
The grey brigade activists explain why they are sitting down for Palestine
On Saturday at 1pm, Polly Smith perched on a stool in London's Parliament Square and gripped a handwritten sign that read: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action'.
The 74-year-old retired care worker wanted to sit on the floor with her fellow protesters, who gathered to show support for Palestine Action after the group was labelled a terror organisation. However, due to mobility issues caused by arthritis, she needed a stool.
'Just because I'm older, and my legs don't work as they used to, that won't stop me,' Polly adamantly tells Metro.
Next to her was a bag packed with enough medication to last a few days, just in case she was arrested. After being detained twice in the past year at previous protests for Palestine, Polly knows it's best to be prepared.
It's given her knowledge of the system that she never expected to gain in her seventies, such as that extra biscuits are given to people who need food to take medication, and a prison breakfast tastes better than it looks.
Ahead of this latest protest organised by Defend Our Juries, the Met Police had warned they would arrest anyone expressing support for Palestine Action, so Polly expected she'd be making it a hat-trick. As predicted, after just four minutes, she was marched over to a police van.
Polly struggled to climb up the high step, so she asked for help, and four police officers gently pushed her inside.
'My friends joke that now I'm retired, my hobby is getting arrested,' she adds.
'I expected it this time, but I was still pretty scared when I arrived at the police station. I live alone in a one-bed flat in Ipswich, and I worried about who'd sort out paying the bills if I was given a sentence.' Membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison under the Terrorism Act 2000.
The concern was not enough to deter her, nor others — she is one of over 500 people arrested, after being lifted off the ground by officers as chants of 'Shame on you' were shouted by onlookers. Nearly 100 of those detained were in their seventies and 15 were in their eighties, while demonstrators had an average age of 54.
'I have noticed a lot more people my age at protests,' recalls Polly, who was released on Sunday morning without charge. 'What's happening in Palestine with the bombings and the famine is a genocide, and we want to play our part when we see something wrong.
'We may have a few more grey hairs, but we can still take action against the government supporting Israel.
'It's important that we're there as it shows everybody demands change. All walks of life,' she stresses.
It is bearing witness to the long history between Israel and Palestine that motivates some people to get out and be heard, such as 70-year-old retired care worker Trudi Warner, who was also arrested on Parliament Square at the weekend.
'For people of my age, the situation in Palestine has been going on our entire lives, and has now come to this appalling situation,' Trudi tells Metro. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has recently called the 'starvation' in Gaza 'indefensible', adding that the Palestinian people have an 'inalienable' right to a state.
Trudi continues: 'We are aware of vulnerability and mortality, and maybe feel more empathy with others facing these losses. We have deep concern for children and young people, and our responsibilities to them.'
She says that people of her generation have 'less to lose' if they get a criminal record, as many of them are no longer seeking employment.
In a statement, the Met said that detained protesters had been taken to prisoner processing points in the Westminster area, and those whose details could be confirmed were bailed, with conditions not to attend any further protests in support of Palestine Action. Those whose details were refused or could not be verified were taken to custody suites across London.
A Met Police spokesperson also told Metro: 'Recognising the duty of care we have for those in our custody and reflecting on the age of those who have been arrested at previous protests in support of Palestine Action, we took precautions ahead of Saturday's operation.
'There was water available at the prisoner processing points and access to toilets. We had police medics on hand as part of the policing operation, and we processed people as quickly as possible to ensure nobody was waiting an unreasonably long time.
'Notwithstanding that, a degree of personal responsibility is required on the part of those who choose to come and break the law. They knew they were very likely to be arrested, which is a decision that will inevitably have consequences.'
Activist, novelist and Nobel Peace Prize nominee Angie Zelter, 74, agrees with Trudi and even warned younger people at the demonstration to leave getting detained to the older attendees.
'I was speaking to some Israeli Jewish people there, one of whom was 17 years old, and I said, 'Look, don't risk getting arrested, because you've got your whole life ahead of you',' she tells Metro. 'It's white, middle-class, privileged, older people like me who should. If we haven't got caring responsibilities, then it's our duty.'
This sentiment is echoed by Amnesty International's law and human rights director, Tom Southerden, who said older people feel they are more able to take risks associated with participating in civil disobedience.
'The consequences for younger people of being labelled a 'terrorist', in terms of threats to their careers and other future prospects, are so serious,' he highlights.
