Palestinian artists to perform at Edinburgh Fringe
The event last took place in 2015, and thanks to a successful crowdfunding campaign and the tireless work of volunteers, it will return to the world's largest performing arts festival in the summer.
READ MORE: UK won't recognise Palestine at UN conference despite 'discussions', reports say
The mini-festival, taking place in Portobello Town Hall between August 12 and 15, will feature a number of Palestinian artists involved in a wide range of different practices –including music (both traditional and electronic), dancers, a puppet show, poetry, a Scottish-Palestinian musical, an autobiographical one-man show, live art and lecture performances.
The crowd-funding campaign, which has so far raised £37,979, has paid for the artists' travel and visa costs, as well as the fees they will be paid during the festival.
Artists are travelling from all over the world, such as from Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey, the US, Ireland, Holland as well as from within the UK.
Organisers are also hoping to bring across several artists who are currently in Gaza, although there is currently "no clear route" to enable this to happen under Israel's brutal bombardment of the enclave.
One of those currently in Gaza is playwright and director Rafat Al Aydi, from Theatre Day Productions, who has translated his play, titled Ruh al Ruh, into English to be performed at the festival.
READ MORE: Israeli forces kill six Palestinians near Gaza aid site
The play was written in one day and one night in Gaza last summer and focuses on a couple trying to come to terms with life under war and occupation.
After the performance, a talk with Al Aydi will then take place if a connection with Gaza can be established.
Other artists in Gaza which organisers are trying to bring over include Lafi, a rap artist from the Jabalia refugee camp, and his sound technician Abdelrahman Nabahin, who is also a visual artist.
'There's joy and warmth in Palestinian art'
Sara Shaarawi, an Egyptian playwright now based in Scotland, is one of the festival's organisers. She was also involved with the festival back in 2015, and hopes this year's event will "give people a chance to feel all the different types of art that Palestinians artists make".
She praised the support from volunteers and those who have donated to the crowdfunder, but stressed more needed to be done to ensure the artists performing at the festival have the best experience.
(Image: Beth Chalmers) Shaarawi (above) said: 'There's a huge amount of donated labour and time and it's been lots of people offering and volunteering their skills, which has been really moving.
'The support is very much coming from the grassroots, which has its challenges and it's hazards, but it's also a beautiful thing to see the arts community come together to make this happen.
'While we're almost there and we're confident, we still need about £15,000 to make this fully happen.'
READ MORE: Owen Jones: The UK media has ignored this hugely revealing scandal in Israel
Shaarawi said the money would go towards specialist equipment, "to make sure that performers' work is presented in the highest quality we can", as well as on things like community meals to make the hosting of the artists more "special".
'It's about making sure that we can actually properly host this group of people and make sure they're taken care of and that they enjoy their time in Edinburgh," she added.
The filmmaker said that Israel's ongoing assault on Gaza has made it even more necessary for Palestinian artists to have a space at a festival as big as the Fringe.
She said: 'This festival [the Fringe] came to be post-war as a place of healing, as a place of processing and coming together.
'With what's happening in Gaza and Palestine right now and to the Palestinian community all over, it's really important that they have a space in a festival that's on the scale of the Fringe."
Shaarawi added that it was important for art to "reach out to people and humanise stories, especially when enormous violence happens".
READ MORE: Majority of people in the UK support sanctions against Israel, new poll finds
'The narratives, stories and voices you see in Palestinian art, they're such joy and celebration and warmth and hospitality," she continued.
"At this moment it's particularly important with all the challenges and censorship that they've been facing that they feel they are not only welcomed but celebrated."
Shaarawi also said that artists have an "immense responsibility" to support Palestinian artists.
"Our institutions are not stepping up in the way that they could, our Government is not really doing anything about this.
"It's a way for us to reach out and support our colleagues and friends at a time when things are really difficult.
"As governments and countries are lacking in words, it's important for artists to not only look outward, but to reach outward as well."
The Welcome To The Fringe, Palestine festival will take place at Portobello Town Hall between August 12 and 15. More information can be found here.
