A US Navy sailor walked BI through what it was like shooting down a small drone with a .50 caliber machine gun
The engagement came during a major NATO exercise focused on naval air defense.
It underscores how drones are increasingly becoming a key element of maritime warfare.
Petty Officer Second Class Brian Diaz saw the small drone coming in through his binoculars. The US Navy sailor quickly called in the threat and got the go-ahead to open fire on it with his deck-mounted M2 Browning .50 caliber machine gun.
A hundred rounds went out in a flash. They found their target, and Diaz, a gunner's mate, scored a direct hit on the drone, sending it crashing into the chilly Atlantic waters below. Sailors on the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer USS Thomas Hudner erupted in cheers.
The drone that Diaz shot down with his machine gun did not belong to a real enemy, but the exercise was serious all the same, simulating a threat that warships like the Thomas Hudner could face in the future, as drones are finding a greater role in naval warfare.
"Being able to go through the motions just gives me peace of mind, that I know I can do it, come the need to do it," Diaz shared with Business Insider during a recent visit to Thomas Hudner that came on the heels of the warship's participation in NATO's Formidable Shield 25 exercise last month.
Formidable Shield is Europe's largest live-fire naval exercise and a key opportunity for allies to train for a variety of air defense scenarios. For the Thomas Hunder, the drills included missile and drone engagements.
One day, toward the end of the exercise, a handful of NATO warships lined up to face off against different defense scenarios. Diaz was on watch with the .50 caliber, looking out over the water and waiting for instructions to come through on the radio.
Diaz said that his first engagement that day was a remote-controlled boat, simulating an uncrewed surface vessel. It was pretty far out, and he could barely see it. Thomas Hunder engaged with all its weapons systems: the large five-inch deck gun, the Mark 38 machine gun system, and the .50 caliber. Eventually, the five-inch gun hit it.
It was later that day that he fought the flying drone, a small quadcopter system. Other warships called in the threat to Thomas Hunder. Diaz recalled that he couldn't see it at first, but eventually, the team spotted the threat and marked it as a contact.
The drone started to get closer, at one point 200 meters (650 feet) out, getting well within range of the .50 caliber. Diaz asked for permission from a superior to engage the drone before opening fire alongside another sailor operating a second M2 Browning.
"We're both shooting," Diaz said. "Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom."
At one point, the other sailor paused to reload. That's when Diaz made the kill.
"I think I shot the wing off," Diaz said. "What it does is, it's flying, and it's just sitting there, and it just — donk!" he explained. "There's a little sway, and it's straight into the water."
Drones of this size, often just a few inches or a foot in length, are incredibly difficult to shoot down because they're so small and can move erratically in the air. Diaz said he was nervous during the engagement, but the successful hit got the crew fired up.
Cdr. Cameron Ingram, Thomas Hunder's commanding officer, told BI that some of the crewmembers were watching Diaz from the bridge wing at the time, wondering whether he would be able to take down the drone.
"And then he clips it, and it falls," Ingram said. "The whole bridge wing explodes with excitement," he said, noting that the sailor "walks a step taller now."
The exercise underscores how the US Navy is increasingly integrating counter-drone training into its planning as it absorbs lessons from the Red Sea conflict, during which the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen regularly launched drones and missiles at military and civilian vessels operating in the area.
The Houthis relied heavily on one-way attack drones like the KAS-04, or Sammad. This fixed-wing drone, which is packed with explosives and can fly long distances, is much larger than a cheap, commercially available quadcopter drone but significantly smaller than a US military MQ-9 Reaper, a well-known combat drone.
US warships, including Thomas Hunder, shot down Houthi KAS-04s. The ships weren't known to have battled any Houthi quadcopters; these threats, however, are something the Navy is training for, especially considering their proliferation in other fights.
During BI's visit to the Thomas Hudner, which sailed from England to France last weekend ahead of the D-Day events this week, the watch team spotted a quadcopter drone as the destroyer was setting off on its journey. They closely monitored the drone, which turned out not to pose any immediate danger to the ship. Still, the crew was ready to take action if needed.