Angie also believes there is more older representation because many young activists are now in prison. 'People have got to realise that the protest laws are being taken away from us. We are sliding towards fascism and a dictatorship in this country,' she warns.
Retired teacher and mental health support worker Naomi Hutchings, 62, has been championing causes for decades, including Greenham Common and Cruisewatch in the 1980s. She attended the protest on Saturday, as she fears that the right to demonstrate is being 'eroded'.
'My generation has grown up with protest as a way of generating change, so it seems particularly concerning that protest is being suppressed by the previous government with the Policing Bill in 2022 and now by this government declaring Palestine Action to be a terrorist group,' she says.
'With all the protests against refugees as well, it feels a bit like the 1930s in Germany. I don't want to look back and feel I did nothing to stand up for what I believe is right.'
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Palestine Action (PA) is a British pro-Palestinian direct action network founded in 2020, which uses disruptive tactics to draw attention to Israel's actions in Palestine.
In July, PA was officially considered a terrorist group by the British government. When announcing the proscription, the Home Office pointed to three 'attacks' carried out by PA: one in 2022 at the Thales defence factory in Glasgow, and two last year at Instro Precision in Kent and Elbit Systems UK in Bristol.
A few days before the announcement, two activists from the group also broke into RAF Brize Norton and damaged a pair of aircraft with red paint.
Palestine Action said the red paint symbolised Palestinian blood, and claimed they also used crowbars to cause further damage.
On July 30, the High Court ruled the proscription of Palestine Action could be reviewed after lawyers for the group's co-founder Huda Ammori, argued the move gagged legitimate protest.
However, Judge Mr Justice Chamberlain also refused a request to pause the ban temporarily until the outcome of the challenge.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper stated that although the right to protest is something that the government want to protest 'fiercely', it is 'very different from displaying support for this one specific and narrow, proscribed organisation.'
The MP added that Palestine Action was proscribed due to strong security advice following 'serious attacks the group has committed, involving violence, significant injuries and extensive criminal damage.'
'It also follows an assessment from the joint terrorism assessment centre that the group prepares for terrorism, as well as concerning information referencing plans and ideas for further attacks, the details of which cannot yet be publicly reported due to ongoing legal proceedings,' she continued.
The Home Secretary also said that they are 'not a non-violent organisation' and UK national security must be prioritised.
Amnesty International described the weekend's mass arrests under UK terrorism law as 'deeply concerning'. Sacha Deshmukh, chief executive of Amnesty UK, said: 'The protesters in Parliament Square were not inciting violence and it is entirely disproportionate to the point of absurdity to be treating them as terrorists.' More Trending
A 'deep concern about the ongoing genocide by Israel against the Palestinians in Gaza', and specifically, the UK government's response, is something that is an issue for all members of society, young and old, says Tom.
He adds that for the older generation it 'undermined their long-held beliefs about fundamental principles of international law and human rights that they had thought were inviolable.'
Amnesty is clear in its stance that protest can change the world for the better, from stopping wars and winning human rights victories to standing up against racism; participation has no age limit.
'Anybody can make change,' Polly agrees. 'If you've got the inclination, age is just a number.'
Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Josie.Copson@metro.co.uk
Share your views in the comments below.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
I watched the police arrest hundreds of peaceful protesters – I fear Britain is on a slippery slope towards authoritarianism
Last Saturday, I stood in Parliament Square and bore witness to the largest mass arrest in a single day in the last decade. The Metropolitan Police detained 532 peaceful protesters – an operation that will live in infamy. The demonstration was organised by Defend Our Juries, which had called on participants to sit peacefully on the Parliament Square lawn between 1pm and 2pm, holding signs that read: 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action.' Organisers had expected around 500 people. In fact, thousands turned up. That morning, I had published an opinion piece in The Independent announcing that I would be there, holding a sign quoting Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR): 'Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.' I also quoted Volker Türk, the UN high commissioner for human rights, who warned that the UK government's proscription of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation 'appears to constitute an impermissible restriction on those rights that is at odds with the UK's obligation under international human rights law'. When I arrived at 1pm, the square was surrounded by police. Hundreds of Metropolitan Police vans were stationed around the square, stretching as far as Oxford Street. Officers formed cordons to prevent people entering, but I managed to squeeze in. For nearly three hours, I stood in silence, holding my sign. The arrests began shortly after the scheduled sit-in concluded at 2pm. Officers began to position themselves to advance against the peaceful protesters seated on the lawn, and the few lying on the ground. Police reinforcements, including officers from Wales, swept into the square. Of the 532 arrests, 522 were for the simple act of holding placards supporting Palestine Action, under Section 13 of the Terrorism Act, which carries a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison. The statistics are as shocking as the scenes I saw. According to the police's own figures, 112 of those detained were in their 70s, and 15 in their 80s. Nearly half were 60 or older, with an average age of 54. The police waged a relentless campaign against the protesters. Many were frail, elderly, or disabled. I saw priests and vicars in clerical collars led away in handcuffs. I saw retired nurses and NHS healthcare workers in scrubs being taken into police vans. One of them, Nick, was interviewed, and asked if he was afraid. His reply was very moving and and it almost brought me to tears: 'I'm absolutely terrified. I'm shaking. I'll be honest with you. I nearly cried earlier. The thought of doing something like this is just awful, but it's even more awful if we don't do it. I mean, I think to myself, you know, I've seen things, not on the mass media. I've seen things that cannot ever be unseen. And if we don't protest about it, we're culpable.' I also saw Jewish protesters critical of the Israeli government's actions being arrested alongside climate and human rights activists, including Chris Romberg, 75, a former British Army colonel and the son of a Holocaust survivor. No one was spared. One image that is seared in my mind: an elderly blind man in a wheelchair being dragged away by multiple officers as demonstrators shouted 'Let him go!' and 'Shame on you, shame on you!' I also watched the police arrest a frail woman in her 80s suffering from Parkinson's disease, while her son pleaded with the officers not to arrest her. The Metropolitan Police's motto is 'Working Together for a Safer London', but it is hard to see how dedicating so many resources to policing a peaceful protest and arresting frail and elderly citizens exercising such an ancient British freedom achieves this objective. Jonathan Porritt, former environmental adviser to King Charles, referred to the UK government's policy as 'absolutely standard authoritarian tactics'. 'I've come to the conclusion that the UK government is incontrovertibly complicit in this genocide not just through the continuing sale of arms to Israel, but because of its reckless refusal to follow guidance to seek to prevent genocide in countries like Gaza.' This is exactly how states erode democratic freedoms – not in one sudden lurch, but in small, calculated steps, until dissent itself becomes a criminal offence. The decision to ban Palestine Action was itself the product of a cynical political ploy. Home secretary Yvette Cooper bundled the group together with two violent white supremacist organisations – the neo-Nazi Maniacs Murder Cult and the Russian Imperial Movement – and forced MPs to vote for all or none. Many later admitted they felt they had no choice but to approve the ban. As Yasmine Ahmed, UK Director of Human Rights Watch, has warned: 'Proscribing Palestine Action is a grave abuse of state power and a terrifying escalation in this government's crusade to curtail protest rights.' The crucial issue here is that Palestine Action exposed what it – and many of us – see as the UK's complicity in the commission of genocide by Israel against the Palestinian people. Since December 2023, the RAF has flown more than 600 surveillance missions over Gaza, reputedly to locate hostages. This is why ordinary citizens – older people, clergy, disabled protesters – were criminalised for condemning what we believe to be genocide and demanding accountability. It also begs the question: who does prime minister Keir Starmer answer to – the UK electorate, Donald Trump, or the Israeli government and its lobbying organisations? Let me be clear: I unequivocally condemn Hamas for the atrocities of 7 October 2023. I call for an immediate and lasting ceasefire, and the unconditional release of all hostages. I was horrified seeing the images of an emaciated hostage. These crimes demand justice, but not through the carpet bombing of Gaza from North to South, the slaughter of civilians, and what is surely a deliberate policy of starvation of the population. Renowned human rights lawyer Clive Stafford Smith, who has defended Guantánamo Bay detainees, has drawn direct parallels between this crackdown and authoritarian measures elsewhere: 'Supporting Palestine Action's right to protest is not the same as supporting Palestine Action. It's time for Keir Starmer to remember why human rights exist.' Even conservative voices such as Andrew Neil, who strongly disagrees with Palestine Action's aims, have condemned the terrorism designation as absurd and a waste of police time and public resources. What I saw on Saturday was not public order policing. It was the suppression of lawful dissent, and the deliberate targeting of vulnerable people to send a chilling message: no cause is safe from criminalisation. This is the logic of authoritarianism – a steady erosion of freedoms under the pretext of security. I know what authoritarianism looks like. I was born in Nicaragua. In 1981, in Honduras, I faced Salvadorian death squads armed with M16 assault rifles. I had a terrifying experience that changed the course of my life. That experience taught me the importance of bearing witness. I came to Parliament Square to stand with ordinary citizens calling attention to the genocide against the Palestinian people – and the UK government's complicity. The UK government has embarked upon a dangerous path. The right to peaceful protest, the cornerstone of our democracy – from the suffragettes to the anti-apartheid movement – is under attack. The government has conflated dissent with terrorism, and the police have acted as enforcers of political orthodoxy rather than guardians of public safety. When Benjamin Disraeli said in 1845 that 'a Conservative government is an organised hypocrisy', who could have imagined that his words would describe so aptly the current Labour government and its authoritarian home secretary? The question we must ask ourselves is simple: When history judges us, will we be remembered as those who stood against injustice, or those who stood by in silence? Parliament Square on 9 August was not just a police operation. It was a test of our democracy – and it is a test we are in danger of failing.