Click here to donate to the group's fundraiser.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
12 hours ago
- Spectator
The pensioner Intifada
To anyone brought up in the seventies and eighties, the fact that so many Palestine Action protestors are themselves in their seventies and eighties is the least surprising fact of the year. These people were the original 'Boring Old Hippies,' those dreary teachers and lecturers whom so many of us had to suffer the first time round. Since age confers a harmlessness on everyone, it was rather sweet to see them again, enjoying one last stab at rebellion before marching off to that Great Student Demo in the Sky. And yet when I was growing up, these 'rebels' were the very people we rebelled against. Musically, we couldn't bear their Pink Floyd, their early Genesis and those heavy slabs of prog rock inspired by the Hobbit-y tosh of Tolkien. No wonder we embraced the rhythm of reggae, the joy of disco and (initially at least) the rebellion of punk. Punk was very much the middle-class, minority interest successor to prog. It started well, but it was almost instantly colonised and gentrified by the hippies themselves. Long hair sheared, they quickly replaced the Sex Pistols with the Clash, who were more aligned with their values. The Clash's third LP was a triple album and was so pompous and overblown it made Pink Floyd sound like Paul McCartney. Sandinista! was dedicated to the Sandinistas, whose cause in Nicaragua was viewed not dissimilarly from the cause of the Palestinians in Gaza. They would have done well to remember John Lydon snarling: 'You're too old and your hair's too long.' That was exactly how we felt about hippy teachers who tried too hard to be groovy. I'll always remember one flared-trousered example asking us to 'Call me Tony'. As soon as he said this, that vital wall between pupils and teachers – the one that separates respect from ridicule – started to crumble. It's only in recent years that the wall has been re-pointed. You may be aware of the resurgence of school uniforms in state schools. Apparently this is the result of the Call Me Tonys, who'd always decried them, finally shuffling off into retirement. And now, with generous public sector pensions providing free time and disposable income, they're back. And what could be more fun than taking up a cause and a placard? Trouble is, it's invariably the same sort of cause, isn't it? Whether they realise it or not, much of their worldview is still rooted in The Authoritarian Personality, a political and philosophical treatise written in the aftermath of the second world war. Its central tenet was that, because the Nazis were evil and were also right-wing, then everything right-wing is bad and everything left-wing is good. This may explain why our OAP protestors turned a blind eye to mass murder in China and the Soviet Union to embrace the shaky shibboleths of Marx and Mao. And it's why they now condemn the mass slaughter of Palestinians but remain shamefully silent on the mass slaughter of Israelis. The Boring Old Hippies have mostly been a bit quiet since the miners' strike and the end of the Greenham Common protests. I imagine those vintage 'Nuclear Power? No Thanks' badges now fetch quite a price on eBay. Those who wore them vanished from view around 1997, when Tony Blair moved into No. 10. What was there to protest against? His new government may have been nominally Labour, but when Peter Mandelson declared that he was 'intensely relaxed about people getting filthy rich', the hippies had the permission they needed to become breadheads. And now, money made and mortgages paid, they can afford a bit of geriatric insurrection. They haven't had a cause like this for years. Extinction Rebellion was a bit fanatical; the People's March a bit 'Waitrose' – but Palestine is perfect. It must have been lovely for them to once again feel the insurgent thrill of being 'busted by the fuzz'. So let them have their fun. They won't be doing this for much longer.
The National
12 hours ago
- The National
Why Darren McGarvey wants out of the prison of his own persona
Given recent publicity, you might think this is a quote from Darren McGarvey's new book Trauma Industrial Complex – but not so. It's a tweet I sent in July 2021 in response to headlines that Prince Harry was to write another 'intimate and heartfelt memoir of his life'. At the time, the comment threw up a response from the Scottish rapper. 'Only if you are a one-trick pony,' he replied, perhaps a tad defensively. 'Confessional is just one facet. Every day I see healing from the identification people get hearing others share. You're right – it can be commodified sometimes cynically. But when done well for the right reasons, it's as legitimate and profound as any other meaningful writing. People are entitled to their privacy. Their stoicism. But that's not everyone's bag.' READ MORE: Israel in talks to resettle Palestinians in South Sudan, sources say Remembering this exchange, I was interested to discover that McGarvey's third book focuses on the dangers of over-disclosure. In essence, the book is a sustained reflection on McGarvey's experiences of going public and the consequences of becoming trapped in the story and the persona which shot him to fame. McGarvey has discovered he might be an unreliable narrator. He's tired of being described as honest and brave and authentic. He doesn't want to be led out onto stages again and again to tell pat, pre-packaged stories about his past. I don't love the title. A riff on Dwight D Eisenhower's famous reference to the 'military industrial complex' which criticised the unhealthy relationship between the defence industry and politics in the United States. For McGarvey, the 'Trauma Industrial Complex is the system in which the very real and urgent issue of mass unacknowledged untreated trauma is commodified, medicalised and repackaged for profit, validation and influence'. Like McGarvey, I worry our confessional culture is giving folk perverse incentives to expose more and more of themselves in public, as if confession is inevitably good for the soul. I'm not so sure. Learning to be honest with yourself is one thing. Telling Twitter, another. But then, I don't have a lifestyle built on telling strangers about my private life. And that must alter your perspective a bit, particularly if, like McGarvey, you've now reached the conclusion that you can't afford to live with one of the very things which made you a success