Sainsbury's to ban unhealthy snacks for staff amid government obesity crackdown
Staff members will, instead, be offered items from a list of approved 'light meal' options, including soups, porridge and bread.
These options are intended to replace the 'largely unhealthy snacks' that colleagues had complained about, and which, some staff claimed, were vanishing before the end of their shifts.
The supermarket insists the changes will ensure a 'more consistent range of free food' and give employees the chance to 'make light meals for breakfast, lunch and dinner'.
'We are committed to ensuring that every colleague who needs it can have something to eat at work,' it added.
The new guidelines will apply across all Sainsbury's outlets, Argos sites and distribution centres.
The move comes against the backdrop of the Labour government planning a wave of new measures to reduce levels of obesity.
The Office for Health Improvement and Disparities estimates that more than a quarter of the English population is now obese. Rates of obesity have doubled since the 1990s, costing the NHS an estimated £11 billion a year, which is three times the annual budget for the ambulance services.
Health secretary Wes Streeting has warned that, unless the 'rising tide of cost and demand' is curbed, the NHS 'risks becoming unsustainable'.
Simon Roberts, Sainsbury's chief executive and a member of the government's Food Strategy Advisory Board, has welcomed Labour's latest proposals to order supermarkets to shave up to 100 calories off the average shopping basket, a measure that, if unmet, could incur fines.
He has urged that such rules be applied 'across the entirety of our food sector'.
Meanwhile, ministers are also plotting regulations for restaurants to monitor diners' calorie intake and drive it down further.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
AI can detect warning signs of heart attack, scientists say
A new artificial intelligence system can predict a person's risk of heart attack or stroke within a decade using routine eye test scans. Developed by University of Dundee researchers, the AI analyses digital retinal photographs to provide personalised risk predictions in under a second. The technology was trialled on eye scans of individuals with type 2 diabetes and achieved 70 per cent accuracy in predicting major cardiovascular events. Experts suggest this simple, quick test could complement existing checks like blood pressure and cholesterol, allowing for earlier intervention. While promising, further research is needed to confirm its robustness and feasibility for widespread clinical use in preventing cardiovascular diseases, the British Heart Foundation says.
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Summer holiday warning as children told not to drink popular ice drink
Children under the age of seven should not consume slush ice drinks, commonly known as "slushies", if they contain glycerol, due to the serious health risks they pose, the food safety watchdog has warned. The Food Standards Agency (FSA) stated that "very high" exposure to glycerol, typically occurring when a child consumes several slushies in a short period, can lead to shock, dangerously low blood sugar levels, and even loss of consciousness. For children aged seven to 10, the popular summer treat should be limited to a maximum of 350ml per day – roughly the size of a standard fizzy drink can. Parents and caregivers are advised to inquire with sellers about glycerol content and to check product labels or signage at the point of sale. The FSA said consumers should avoid products if they are unsure about ingredients and seek medical advice if a child develops symptoms. If a child becomes unwell with headaches, nausea or vomiting soon after consuming slush ice drinks, the caregiver should immediately give them drinks or food containing sugar and call 111 for medical advice. Urgent medical attention should be sought by calling 999 if a child becomes drowsy or confused. The advice also applies to ready-to-drink slush ice drinks with glycerol in pouches and home kits containing glycerol slush concentrates. The FSA has asked retailers to support its advice by not offering free refills to children aged under 10. It has also reminded manufacturers of slush ice drink concentrates to use only the minimum amount of glycerol necessary to achieve the frozen effect. The FSA issued the revised guidance ahead of an expected seasonal spike in slush ice drink sales at children's indoor play areas, leisure facilities and outdoor events over the summer holidays. FSA chief scientific adviser Professor Robin May said: 'As we head into the summer holidays, we want parents to be aware of the potential risks associated with slush ice drinks containing glycerol. 'While these drinks may seem harmless and side-effects are generally mild, they can, especially when consumed in large quantities over a short time, pose serious health risks to young children. 'That's why we're recommending that children under seven should not consume these drinks at all, and children aged seven to 10 should have no more than one 350ml serving. 'We're working closely with industry to ensure appropriate warnings are in place wherever these drinks are sold, but in the meantime we are asking parents and carers to take extra care when buying drinks for young children, particularly during warmer months when consumption of 'slushies' typically increases.' There have been nine confirmed cases of glycerol intoxication in young children requiring hospitalisation over the past three years in the UK, with seven additional potential cases reported in the media.
Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The Sandie Peggie scandal insults the British public
NHS Fife has the wild-eyed optimism of a gambler chasing their losses. Barely a day after admitting nurse Sandie Peggie had done nothing wrong, the trust's lawyers were back in court, still hell-bent on defending the indefensible. At any point since the case began, they could have folded – settled the matter with dignity and spared the public purse the £220,000 that's already sunk. But what NHS Fife lacks in judgement, it makes up for in dogged, taxpayer-funded bloody-mindedness. The tribunal, now back underway in Dundee after a five-month pause, centres on a Christmas Eve incident at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy. Peggie, a nurse with more than 30 years' unblemished service, had a sudden and heavy period during her shift. She entered the women's changing room to check her scrubs – and found Dr Beth Upton already inside, undressing. Upton is a man who claims to be a woman. Peggie voiced her discomfort. What was said is disputed, but Upton complained – and the board logged it as a 'hate incident.' This wasn't a political protest or a publicity stunt. It was a woman, bleeding through her clothes, asking for privacy. To anyone outside NHS Fife's boardroom or trans activist cliques, it's obvious: a woman spoke up against an entitled man, and her employers punished her for it. Peggie was accused of 'misgendering' and faced allegations of gross misconduct – not just for the changing room exchange, but for allegedly 'failing to communicate' with Upton and putting patient care at risk. In May last year, she filed a tribunal claim against NHS Fife and Dr Upton for sexual harassment, belief discrimination, and victimisation – all while still under investigation by the trust. Last night, after 18 months, NHS Fife issued a mealy-mouthed statement conceding that there was 'insufficient evidence' to support any finding of misconduct. Yet in court, their lawyers have pressed on. The tribunal, which began in February, resumed this week with testimony from Isla Bumba, the trust's equality and human rights officer. Bumba, a diversity officer with no formal policy in place to guide her, admitted she was asked to write guidance on trans staff facilities when Dr Upton was hired. Inexperienced but well remunerated, Bumba told the court she based her understanding on a 'general consensus' among health boards. Then in April, the Supreme Court finally spelled it out: under the Equality Act, 'woman' means biological female. The court confirmed that even those with a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) may lawfully be excluded from single-sex spaces. Upton, notably, does not even have a GRC. In the months since, like other public bodies blindsided by reality, NHS Fife is scrambling to revise its guidance. The trust now says 'work is underway across the entirety of the health board's estate' to ensure compliance with the ruling. All they ever needed to do, of course, was listen to Peggie. The trust still insists it acted appropriately. And it continues to burn through NHS time, money and credibility in the process. While junior doctors strike, hospitals crumble, and patients wait months for care, NHS Fife's management is shovelling public money into defending a policy apparently cobbled together by a recent graduate who seems to have mistaken fashionable groupthink for the law. Earlier today, First Minister John Swinney bestowed what will surely be the kiss of death: his 'full confidence' in NHS Fife. Just as Nicola Sturgeon's career was shredded by her handling of the Isla Bryson scandal – a double rapist who declared himself a woman and was placed in a women's prison, Swinney now appears to be staking his reputation on the judgment of gender ideologues. If this is a gamble on public patience, NHS Fife is betting with borrowed chips – and the public has just about had enough of being the house that always loses.
