logo
Chinese Australians, Previously Scorned, Are Now Courted as Nation Nears Tight Election

Chinese Australians, Previously Scorned, Are Now Courted as Nation Nears Tight Election

It was deep into World War II when Mark Wang's father, who worked for China's military intelligence, left Shanghai to meet with U.S. General Douglas MacArthur in Melbourne, Australia. Since China had no functioning consulate in the city, they chose to talk in the home of a prominent local businessman, whose family had first emigrated from China in the mid-1830s. In between discussions on how best to expel the Axis Powers from China, the pretty daughter of his host caught the older Wang's eye.
'It was love at first sight,' says Mark Wang, the CEO of the Museum of Chinese Australian History in Melbourne, of his parents' first meeting. 'And that's why I'm here!'
It's a sweet anecdote that also illustrates how the fates of Australia, China, and indeed the U.S. have long been intertwined. While Australia has been inhabited by Aboriginal peoples for at least 65,000 years, the first European settlers arrived in 1788, with the first Chinese following just 30 years later. It was not always a harmonious melding with periodic race riots culminating in the 1901 White Australia Policy, which effectively halted legal migration from Asia to the self-styled 'Lucky Country.' After that policy was repealed in 1975, Chinese immigration ebbed and flowed corresponding to the various crises that blighted the continent, from the Vietnam War, Tiananmen Square massacre, and recent crackdown on freedoms in Hong Kong. Today, persons of Chinese heritage comprise some 5.5% of Australia's 26 million people.
'The Chinese-Australian community are major contributors to our cultural life, economy, business, to every aspect,' Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told TIME in a February interview. 'Chinese Australians have been a large part of our multicultural community for 200 years.'
And they may prove pivotal to Australia's future as federal elections approach on Saturday. Polls have Albanese's center-left Labor Party neck-and-neck with the opposition right-leaning Liberal-National Coalition, with observers believing a hung parliament—whereby no party reaches the 76 seats required to form government—remains a likely outcome.
The tight race has led to a surge in political advertising and campaigning on popular prominently Chinese-language apps such as WeChat and Red Note targeting marginal, multicultural constituencies in recent weeks. Since January, the RECapture Project has found more than 220 authorized Liberal ads on WeChat and about 35 for Labor. Even non-ethnic Chinese candidates have embraced the platforms, sharing videos of themselves eating Sichuan hotpot and drinking bubble tea.
Fan Yang, a University of Melbourne research fellow who leads RECapture, says that campaign posts are often sophisticated and appear tailored with the help of outside agencies. 'Red Note is known for lifestyle and e-commerce, which means political content is less prioritized by the platform algorithm,' she says. 'One way that politicians navigate the algorithm is to approach third party influencers to increase their online visibility.'
The fact that some neighborhoods with the highest proportion of ethnically Chinese voters are also the closest fought is galvanizing this strategy. The Labor-held ultra-marginal Sydney seat of Bennelong has around 30% residents of Chinese heritage and is now notionally Liberal due to a redrawn boundary. According to RECapture, Liberal candidate Scott Yung has appeared in more than 100 authorized ads since January. Meanwhile, Sydney's Bradfield constituency has the fifth largest population of ethnically Chinese voters nationwide and has been inundated with WeChat ads for both main parties' candidates as well as independents. Attack ads targeting both party leaders have also proliferated as the election draws near.