in the first place. It sounds like a paradox, but I've often thought confessions can be excellent ways of avoiding responsibility. One of my earliest memories of hearing McGarvey on the radio was listening to an interview he was doing with Shereen Nanjiani. He told the interviewer he'd done things in his past which he wasn't proud of. People had been hurt along the way, he said. Nanjiani immediately responded to this admission by congratulating McGarvey on how brave and inspiring and searingly honest he was being. We progressed, without intermission, from an admission of badness into a patronising round of applause. The moment is emblematic of how McGarvey has often been treated by the media since Poverty Safari won the Orwell Prize in 2018. This dramatic mood shift wasn't McGarvey's fault. I suppose he could have piped up and forced the interviewer to challenge her vacuous transition from a recognition of wrongdoing to the transformation of that wrongdoing into the latest gritty and authentic confession – but why should he? It isn't his fault if people code him in this perverse way. In one striking story from the new book, McGarvey is confronted with a challenging question from a therapist during a more recent stint in rehab. 'You tell stories to protect yourself. Why is that?' he is asked. Over the years, it has been something I've noticed about him too. In December 2023, McGarvey published a startling post on Twitter. In it, he disclosed that he had 'been dealing with longstanding debt for over three years' but was finally free of its burden. In characteristic form, this was written as a triumph over adversity – but with a sting. The 'debt' in question was unpaid income tax. This could have been a dangerous moment for our young hero, but confession did its magic work once again. If one of the more hostile tabloids had got hold of the story first, you could have expected to read headlines along the lines of 'social justice warrior doesn't pay his taxes' – 'socialist boasts of big pig pay cheques but doesn't pay HMRC its due' – but instead, various social media correspondents suggested it was 'inspiring' to hear that this particular new occupant of the higher tax bracket had finally given the exchequer everything it was due. READ MORE: Far-right protest in Falkirk met by anti-racism counter-demo outside asylum hotel McGarvey's account of this debt in the book is given glancing reference – 'my financial illiteracy' – but nothing more is said. It takes real chutzpah to successfully rechart not paying your income tax on time into yet another inspiring redemption arc. I don't recommend anyone else try it, but for McGarvey, it worked because, as he says, he's good at telling stories. THIS book isn't primarily an attack on those who have been sceptical about McGarvey, but on the image of him held by his most uncritical fans. 'I was affirmed, validated and applauded until I literally could not function under the weight of my own bullshit,' he says. The metaphors he uses are striking. McGarvey characterises the persona he has developed for himself as 'a prison', feeling like 'an artist might do if they awakened one morning to find themselves trapped in their own drawing'. He speaks of his fears of 'conditional acceptance from a tribe that loves me only as long as I play my assigned role' – that role being the one with the unhappy childhood, addiction and good old-fashioned poverty that self-loathing, socially-conscious middle classes can gawp at in awed but remote fascination. In another passage, he says he feels 'like an animal caged in a zoo; aware I could overpower my handlers and flee if opportunity presented itself, though what I'd do, or where I'd go after, are unknowns yet too frightening to face'. As that final clause suggests, what is less obvious is whether McGarvey is really prepared to live with the consequences of breaking free of his handlers. In the book, he claims that his recent August Fringe run was 'already sold out' and concludes with a zen-like depiction of himself, reconsecrated to living a smaller and more sincere life, less in thrall to the need for external recognition and online validation, content to be setting up for recovery support sessions, putting on the kettle in draughty halls, setting out plastic chairs. His obvious agitation about waning interest in his output on social media suggests that he may not be quite as reconciled to the consequences of ripping the painting out of the frame as the concluding chapters suggest. I don't blame him. Writing and publishing this book must have been a terrifying experience. It is one of the most unstinting repudiations of a public self I've ever read, and if McGarvey is concerned about reactions to it, I can understand why, because this book assertively rejects key parts of his public appeal, activity and authority claims over the last five years. If it is taken seriously, it should have consequences, but I imagine an irritatingly large number of people will still say they find it brave, authentic and challenging – while ignoring the elements of it which are truly courageous, sincere and difficult. McGarvey writes with a combination of well-earned pride about his achievements and a degree of bitterness about how uninterested people are when he tries to escape his genre. 'Any time I've ever floated the idea of producing a piece of work that was not about my poverty, addiction, or some adjacent topic, it's been met with resistance or disinterest,' he says. 'I find myself continually drawn back to the same story. My audience, in many ways, won't let me move on from it. Or, at least, that's how it feels sometimes. Any work I produce which is not anchored in my own suffering in some way draws tangibly less interest from both audiences and, in some cases, commissioners – a problem when your whole career is based on you being the product. 'Without it,' he frets, 'people may lose interest in anything else I have to say.' But as other creative spirits have discovered, killing off the character who made them famous often has the consequence that people aren't interested in you at all any more. McGarvey is clearly conscious of this risk. And there's the big anxious, unanswered question underpinning this book. Without Loki, without the misery memoir appeal and the no-mean-city reminiscences, does anyone care what Darren McGarvey has to say? 'Will I ever just be accepted as a professional in my own right, like everyone else?' Time will tell, I suppose.
