Jayden Daniels' Change in Physical Appearance Turns Heads at Commanders Practice
Combining that with his 891 rushing yards and six touchdowns, it's not much of a surprise that he wound up winning Offensive Rookie of the Year and being named to the Pro Bowl.
Advertisement
Daniels even led the Commanders to the NFC Championship Game, losing to the Philadelphia Eagles 55-23. It was still the furthest they had advanced in the playoffs since winning the Super Bowl at the end of the 1991 season.
Now, it's clear the team is ready to get back to work for 2025, and on Thursday, the Commanders' official X page posted photos of several players at voluntary organized team activities (OTAs), with one featuring their star quarterback.
The photo quickly caught the attention of many fans, who believe Daniels looks much bulkier and stronger compared to last season.
"JD5 looks like he put on some size," said one comment.
Advertisement
"Yea he put on some wait and muscle," said another.
"JD5 beefed up. League be on notice," a third added.
A fourth stated, "Yea man. Dude looking swole. Love it. He said it after the season that putting on weight was going to be a focus. Looks like the young man hit his goal."
"Yeah 5 has definitely been in the Weight Room," a fifth continued.
"Jayden actually putting work in at the weight room?? Let's go," said another.
Washington Commanders quarterback Jayden Daniels.Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images
Of course, it remains to be seen what's in store for Daniels in his second year, as he and the Commanders have some relatively lofty expectations, with ESPN BET tying them for the seventh-best odds (+1600) to win the Super Bowl.
Related: Texans Facing Major C.J. Stroud Decision After $300 Million Prediction
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
a minute ago
- Los Angeles Times
News Analysis: Matthew Stafford's injury raises serious concerns for Rams as season approaches
Rams coach Sean McVay was not talking. Aubrey Pleasant deferred to McVay. And Stetson Bennett was so busy leading a comeback victory, he said he did not notice. No one in the Rams organization could answer these questions: How did Matthew Stafford's scheduled workout on Saturday play out? And was he at the Rams' 23-22 victory over the Chargers at SoFi Stadium? A team spokesman declined to comment, saying McVay would address the situation on Monday. So the Stafford saga plays on, incrementally worsening as the Sept. 7 opener against the Houston Texans draws near. Stafford, 37, is preparing for his 17th NFL season. Check that: He would be if not for a back issue that has prevented him from taking a single snap or throwing a single pass during a team practice. In late July, when the Rams reported to training camp at Loyola Marymount and Stafford's back issue came to light, the situation was cause for concern. For everyone, it seemed, but McVay. The Rams had a plan, he said. He was not concerned. Stafford would not practice for the first week, but he would be out there with teammates in Week 2. It did not happen. Nearly a month later, it still hasn't. McVay said last week that the Rams were 'trying to get our hands around' the situation. But time is becoming shorter. The Rams are three weeks away from the season opener against the Houston Texans at SoFi Stadium. Jimmy Garoppolo has taken first-team snaps during team workouts and joint practices with the Dallas Cowboys and the New Orleans Saints. Bennett has started preseason games against the Cowboys and the Chargers. Garoppolo led the San Francisco 49ers to a Super Bowl. Bennett is playing with the confidence he displayed while leading Georgia to two national titles. With a physically sound Stafford, the Rams would be regarded as a legitimate Super Bowl contender. With Garoppolo or Bennett... How much time Stafford would need to be ready for the opener is an open question. Three weeks? Two? One? No one questions Stafford's toughness or grit. Or his desire to win another Super Bowl. But for now, his physical condition and availability — and the Rams' prospects this season and beyond — remain in doubt.


