Gold Mining ETF (SGDM) Tops in Q1: 5 Best-Performing Stocks
Sprott Gold Miners ETF SGDM, which offers exposure to gold stocks, has gained 31.6%, becoming the best-performing ETF of the first quarter.Although most of the stocks in SGDM's portfolio delivered strong returns, a few have gained more than 50%. These include Orla Mining Ltd. ORLA, SSR Mining Inc. SSRM, Gold Fields Limited GFI, Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited HMY and AngloGold Ashanti PLC AU.Gold mining stocks and ETFs are outperforming this year, driven by a surge in gold price. Mining companies act as leveraged plays on the underlying metal prices and thus tend to experience more gains than their bullion cousins in a rising metal market (read: Gold Mining ETFs Shine Amid Market Rout).Gold has been on an unstoppable rally and recently breached the 3,050 level. The strong safe-haven demand amid economic uncertainties triggered by U.S. President Donald Trump's trade tariff war and escalating geopolitical tensions, as well as potential rate cuts, drove the rally. Gold is often used to preserve wealth during financial and political uncertainty and usually does well when other asset classes struggle. Additionally, the inflationary pressure caused by new tariffs will benefit the precious metal's status as a hedge against rising prices.In the latest meeting, Fed Chair Jerome Powell kept interest rates steady and maintained the two-rate cut projections for this year. Lower interest rates will continue to support gold prices as these raise the yellow metal's attractiveness compared with fixed-income assets such as bonds. Notably, gold is highly sensitive to rising U.S. interest rates, as these increase the opportunity costs of holding the non-yielding bullion.Apart from these, central banks are among the major drivers of gold prices. Banks are dominant buyers of gold as they seek to diversify their reserves away from the U.S. dollar. In particular, China extended its purchases for the fourth consecutive month in February. According to the latest report from the World Gold Council, global gold demand reached a record high in 2024, driven by sustained central bank buying and growth in investment demand. Central banks accumulated more than 1,000 tons of gold for the third consecutive year (read: Gold ETFs at All-Time High as Bullion Surges Past $3000). Let us take a closer look at the fundamentals of SGDM.
Sprott Gold Miners ETF follows the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, which aims to track the performance of larger-sized gold companies whose stocks are listed on Canadian and major U.S. exchanges. It holds 35 stocks in its basket, with Canadian firms taking the top spot at 79.2%, followed by 18.7% in the United States. Sprott Gold Miners ETF has amassed $321.7 million in its asset base and trades in a lower volume of around 44,000 shares a day. It charges 50 bps in annual fees from investors.
Orla Mining is primarily engaged in developing the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project, an advanced gold and silver open-pit and heap-leach project located in Zacatecas State, central Mexico. The stock has skyrocketed 63% since the start of the year and accounts for a 3.4% share in the ETF. It has an estimated earnings growth rate of 84% for this year.Orla Mining has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) and a VGM Score of A.SSR Mining is a mining company focused on the operation, development, exploration and acquisition of precious metal projects. The company primarily explores for gold, silver, and mineral properties. The stock has jumped 60% so far this year and accounts for a 0.4% share in SGDM's basket. It has an estimated earnings growth rate of 185.7% for this year.SSR Mining currently has a Zacks Rank #3. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.Gold Fields is one of the world's largest unhedged gold producers, with operating mines in South Africa, Ghana and Australia. The stock has soared 55.8% and accounts for a 1.27% share in the ETF. Gold Fields has an estimated earnings growth of 40.1% for this year.GFI has a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell) and a VGM Score of B.Harmony Gold conducts underground and surface gold mining. It is engaged in related activities such as exploration, processing, smelting and refining. The stock has surged 54.2% since the start of the year and accounts for a 0.39% share in the ETF. Harmony Gold has an estimated earnings growth of 10.2% for the fiscal year (ending June 2025) and has a Zacks Rank #4. It has a VGM Score of B (read: Gold (GLD) or Gold Mining (GDX): Which ETF is Better?).AngloGold operates as a gold mining company in Africa, the Americas and Australia. The company explores for gold. AngloGold has gained 51% so far this year and accounts for a 0.94% share in the ETF. AngloGold has an estimated earnings growth rate of 12.7% for this year but has a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell).
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
AngloGold Ashanti PLC (AU) : Free Stock Analysis Report
Gold Fields Limited (GFI) : Free Stock Analysis Report
Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (HMY) : Free Stock Analysis Report
Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM): ETF Research Reports
Silver Standard Resources Inc. (SSRM) : Free Stock Analysis Report
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA) : Free Stock Analysis Report
This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com).
