
Toolkit launched to protect child influencers
These are children that post content online via social media accounts that may generate economic gain in the form of monetary payments or goods.
It often occurs through sponsorships, product placements or paid adverts, where the parents are approached by a brand or agency to promote a product or experience.
The 'Kids as Content' Digital Safeguarding Toolkit is designed to protect children in the digital space.
It is a guide for parents, industry professionals, and policymakers focussing on considerations such as child labour risks when it comes to payments.
The toolkit also examines health and safety concerns, as well as risks linked to family, identity, education and dignity.
It is based on the research of Dr Francis Rees, Co-ordinator for the Child Influencer Project and a Lecturer in Law at the University of Essex.
"The project has identified basic workplace risks such as children not having the same entitlements to access their money," Dr Rees said.
"They also wouldn't go through the normal health and safety assessments or know their working hours."
"It is about getting parents to take a beat and think about what they are posting, how they are framing the child, and also to think about their own bargaining positions with brands and agencies who should be paying them properly for this work," she added.
The toolkit was launched today at the Office of the Ombudsman for Children.
The Ombudsman, Dr Niall Muldoon, believes new laws may be needed to protect child influencers.
"If they were child actors, there would be all sorts of regulations, we have advertising standards when it comes to health and safety, remuneration, hours of work and education to make sure the child is protected at all times," Dr Muldoon said.
"That's not in this sphere and we need to start upping our game and looking at the legislation around that," he added.
There are also concerns about the negative comments, exposure to harmful content and unwanted followers that can come with being a child influencer.
Fiona Jennings, Head of Policy and Public Affairs at the ISPCC said laws are being developed in other countries to protect child influencers.
"We need to close a legislative gap that is there at the moment," Ms Jennings said.
"Invariably this type of work happens within the home space and it can be difficult for a child to understand what is family life when it drifts into child influencing," she added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
07-08-2025
- RTÉ News
Could more time off when you're young compensate for later retirement?
Analysis: None of us knows how long we will live or how healthy we will be in the future so it makes sense not to leave our free time until it may be too late By Malte Jauch, University of Essex In 2022, the Irish Government decided to maintain the state pension age at 66, despite recommendations to do otherwise from the Pensions Commission. The Commission had recommended gradually increasing the pension age to 67 in 2031 and to 68 in 2039. In the UK, the state pension is currently paid to people at 66, but that's set to rise to 67 in the next couple of years, and a move to 68 might come sooner than previously planned after Keir Starmer's government launched a review. Gradually increasing the working lifespan is never going to be popular. But one way of making this policy more palatable could be to give people early access to some of the free time that retirement promises. After all, sometimes that promise fails to deliver, because many people die before they reach retirement age. Globally, about 27% of men and 18% women die before the age of 65 (although this proportion also includes deaths before working age). In wealthy countries, the number of people who die prematurely is lower than the global average, but still significant. In the EU, 16% of men and 8% of women die before 65. From RTÉ Radio 1's Today with Claire Byrne, Dr Harry Barry and UL's Dr Ann-Marie Creaven on why you should be preparing for your retirement For these people, the promise of free time and leisure in old age never materialises. There will also be many whose physical and mental health will have deteriorated by the time they retire, so that they are less capable of enjoying their free time. So perhaps slogging away until retirement is not an ideal arrangement. But what if you could transfer some of the time off that retirement promises to an earlier stage of your life, when everything is a rush, crammed with the demands of work and domestic responsibilities? Luckily, the stark contrast between a time-poor middle age and a time-rich old age is not unavoidable. Governments can choose different approaches that directly affect how free time is distributed across our life stages. Japan, for example, is a country which has opted to focus on delaying leisure time, and encourages workers to postpone that enjoyment of free time until old age. It does this in part by rewarding workers with wage increases – known as "seniority-based pay" – if they don't take career breaks. From RTÉ Brainstorm, why micro-retirement has become a new workplace trend for Gen Z & millennials Japanese employment law also permits companies to force employees to retire at the age 60. As a result, on average, Japanese workers work 1,680 hours per year and retire at 63. In the Netherlands by contrast, people work less (1,433 hours per year) and retire later – at 67. Labour laws make it easier for employees to decrease their hours, by going part time, for example. Discrimination between workers based on work hours is prohibited, so that those who opt for part-time work are guaranteed equal treatment with regard to wages and other benefits. But the high legal age of retirement discourages Dutch workers from early retirement. Time on your side? So how should we assess these different approaches? One way to look at retirement is that it compensates us for our previous hard work. The prospect of compensation might lead us to adopt a relaxed attitude toward long work hours. Once we've stopped work, we'll be rewarded with a large chunk of leisure. From RTÉ Radio 1's Morning Ireland, Dr Orla Kelly from UCD discusses the results of Ireland's first four-day week reduced worktime trial But for those who don't make it to retirement, this promise of a life of leisure turns out to be a cruel joke. Early deaths are also more prominent among those who have already suffered from poverty and other disadvantages. The same is true for ill health. The disadvantaged are much more likely to suffer from a variety of conditions that prevent them from being able to fully enjoy retirement. Another risk for those who are healthy when they retire is that relatives or friends may have died. This reduces the value of the retirees' free time because the loved ones they hoped to share that time with are no longer around. So perhaps some of that free time could be better used when workers are younger. Raising a family, for example, is extremely time consuming, and there can't be many parents of young children who don't wish for a few extra hours a week to call their own. Even devoting time to hobbies when we're younger might be considered more efficient than waiting until we have retired. After all, if you learn a new language or how to paint when you're in your 40s, you may have much more time to enjoy your new skill over the ensuing decades. My research suggests that the state should help people take some of their retirement early for all these reasons. None of us knows how long we will live, or how healthy we will be in the future. Faced with this uncertainty, it makes sense not to gamble with our opportunities for free time and leave it until it may be too late. Even those who enjoy their work have strong reasons not to postpone a large proportion of their time off, and governments should help us access more of it while we're younger.