Metro
5 hours ago
- Metro
Trump and Putin to discuss 'huge untapped potential' for Russia-US economic gain
A new type of controversial deal is reportedly brewing as Donald Trump is gearing up to meet Vladimir Putin in Alaska tomorrow. Never one to shy away from a real-estate-style proposal, the US president is preparing to offer his Russian counterpart access to both Ukrainian and American rare earth minerals on a plate. This package of economic proposals aimed at incentivising the Kremlin to agree to a ceasefire is the latest money-making opportunity for Putin and his cronies. It will include opening up Alaska's natural resources to Russia and lifting some US sanctions on its crumbling aviation sector, The Telegraph has reported. Another key element of Trump's plan will see the Kremlin gaining access to rare earth minerals in occupied Ukrainian territories. Ukraine is one of the few European countries with high deposits of lithium, holding one-third of the continent's reserves and around 3% of the global reserves. Russia currently controls about 17,981 square miles of the territory known as Donbas, made up of the Luhansk and Donetsk regions. It also occupies almost all of Luhansk and three-quarters of Donetsk where Ukraine's most valuable lithium deposits are located. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video This comes after Trump pressured Ukraine into signing a questionable-at-best minerals deal that grants the US access to the nation's mineral wealth. It was signed at the end of April, and it reflected the Trump administration's transactional approach to mineral diplomacy. In addition to Ukraine's resources, Trump is also considering offering Putin opportunities to tap into the valuable natural resources in the strait that separates it from the US. Alaska, separated from Russia by just three miles of the Bering Strait, is estimated to hold significant undiscovered oil and gas reserves, including 13% of the world's oil. UK government sources told The Telegraph that such incentives could be acceptable to Europe so long as it was not seen as rewarding Russia. More Trending One said: 'The sense is that it has to be presented to align with public opinion around this, it cannot be seen as a reward for Putin.' Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov confirmed earlier this morning that Trump and Putin will discuss the 'huge untapped potential' for Russia-US economic ties as well as the prospects for ending the war. Ushakov told reporters that the summit would start at 7.30pm UK time, with the two leaders meeting one-on-one, accompanied only by translators. He added that delegations from the two countries would then meet, and the presidents would give a joint news conference. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Fans slam iconic 80s rockers for calling Trump appointment 'great honour' MORE: Keir Starmer embraces Volodymyr Zelensky on Downing Street ahead of Trump-Putin meeting MORE: South Park's latest savage Donald Trump takedown scores 6,200,000 viewers in 3 days


The Herald Scotland
9 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
The absurdity and horror of life in a time of genocide in Gaza
It happens with dread regularity: cooking dinner on the barbecue as the radio begins playing reports of starvation in Gaza. My plate sickening me, revolting me. I eat my lunch while the TV shows children with their brains blown out. I open social media on holiday and am confronted with the reality of genocide. Human beings are being pounded with bombs, starved and then shot as they scrabble for food at aid stations. We're witnessing live-streamed genocide. This is hell. I don't want to look away. I must look, because to not look is to not know, and we must know. Read More: I am not, I hope, a stupid man, or someone incapable of processing their emotions, but I don't know how to fit what I see, read and hear into the plodding reality of my day-to-day life. I'm not sure what it says about my humanity that I can look at pictures of a land levelled to ash, then get in my car and go shopping. There's an absurd horror to how we all - everyone and every government across the west - is responding to what's happening in Gaza and being done to the Palestinian people. That sense of absurdity clashing up against horror reaches from the level of the lone individual - how a plate of food can accuse me like an indictment - to the level of a society or nation. I watched the British satirist John Oliver on television this week feel compelled to prove to his viewers repeatedly - mounting evidence upon evidence - that Israel is starving the people of Gaza. Why must he be made to do this? Can't we all see what's happening with our own eyes? Do we require proof