Zacks Investment Research
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
18 minutes ago
- Newsweek
The Inflation Time Bomb—Trump's Policies Will Hit Your Wallet Soon
Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. With inflation hovering modestly above 2 percent despite President Donald Trump's aggressive tariff increases and immigration enforcement, some might wonder whether warnings about his policies driving up prices were overblown. They weren't. The inflationary pressures are building beneath the surface, masked by timing, supply chain buffers, and massive corporate stockpiling ahead of policy changes. The time bomb is ticking—and consumers should begin bracing for the explosion. Trump's most disruptive policies didn't begin in earnest until months after his January inauguration. While he announced a 10 percent tariff on Chinese goods in late January, the real escalation came in March when rates jumped to 20 percent, then spiked to 145 percent by April before being partially rolled back. The administration's "Liberation Day" universal tariff on April 2 marked the broadest increase since the 1930s. Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York City on June 18, 2025. Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York City on June 18, 2025. TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP via Getty Images Immigration enforcement followed a similar pattern. Though raids began in January, the most aggressive workplace operations didn't intensify until late May, when Trump aide Stephen Miller pushed for 3,000 arrests per day—triple the early administration pace. Only recently have we seen dramatic workplace disruptions that at one point caused Trump to pull back on raids of farmers, hotels, and other key industries that rely on immigrants for labor. However, that pause proved to only be a brief reprieve, guaranteeing that the inflationary pressures from this aggressive immigration policy will continue to build. What truly delayed the impact of Trump's most inflationary policy was an unprecedented wave of corporate front-loading in late 2024 and early 2025. Companies rushed to import goods before tariffs took effect, creating exactly the buffer that's now insulating consumers from immediate price shocks. These panic purchases were so intense it caused the U.S. economy to contract 0.3 percent in Q1 despite robust domestic demand. By May, container imports fell 9.7 percent as the stockpiling surge ended and higher tariff rates took hold. By stocking up as they did, companies bought themselves time to ride through a few months of high tariffs without it affecting their bottom line. As Trump's trade war drags on, those Q1 stockpiles dwindle as companies forestall replenishing their inventories in the hope that tariff rates will suddenly come down. Freight bookings for April dropped 41 percent month-over-month as businesses adopted this "wait and see" approach. The gap between inventory levels and inventory costs has expanded to the third highest in the index's history. In essence, it is becoming increasingly expensive to store inventory while simultaneously becoming more expensive to replace it. The Federal Reserve's stance reveals perhaps the clearest evidence that policymakers anticipate the inflationary surge ahead. Despite months of consistently lower inflation readings and unprecedented presidential pressure to cut rates, Fed officials have held interest rates steady—a decision that only makes sense if they're bracing for future price pressures. By keeping rates elevated despite political pressure and recent good inflation data, the Fed is acknowledging their belief that current price stability is temporary. They're positioning for the inflationary impact they know is coming rather than reacting to the deceptively calm present. The ingredients for an inflationary surge are now in place: depleted inventory buffers, supply chain disruptions in essential industries, elevated tariffs on a vast array of goods, and increasingly fragile inflation expectations. When companies exhaust their stockpiles and face the choice between absorbing higher costs or passing them to consumers, the answer isn't just predictable, it is a necessary function of the corporate mandate to maximize shareholder value. Food prices are particularly vulnerable. With agricultural raids creating labor shortages during peak growing season and tariffs raising input costs, the sector faces a perfect storm. The lag between policy implementation and consumer impact is ending. Trump's own acknowledgment of economic "harm" from his policies—and his scramble to dial them back—suggests the administration has already seen internal projections of what's coming. The question isn't whether Trump's policies will drive inflation, but when Americans will feel it at the grocery store. The time bomb is real, and the fuse is shortening. Nicholas Creel is an associate professor of business law at Georgia College & State University. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
NATO leaders gather for historic summit
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — NATO leaders were gathering in the Netherlands on Tuesday for the start of a historic two-day summit that could unite the world's biggest security organization around a new defense spending pledge or widen divisions among the 32 allies. The allies are likely to endorse a goal of spending 5% of their gross domestic product on their security, to be able to fulfil the alliance's plans for defending against outside attack. Still, Spain has said it cannot, and that the target is 'unreasonable.' President Donald Trump has said the U.S. should not have to. Slovakia said that it reserves the right to decide how to reach the target by NATO's new 2035 deadline. 'We are not living in happy land after the Berlin Wall came down. We are living in much more dangerous times and there are enemies, adversaries who might want to attack us,' NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said ahead of the summit in The Hague. 