logo
Tariffs could jumpstart Beijing's global spying efforts, executive warns

Tariffs could jumpstart Beijing's global spying efforts, executive warns

Axios08-04-2025

Escalating U.S.-China trade tensions are likely to fuel a surge in Beijing-backed cyber espionage, a top security executive warns.
Why it matters: U.S. companies and government agencies were already grappling with an unprecedented wave of hacking activity linked to the Chinese government.
New tariff threats could intensify that pressure.
Driving the news: President Trump threatened on Monday to impose an additional 50% tariff on Chinese goods starting Friday. The warning followed Beijing's move to implement its own 34% retaliatory tariff.
"All talks with China concerning their requested meetings with us will be terminated until such time as the tariffs are removed," Trump said.
Threat level: The escalation gives Chinese operatives a stronger incentive to gather intelligence from U.S. politicians and global companies about how seriously to take the tariff threats, Levi Gundert, chief security and intelligence officer at Recorded Future, told Axios.
"There will be a premium put on very timely information that helps them navigate this new era," he said.
The volume of China-backed espionage targeting U.S. entities is already at record levels.
Gundert said Beijing will likely also intensify efforts against governments and companies in other countries that are also negotiating new tariff deals with Trump.
Between the lines: Spying on sensitive political and economic discussions has long been a core objective of Chinese cyber operations. Gaining insights into tariff talks would fall squarely within Beijing's typical spying domains, Gundert said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scoop: Trump pressed to take hard line with Iran after Israel strikes
Scoop: Trump pressed to take hard line with Iran after Israel strikes

Axios

time29 minutes ago

  • Axios

Scoop: Trump pressed to take hard line with Iran after Israel strikes

A group of pro-Israel members of Congress is urging President Trump to ensure "zero enrichment, zero pathway to a nuclear weapon" in negotiations with Iran, Axios has learned. Why it matters: The lawmakers — including a Republican, Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) — said Israel's strikes against Iranian nuclear sites and other military targets has created a "renewed sense of urgency" on the issue. "This decisive action comes after two months of unsuccessful diplomatic attempts and represents a critical chance to stop the Iranian regime from acquiring a nuclear weapon," they wrote in a letter to Trump first obtained by Axios. The White House did not immediately respond to Axios' Saturday afternoon request for comment on the letter. Driving the news: The letter is led by Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.), a staunchly pro- Israel centrist Democrat, and signed by seven other House Democrats, in addition to Bacon. The nine lawmakers noted that the two-month deadline which Trump set in March for reaching a nuclear deal arrived on Thursday — the day Israel launched its strike. They urged him to add "crushing diplomatic pressure ... to Israel's military pressure" by working with European countries to impose "Snapback" sanctions on Iran for being out of compliance with the 2015 nuclear deal. What they're saying: Trump told Axios' Barak Ravid on Friday that he believes Israel's strike improved the chance of reaching a nuclear agreement with Iran. "I couldn't get them to a deal in 60 days. They were close, they should have done it. Maybe now it will happen," he said. But Iran's foreign minister said that nuclear talks planned for Sunday have been cancelled, and Trump said Saturday that the war between Israel and Iran "should end."

Everyone should keep an eye on this Persian Gulf island
Everyone should keep an eye on this Persian Gulf island

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Everyone should keep an eye on this Persian Gulf island