recounted endlessly? Britain arrests hundreds of ordinary men and women as terrorists for daring to hold signs reading: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' These people are the conscience of our country. Many are elderly, respected in their communities. It isn't an act of terrorism to speak out against genocide. It isn't an act of terrorism to defend an organisation which protests genocide. It isn't an act of terrorism to spray-paint planes in protest against genocide. If Palestine Action members break laws of trespass or criminal damage, then charge them with that. Don't make terrorists out of protestors. Don't tell ordinary citizens they're terrorist sympathisers. Palestine Action at Trump Turnberry (Image: Milo Chandler) As protestors were dragged away by police, Benjamin Netanyahu prepared to increase the attack on Gaza. Dear God, what does that even mean? How can you increase what's already beyond bearing? More than 50,000 children have been killed in Gaza. Yet only now is the British government preparing to 'urgently accelerate' efforts to bring around 100 badly injured children here for medical treatment. Isn't this madness? Isn't it all madness? Amid this absurdity in the face of unspeakable horror, Israel stands accused of crimes including genocide. The World Health Organisation says starvation in Gaza is 'man-made'. Amnesty International and Médecins Sans Frontières concluded that Israel is conducting genocide. Israeli groups B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights say the country's conduct constitutes genocide. Israel is being investigated for genocide at the International Court of Justice. Mirjana Spoljaric, president of the International Committee of the Red Cross, says 'humanity is failing in Gaza … It should really shock our collective conscience … It will haunt us'. Lord Sumption, a former UK Supreme Court Justice, said: 'Genocide is a question of intent. It means killing, maiming or imposing intolerable conditions on a national or ethnic group with intent to destroy them in whole or in part. 'Statements by Netanyahu and his ministers suggest that the object of current operations is to force the Arab population of Gaza to leave by killing and starving them if they stay. These things make genocide the most plausible explanation for what is now happening.' The UN committee investigating 'Israeli practices affecting the human rights' of Palestinians said 'Israel's warfare in Gaza is consistent with the characteristics of genocide'. In the wake of the Hamas October 7 atrocities which began this monstrous period of history, Netanyahu said: 'You must remember what Amalek has done to you, says our Holy Bible. And we do remember.' The quotation refers to God commanding the destruction of the Amalekites. Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant said: 'We are fighting human animals and we act accordingly.' Finance minister Bezalel Smotrich said Israel had 'returned Khan Yunis to the Stone Age'. Israeli army spokesman Daniel Hagari boasted Gaza would be turned into a 'city of tents'. Politicians have variously called for 'erasing all of Gaza from the face of the earth' and 'crushing and flattening Gaza'. The former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said that Israel is 'committing war crimes'. He added: 'What we are doing in Gaza now is a war of devastation: indiscriminate, limitless, cruel and criminal killing of civilians. It's the result of government policy - knowingly, evilly, maliciously, irresponsibly dictated.' Israel's government denies the accusations against it, as do many of its supporters around the world and here at home. One could go on: recounting the blood, the deaths, the accusations, the rebuttals. The absurd horror. All I can see is mountains of dead. All I can see is once sensible people and governments standing in the shadow of crimes which history will never forget, too dumbfounded or scared or self-interested to act or speak up. Why can't we just say what we see? We saw that Hamas committed monstrous acts and we rightly raised our voices in revulsion because our shared humanity demanded that response. Since then monstrous acts have been committed by Israel and our shared humanity demands we respond with outrage. Our shared humanity doesn't demand that we arrest those who speak in defence of the weakest. It demands that the hostages be freed, and it demands that the Palestinian people be freed with them. Neil Mackay is the Herald's Writer-at-Large. He's a multi-award winning investigative journalist, author of both fiction and non-fiction, and a filmmaker and broadcaster. He specialises in intelligence, security, crime, social affairs, cultural commentary, and foreign and domestic politics