Ingram said that small quadcopters are "absolutely a threat," even if there are limitations in their capability, specifically endurance, range, and payload capacity. While these drones generally can't carry enough ordnance to effectively disable a destroyer, they could certainly hurt people and do enough damage to potentially force the warship into repairs.
"I think there will probably be a desire to weaponize those things, but there are limitations," Ingram said.
Destroyers like his don't operate close to the coast. An enemy would have to send the drones out several miles from the shore or have a launching platform closer to the warship. But even then, the payload wouldn't be as heavy as a Houthi KAS-04. It is possible that the ship could encounter one near port. Warships have been attacked pierside in the past, though by other threats.
The Ukraine war has demonstrated the effectiveness of quadcopters, small, inexpensive first-person view (FPV) drones, in combat. They are mostly used in engagements on land, but Kyiv has at times integrated these drones into maritime operations, demonstrating that it's still possible to burden a naval force even if the desired target isn't necessarily an expensive warship.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
A Hugging Face research scientist is in talks to raise around $40 million for a buzzy robotics startup, sources say
Hugging Face's robotics lead is in talks to raise about $40 million for his robotics startup, two sources told BI. Investor interest in robotics is high, with $16 billion raised globally in 2025 so far. Hugging Face has also launched a humanoid desktop robot, expanding into robotics. The robotics lead at open-source AI company Hugging Face is in talks to raise funding for his own robotics startup, Business Insider has learned. Remi Cadene's startup, Uma, is in discussions to raise around $40 million in seed funding, two sources told Business Insider. There is no public information about Cadene's Paris-based startup, but one source said it's working on full-stack robotics for industrial and commercial use cases. Cadene is a robotics research veteran who has previously worked for Meta and Tesla. During his most recent stint at Tesla, he was a staff scientist working in its humanoid robot and self-driving divisions. He is now a principal research scientist at Hugging Face, which he joined in March 2024. Four sources confirmed the existence of Uma to Business Insider. There is no reference to Cadene's startup on his LinkedIn profile or personal website, suggesting the startup is still in stealth mode. Cadene's "scientific interest lies in understanding the underlying mechanisms of intelligence," according to his blog. Details about Uma's round size and deal are subject to change as the deal has not been finalized yet. Hugging Face and Cadene did not respond to Business Insider's requests for comments. The hype around AI has galvanized investor interest in robotics, with startups globally raising $17.2 billion in 2024. This year, momentum for the technology has been strong, with robotics startups raising over $16 billion in 2025 so far, per PitchBook data. Notable raises this year include Genesis Robotics' $110 million seed round and Coco Robotics' $80 million round. Hugging Face has also dabbled in the robotics sector, recently launching a desktop robot after acquiring Pollen Robotics in 2025. Larger AI companies have long been founder factories for executives and researchers. This week, GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke announced that he would be exiting the developer platform to become a startup founder again. Read the original article on Business Insider

Business Insider
9 hours ago
- Business Insider
As AI coding services face a reckoning, Bolt tries to go beyond building
AI coding startups are facing a reckoning, with questions about pricing models and customer churn. Eric Simons, CEO of startup StackBlitz, has been working on potential solutions. StackBlitz runs a popular AI coding service called and on Thursday the startup rolled out new features and an updated subscription aimed at keeping customers engaged on its platform for longer, Business Insider learned exclusively. In the crowded AI coding market, many startups rely on reselling AI inference. They pay for access to AI models from frontier labs and Big Tech providers, then charge customers for their bespoke coding services — hoping to make a profit on the difference. However, once users finish building a project, there's less reason to stick around. That increases the chance that some customers cancel their subscriptions. Simons is seeing churn rates across the AI coding market running at 20% to 40%. He declined to say what Bolt's churn rate is; however, he noted that Wix, a more traditional website-building service, has much lower churn rates. That's because Wix generates the bulk of its recurring revenue from hosting and similar stickier offerings, rather than one-off project creation. "This is the problem across all these companies right now. The churn rate for everyone is really