Still, the brazen courting of Chinese Australians—both Albanese and Coalition leader Peter Dutton have been recently filmed enjoying Chinese meals on the campaign trail—is a welcome departure from Australia's last federal election in 2022, when anti-Chinese sentiment had reached an unfortunate peak amid a severe chill in Sino-Australian relations as well as COVID-related racism. According to a 2021 report by the Lowy Institute, almost one in five Chinese Australians reported being physically threatened or attacked in the previous year.
The pandemic marked a crescendo, but anti-Chinese bigotry had been building since around 2016, when then Australian Prime Minister Malcom Turnbull ordered an investigation into alleged Chinese Communist Party (CCP) interference, leading to an Espionage and Foreign Interference Bill the following year. A slew of high-ranking local and national politicians were subsequently accused of being in the pay of the Chinese government. The election of U.S. President Donald Trump on a Sinophobic ticket and his subsequent railings against the 'China virus' and 'kung flu' also helped normalize anti-Asian sentiment, say local community members.
In October 2020, Liberal senator Eric Abetz sparked outrage when he asked three Chinese Australians called before the chamber to discuss non-White parliamentary under-representation 'whether they are willing to unconditionally condemn the Chinese Communist Party dictatorship' in what one of the participants subsequently denounced as a 'McCarthyist' loyalty test.
Of course, anti-Chinese sentiment goes back to Australia's Gold Rush period. In 1855, the state of Victoria imposed a £10 levy on every Chinese immigrant arriving in the colony. To circumvent this 'poll tax,' many Chinese immigrants landed in South Australia and then walked the over 350 miles to Melbourne, which on the back of the mining boom was soon to become the richest city in the world.
In 2017, Jimmy Li, president of the Chinese Community Council of Australia Victoria Chapter (CCCAV), helped organize a walk to retrace this epic journey to raise awareness of the historical injustice. 'One of the proudest aspects of Australia is our multiculturalism,' he says. 'People live peacefully together, maintain their cultures, but also we connect, interact, and work together.'
It's a view that has broad public support, with a 2023 survey finding that nearly 90% of respondents believed that 'multiculturalism has been good for Australia.' Indeed, an internal review by the Liberal Party following their 2022 election defeat found that many Chinese Australians—which had traditionally backed the party—had shifted their support due to geopolitical tensions and the COVID backlash.
Under the Albanese government, bilateral relations have warmed significantly, and Dutton has also toned down his hawkish rhetoric, saying last year that he was 'pro-China and the relationship we have with them.' Still, the pall of Chinese interference continues to dog this election. In recent weeks, both Yung, the Liberal Bennelong candidate, and independent lawmaker Monique Ryan have had to fend off allegations of CCP backing.
The question remains how to get more Chinese Australians actually into political life rather than simply being courted by the nation's establishment. While Chinese Australians are active in philanthropy and local politics, the cohort remains underrepresented at the federal level. 'It's a work in progress,' says Yan Ma, a CCCAV committee member. 'Politicians from every part of every spectrum who care about multicultural communities are actively recruiting Chinese speaking or Chinese background staff members. So that's a good sign.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MAGA's blue-collar base waits patiently for populist payoff
MAGA's blue-collar base waits patiently for populist payoff

