logo
America's Genius Act for crypto regulation shows no ingenuity

America's Genius Act for crypto regulation shows no ingenuity

Mint5 days ago
If this session of the US Congress is remembered for anything, it may be for poorly named legislation. First there was the One Big Beautiful Bill, which wasn't. Now there is the Genius Act, which isn't.
The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act, which Congress passed this week, would regulate stablecoins and effectively transform them from a security to a means of payment.
While there is a need for some regulation, as some retailers are considering issuing their own stablecoins, mainstreaming cryptocurrency is hardly a genius move.
The bill would introduce a tremendous amount of risk to the financial system and to consumers. And for what purpose? The US already has a means of payment—it's called the dollar—and it works pretty well.
For most of crypto's history, its use case, other than paying for goods and services in the underground economy, has been unclear. Tokenization does have the potential to make payments quicker and more efficient.
Also read: Mint Explainer: CoinDCX loses $44 mn to hackers. Why are crypto firms especially vulnerable?
The big problem has always been volatility: Cryptocurrencies are not a stable store of value, and therefore not a useful means of payment. Stablecoins solve this by striving to maintain a dollar peg.
They can do this in several ways, the most common of which is to use low-risk assets such as Treasury bills as backing.
This will not produce a perfect peg to the dollar. The exchange rate between the dollar and Tether, the most popular coin backed mostly by Treasury bills, still fluctuates. It is more stable than an unhedged cryptocurrency, but not perfect.
Crypto coin issuers are very similar to banks of the 1830s, which also issued their own currencies and were regulated by the states.
In a similar spirit, under the Genius Act, companies that issue less than $10 billion worth of coins would also be regulated by the states while the US Federal Reserve would regulate bigger issuers. The thing about the 1830s is that the system was very chaotic.
Constant oversight was necessary, because any hint of currency devaluation created bank runs and failures. States had different standards, and several underregulated their local banks, creating a lack of confidence in the system.
Back then consumers had no choice, as no universal fiat currency was widely available. Today, of course, Americans can just use dollars.
Vendors don't have to worry that their value will fluctuate and holders don't have to worry that it will collapse. The central bank will ensure that it doesn't. And despite the occasional bout of inflation, the Fed has a great track record.
Also read: Subhash Chandra Garg: Don't vacillate on a regulatory framework for crypto assets
Mainstreaming stablecoins also poses risks to the financial system. Stablecoin issuers are already becoming a major source of demand for US Treasuries.
Tether purchased more than $33 billion of them last year and now owns more than Germany. If the market takes off, some banks estimate stablecoin issuers could be a captive buyer for trillions of dollars in Treasuries.
The government might find that extra demand appealing, as it would help keep rates low. But it also introduces systemic risk. If there is ever a run on a large coin, all these Treasuries would need to be sold quickly—potentially causing a financial crisis or risking a bailout.
It's worth asking what the benefits of the Genius Act might be. It would make payments more efficient than the current system of using banks and credit and debit cards—which all charge non-trivial fees. But for stablecoin issuers to turn a profit, they'd also have to charge fees.
Currently they earn most of their revenues from returns on their reserve assets. But to comply with effective regulation or just inspire confidence, these assets need to have a stable price (relative to the dollar) and be perfectly liquid.
In other words, they have to be the kind of asset that pays no return. The only way to make money while also paying compliance costs would be to charge fees. Probably not much less than what credit-card companies or banks charge.
There are also concerns specific to the Genius Act itself: There is not enough regulatory scrutiny, so illicit use would still be possible. There are inadequate provisions for bankruptcy and for enforcement.
And then there are concerns about conflicts of interest—particularly with the president, whose family issues its own coins.
But the biggest question is why the US government wants to make it easier to use stablecoins as a means of payment. Not only does it create needless risk, but it also undermines the government's own function as the issuer of the dollar.
Also read: Defence alert: Crypto is turning into a geopolitical weapon
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) has a better idea: To get the benefits of cryptocurrency while minimizing risks, and to better integrate blockchain technology into central banking, just tokenize the US dollar. ©Bloomberg
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Parliament Braces For Uproar? Congress Issues Whip, Gears Up For Fiery Operation Sindoor Faceoff
Parliament Braces For Uproar? Congress Issues Whip, Gears Up For Fiery Operation Sindoor Faceoff

India.com

time28 minutes ago

  • India.com

Parliament Braces For Uproar? Congress Issues Whip, Gears Up For Fiery Operation Sindoor Faceoff