high," Simons said. "You have to build a retentive business." Love Business Insider? Log into Google and make us a preferred source. Adding more valuable, stickier services on top of these models is the goal now, and Simons is repositioning Bolt with a new mantra, "Build Without Boundaries." "The challenge here is that if your business is purely AI, reselling AI inference, your business is very fragile and vulnerable, because the winds can shift violently," Simons added. One solution is to offer a broader array of tools that bring more users into your ecosystem. This is why Bolt launched a subscription overhaul on Thursday aimed at making the service more of an end-to-end platform, not just a building tool. Pricing will remain the same for most tiers, with only the entry-level plan rising from $20 to $25 a month. Every plan will now include hosting, domains, databases, serverless functions, authentication, SEO optimization, Stripe-powered payments, and analytics for an unlimited number of projects. Bolt is partnering with companies such as infrastructure leader Netlify and database provider Supabase to provide the same scale and reliability used by major tech companies, but wrapped into one subscription. The idea is to keep users in the Bolt ecosystem well past the initial creation phase. Instead of exporting their projects to another host or backend service, users can launch, run, and scale them without leaving the Bolt platform. Pay-as-you-go pricing will kick in only for unusually high traffic, with user-set caps to avoid surprise bills, Simons told Business Insider. Simons sees this approach resonating with two main audiences: "prosumers," solo builders and entrepreneurs launching new products; and B2B product teams that use Bolt for rapid prototyping and internal tools. For the latter, staying in Bolt isn't just convenient; it embeds the platform into their ongoing workflow, making it harder to leave. By going "beyond building" and integrating the entire product lifecycle into one subscription, Simons hopes to shift Bolt from being a one-off AI tool to an essential part of its customers' day-to-day operations. Indeed, other AI coding services, Replit and Lovable, offering extra features now too, such as hosting. In an industry where the winds can change fast, the bet is that offering a complete, durable ecosystem is the only way to scale sustainably.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Our Best Look At DARPA's Defiant Uncrewed Surface Ship
We now have a full look at the U.S. military's USX-1 Defiant medium-sized drone ship as it gets closer to heading off on a months-long open-water demonstration cruise. Defiant was designed from the outset to operate without any humans ever onboard, as well as for efficient mass production, and is set to help lay the groundwork for the U.S. Navy's vision of a future family of uncrewed surface vessels (USV). The U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) recently released new videos and pictures of Defiant from ongoing initial in-water testing. The ship was developed and built specifically for DARPA's No Manning Required Ship (NOMARS) program. It was formally christened at a ceremony in Everett, Washington, where it is currently homeported, on August 11. Serco Inc. is the primary contractor for the USV. The 180-foot (55-meter) long, 240-metric-ton displacement Defiant has been mostly under wraps since it was launched earlier this year, something TWZ was first to confirm. What we can see now of the uncrewed ship, especially its central mast adorned with various commercial navigation radars and other antennas, as well as its largely flat and open deck, aligns well with previously shown models and renderings of the design. The vessel's open deck architecture is intended to allow for the relatively rapid loading and unloading of containerized and otherwise modular payloads, something we will come back to later on. We also now see that there is an angled structure on top of the bow, which appears to be designed in part to help shield an access point to spaces below deck. It might also help break waves in heavier sea states. Defiant is designed to be able to sail safely in waters where waves are cresting at up to 13 feet, and at least survive conditions where waves might get up to 30 feet tall. As noted, Defiant was built to operate without human personnel onboard, even just to monitor systems or provide an extra margin of safety, and so it does not have any accommodations for them. However, Defiant is seen in the recent DARPA imagery with a tent set up at the stern, which would provide some basic shelter for individuals working onboard as part of the initial testing. 'Defiant is a tough little ship and defies the idea that we cannot make a ship that can operate in the challenging environment of the open ocean without people to operate her,' Greg Avicola, the NOMARS program manager, said during the recent christening ceremony, according to a press release. 