logo
What are college football programs actually worth? Experts say from $1.65 billion to $0

What are college football programs actually worth? Experts say from $1.65 billion to $0

New York Times7 days ago
On Monday, The Athletic put a price tag on every Power 4 college football team if they could be bought and sold like pro franchises, from Texas (almost $2.4 billion) to Houston ($91 million).
Today, we're going to consider a related but different question: How much are those programs actually worth?
Advertisement
That's a topic being researched by a pair of valuation experts, Kevin Kaiser of the University of Pennsylvania and Jacqueline Garner of Georgia Tech. Although their work is ongoing, their initial figures range from more than $1.6 billion (Ohio State) to … $0. The differences in the questions and answers are both significant and relevant, as they explained in a recent conversation.
Because professional sports teams are businesses, it's natural to think of them like any other company or investment: The price you pay reflects how much money you think it will make.
That, however, is not how the industry works in practice. The billionaires who buy teams view them as trophy assets to show off, like a superyacht or a van Gogh.
'We don't think of these things as investments when the people buying them are buying them for the consumption benefit of telling their friends they just bought a football team,' said Kaiser, an adjunct full professor of finance at Penn's Wharton School of Business. 'In that sense, they're buying it based on how happy they are, and the price they pay is a reflection of happiness, not (cash flow) value.'
The disconnect means the prices for pro franchise transactions — like the $6 billion sales of the Washington Commanders and Boston Celtics — are much higher than how much those teams are actually worth on paper.
'We can't back into a value of that,' said Garner, a senior lecturer at Georgia Tech and former financial economist at the other SEC (the Securities and Exchange Commission). 'There's no set of estimates where we can come up with $6 billion with their cash flows. Even if I make really nice assumptions or nice estimates, I can't come up with $6 billion.'
The same idea would apply to theoretical transactions of college football teams.
Advertisement
Even if the cash flow figures mean a program has little to no financial value, a booster with deep enough pockets will want to buy it, anyway, for the joy and bragging rights of owning their beloved team.
If (when?) investment companies fully venture into college sports, they can't and won't approach the process the same way billionaires do in the NFL or NBA.
'They don't need a trophy asset,' Garner said. 'In fact, they'll lose their job with trophy assets.'
Instead, those firms have a fiduciary duty to pursue deals that make money. That leads to some of the major lingering questions with college sports and private equity: How will outside groups cause cash flows to grow enough to make it worth their investments? Where does the extra money come from? What expenses get cut?
Kaiser envisions another likely scenario. What if a private equity firm that wants to make money partners with a booster who wants a trophy asset? The different perspectives would affect everything from the purchase price to the payouts.
'You can kind of imagine that private equity's going to position themselves to maximize their take from the cash flow and leave the other party stuck with the stump that basically isn't going to generate much cash flow, but they're going to have the happiness of saying they own the team,' Kaiser said.
When paying players directly became legal on July 1 through the House vs. NCAA lawsuit settlement, schools added an immediate expense of up to $20.5 million. But that's just Year 1; the payments are expected to increase 4 percent annually after that.
If you assume investors seek a 10 percent return on buying a team, Garner and Kaiser said the revenue-sharing era hacks almost $350 million off a program's valuation unless it's offset by things like higher ticket prices. The hit is large enough to wipe out any value from some of the Power 4's smallest revenue generators.
Advertisement
'The great teams, the big ones who we all know, they'll be relatively fine,' Kaiser said. 'But relatively fine, still, it hurts to lose $350 million in value overnight. This is, in my view, going to generate a long-term consequence that's probably going to separate the football teams from the universities eventually.'
It's hard to consider any college football programs as long-term investments without acknowledging the entire landscape. Conference realignment is relatively quiet at the Power 4 level, but the next seismic wave (if it happens) could be not far off as TV deals for the Big Ten, SEC, Big 12 and College Football Playoff all expire between 2030-34.
The valuation for programs in that future top tier — whatever it looks like — will depend on how much their cash flow increases through things like ticket sales or TV contracts.
'They're going to be getting a lot more cash flows because of this shift vs. other schools, and then the value gap is going to grow wider,' Garner said.
How much wider?
'The difference isn't tiny,' Kaiser said. 'It's astronomical, and so the difference in valuation will be astronomical. If suddenly we have D-I teams that are moved out of that premier league or super league or whatever it's going to be, then they're going to be relegated effectively to D-II schools in some respects.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ultra Clean Holdings Inc (UCTT) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Navigating Market Challenges ...
Ultra Clean Holdings Inc (UCTT) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Navigating Market Challenges ...

