How Trump's actions against LA protesters defy all precedents
Analysis: Trump's unilateral decision to take federal control over the National Guard pits the president against the state of California
Violence has erupted on the streets of cities across southern California over the weekend, as protesters clashed with agents from the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency detaining people they suspected to be illegal immigrants. The US president, Donald Trump, took the unusual decision on Saturday to deploy 2,000 troops from California's National Guard, despite not being requested to by the state's governor, Gavin Newsom.
Newsom has threatened to sue Trump over what he has called "an illegal act, an immoral act, an unconstitutional act". Other California officials have also denounced the move, with Senator Adam Schiff calling it a "dangerous precedent for unilateral misuse of the guard across the country".
Raids by ICE agents have increased significantly since mid-May when the Trump administration threatened to fire senior ICE officials if they did not deliver on higher arrest quotas. Several high-profile wrongful arrests of US citizens have further inflamed tensions. Protests have escalated in California, a Democratic stronghold and a "sanctuary state" where local law enforcement does not cooperate with ICE to detain illegal immigrants.
At around 24,000 troops, California's National Guard is the largest in the United States. Each state has its own National Guard unit, a reserve force under the control of the governor which can be called upon in times of crisis – often to help out during natural disasters or other emergencies. For example, in January, Newsom activated several thousand troops to aid relief work during the devastating fires that threatened Los Angeles. In 1992, the then president, George H.W. Bush, backed the call of the then governor of California, Pete Wilson, call to deploy National Guard members to quell the South Central LA riots.
From RTÉ Radio 1's Today with Claire Byrne, Los Angeles-based reporter Sean Mandell reports on the ongoing LA protests
Now troops are back on the streets of LA. But this time not at the behest of the governor. Trump's unilateral decision to take federal control over the National Guard pits the president against the state of California – and importantly, against a state that has constantly resisted his anti-immigrant agenda. Newsom is seen by many as a possible contender for the Democratic Party's nomination in the 2028 presidential election.
Historical precedents
Is there a precedent for this? Yes and no. The Insurrection Act (passed in 1807, but revised several times) authorises the president to call on the National Guard in times of crisis or war to supplement state and local forces. This has been codified in title 10 of the US Code, which details the laws of the land.
In 1871, the law was revised to specifically allow for the National Guard to be used in the protection of civil rights for black Americans. Legal experts have long called for reform of the Insurrection Act, arguing that the language is too vague and open to misuse.
From RTÉ News, Trump calls deployment of troops in Los Angeles a 'great decision'
In the past, former US presidents, Dwight D. Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson all invoked different sections of the Act to protect civil rights, particularly against segregationist states. While the act implies consent between governor and president, it does not require it.
Two examples stand out. On June 11 1963, Kennedy issued executive order 11111 mobilising the National Guard to protect desegregation of the University of Alabama, against the wishes of Alabama governor George Wallace.
Wallace's determination to block the registration of two black students, Vivian Malone and James Hood, produced a produced a sensational media moment when Wallace physically blocked the entrance of the university. Local law enforcement stood by the governor. With the state of Alabama in defiance of federal law, Kennedy saw no alternative but to deploy the guard.
Less than two years later, in March 1965 Lyndon B. Johnson again deployed the guard in Alabama, bypassing Governor Wallace. In February, a state trooper in the town of Marion killed a young voters-rights activist, Jimmie Lee Jackson.
This shooting, along with several violent attacks by the local police on voter registration activists in Selma, inspired a series of marches in support of the 1965 voting rights bill. On the eve of the march from Selma to Montgomery, tensions between local police and civil rights protesters were at a high. In response, Johnson bypassed Wallace and called in the National Guard to ensure, as he put it, the rights of Americans "to walk peaceably and safely without injury or loss of life from Selma to Montgomery".
Before last Saturday, this was the last time a president circumvented the authority of the state governor in deploying the guard. But even in this instance, there was an implied request from Wallace, who explicitly requested federal aid in the absence of state resources.
The subtext here is that Wallace did not want to be seen to call up the National Guard himself, so he forced Johnson to make that decision, allowing him to claim that the president was trampling on state sovereignty.
Insurrection Act
But this is not the current situation in California. The LAPD is the third largest police force in the US, with over just under 9,000 sworn officers. While its ranks have shrunk in recent years, it has been responding to the recent protests and unrest. There is no reason to think that Newsom would hesitate to call in the National Guard if warranted.
In reality, Trump has invoked the Insurrection Act to protect ICE agents. Indeed, the National Guard has a complicated history of responding to civil unrest. The current situation is in stark contrast with the past, and faces serious questions of legitimacy.
It is difficult not to see this as the latest move by the Trump administration to subjugate California. In early January Trump threatened to withhold federal aid to rebuild after the wildfires. In past months he threatened to withdraw all of the state's federal funding to punish it for its stance on campus protests and the inclusion of transgender athletes in women's sports.
