space to keep at least 1,500-2,000 dogs at sterilisation centres. Once the space is occupied, we will further work out a proposal to create animal shelters in Dwarka on priority, followed by Ghogha, where we have over 80 acres of open area. We have asked the authorities to make sure that the dogs caught are not released and remain in ABC centres," said the official. The directives come at a time when MCD's veterinary department is facing a severe staff crisis. Out of the total 649 sanctioned posts, 279 are vacant. This includes the post of department director, which has been vacant for more than nine months. The matter has been raised several times in standing meetings. In the case of animal catcher field staff, out of 350 posts, 109 are lying vacant. "The shortage of staff is affecting the functioning of the department," said the official. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.

How Haryana's new ‘dictionary meaning of forest' will affect the Aravallis
How Haryana's new ‘dictionary meaning of forest' will affect the Aravallis

Indian Express

time8 hours ago

  • Indian Express

How Haryana's new ‘dictionary meaning of forest' will affect the Aravallis

The Haryana government on Monday (August 18) officially defined the 'dictionary meaning of forest'. Officials say that the state's definition of a forest 'references precedents from Supreme Court rulings' and is aligned with 'judicial expectations'. Environmentalists, however, say that it is a narrow definition which will exclude the ecologically sensitive Aravalli ridge from protection, and make it vulnerable to unchecked development, illegal mining and real estate encroachment. In its notification dated August 18, Haryana's Environment, Forest and Wildlife department stated: 'A patch of land shall be deemed to be 'forest as per dictionary meaning' if it fulfils following conditions: * It has a minimum area of five hectares, if it is in isolation, and a minimum area of two hectares, if it is in contiguity with the government notified forests; and * It has a canopy density of 0.4 (40%) or more'. The notification further specifies that 'all linear/compact/agro-forestry plantations and orchards situated outside the government notified forests shall not be treated as forests under the above definition'. Such linear plantations are frequently found along roads, canals and railway tracks, where they can serve multiple purposes. SC's directives in March The Haryana government's notification came after the Supreme Court on March 4 directed all States and Union Territories to define what constitutes a 'forest' and commence surveys to identify forest areas in their respective jurisdictions. The court said that States and UTs must constitute expert committees within one month to identify 'forest-like areas', 'unclassified forest lands', and 'community forest lands', and that these committees must complete their mapping of forest lands and submit a report to the Centre within six months. The court further said that 'the process must strictly follow the 2011 Lafarge Umiam Mining guidelines, mandating a GIS-based decision-support database that includes — district-wise plots that may qualify as 'forest' under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (FCA); Core, buffer, and eco-sensitive zones of protected areas; important wildlife migratory corridors; lands diverted from forest use in the past; and supporting maps like TOPO-sheets and Forest Survey of India maps'. Chief Secretaries of States and Administrators of UTs who fail to comply will be held 'personally accountable for any non-compliance [with the court's directives],' the court said. These directives were made in the challenge to the 2023 amendment to the FCA (Ashok Kumar Sharma, IFS (Retd) & Ors. vs. Union of India) that the apex court is currently hearing. At the heart of both the amendment and the challenge to it is the question: 'what constitutes a forest?' The FCA of 1980 restricted 'the dereservation of forests or use of forest land for non-forest purpose'. The Act barred the diversion of forest land for non-forest purposes without the prior approval of the Centre. In 1996, a Supreme Court Bench of Justices J S Verma and Justice B N Kirpal in T N Godavarman Thirumulpad v Union of India ruled that the word 'forest', for the purposes of the FCA, 'must be understood according to its dictionary meaning' which 'covers all statutorily recognised forests, whether designated as reserved, protected or otherwise'. This was a landmark order: effectively, any parcel of forested land, regardless of size, official status or ownership, could be deemed a forest. This widening of the applicability of the FCA, according to the Statement of Objects and Reasons of the 2023 amendment, was 'restraining the authorities from undertaking any change in the land use and allowing any development or utility related work'. 'Today, this (the FCA) comes in the way of building even toilets in schools for tribal girls,' Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav had said in Parliament while introducing the amendment. To resolve this issue, the amendment made the FCA applicable only to notified forests and lands that were identified as 'forest' in government records. This amendment was challenged by a group of retired Indian Forest Service officers and NGOs such as Vanashakti and Goa Foundation who said that it 'substantially diluted' the FCA. In February 2024, the apex court directed all UTs and State governments to follow Godavarman's definition of 'forest' while it was hearing Ashok Kumar Sharma. In March, the court issued the aforementioned directives, and asked the Centre to compile and consolidate reports submitted by all States and UTs. The next hearing in the case is scheduled for September 9. Reactions to Haryana's definition Although Haryana constituted state- and district-level committees in April, surveys were stalled until a formal definition of 'forest' was finalised. Officials say that 'with the official notification… these committees can finally proceed clearing the path for surveys that determine which areas qualify as forests, a critical step in ensuring they gain protection under the FCA'. But environmentalists have been critical of Haryana's definition which, they say, creates 'a very high threshold' for a land to be classified as forest. 'It is a pity that Haryana has blindly followed the lead of states like Goa in choosing a minimum threshold of 40% forest canopy cover to identify an area as a deemed forest,' environmentalist Chetan Agarwal told The Indian Express. 'The Aravallis in the south and west (of Haryana) get only 300 to 600 mm rainfall annually. This low rainfall and the rocky terrain creates tough conditions for growth of forests in the Aravalli. Vegetation here has adapted over millions of years into a stunted growth of thorny and dry deciduous species and scrub forest conditions,' he said, adding that 'the decision to keep such a high threshold of forest cover will exclude much the Aravallis from the protective embrace of the FCA' and that this definition was prima facie violative of the 1996 Godavarman judgement. 'The minimum area threshold of 2 and 5 hectares is also unreasonably high for such a dry state and should have been kept at 1 and 2 hectares, respectively', Agarwal added.