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ultra Clean Holdings Inc (UCTT) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Navigating Market Challenges ...

Total Revenue: $518.8 million, compared to $518.6 million in the prior quarter. Product Revenue: $454.9 million, compared to $457 million last quarter. Services Revenue: $63.9 million, up from $61.6 million in Q1. Total Gross Margin: 16.3%, compared to 16.7% last quarter. Product Cost Margin: 14.4%, compared to 14.9% in Q1. Services Margin: 29.9%, compared to 29.8% last quarter. Operating Expense: $56.1 million, down from $59.4 million in Q1. Operating Margin: 5.5%, compared to 5.2% last quarter. Net Income: $12.1 million, compared to $12.7 million in the prior quarter. Earnings Per Share (EPS): $0.27, compared to $0.28 in the prior quarter. Cash and Cash Equivalents: $327.4 million, compared to $317.6 million at the end of last quarter. Cash Flow from Operations: $29.2 million, compared to $28.2 million last quarter. Share Repurchase: 182,000 shares at a cost of $3.4 million. Projected Q3 Revenue: Between $480 million and $530 million. Projected Q3 EPS: Between $0.14 and $0.34. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with UCTT. Release Date: July 28, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Ultra Clean Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:UCTT) reported a slight increase in Q2 revenue, reaching $518.8 million, slightly above the previous quarter. The company has secured new business in its Czech Republic facility, expected to contribute to revenue growth in Q4. UCTT is focusing on new product introductions and component qualifications, which are anticipated to enhance margins starting in early 2026. The company is implementing cost reduction initiatives, including workforce reductions and organizational restructuring, which are expected to yield significant savings by Q4. UCTT is well-positioned to capitalize on the growing AI investment trend, supported by strong customer partnerships and a vertically integrated solutions portfolio. Negative Points The company is operating at a $2 billion run rate, below the anticipated $4 billion due to current market conditions. Tariff-related costs remain a concern, with customers slow to reimburse UCTT for incurred charges, impacting financials. The semiconductor market's uncertainty and limited visibility are affecting UCTT's revenue projections, with Q3 expected to range between $480 million and $530 million. Gross margins have slightly decreased, influenced by fluctuations in volume, mix, manufacturing region, and tariffs. A goodwill impairment charge was recorded due to a decrease in stock price, reflecting market uncertainty and impacting financial results. Q & A Highlights Q: What contributed to Ultra Clean Holdings' Q2 revenue exceeding the midpoint of guidance? A: Clarence Granger, Chairman and Interim CEO, explained that there was a slight upside from China, an increase in shipments from the Austin site, and a rise in services revenue. Q: Is the expectation for China revenue to improve in the second half of the year still valid? A: Clarence Granger confirmed that China revenue is expected to improve, with Q1 at $21 million and Q2 at $35 million. The company anticipates a consistent run rate of $40 million to $50 million per quarter from Chinese-based customers. Q: How does Ultra Clean Holdings view the potential impact of new AI rules on their China business? A: Cheryl Knepfler, VP of Marketing, stated that while there is always a risk, the company expects to continue selling to China as the areas they serve are broadly supported across the industry. Q: What is the outlook for Ultra Clean Holdings' revenue in Q4 2025? A: Clarence Granger indicated a cautiously optimistic outlook for Q4, with potential upward bias due to cost reductions, new business opportunities, and further integration of fluid solutions. Q: How does Ultra Clean Holdings view the potential for growth in 2026? A: Cheryl Knepfler mentioned that there are opportunities for incremental growth in 2026, with expectations for high single-digit to low double-digit growth, supported by new fabs coming online and share gains. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio

Kforce Inc (KFRC) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Navigating Revenue Decline with Strategic ...
Kforce Inc (KFRC) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Navigating Revenue Decline with Strategic ...

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Kforce Inc (KFRC) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Navigating Revenue Decline with Strategic ...