Unlike his predecessors, Trump has not mobilised the National Guard to protect civil rights against a hostile police force. Instead, he appears to be using this as leverage to undermine a political opponent he views as blocking his agenda. Circumventing gubernatorial powers over the National Guard in this way has no precedent and heralds the next stage in an extended conflict between the president and the state of California.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Ukraine's Zelenskiy says he hopes to meet Trump at G7 meeting in Canada
Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy has said he plans to attend the Group of Seven summit in Canada next week and hoped to meet US president Donald Trump on the sidelines of the meeting. Mr Zelenskiy told a news briefing he planned to discuss continued support for Ukraine , sanctions against Russia, and future financing for Kyiv's reconstruction efforts during the upcoming summit. 'Anyway, the final decision is in the White House, it depends on the president of the United States of America,' Mr Zelenskiy said regarding the possible imposition of tough sanctions against Russia. 'I hope that we will have a conversation (with Trump) at the G7 summit and I hope that if no decisions are made before then, I will be able to have at least an understanding of how close we are to that decision,' he added. READ MORE Mr Trump last week said that he had not decided whether to deploy sanctions against Russia that are being considered by the US senate. [ The Irish Times view on the US and Ukraine: Trump's intentions are far from clear Opens in new window ] Mr Zelenskiy said at a joint press conference with the German defence minister Boris Pistorius that Kyiv was unlikely to be able to compensate for US weapons systems if such deliveries stopped. He also said that Ukraine intends to expand co-operation with Germany in joint weapon production. 'We need financing... Germany is one of those countries where they understand it and they know the rules and they always do what they say,' Mr Zelenskiy said. Mr Pistorius said on Thursday that his country's military support for Ukraine had reached €7 billion this year and a further €1.9 billion are pending parliamentary approval. - Reuters (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025
The Irish Sun
3 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Rogue state Iran plans terrifying response to Israel blitz from immediate counterstrikes to secret NUKE as tensions boil
IRAN could be spurred on to rush the creation of a nuclear weapon if Israel unleashes an attack, an ex-military intelligence agent warns. Israel's top brass are understood to be poised to blitz the rogue nation within days without the backing of the US. 7 A missile launches from an undisclosed location in Iran Credit: EPA 7 Satellite picture shows Iran's nuclear site in Isfahan, Iran, in April 2024 Credit: AP 7 It comes as Donald Trump's 60-day deadline to thrash out a deal with Tehran over its nuclear programme last night expired. Senior military and political sources in Tel Aviv told The Sun back in April A senior diplomatic insider, speaking in Jerusalem, said Tehran's nuclear programme should have been Israel hoped to coordinate an attack with the US, but More on Israel And now US officials have been warned Israel is ready to unleash strikes on the rogue nation, sources have revealed. In a telling sign, the US has scaled down its presence in the Middle East and removed non-essential staff from its embassy in Baghdad, Trump alluded to potential conflict last night as he said: "They are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place and we'll see what happens. "They can't have a nuclear weapon, very simple, they can't have a nuclear weapon, we're not going to allow that." Most read in The Sun has been making preparations behind the scenes to swiftly blitz Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities as he deems the country "enemy number one". Trump, however, had firmly insisted Israel take no action that could jeopardise his administration's efforts to thrash out a deal with Iran. Israel MUST defy Trump and strike weakened Iran to neutralise nuclear threat But Netanyahu appears on the brink of giving the green light to strike as a sixth round of talks tentatively set for Sunday in Oman looms. Iran's furious Revolutionary Guard commander vowed Tehran would respond in a "more forceful and destructive way" to Israel than in past offensives. It comes as the UN nuclear watchdog found Iran is not complying with its nuke obligations amid alarming reports that the Islamist state has stepped up secret plans to build nuclear weapons Raz Zimmt, who spent more than two decades in the IDF's military intelligence, said Iran is likely to immediately retaliate with a huge missile blitz if Israel launches missiles as its turf. But the veteran Iran-watcher warned it could spur Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei to continue his warped nuke scheme with no oversight - or even break out a nuclear weapon. He told The Sun: "We have to make a distinction between two concerning scenarios in the day after an attack whether it's an Israeli or an American attack. "The immediate retaliation would probably be the launching of long-range missiles from Iran against Israel if that's an Israeli attack. "I assume that if it's just an Israeli attack Iran will not take the risk of engaging the United States into a military confrontation with Iran by targeting US forces or US bases in the region. Iran's breaching nuclear rules IRAN has been declared as in breach of its nuclear rules for the first time in two decades. It is the culmination of several stand-offs between the Vienna-based IAEA and Iran since Trump pulled the US out of a nuclear deal between Tehran and major powers in 2018 during his first term, after which that accord unravelled. Tehran said it "has no choice but to respond to this political resolution", and said it would launch a new enrichment site "in a secure location". The state said: "Other measures are also being planned and will be announced subsequently." An IAEA official said Iran had given no further details such as the location of the site. It comes as US and Iranian officials are due to hold a sixth round of talks on Tehran's accelerating uranium enrichment programme in Oman on Sunday. The Trump administration has been trying to secure a deal with Tehran