'We have to make sure that we defend our beautiful way of life and systems and our values,' he said. Ahead of the two-day meeting, Britain, France and Germany committed to the 5% goal. Host country the Netherlands is also onboard. Nations closer to the borders of Ukraine, Russia and its ally Belarus had previously pledged to do so. Trump's first appearance at NATO since returning to the White House was supposed to center on how the U.S. secured the historic military spending pledge from others in the security alliance — effectively bending it to its will. But in the spotlight instead now is Trump's decision to strike three nuclear enrichment facilities in Iran that the administration says eroded Tehran's nuclear ambitions, as well as the president's sudden announcement that Israel and Iran had reached a 'complete and total ceasefire.' Ukraine has also suffered as a result of that conflict. It has created a need for weapons and ammunition that Kyiv desperately wants, and shifted the world's attention away. Past NATO summits have focused almost entirely on the war in Ukraine, now in its fourth year. Still, Rutte insists it remains a vital issue for NATO, and that the allies can manage more than one conflict. 'If we would not be able to deal with … the Middle East, which is very big and commanding all the headlines, and Ukraine at the same time, we should not be in the business of politics and military at all,' he said. 'If you can only deal with one issue at a time, that will be that. Then let other people take over.' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy arrived in The Hague for a series of meetings, despite his absence from a leaders' meeting aiming to seal the agreement to boost military spending. It's a big change since the summit in Washington last year, when the military alliance's weighty communique included a vow to supply long-term security assistance to Ukraine, and a commitment to back the country 'on its irreversible path' to NATO membership. In a joint tribune on the eve of this year's summit, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said they backed U.S. peace efforts that should preserve Ukraine's sovereignty and European security. 'For as long as the current trajectory lasts, Russia will find in France and Germany an unshakeable determination. What is at stake will determine European stability for the decades to come,' they wrote in the Financial Times newspaper. 'We will ensure that Ukraine emerges from this war prosperous, robust and secure, and will never live again under the fear of Russian aggression,' the two leaders wrote.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive-Fed should wait on rate cuts with price hikes expected, Bostic says
By Howard Schneider ATLANTA (Reuters) -The Federal Reserve need not cut interest rates with companies planning to raise prices later this year in response to higher import taxes and with the job market still stable, Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic told Reuters. "I think we have some space and time" to watch how the tariff and other policy debates evolve, said Bostic in an interview at his office in downtown Atlanta. He sees the Fed only needing to approve a single quarter-point rate cut late in 2025, based on his view that economic growth will fall to perhaps 1.1% this year and inflation returning to nearly 3% by year's end. Though some Fed officials say rates could fall as soon as July, and U.S. President Donald Trump has been criticizing tight Fed monetary policy, Bostic said the job market shows little sign of fading, while inflation remains a risk. "I'm more concerned about what happens if we don't get to our 2% mandate. Because of that I'm willing to stay in this restrictive posture for longer just to be absolutely sure," said Bostic, referring to the 4.25% to 4.5% policy interest rate the Fed has maintained since December to contain inflation. "I would see the last quarter (of the year) is sort of when I would expect we would know enough to move." Fed policy will be the focus of congressional hearings this week, with Fed Chair Jerome Powell beginning two days of testimony Tuesday morning before the House Financial Services Committee. Trump has called for immediate rate cuts, but uncertainty around his trade and other policies has pushed the central bank onto a cautious footing that may be further amplified by new risks around the conflict with Iran. After a turbulent few months in which recession risk rose alongside the Trump administration's plans for historically high import tariffs, then fell as Trump backed off, Bostic said business sentiment has improved recently - something Powell alluded to in a press conference last week. "Business leaders have lowered the probability of the doomsday scenario" in which tariffs and prices skyrocket and demand wanes, Bostic said. Business executives, he said, have told him they are confident about finding strategies to deal with the tariff levels they expect they are most likely to face. Those strategies include raising prices, perhaps in several steps over time, as companies respond to their competitors, negotiate with suppliers and monitor how consumers adapt, he noted. "They tell me 'I'm pretty sure I am going to have to raise my prices. The question is not whether but when,'" Bostic said, citing a major reason he remains reluctant to cut rates until more is known. Bostic's single anticipated cut this year is less than the two quarter-point cuts at the median of projections issued last week by the Fed's 19 policymakers. Bostic is not a voter this year on interest rates, but like all Fed officials he participates in Federal Open Market Committee debates about appropriate policy. Since December that has meant holding the benchmark overnight rate steady as the Trump administration moved to reorder global trade by imposing stiff tariffs on imported goods. Some of those levies are already in place, but have yet to significantly affect the pace of price increases that are near but still above the central bank's 2% target. In recent days, Fed Governors Chris Waller and Michelle Bowman, who is also the U.S. central bank board's vice chair for supervision, said recent inflation data has been mild enough to justify a rate cut as soon as July. But much remains unknown ahead of a July 9 deadline for the imposition of U.S. tariffs as high as 50% on European Union nations and various levies across much of the rest of the world. Bostic said many businesses in his southern Fed district say they have held the line on prices so far, but have nearly exhausted the tools at hand to keep doing so. "More and more businesses are telling me that in their sector, the strategies that they had to forbear are increasingly running their course," Bostic said. "They have worked but they have run their course and they can't keep doing it." Sign in to access your portfolio