Axios

time19 minutes ago

  • Axios

MAGA's blue-collar base waits patiently for populist payoff

President Trump 's second term has been a payday for the powerful, exposing a disconnect in his promise to deliver for "the forgotten man" of America's working class. Why it matters: The populist paradox at the heart of MAGA — a movement fueled by economic grievance and championed by a New York billionaire — has never been more pronounced. Trump's blue-collar base remains fiercely loyal, energized by his hardline stances on immigration, trade and culture — and patient that his economic "Golden Age" will materialize. But so far, the clearest financial rewards of Trump's tenure are flowing upward — to wealthy donors, family members, insiders and the president himself. The big picture: Trump's inner circle has shattered norms around profiting from the presidency, dulling public outrage to the point where even the most brazen access schemes draw only fleeting scrutiny. Take crypto: The top holders of Trump's meme coin were granted an exclusive dinner last month at the president's Virginia golf club, where some paid millions for access. The White House refused to release the guest list, but wealthy foreigners — including a Chinese billionaire who faced SEC charges under the Biden administration — were among those revealed to be in attendance. Trump's sons, meanwhile, are spearheading a family crypto venture that has raked in hundreds of millions of dollars. Trump Media, the parent company of Truth Social, is raising $2.5 billion to buy Bitcoin. All of this — plus a flurry of lucrative real estate deals overseas — is playing out as Trump presides over U.S. foreign policy and the fate of crypto regulation. Zoom in: Now take Trump's relationship with his donors. His Cabinet is the wealthiest in American history, stocked with mega-donors whose combined net worth reaches well into the billions — even discounting estranged former adviser Elon Musk. Trump has granted pardons or clemency to a stream of white-collar criminals and wealthy tax cheats, many of whom hired lobbyists, donated to the president or raised money on his behalf. The Wall Street Journal found that the biggest corporate and individual donors to Trump's inauguration later received relief from investigations, U.S. market access and plum postings in the administration. The other side: Trump officials wholly reject the premise that the administration's policies don't benefit the working-class Americans who voted for the president en masse. The White House points to cooling inflation, plummeting border crossings, and the tariff-driven re-shoring of manufacturing as evidence of Trump delivering on his core promises. They frame his crypto push, AI acceleration and deregulatory agenda as driving forces behind a pro-growth tide that will lift all boats — including for middle- and working-class Americans. Reality check: Inflation may remain benign for now, but there are growing signs businesses are experiencing higher prices and passing some or all of those costs directly through to consumers, Axios managing editor for business Ben Berkowitz notes. While companies have made encouraging public statements about re-shoring, in almost all of those cases it's too soon for any shovels to be in the ground. What to watch: Trump's "One, Big, Beautiful Bill" is packed with populist red meat, including the extension of his first-term tax cuts, the elimination of taxes on tips and overtime, and $1,000 " Trump Accounts" for newborns. "All his hopes and dreams on that front are pinned to that reconciliation bill," one MAGA operative told Axios, characterizing it as "the bulk" of Trump's legislative agenda for the middle class. "The president expects the Senate to quickly pass the One, Big, Beautiful Bill, codifying huge tax cuts that will mean permanent savings for hardworking Americans," White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said. Between the lines: Several independent analyses project that the wealthiest Americans would benefit most from the bill. A Penn Wharton study that found the top 10% of earners would reap 70% of the legislation's total value. The Congressional Budget Office projects that Medicaid work requirements and other health care cuts would leave about 11 million people uninsured by 2034. Millions could also be forced off of food stamps. "Medicaid, you gotta be careful," former Trump adviser Steve Bannon said on his "War Room" podcast in February. "Because a lot of MAGAs are on Medicaid, I'm telling you. If you don't think so, you are dead wrong." Factory investments in red districts are expected to suffer most from the bill's rollback of clean energy credits included in President Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. The bottom line: Inside the MAGA movement, there's little concern about who's getting rich as long as Trump keeps fighting the culture wars, deporting immigrants and tearing down liberal institutions.

Palantir's H-1B Hiring Sparks Fears Over Sensitive U.S. Data Access
Palantir's H-1B Hiring Sparks Fears Over Sensitive U.S. Data Access

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Palantir's H-1B Hiring Sparks Fears Over Sensitive U.S. Data Access