Total Revenue: $334.3 million, a decline of 6.2% year over year. Earnings Per Share (EPS): $0.59, consistent with expectations. Gross Margin: Increased 40 basis points sequentially to 27.1%. Flex Revenue: Sequential growth in Technology and Finance and Accounting businesses. Direct Hire Revenue: Challenged and below expectations, representing approximately 2% of overall revenues. Average Bill Rate in Technology: $90, stable over the past three years. Average Bill Rate in Finance and Accounting: Approximately $54 per hour, improved sequentially and year over year. SG&A Expenses: 22.2% of revenue, increased 40 basis points year over year. Operating Margin: 4.5%. Effective Tax Rate: 24.6% for the second quarter. Capital Returned to Shareholders: $17.4 million through dividends and share repurchases. Operating Cash Flows: $18.4 million. Return on Equity: Exceeds 30%. Net Debt Levels: Approximately $67.5 million. Q3 Revenue Guidance: Expected to be in the range of $324 million to $332 million. Q3 EPS Guidance: Expected to be between $0.53 and $0.61. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with KFRC. Release Date: July 28, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Kforce Inc (NYSE:KFRC) reported sequential flex revenue growth in both technology and finance and accounting businesses, indicating resilience in a challenging macroeconomic environment. The company is well-positioned to capitalize on the increasing demand for AI foundational readiness work, leveraging its expertise in technology and access to evolving skill sets. Kforce Inc (NYSE:KFRC) has successfully shifted towards consulting-oriented solutions, which have shown strong demand and contributed to stable margins and average bill rates. The company's development center in Pune enhances its ability to provide cost-effective solutions through a blended onshore, nearshore, and offshore model. Kforce Inc (NYSE:KFRC) has a strong client base, predominantly consisting of large, market-leading companies, which supports its long-term above-market performance. Negative Points Total revenues declined 6.2% year over year, with direct hire revenues particularly challenged due to macroeconomic conditions. The company experienced some unanticipated project ends, leading to a modest sequential decline expected in the technology business for Q3. Flex revenues in the finance and accounting business, although showing sequential growth, declined 16.8% year over year. Overall gross margins declined 70 basis points year over year due to higher healthcare costs and a lower mix of direct hire revenues. SG&A expenses as a percentage of revenue increased 40 basis points year over year, driven by deleverage from lower revenue levels and higher healthcare costs. Q & A Highlights Q: Can you discuss the levels of discussion around AI projects and when you expect demand to increase significantly? A: Joseph Liberatore, President and CEO, explained that most organizations are in the preparation phase for AI, focusing on foundational readiness in governance, data, cloud, and security. Only about 10% of organizations are fully equipped to leverage AI, mostly in the technology sector. There is significant opportunity in data organization and digital modernization, which will prepare companies to leverage AI in the future. Q: What is causing the early project ends in Tech Flex, and do you expect these projects to resume? A: David Kelly, Chief Operating Officer, noted that some projects ended unexpectedly due to clients reallocating investments to other technology projects. This was not a reduction in technology spend but a shift in focus. Despite these ends, the overall sentiment is stability, with consistent new assignments and project wins. Q: How would you characterize the current pipeline, and are companies holding off on legacy projects due to AI uncertainties? A: David Kelly stated that the pipeline remains strong, particularly in data and digital areas. Companies are not holding off on legacy projects due to AI but are looking for immediate returns amidst economic uncertainty. AI preparation involves years of work, and companies cannot afford to wait. Q: What has driven the sequential growth in the Finance and Accounting (FA) business, and is the repositioning complete? A: David Kelly highlighted the team's focus on higher skill sets and an executable model, moving away from administrative FA work. The average bill rate is now in the mid-50s, aligning with client needs. The repositioning appears complete, with recent sequential growth indicating stabilization. Q: Can you provide more details on the impact of nearshore and offshore dynamics on margins and hourly rates? A: David Kelly mentioned that while the nearshore and offshore presence is slightly accretive to margins, it is not yet significant enough to impact overall bill rates or margins. The focus is on supporting U.S. revenue, and the consulting-oriented engagements contribute to stability in bill rates and margins. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Kremlin Is Silent on New Trump Deadline Russia Is Likely to Snub
Kremlin Is Silent on New Trump Deadline Russia Is Likely to Snub

Bloomberg

time4 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Kremlin Is Silent on New Trump Deadline Russia Is Likely to Snub

Donald Trump's decision to sharply curtail a deadline for Vladimir Putin to halt his war in Ukraine is being met by silence in the Kremlin so far, though analysts say it won't pressure the Russian president into changing course. The US president threatened Monday to impose sanctions within 10-12 days on countries buying Russian exports including energy unless Putin accepts a ceasefire, instead of the 50 days he announced earlier this month. 'There's no reason to wait. If you know what the answer is,' Trump said, voicing frustration at Putin's repeated rejection of his calls for a truce.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store