India's Stray Romance: Love, lies, rabies, solutions
India's Stray Romance: Love, lies, rabies, solutions

India Today

timea day ago

  • India Today

India's Stray Romance: Love, lies, rabies, solutions

India's love for its stray animals is the stuff of mushy stories, and the entire country is the theatre of this romance. Picture this: a cow, swarmed by flies, covered in mud, munches serenely on a plastic bag in the middle of a traffic jam while motorists chant 'gau mata ki jai' and drive past. Down the same road, a dozen dogs tear at garbage, fighting over bones tossed by a kind-hearted samaritan who will later tweet #BeKind, and post lugubrious in this drama laced with emotion, apathy plays the lead role, leaving the strays where they are, free to multiply and die. Compassion, though ready to burst through, always remains on the leash, or on social media.A Theatre of HypocrisyTake the cow, India's divine mother. Five million strays, per the 2019 livestock census. These aren't refugees from across the border—95 per cent belong to dairy farmers who let them roam, grazing on urban trash to cut feed costs, then milk them for profit. It's the ultimate hustle: zero fodder costs, maximum spiritual clout. The outcome: bellies full of plastic, intestines blocked, and streets choked with dung. Solution? Everyone shrugs: it's every Indian's mother, the other children will the dogs. Sixty million strays, the world's highest. That's nearly a medium-sized European country roaming on four legs. The math is simple: For a population of 1.4 billion it is just .042 dogs per head, or 1 dog per 23 numbers bite harder than they bark: 3.7 million annual dog bites; 36% of the world's rabies deaths belong to India; one child dies every four hours. Delhi alone, mid-2025: 35,198 bites, 49 deaths. The love here is lethal—the more we feed, the more they Without ResponsibilityIndia's animal policy is a circus where outrage is the headline act and accountability never shows up. Politicians milk cow bhakti into votes, urban elites turn dog rescues into Instagram content, and municipalities treat animal control like pothole repair—stuffed into last year's result? Both cows and dogs suffer, humans pay the price, and the 'mushy story' of India's love for strays ends in a tragicomic Supreme Court's 2025 plan to relocate Delhi's 1 million dogs has led to pan-India outrage, howls of 'genocide.' Concern for canines is justified–-dogs can't be herded in shelters that could turn into Auschwitz camps of death and decay. They deserve empathy, care and the right to rage without responsibility is a street dog chasing its own tail, or a cow mata arranging her own dinner—lots of noise, zero Power of CompoundingOne unsterilised female dog, producing two litters per year for six years, could result in thousands of descendants, assuming 6 puppies per litter, 80% survival rate, and subsequent generations reproducing at the same rate starting at age doesn't have to be this way. Eradicating polio was once called impossible. But vaccines, mass campaigns, and accountability deadlines made it possible. Stray management needs the same ruthlessness:Policy, Not PietyWant a fix? Here are a few cows: Mandatory registration of all cattle; fines and seizures if they're abandoned. Subsidised gaushalas tied to digital tracking of herd sizes. Fund them through a cow cess that actually goes to barns, not to politicians' barns of dogs: Mass sterilisation and vaccination drives—with GPS tagging, community volunteers, and strict completion targets. A District Dog Board with annual audits and penalties for officials who fudge data. Zero tracking = zero both: A 'Stray Animal Authority of India' with investigative powers, a fixed national roadmap, and reports every six months. Performance-linked funding, just as with Swachh it like the polio menace that we eradicated—rope in vets, NGOs and health workers. Run awareness the FixWhere's the money? Same place it always is when votes are at stake. India spends crores subsidising statues, rallies, and spiritual jamborees. A small dog tax per household, diversion of MP-MLA funds, panchayat money, CSR mandates, and state-allocated veterinary corps could bankroll sterilisation and shelters nationwide. Remember: one unsterilised female dog multiplies to thousands. A penny spent is thousands saved. Delay equals geometric Jaipur ModelThe Jaipur model, launched in 1994 by an NGO and Jaipur Municipal Corporation, is India's gold standard for humane stray dog control. Daily teams capture, operate, vaccinate and release dogs, costing Rs 800–Rs 2,200 each, funded by JMC and donors. Implementation stalls often, due to funding and resistance, but the programme continues despite hurdles, bringing down the population of strays, and cases of this model, scale it nationally, tie it to a digital dashboard. Make stray control a performance parameter for mayors and district The DogIndia can send rockets to the moon but cannot build kennels with roofs. We legislate holiness for cows while letting them inherit slow death by plastic. We hashtag dog love and then bury children bitten to death. That's not compassion—it's criminal negligence, dressed up with flowers, candlelight vigils and social media empathy is not bread crumbs (or plastic) on the street; it's policy with teeth. Without it, India's romance with strays will remain what it has always been: a love story written in blood, dung, and hypocrisy.(Sandipan Sharma likes to spin gripping tales on cricket, cinema, and history. When not scribbling, he dodges life's mundane bits by reading everything under the sun. He has been a journalist and author for 25-plus years. - Ends(Views expressed in this opinion piece are those of the author)Tune InMust Watch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store