USA Today
a minute ago
- USA Today
Decisions, decisions: Headlining quarterback competitions around the NFL
NFL teams' hopes live and die with the play of their quarterbacks. For every Patrick Mahomes, Lamar Jackson, and Josh Allen, there are franchises with signal-callers at the other end of the talent spectrum. The preseason is a time for some squads to try to decide who their quarterback will be (at least, for Week 1). That's not a great look when one doesn't know who the most important player on the team will be without watching "meaningless" preseason contests. Then, there are the Los Angeles Rams, who thought they had a franchise QB but ... The Matthew Stafford quandary There is all sorts of mystery and drama surround the Rams' Super Bowl-winning quarterback, Stafford. Los Angeles had a chance to part ways with him in the offseason but stuck with the veteran. Now, in the preseason he has a bad back and after saying he threw 60 practice passes and looked great, coach Sean McVay is supposed to address the Stafford situation on Monday. If Stafford is lost for any amount of time, that puts Jimmy Garoppolo or Stetson Bennett taking snaps. Not a good look for the defending NFC West champs. Colts close in on decision Shane Steichen says he is close to making a decision between Anthony Richardson and Daniel Jones as Indianapolis' starting quarterback. The fact that it is any sort of decision between the former New York Giants' No. 1 pick and a guy who was supposed to be a franchise QB when chosen fourth overall in 2023, is ominous. Richardson started all of 13 games at Florida. Beginning to feel like NFL teams should put more emphasis on quarterbacks who actually play a lot of college football then potential. Is Richardson simply the next Trey Lance? Will Trey Lance be Justin Herbert's backup? Lance flubbed in San Francisco and didn't get much run in Dallas. The former No. 3 overall pick, who had all of 17 college starts -- sounds like Richardson -- is looking like the backup for the Bolts. He has played well in the preseason, for what it is worth. Easton Stick somehow isn't a Chargers backup anymore. He seemed destined to live in that role, but is now a Falcon. Taylor Heinicke is also in the running. He's a nice body to have around, but that's about it. Jim Harbaugh best hope that Justin Herbert remains upright. Giant decision for Brian Daboll Will Jameis Winston stick with the Giants behind Russell Wilson as the New York Giants' backup QB? All the buzz is the second, first-round pick Jaxson Dart looks like he will be the second-stringer behind the veteran. Wilson has to know he is nothing but a stop-gap until the Giants play poorly enough for coach Brian Daboll to hand the team to Dart. But will they simply have the rookie from Ole Miss at the ready if the former Seahawk, Bronco, and Steeler isn't cutting it? For all of Winston's charm and humor, at this point, he is a career backup. And that's a guy who was a No. 1 overall pick years ago. Kevin Stefanski's choice The quarterback carousel never stops in Cleveland. Never. Kevin Stefanski will name his No. 1 quarterback this week. Let's take a stab and say it will be Joe Flacco. Kenny Pickett has not played in the preseason. Dillon Gabriel saw action in Week 2. Shedeur Sanders played well in Week 1 and then hurt his oblique. No matter who Stefanski chooses, the Browns' situation overall is bleak.


USA Today
a minute ago
- USA Today
Broncos broadcast claims Parsons wants to play in Denver, but the quote never happened
There's a lot of folks who talk professional football who aren't in regular season form yet, either. Earlier this summer, ESPN's First Take ran a highlight of Dak Prescott connecting with new wideout George Pickens from training camp. The problem? The Cowboys had yet to hold a single practice yet and the highlight was Prescott finding Brandin Cooks down the left sideline from two camps ago. This next one might even be more egregious, even if it didn't happen a grand scale. Fast forward to the ongoing preseason, where teams' local TV stations trot out their own broadcast teams to narrate the exhibition games. On the local Denver broadcast of this weekend's Broncos action, their team arranged an entire segment to talk about a star NFL player who wants to join the Broncos because they are on the verge of a Super Bowl run. Everyone is fully aware that the Dallas Cowboys are in the middle of a contract stalemate with All-Pro defensive end Micah Parsons. The two sides haven't been able to reach an agreement as Parsons executes a hold-in, where he's at training camp but isn't participating in things that could injure him. If you haven't guessed by now, the full-throated support of the Broncos chances were attributed to Parsons, via his weekly podcast. The problem? Parsons didn't say anything of the sort; his podcast for Bleacher Report isn't even airing right now. It was all made up by a Twitter troll, just like the one that got ESPN. In the wide world of sports reporting, getting the scoop has now become more important than getting it right. But perhaps they might have noticed that there wasn't a single other outlet that was rolling with the news that a star player under contract was publicly waxing poetic about playing for a specific, different organization. Sorry Broncos fans that got duped. Follow Cowboys Wire on Facebook to join in on the conversation with fellow fans!