Have Your Say On Proposed Catch Limits For Fisheries Across New Zealand
The public consultation, which began today, includes proposed changes for three blue cod stocks, snapper on the west coast of the South Island, and blue mackerel on the west coast of the North Island.
'The blue cod fish stocks being reviewed are all highly-prized shared fisheries, important to recreational, customary, and commercial fishers alike,' says Emma Taylor.
'Proposed cuts to commercial catch for two blue cod stocks are in response to latest abundance estimates, while the third had a commercial catch limit cut last year. Recreational daily catch limits are proposed to be reduced for all three fisheries, in line with the settings in place under the National Blue Cod Strategy.'
Emma Taylor says the latest assessment of blue mackerel on the west coast of the North and South Islands shows that the fish stock is above the target level, so the proposals include an increased catch for the fishery.
'These are just a small portion of the fish stocks included in the proposed changes. I encourage anyone with an interest in our fisheries to read the consultation material and provide feedback.
' The fisheries included in this review represent stocks that are of importance to New Zealand economically, socially, and culturally,' says Emma Taylor.
'We need to ensure that catch limits and other settings for our fisheries strike the right balance between getting value for all New Zealanders while ensuring they remain sustainable for future generations.
'Following consultation, we will prepare advice for Fisheries Minister Shanes Jones to make decisions on any changes, which would come into effect for the fishing year starting 1 October 2025,' says Emma Taylor.
Also included in the proposed changes are deemed value rate changes for six fish stocks. The consultation is open now and will run until 23 July 2025.
The full proposals, as well as more information about the consultation and how to make a submission can be found on Fisheries New Zealand's website: https://www.mpi.govt.nz/consultations/review-of-sustainability-measures-for-fisheries-october-2025-round/
Proposals for changes to catch limits for orange roughy on the Chatham Rise are also being developed and will be available for consultation in the coming weeks.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
36 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
New political poll predicts hung Parliament
By Anneke Smith of RNZ The race for Election 2026 appears to be on a knife edge, with a new political poll predicting a hung Parliament. The latest Taxpayers' Union-Curia Poll - taken between 3 and 5 August - comes after a string of negative headlines about the economy. Labour has overtaken National as the largest party, gaining 2 points to 33.6 percent, while National drops 2.1 points to 31.8 percent. The Greens are up 0.4 points to 9.8 percent, ACT is down 0.5 points to 8.6 percent, New Zealand First is down 2 points to 7.8 percent and Te Pāti Māori down 0.3 points to 3.2 percent. If an election were held today, the centre-right bloc would lose four MPs for a total 61 seats, while the centre-left bloc would gain four MP and also reach a total 61 seats. With neither bloc having the upper hand, it would be a hung Parliament. The last Taxpayers' Union-Curia Poll showed the coalition parties reasserting their lead with enough support for 65 seats, driven by a surge in support for New Zealand First. Party vote Labour 33.6 percent, up 2 percentage points (43 seats) National 31.8 percent, down 2.1 (40 seats) Greens: 9.8 percent, up 0.5 (12 seats) ACT: 8.6 percent, down 0.5 (11 seats) NZ First: 7.8 percent, down 2 (10 seats) Te Pāti Māori: 3.2 percent, down 0.3 points (6 seats) For the minor parties, TOP is up 1.4 points to 2.6 percent, Outdoors and Freedom is up 1 point to 1.1 percent and Vision NZ is up 0.4 points on 0.4 percent. Cost of living remains voters' most important issue at 24.4 percent (+2.8 points), closely followed by the economy more generally at 20.7 percent (+1.6 points). Health is the next largest issue on 10.0 percent, followed by employment on 6.0 percent. Preferred prime minister Christopher Luxon: 20.2 per cent, up 0.5 Chris Hipkins: 20.2 per cent, up 0.6 Winston Peters: 8.2 per cent, down 1.1 Chlöe Swarbrick: 8 per cent, up 1 David Seymour: 6.2 per cent, up 0.5 In preferred Prime Minister ratings, Christopher Luxon is up 0.5 points to 20.2 percent while Chris Hipkins is up 0.6 points to also sit at 20.2 percent. Winston Peters is down 1.1 points to 8.2 percent, Chlöe Swarbrick is up 1.0 point to 8 percent, and David Seymour is up 0.5 points to 6.2 percent. The poll was conducted by Curia Market Research Ltd for the Taxpayers' Union. It is a random poll of 1000 adult New Zealanders and is weighted to the overall adult population. It was conducted by phone (landlines and mobile) and online, has a maximum margin of error of +/- 3.1 percent and 6.2 percent were undecided on the party vote question. Curia is a long-running and established pollster in New Zealand, which has resigned its membership from the Research Association New Zealand (RANZ) industry body. Polls compare to the most recent poll by the same polling company, as different polls can use different methodologies. They are intended to track trends in voting preferences, showing a snapshot in time, rather than be a completely accurate predictor of the final election result.
Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Letters to the Editor: nuclear, solar and war
Today's Letters to the Editor from readers cover topics including the use of nuclear weapons, how solar farms impact the environment, and a civilised way out of war. We should all strive to stop nuclear weapon use On August 6 great publicity was given to the marking of the 80th anniversary of the atomic bomb that destroyed Hiroshima, killing 200,000 men, women and children and causing immense suffering from radiation. However, not many New Zealanders know radiation fell on our New Zealand Navy sailors during Operation Grapple on the frigates HMNZS Pukaki and HMNZS Rotoiti in 1957 and 1958 when the British Government tested hydrogen nuclear bombs over Christmas Island and Malden Island in the mid-Pacific. The biggest of the detonations was equal to 140 Hiroshima bombs. The servicemen on these two frigates were ordered to stay on deck to observe nine explosions over many months during this period. Medical investigations here have now proved severe damage to the sailors' health. So, we in New Zealand have had a tragedy that has not been acknowledged by any formal apology from the New Zealand or British Government. Medical evidence has proved that this radiation has caused tragic results for most of these New Zealand servicemen and some of their children and grandchildren. Also, one nuclear explosion in a port or on land in New Zealand would contaminate our food-producing industries. We should all strive to stop the use of nuclear weapons on Planet Earth. Lady Fiona McHardy Elworthy Spare a thought An element of humility might serve Christopher Luxon and Nicola Willis better than flippant comments and brush-offs when asked about unemployment. We know you're "sorted" but the rest of us might not be. Solar farm impact Large solar farms in the United Kingdom do have an impact on the environment, so let's introduce solar power well in New Zealand. I agree with Dr Duncan Connors ( ODT , 3.7.25) their place is best on top of large shopping centres, car parks and new builds, but not over the land. We needed an upgraded waste collection, but look how the highly coloured plastic bins now line our streets and distract from the character and colour of properties. It would never happen in Bath. Visual planning is important. Especially in a heritage city like Dunedin. Metiria Turei's opinion piece ( ODT , 8.8.25) suggests late voting enrolments should be allowed. However after the unnecessary delay in forming the new government, due in part to late enrolments, it seems counterproductive to democracy. In life there are always deadlines. If a person can't take their voting seriously enough to be enrolled in time, then it's a life lesson learned to their advantage. On allowing prisoners to vote, it should be taught in schools that to offend in society means losing societies privileges, one of which is voting. This might disadvantage the Greens, who propose to defund police and abolish prisons, but that's my opinion. Failing to face the truth will get us nowhere Now the world is finally coming to see Benjamin Netanyahu for the criminal he is, it is time to move on to the next phase in the Israel/Palestine tragedy. That is not recognition of a Palestine state which, even if it ever got off the ground would be nothing more than a failure to face the truth. The Arabs hate the Israels almost as much as the Israelis hate the Arabs, which is almost as much as white South Africans hated black South Africans and vice-versa. However, the people holding all the power tend to have an extra bite to their hatred, a sort of paranoia. Ask any colonist. Who thought white and black South Africans would one day live together in a democracy? But that, as difficult as it was to swallow and as difficult as it will continue to be for many years to come, was preferable to annihilation. No-one should be surprised that people who have been oppressed for generations find it difficult to immediately respect democracy. After all, the other lot didn't. Tough as it is, democracy is the only civilised way out of this horrible mess. Talk of recognising a Palestinian State is either foolishness or deliberate deceit. Nothing short of one adult one vote and sharing the land will (eventually) solve the problem. Address Letters to the Editor to: Otago Daily Times, PO Box 517, 52-56 Lower Stuart St, Dunedin. Email: editor@
Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Time those who can and would are given something to do
Everyone has the right to work, Randal Scott writes. Iain dropped in to see us on Saturday night. He's pretty depressed at the moment and can't see why it's worth living any more. What's the point when you wake up every morning and have nothing to do? One of the absurdities of our time is that people in employment often complain about having too much to do while more than 100,000 Kiwis do nothing. Our communities are full of individuals who are able-bodied or able-minded, or both, and desperately want to make a contribution. Our current economic model, introduced in the 1980s, deliberately creates a level of unemployment that suppresses wages and reduces inflation. It is a cruel policy tool that wastes human potential and drives people like Iain to despair. A previous administration talked about basing its policies on kindness, but what is kind about paying people every week to not participate in the society they are part of? It must be very discouraging to be told to go job-hunting for roles that have been outsourced overseas. Globalisation has brought us cheap food and goods at the expense of the manufacturing sector in New Zealand. The same people who complain about the cost of "dole-bludgers" are more than happy to contribute to their demise by buying cheap food, clothing and other items that are produced by labourers in other countries. There is so much meaningful work that could be done by people who receive Jobseeker Support. As a country, we could recycle more, we could have cleaner towns and cities, we could do a better job of maintaining infrastructure, and we could improve our productivity by freeing up skilled hands to do their essential work. I would like to see the government replace all benefits with part-time jobs for people who would work 20 hours a week. To be clear, this wouldn't be a "work for the dole scheme", because allowances for unemployed people would no longer exist. Instead of being paid to live on the fringes of our society, people without jobs could be gainfully employed by government agencies, schools and community groups like sports clubs. Councils around the country would receive funding from the government to employ people on an as-needed basis — when the economy was contracting the number of these employees would rise, but the private sector would employ many of these workers whenever the economy was expanding. Article 23 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights says: "Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment." I believe current government policies are a breach of this statement because even in times of low unemployment there are more than 50,000 New Zealanders with no paid work to do. It is morally repugnant to pay people to do nothing when there is so much important work to be done and so many potential benefits for our society. If everyone had a reason to get out of bed in the morning we could expect to see reduced crime, improved mental health outcomes across the population and a greater sense of social cohesion. And I'm sure this policy would save significant amounts of money in the long run. We wouldn't have to talk about NEETs (young people not engaged in education, employment or training) anymore because everyone could leave school knowing there was a job to go to. It is time to radically change the way we structure our society to ensure everyone contributes to our shared life through work. Anything less is a moral and fiscal failure. — Randal Scott is a trained youth pastor, secondary school teacher and mental health support worker.