RTÉ News
06-06-2025
- RTÉ News
ISPCC joins worldwide project to tackle online child sexual abuse
The ISPCC has announced its participation in a global project to prevent and respond to online child sexual exploitation and abuse. Safe Online, a global fund dedicated to eradicating online child sexual exploitation and abuse, is funding the project called "Sandboxing and Standardising Child Online Redress". The initiative is being spearheaded by Greek non-profit child welfare organisation The Smile of the Child, and will be co-created by children and young people to ensure their voices are heard. The sandbox project will establish a first-of-its-kind mechanism to advance child online safety through collaboration across sectors, borders and generations. Sandboxes bring together industry, regulators and customers in a safe space to test innovative products and services without incurring regulatory sanctions. Through the participation of youth, platforms, regulators and online safety experts, this first regulatory sandbox for child digital wellbeing will provide for consistent, systemic care and redress for children from online harm. "This project is a wonderful example of what we can achieve when we collaborate and listen to children and young people," said ISPCC Head of Policy and Public Affairs Fiona Jennings. "Having robust online reporting mechanisms in place is a key policy objective for ISPCC and this project will go a long way towards making the online world safer for children and young people to participate in," Ms Jennings said. The project is led by The Smile of the Child, Greece's premier child welfare organisation and ISPCC is a partner alongside The Young and Resilient Research Centre at Western Sydney University, Child Helpline International and the Centre for Digital Policy at University College Dublin.


RTÉ News
19-05-2025
- RTÉ News
Toolkit launched to protect child influencers
A new digital safeguarding toolkit has been launched to protect child influencers, also known as 'kidfluencers'. These are children that post content online via social media accounts that may generate economic gain in the form of monetary payments or goods. It often occurs through sponsorships, product placements or paid adverts, where the parents are approached by a brand or agency to promote a product or experience. The 'Kids as Content' Digital Safeguarding Toolkit is designed to protect children in the digital space. It is a guide for parents, industry professionals, and policymakers focussing on considerations such as child labour risks when it comes to payments. The toolkit also examines health and safety concerns, as well as risks linked to family, identity, education and dignity. It is based on the research of Dr Francis Rees, Co-ordinator for the Child Influencer Project and a Lecturer in Law at the University of Essex. "The project has identified basic workplace risks such as children not having the same entitlements to access their money," Dr Rees said. "They also wouldn't go through the normal health and safety assessments or know their working hours." "It is about getting parents to take a beat and think about what they are posting, how they are framing the child, and also to think about their own bargaining positions with brands and agencies who should be paying them properly for this work," she added. The toolkit was launched today at the Office of the Ombudsman for Children. The Ombudsman, Dr Niall Muldoon, believes new laws may be needed to protect child influencers. "If they were child actors, there would be all sorts of regulations, we have advertising standards when it comes to health and safety, remuneration, hours of work and education to make sure the child is protected at all times," Dr Muldoon said. "That's not in this sphere and we need to start upping our game and looking at the legislation around that," he added. There are also concerns about the negative comments, exposure to harmful content and unwanted followers that can come with being a child influencer. Fiona Jennings, Head of Policy and Public Affairs at the ISPCC said laws are being developed in other countries to protect child influencers. "We need to close a legislative gap that is there at the moment," Ms Jennings said. "Invariably this type of work happens within the home space and it can be difficult for a child to understand what is family life when it drifts into child influencing," she added.