Palantir Technologies, the surveillance giant under growing scrutiny for its ties to the Trump administration, employs scores of foreign workers even as it helps compile vast amounts of sensitive data on Americans. Palantir sponsored 78 foreign workers in 2024 — the most recent year for which data is available — and has sponsored 263 workers under the program since 2020, The H-1B Salary Database indicates that about half of these roles are for AI and software engineering positions, placing foreign nationals in critical technical roles at a company now reportedly embedded in the core operations of U.S. federal agencies. Nationals from India and China receive the most H-1B visas of any country's workers. USCIS data reveals that during fiscal year 2023, 72% of H-1B visas were issued to Indians, while 12% went to the Chinese. The database disclosures stand in stark contrast to recent revelations from The New York Times, which reported on May 30 that Palantir has become the centerpiece of an ambitious effort by the Trump administration to centralize federal data on American citizens. The reporting detailed how Palantir's Foundry platform is being adopted across agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Health and Human Services, and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), enabling the administration to merge disparate databases that contain financial, medical, and immigration records. The Times reported that Palantir, co-founded by Peter Thiel and led by CEO Alex Karp, received more than $113 million in federal contracts under the Trump administration, not including a new $795 million Department of Defense award. Former employees and privacy advocates voiced concern that the company — already entwined with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Pentagon — is facilitating the construction of what critics describe as a potential 'national citizen database.' The concerns are compounded by the company's international footprint and foreign staffing. Palantir lists between 1,000 and 5,000 employees on LinkedIn, with most external estimates placing its global headcount at just under 4,000. The company maintains a presence on every inhabited continent — including operations and staff in Asia and Europe, according to LeadIQ. A recent Business Insider Africa report also confirmed that Palantir provides artificial intelligence tools to foreign militaries, including those of Israel and Ukraine. The firm held its first 2025 board meeting in Tel Aviv and has partnered with the Israeli Ministry of Defense to support ongoing war efforts. The optics of such international entanglements have not gone unnoticed among former staff. In a letter obtained by NPR and published May 5, thirteen former Palantir employees condemned the company's expanding work with the Trump administration, particularly its $30 million deal with ICE to develop a system capable of tracking migrant movement in near real-time. 'Early Palantirians understood the ethical weight of building these technologies… These principles have now been violated and are rapidly being dismantled at Palantir Technologies,' the ex-employees wrote. The former employees also warned that the software they helped build could now be used for surveillance targeting immigrant families, journalists, and political dissenters. The New York Times further detailed internal dissent among employees disturbed by the firm's proximity to Trump's political agenda. Some engineers reportedly raised red flags about inadequate security practices among Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staff — a Trump-aligned task force spearheading the data initiative, many of whom previously worked at Palantir or companies funded by Thiel. Despite public concerns, Palantir has emphasized that it acts only as a data processor. In a 2020 blog post, the company The White House declined to comment for the Times story but pointed to President Trump's executive order mandating that federal data silos be eliminated in favor of cross-agency access. Supporters argue the plan increases government efficiency and saves taxpayer money. However, critics — including civil liberties lawyers — have warned that concentrating this data creates new risks of abuse. Mario Trujillo of the Electronic Frontier Foundation told the Times, 'If people can't trust that the data they are giving the government will be protected, it will lead to a crisis of trust.' The Dallas Express contacted Palantir to ask whether H-1B workers are processing sensitive American data; a company spokesman did not return a comment by the time of publication.

Trump's CIA director details strategy using Mandarin videos to tap Chinese dissent for intelligence gains
Trump's CIA director details strategy using Mandarin videos to tap Chinese dissent for intelligence gains

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's CIA director details strategy using Mandarin videos to tap Chinese dissent for intelligence gains

CIA Director John Ratcliffe detailed the reasoning behind the agency's strategy of releasing two Mandarin-language videos aimed at encouraging Chinese nationals to reach out through the dark web, part of a broader effort to gather intelligence from inside America's top adversary. In an interview on "My View with Lara Trump," Ratcliffe said the initiative was designed to tap into dissatisfaction among Chinese citizens and collect key information on the Chinese Communist Party [CCP] and its operations. "We released two Mandarin-speaking videos to the Chinese people, inviting them to contact us through the dark web because a lot of the people in China are not happy with what's happening," he shared on Saturday. Cia Videos Aim To Turn Chinese Officials And 'Steal Secrets' "They can be great sources of intelligence for us." The campaign was part of a larger strategy to counter threats from foreign and domestic adversaries and bolster U.S. leverage in high-stakes negotiations, including President Donald Trump's efforts to secure deals with Chinese President Xi Jinping. Read On The Fox News App Cia Director Says China Is #1 Priority, Poses Biggest Challenge From Adversary In Us History Ratcliffe also emphasized his commitment to depoliticizing the CIA and returning the agency to its core mission of intelligence-gathering – not political interference. He cited the use of the Steele dossier and attitudes that dismissed the Hunter Biden laptop as "Russian disinformation" as evidence. "Those were the types of politicization that really tarnish what the intelligence community is supposed to do," he said. "We're supposed to be apolitical, and that's what President Trump wants me to be. We're going to be better. We're gonna get back to what made the CIA great."Original article source: Trump's CIA director details strategy using Mandarin videos to tap Chinese dissent for intelligence gains

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store