Everyone should keep an eye on this Persian Gulf island originally appeared on TheStreet. Kharg Island is a small island in the Persian Gulf. It lies 16 miles off the northwest coast of Iran. It's 451 miles from Tehran, Iran's capital — roughly the distance from Detroit to New York City. It is just five miles long, about 40% the size of New York's Manhattan Island. And 125 from Iran's border with Iraq. 💵💰💰💵 It is also unique in the Persian Gulf. The island's limestone foundation allows it the luxury of fresh water reserves. Most importantly it also is the key port that exports Iranian crude oil. About 90% of Iran's oil exports flow through Kharg's terminal complex. And about a third of those exports go to could prove to be one of two key strategic places if the Israeli-Iran War (let's call it that for now) spins out of control. The other is the Strait of Hormuz, 21 miles wide at its narrowest, same as the English Channel. About a third of the world's liquified natural gas and 25% of its crude oil must pass through the strait to pass from the 615-mile Persian Gulf to reach buyers in Europe, Asia and elsewhere. Giant oil tankers with oil and natural gas from Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Oman and Abu Dhabi, Qatar and Bahrain flow though the strait Iran is the northern side of the strait, Oman on the southern. For years, whenever there's a conflict involving Iran, there are fears the country might block the strait. The importance of Kharg and the Strait of Hormuz helps explain why crude oil prices shot up as much as 14% late Thursday on the very first reports of Israel's attack on Iranian military and nuclear West Texas Intermediate, the benchmark U.S. crude closed Friday up 7% to $71.29, and Brent, the benchmark global crude, was up the same amount to $74.23. If the worst of the conflict scenarios come to pass — Kharg's terminals and the strait are shut down, all bets are off on oil prices and, by extension, natural gas and gasoline prices. Kharg's terminal were blown up during the Iraq-Iran War of 1980-1988. And the shooting between Israel and Iran (via drones and missiles) continued off and on Saturday and into Sunday. In the event of a Kharg shutdown and strait closed, Reuters reported, some analysts were suggesting crude prices could top $120 a barrel or higher, which would send gasoline prices much higher, maybe up to the top U.S. average price of $5.22 a gallon in May 2022. Global economies would be disrupted, and inflation would almost certainly jump. AAA's daily U.S. average gasoline price was up a penny to $3.133 a gallon on Saturday. The price is up just 3.1% so far in 2025. U.S. oil and gas stocks jumped on the Israeli-Iran news Friday. The Energy Sector of the Standard & Poor's 500 Index was alone among the 11 sectors of the index to post a gain for the Energy Select Sector SPDR exchange-traded fund () , which matches the index's Energy Sector, was up 1.7%. Oil services giant Halliburton () was up 5.5%. APA Corp. () , parent of oil-and-gas producer Apache, was up 5.3%. The S&P 500 was down 1.13%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, down as many as 887 points in the afternoon, finished with a 700-point loss, or 1.8%, to 42,198. The major stock indexes — Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq Composite, Nasdaq-100 and Russell 2000 — all finished lower on the week. More Economic Analysis: Hedge-fund manager sees U.S. becoming Greece A critical industry is slamming the economy Reports may show whether the economy is toughing out the tariffs That said, many analysts do not believe things will get that out of hand. Similar worries about Kharg and the Strait of Hormuz have generated similar worries and price projections. But, in a note on Friday, Amarpreet Singh, an analyst with Barclay's, said "cool heads have prevailed." Moreover, as Ian Bremmer, president of the Eurasia Group, a consulting firm that watches matters like these, thinks Iran has few cards to play in this conflict. Israeli intelligence capabilities are just too capable, he said on a podcast, and Iran's military capacity has been diminished substantially by the attacks this week. Still, attention must be paid. Most should keep an eye on this Persian Gulf island first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 14, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 14, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

James River Group Holdings, Ltd. (NASDAQ:JRVR) is largely controlled by institutional shareholders who own 80% of the company
James River Group Holdings, Ltd. (NASDAQ:JRVR) is largely controlled by institutional shareholders who own 80% of the company

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

James River Group Holdings, Ltd. (NASDAQ:JRVR) is largely controlled by institutional shareholders who own 80% of the company

Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, James River Group Holdings' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions The top 7 shareholders own 51% of the company Recent purchases by insiders Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. To get a sense of who is truly in control of James River Group Holdings, Ltd. (NASDAQ:JRVR), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 80% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk). Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute. In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of James River Group Holdings. Check out our latest analysis for James River Group Holdings Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. James River Group Holdings already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of James River Group Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too. Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. James River Group Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Gallatin Point Capital LLC, with ownership of 13%. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 10% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 6.6% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO Frank D'Orazio is the owner of 0.5% of the company's shares. We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat. While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily. The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group. Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in James River Group Holdings, Ltd.. In their own names, insiders own US$5.3m worth of stock in the US$268m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling. With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over James River Group Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders. While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for James River Group Holdings that you should be aware of. But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store