aimed at curbing Iran's nuclear programme. Donald Trump is said to be in advanced talks with Iran over a preliminary agreement that could include provisions on uranium enrichment - terms Israel finds unacceptable. "In that case, we'll probably see more or less what we saw in early October. "Perhaps more than that Iran is still equipped with thousands of ballistic missiles it can use against Israel. "Those can certainly inflict significant damage to Israel but this is only the immediate kind of retaliation. Israel of course can try to defend itself. "Israel can carry out strikes which could in a way limit the missiles capabilities in Iran." An Iron Dome operator previously told The Sun how the IDF was ready for any possible air assault from Iran. Tsgt Y said: "Fearful [of an attack from Iran]? No. We're prepared for anything that might come." Dr Zimmt warned Israel blitzing Iran could spark weeks of military confrontation between the two nations. But he argued it could prompt a far more sinister outcome. Insiders say Iran right now has the capacity to create three to five nuclear bombs - but does not have the ability to make them explode. 7 Iran launched projectiles at Israel before being intercepted by the Iron Dome in the sky above Jerusalem in October 2024 Credit: Alamy 7 Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei pictured last week Credit: Getty 7 "[It is possible] after an Israeli strike Iran will try to take the remnants of what is being left of its nuclear capabilities, the fissile material, the centrifuges, what will be left out of the two main enrichment facilities and try to reconstitute its nuclear programme this time without any IEA inspections," Dr Zimmt said. "And so Iran can certainly use this opportunity to make a decision to break out a weapon which will require continuous efforts by both the United States and Israel to avoid that scenario. "So the immediate retaliation would probably be some kind of missile attack against Israel if it's only Israel. "The second kind of retaliation would be concerning Iran's efforts to rehabilitate its nuclear program and perhaps also breaking out weapons." A French government insider close to Israel said it will be imperative other countries form a deterrence coalition if Israel strikes to fend off retaliation from Iran. The source, speaking to The Sun in Paris, warned Iran "know how to fight" and are "used to long wars". "You must have a kind of coalition against the reaction of Iran," they said. "And you have seen this small coalition immediately before, US, UK and France, and some Arab countries. "But somebody like Trump would not support that, I mean an attack from Iran. "So it must be a kind of deterrence, saying to Iran, OK, you have this strike from Israel, but you can't reply, because we are there now. So if you reply, this is an attack against us. "That's deterrence. "If Iran tries to strike back, you will see immediately a kind of coalition against Iran. "And you will have a huge, huge political issue, because the best ally of Israel, the United States, the best ally of Iran is Russia. "So if you have a strike between Israel and Iran, the problem is between the United States and Russia." IDF sources, speaking to The Sun at a base in Israel in April, revealed the military had been working for months to clear the path for a major strike on Iran. Three air campaigns eliminated strategic aerial defences which were 'the main obstacle' protecting Iran's nuke facilities, the insider confirmed. Vitally, this would allow Israeli aircraft to get to Iran's borders with diminished fear of being blasted. Iran's secret nuke site 'Rainbow' Exclusive by Katie Davis, Chief Foreign Reporter (Digital) CHILLING satellite pictures reveal Iran's sprawling secret nuclear site codenamed "Rainbow". Sources in the country have uncovered how the base is being used to develop nuclear-capable missiles with a 2,000-mile range - able to strike US bases in the Tehran's tyrannical regime is using oil and chemical facilities as a cover for nuclear bases, bombshell docs shared with The Sun by the Haunting aerial images expose a network of clandestine sites - including "Rainbow" - used by iron-fist leaders to create terrifying nuclear weapons. A powerful nuclear blast from Iran could have disastrous consequences for the Middle East - and beyond - thanks to the capability of the warheads. Now sources inside Iran have revealed the regime's nuclear weaponisation entity, Organization of Defensive Innovation and Research's (SPND) secret project to accelerate nuclear ability. Hidden under the guise of a chemical production facility, the crowning jewel of the operation is a base known internally as the 'Rangin Kaman (Rainbow) Site". It is some distance from Iran's already known nuke bases, and is masked as a chemical production company known as Diba Energy Siba. 7
RTÉ News
3 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Los Angeles 'safe and sound for last two nights'
Los Angeles "was safe and sound for the last two nights", US President Donald Trump has said, as he hailed troops for helping to restore order in the city after days of anti-deportation protests. "Our great National Guard, with a little help from the Marines, put the LA Police in a position to effectively do their job," Mr Trump said on Truth Social, adding that without the military, the city "would be a crime scene like we haven't seen in years". The mostly peaceful protests ignited last week over a sudden escalation in efforts to apprehend migrants who were in the country illegally. But there were also pockets of violence, including the burning of self-driving taxis and hurling stones at police. Mr Trump deployed several thousand National Guard troops and some 700 active-duty marines over the objections of Democratic California governor Gavin Newsom, the first such action by a US President in decades. In his post, Mr Trump said Mr Newsom "had totally lost control of the situation". "He should be saying THANK YOU for saving his ass, instead of trying to justify his mistakes and incompetence!!!" he added. Similar protests also ignited in other cities across the United States, as California prepared for a legal showdown of Mr Trump's deployment of the military. A second night of curfew was in place as city leaders tried to get a handle on the after-dark vandalism and looting that scarred a few city blocks in the 1,300-square kilometre metropolis.