Daily Mail
14 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Gal Gadot finally breaks silence on woke Snow White as she claims she was pressured over Israel
Gal Gadot blamed anti-Israel sentiment for the box office failure of the new politically correct live-action remake of Disney's Snow White. The movie was dogged by controversies, many of them involving the leading lady Rachel Zegler, who came under fire for polarizing public statements including 'free Palestine ' and her denunciations of the original animated feature she was remaking. Zegler's casting itself was a hot button issue, as she did not physically fit the original Grimm's fairy tale description of her character as having 'skin as white as snow.' The seven dwarfs also became a source of debate - seven little people were initially cast, but then after criticism from Peter Dinklage they were replaced with actors of varying physical descriptions 'to avoid reinforcing stereotypes,' leading to another backlash that prompted Disney to go back to seven dwarfs but now in CGI. However Gadot, 40, an Israeli who served in the IDF in accordance with the draft and has been an outspoken advocate of her country, has now indicated that she feels opposition to Israel caused her movie to flop. 'I was sure this movie was going to be a huge hit. And then…it happened,' said Gadot, referring to October 7, in an interview in Israel that has gone viral. 'And you know, this happens a lot in various industries, including Hollywood. There's pressure on celebrities to speak against Israel,' she argued. Speaking to an audience of people, she said that 'I can always explain and try to give context about what's happening here, and I always do that. 'But in the end, people make their own decisions. And I was disappointed the movie was so affected and it didn't succeed at the box office. But that's how it goes.' Gadot insisted that she 'really enjoyed filming this movie, really,' prompting an audience member to slyly interject: 'Especially when it wasn't with Rachel Zegler.' Rumors circulated last year that Gadot and Zegler were feuding over their divergent opinions on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. But when her co-star was brought up to her on Israeli TV, Gadot said: 'I even joyed working with Rachel Zegler. I laughed, talked and had fun.' In the run-up to the movie's release, Gadot was given a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame and the controversies surrounding the project largely involved Zegler. Jonah Platt, a son of the movie's producer Marc Platt, even publicly slammed Zegler for her various political rants an claimed his father flew cross-country to 'reprimand' her for 'dragging her personal politics' into the film's promotional tour. Her initial casting as Snow White was a lightning rod of contention, as Zegler herself did not have the 'skin as white as snow' that the brothers Grimm had described. In 2022, while promoting her then-still-in-development new remake, Zegler also made scathing remarks about the original 1973 animated classic. 'There's a big focus on her love story with a guy who literally stalks her. Weird! Weird,' she said of the old movie. 'So we didn't do that this time.' Another controversy began in 2022 when Game of Thrones star Peter Dinklage - who himself has dwarfism - denounced the percolating Snow White remake for having a 'backwards story about seven dwarfs living in a cave together.' Almost immediately thereafter, the little people who had previously been cast for the movie were jettisoned from the project as Disney declared it hoped 'to avoid reinforcing stereotypes from the original animated film.' Other actors with dwarfism then fiercely criticized Dinklage to Daily Mail, arguing that he had reduced the number of jobs for actors with their condition. 'It makes me so sick to my stomach to think that there are seven roles for dwarfs that can't get normal acting roles, or very few and far between roles, and now they are gone because of this guy,' said one of them, Dylan Posti. 'Peter Dinklage is the biggest dwarf actor probably of all time but it doesn't make him king dwarf.' An on-set photo surfaced showing that the 'seven dwarfs' had been replaced by a racially diverse set of 'magical creatures' of various heights and appearances. The photo was deluged with such a tsunami of online mockery that Disney initially denied it was genuine before finally confessing it was.