'While relatively small, Defiant is designed for extended voyages in the open ocean, can handle operations in sea state 5 with no degradation, and survive much higher seas, continuing operations once the storm passes. She's no wider than she must be to fit the largest piece of hardware, and we have no human passageways to worry about.' 'By removing the human element from all ship design considerations, the program intends to demonstrate significant advantages, to include: Size, cost, at-sea reliability, greater hydrodynamic efficiency, survivability to sea-state, and survivability to adversary actions through stealth considerations and tampering resistance,' according to DARPA. 'With scaled production, NOMARS has the potential to efficiently and cost-effectively deliver a distributed USV fleet.' 'One of the challenges that we were really trying to tackle in NOMARS is, how do we take on building a ship that can go to sea for a long period of time with autonomy? There's really two pieces of an autonomy problem. There's the actual autonomy, but then there's the platform the autonomy is operating on,' Avicola, the program manager, also said in a recent official video about the program, seen below. 'A lot of times, the requirements that were designed into it [a platform] for humans, make it sub-optimal for the autonomy problem. What can you do with a ship design where you don't have the constraints of the people? The other side of the coin, though, is, how do you make it reliable? It's hard enough if there are people there to fix it.' 'Really, the only way you can prove that is by giving it a hard test, giving it a test that requires resilience and endurance,' he continued. 'The at-sea demonstration that Defiant will undertake is designed for a long period of time in a real-world environment, in real sea states, proving that the ship can operate untouched for a very long period of time.' After the demonstration, the plan is for DARPA to turn Defiant over to the U.S. Navy. The service, in turn, expects to incorporate it into an experimental fleet it is already using to lay the foundation of its future uncrewed surface fleets. Just earlier this year, the Navy rolled out a new USV vision, now dubbed the Modular Surface Attack Craft (MASC) program. Defiant is very well suited to being a building block for MASC, which is focused heavily on modular, containerized payloads rather than specific hull designs. The Navy currently envisions a family of at least three MASC designs all capable of being readily configured for a wide range of mission sets, which could include intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR), as well as launching long-range kinetic strikes and electronic warfare attacks. You can learn more about what is known about MASC here. For the Navy, Defiant, or a further evolution of the design, something that manufacturer Serco has already been working on, could be even more attractive because of what it offers when it comes to cost and producibility. The service has been struggling with major delays and cost growth on many of its traditional shipbuilding programs in recent years. At the same time, China, America's chief global competitor, has taken a massive lead in building naval vessels and expanding the shipyard capacity needed to sustain that production tempo. The U.S. government has been taking steps to try to reverse this trend, including exploring leveraging foreign shipyards. However, USVs that could operate alongside screwed warships and/or independent groups are also seen as a key way to help bolster Navy surface fleets and do so cost-effectively. 'We have delivered a vessel in a reasonable time frame, at a reasonable cost, which is somewhat rare in today's industry. We did that by being the designer and the prime [contractor] of the vessel, and procuring almost all the material from the industrial base, and integrating it ourselves,' Ryan Maatta, marine engineering manager at Serco, told TWZ earlier this year. 'Rather than it being a shipyard-led prime, it was the government and their system integrator working together to procure all the materials and to pivot when things got tough and get the ship delivered, which is more how we used to do ships in the [19]80s than how we do ships nowadays.' 'I say 14 months with 14 men welded our hull together. The hull is allowed to be very simplistic thanks to the fact that there's no personnel on board. So there's no heads [toilets], there's no galleys, there's no passageways, there's very few penetrations through the bulkheads. So it's very modular in its construction, and it allows for a very quick by-hand construction,' he continued. 'So tier three shipyards [that could produce Defiant], there's more than 35 tier three shipyards in the United States. The size engine we're using are produced by the tens of thousands across three manufacturers.' How Defiant performs on the upcoming open-ocean cruise remains to be seen, but lessons learned from the demonstration could have important impacts on the Navy's broader USV plans. In the meantime, Defiant now emerged fully out into the open as DARPA works toward the NOMARS program's capstone event. Contact the author: joe@ Solve the daily Crossword