Congress on Sunday issued a three-line whip to all its Lok Sabha MPs, directing them to be present in the House for the following three days, beginning from Monday (July 28), as the debate on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor is scheduled to take place. This is a step by the grand old party to ensure full attendance during Parliament's ongoing Monsoon Session. The discussion on Operation Sindoor and the Pahalgam terror attack was a consistent demand of the Opposition, and thus, it is a high-stakes debate. Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said that the debate on Operation Sindoor will be held for 16 hours in the Lok Sabha and for 16 hours in the Rajya Sabha. The first week of the Monsoon Session 2025 was marked by constant adjournments, major disruptions, and a surprise exit of Jagdeep Dhankhar as Vice President. Op Sindoor Discussion In Parl Defence Minister Rajnath Singh is likely to initiate the discussion on Operation Sindhoor in the Lok Sabha on Monday. Furthermore, sources cited by ANI have informed that Home Minister Amit Shah, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, and BJP MPs Anurag Thakur and Nishikant Dubey are also expected to take part in the discussion in the Lower House. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is also expected to take part in the discussion. Meanwhile, the discussion on Operation Sindoor is expected to take place on Tuesday (July 29), and the Defence Minister and the EAM could participate in the discussion along with the PM. Opposition In Parliament Opposition parties have been demanding a discussion on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor and have sought the government's clarification over US President Donald Trump's repeated claims that he brokered a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. The Opposition parties had been demanding PM Modi's presence during the debate. Since the Prime Minister travelled abroad on a two-nation visit this week, the discussion has been scheduled for next week. Apart from this, according to ANI, the floor leaders of the INDIA bloc parties will meet on Monday at 10 am to discuss the strategy for the second week of the monsoon session.

Worked Hard for 5 Years, but SM Krishna Became CM Just 4 Months After Joining Party: Kharge
Worked Hard for 5 Years, but SM Krishna Became CM Just 4 Months After Joining Party: Kharge

India.com

time28 minutes ago

  • India.com

Worked Hard for 5 Years, but SM Krishna Became CM Just 4 Months After Joining Party: Kharge

Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge on Sunday expressed regret over missing the opportunity to become the Chief Minister of Karnataka, recalling how, despite his hard work, SM Krishna, who had joined the party just four months earlier, was chosen for the post. Expressing dismay over the Gandhis' decision to overlook him and appoint S.M. Krishna as the Chief Minister of Karnataka, Kharge said that despite working tirelessly for five years to bring the party to power, his efforts felt wasted. Kharge noted that there have been several such instances and declined to elaborate further. "I too became the CLP leader and worked hard to bring the party to power. Eventually, our government did come to power, but SM Krishna, who had joined the party just four months earlier at the time, became the Chief Minister. All our efforts felt like they went in vain. I had worked tirelessly for five years, and he walked in just four months prior and became CM. There have been many such instances. It doesn't look good to speak about everything on the same day," IANS quoted, Kharge as saying. S.M. Krishna served as the Chief Minister of Karnataka from 1999 to 2004. During that time, Mallikarjun Kharge held ministerial roles in his cabinet and continued to serve under subsequent chief ministers until he entered national politics by contesting the 2009 Lok Sabha elections. In 2022, Kharge, widely viewed as the Gandhis' preferred choice, was elected Congress president after defeating Shashi Tharoor in the party's internal polls. There has long been speculation that caste dynamics influenced the decision to appoint S.M. Krishna as Chief Minister over Kharge, despite the latter's seniority and long-standing contributions to the party. Krishna belongs to the Vokkaliga community, a dominant caste in Karnataka, while Kharge comes from a Scheduled Caste background, which many believe played a role in him being overlooked.

Mallikarjun Kharge recalls how he missed a chance to becoming Chief Minister
Mallikarjun Kharge recalls how he missed a chance to becoming Chief Minister

The Hindu

time28 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Mallikarjun Kharge recalls how he missed a chance to becoming Chief Minister

AICC president Mallikarjun Kharge on Sunday became a bit emotional while recalling his political journey in which he saw several ups and downs. Participating in a function organised in memory of the founders of BLDE Society in Vijayapura, Mr. Kharge took a stroll down memory lane. He became a bit emotional while remembering the loss of his family members in the attacks of Razakars. He also recalled how he came close to becoming the Chief Minister but missed the chance subsequently. He, however, said that he is not upset but, instead, he is happy because he has grown from block Congress president to become the AICC president.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store