Crackdown announced on mass fishing of sprat in bid to protect whales and birds
The move has been taken following
long campaigning by environmental and fisheries groups
in a bid to protect whales, who rely on the small but protein-rich fish.
Previous attempts to restrict overfishing by large trawlers
were overturned in the High Court in 2020 due to a lack of consultation with the industry.
Minister of State for Nature, Heritage and Biodiversity, Christopher O'Sullivan said the new measures are a 'clear signal that Ireland is serious' about protecting marine life.
However, the move has criticised by the Social Democrats as coming 'years too late' and called for a full ban on sprat fishing.
How the restrictions will work
From 1 October next year, trawling activity by fishing vessels over 18 metres in length in inshore waters inside the six nautical mile zone and the baselines will be prohibited.
A limited total allowable catch of 2,000 tonnes of sprat will be permitted for vessels over 18 metres length overall inside the six nautical mile zone and inside baselines from 1st October 2025 to 30th September 2026 only.
Trawlers that are over 8 metres in length which are seeking to fish for sprat during that period will require an authorisation to do so.
Advertisement
The move was announced by the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, which said it carried out a wide consultation and received scientific and economic analysis from the Marine Institute and seafood industry group Bord Iascaigh Mhara.
Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine Martin Heydon and Minister of State with responsibility for Fisheries Timmy Dooley announced the plan to place the restrictions on trawling activity by large vessels.
Heydon brought a memo to Cabinet this morning to inform them of the decision.
He said: 'This is a matter of significant public interest, and the decision has been preceded by an extensive public consultation which has been considered carefully. I am satisfied that this is the right thing to do for the preservation of sustainable fisheries in our inshore waters.'
O'Sullivan, the junior minister for nature, heritage and biodiversity, said the 'de facto ban' was a step forward for Ireland's marine environment and for the future of wildlife.
Industrial trawling of sprat in Ireland's inshore waters to be banned. This decision reflects the valuable input and advocacy of coastal communities throughout the consultation process.
pic.twitter.com/2n1AMmoqjP
— Christopher O'Sullivan TD (@COSullivanTD)
July 22, 2025
'For too long, industrial overfishing of sprat has threatened the very foundation of our marine food web, putting whales, dolphins, and our much-loved seabirds like puffins and kittiwakes at risk,' the Cork South-West TD said.
'The measures agreed today, which amount to a de facto ban on industrial trawling of sprat in our inshore waters, are the result of an extensive public consultation process and careful consideration of the best available scientific advice.'
Social Democrats environment spokesperson Jennifer Whitmore said that the move was a 'half measure' which had come too late to help preserve the sprat and limit the consequences of their overfishing on whales and other creatures.
'It's good to see the government finally acknowledge the damage being done to sprat stocks,' Whitmore said, 'But after seven years of dithering, we need more than incremental steps – we need ambition, urgency, and a full moratorium until we have the science and safeguards to manage this fishery responsibly.'
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
X loses High Court challenge brought against Coimisiún na Meán safety code
Social media giant X has lost a High Court challenge brought against Ireland's broadcasting and online media regulator, Coimisiún na Meán, over its online safety code. X International Unlimited Company, which operates X, formerly known as Twitter, had alleged that the media regulator engaged in 'regulatory overreach' in its approach to restrictions on certain video content. Coimisiún na Meán's online safety code, which was adopted last October and came into effect earlier this month, sets out legally binding rules for video-sharing platforms. It is aimed at protecting the public, and especially children, from harmful online content. X, owned by Elon Musk, had sought a High Court order compelling the commission to quash its decision to adopt certain sections of the code. It also sought the court to overturn the commission's decision to apply the code to its platform. READ MORE In a judgment, Mr Justice Conleth Bradley on Tuesday said he was refusing the reliefs sought by X. The judge dismissed several arguments made by the platform in the proceedings, including that the code was out of step with European legislation. The judge found the code did not go beyond what is permitted by the Audiovisual Media Service Directive (AVMSD), a European Union directive that underpins the code. He said the code was not in conflict with the Digital Services Act, an EU regulation that also sets out rules for online content. In the context of this case, the judge noted the Digital Services Act treats provisions in the AVMSD 'in a complementary manner'. The latter directive is not 'displaced or substantially curtailed' by the Digital Services Act, the judge said, as had been submitted by X. The AVMSD complements the Digitial Services Act in 'providing specific rules in determining what content can be harmful to minors', the judge said. X had submitted that in adopting the sections complained of in the safety code, Coimisiún na Meán went beyond what is permitted by the AVMSD, allowing for a total ban or prohibition of certain online content. X saidthe directive only allows for measures to control access to certain online content. X also argued that parts of the code strayed into the regulation of matters within the scope of the Digital Services Act. Further to this, X argued the code was in conflict with the provisions of the act. The judgment will be formalised later in the week. Mr Justice Bradley said he was minded to make an order for costs in favour of the commission, given it has been entirely successful in defending the action.
Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
Central Bank to question Gary Gannon's right to challenge its role in sale of Israeli bonds
The Central Bank of Ireland wants to raise objections to a Social Democrats TD's application seeking to bring proceedings against it over its role in facilitating the sale of Israeli bonds on the European market, the High Court has heard. Ms Justice Mary Rose Gearty on Tuesday scheduled for next October Gary Gannon 's application seeking High Court permission to bring his case. Mr Gannon is seeking a court order requiring the Central Bank to exercise its powers under European regulations to prohibit the marketing, distribution or sale of bonds issued by the state of Israel. Patricia Brazil, senior counsel appearing for Mr Gannon and instructed by McGarr Solicitors, said she was seeking an urgent hearing date for the 'leave' application in the case. People seeking to bring judicial review proceedings must first be granted permission, or 'leave', by the High Court. READ MORE Barrister David Sweetman, for the Central Bank, said his client wants to raise objections at the hearing of Mr Gannon's application for permission. These objections include Mr Gannon's locus standi, or right, to bring the proceedings, the court heard. Ms Justice Gearty said the case arises from a concern about the continuing conflict in the Gaza Strip . She noted the situation there is 'horrific'. However, the judge said she would not grant an expedited hearing date for Mr Gannon's 'leave' application. While noting it was 'invidious' to compare, the judge said Mr Gannon's case differs from more urgent cases in the court's judicial review list relating to children in this State whom the court can 'help directly'. Ms Justice Gearty directed Mr Gannon's application be set for a date in October. In a sworn statement to the court, Mr Gannon said he believes and is advised that investors in, and holders, purchasers and sellers of Israeli bonds risk being 'complicit in genocide, with various implications for them'.
Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
Legal bid to compel Government to suspend military-related trade with Israel filed in High Court
A legal bid to compel the Irish Government to suspend military-related trade with Israel and stop flights transporting weapons to the Israeli army through Irish airspace has been filed with the High Court . Supporters of the action waved Palestinian flags and shouted 'No jets for genocide' outside the Four Courts in Dublin as the judicial review proceedings were filed on Tuesday. The action is by: Cork-based community campaign group Uplift; three journalists with news outlet The Ditch –Roman Shortall, Eoghan McNeill and Paul Doyle;and Dr Ahmed El Mokhallalati, an Irish-born surgeon who worked in Gaza hospitals. As an Irish-Palestinian surgeon, Dr El Mokhallalati said he is 'outraged that Ireland allows arms trade with Israel and allows military jets pass through Irish airspace, jets that bombed my own family in Gaza, where my Irish children were pulled from under the rubble'. READ MORE 'I was arrested and interrogated while treating patients in Gaza,' he said. 'I believe it is both a moral and legal imperative for the Irish Government to uphold international law and end complicity with genocide.' Represented by Phoenix Law, the applicants claim the Government is in breach of national and EU laws by allegedly facilitating military and dual-use trade with Israel. They claim the Government is allowing flights carrying explosives, guns and ammunition to Israel to pass through Irish airspace. They also claim Government is unlawfully continuing to grant permits for military-related goods, including components for F-35 jets, to be exported to Israel. The proceedings are against the Ministers for Transport and for Enterprise, Trade and Employment, the Government of Ireland, Ireland and the Attorney General. Before judicial review proceedings can be taken, the High Court has to grant leave which involves deciding whether or not the applicants have an arguable case. Speaking outside the Four Courts, Mr Shortall and Brian Cuthbert of Uplift said they hope the court will treat the case as urgent and hear the leave application sometime later this week, before the law term ends on Thursday. Irish-Palestinian surgeon Dr Ahmed El Mokhallalati The Government has called what is happening in Gaza a genocide 'but at the same time continue to allow weapons to be sent to Israel', Mr Cuthbert said. 'People across Ireland refuse to stand by any longer and allow this travesty to continue and we have been left with no choice but to use the courts to force the Irish Government to stop sending weapons to the Israel Defense Forces.' In a statement grounding the action, the applicants referred to research and reports published by The Ditch. It is claimed the material showed flights were and are transporting munitions and other weapons of war to Israel through Irish airspace. Other claims include that goods from Ireland are being exported to Israel for use by two Israeli arms companies for manufacture of weapons and military equipment. The applicants say the Government's position in relation to the use of Irish airspace is 'unclear and contradictory'. They say the Government maintains Irish airspace has not been used to transport weapons of war while also saying they do not know how Irish airspace is being utilised. It is argued the applicants have 'clear evidence' thatIrish airspace has been used to carry munitions and weapons of war being used against the people of Palestine. In an affidavit, Dr El Mokhallalati, who worked in hospitals in Gaza in 2023 and 2024, including as head of the burns unit in Al Shifa hospital, said he has lost dozens of family members who were killed in Israeli military strikes. [ TD Gary Gannon files legal proceedings against Central Bank over Israeli bonds Opens in new window ] 'I am haunted by the number of people injured and killed, the children that I treated and the huge numbers of children who died or had their limbs amputated, he said. 'I continue to lose those I love every day, including medical staff and relatives, and I live in fear at what may happen to those who have not perished, with the ever-high risk that my uncles, aunts, cousins and grandparents may be lost in this genocide.' From media coverage and articles, he believes Ireland has been facilitating the transfer of weapons and munitions of war to be used against the people in Gaza, he said. While appreciative of the solidarity which the people of Ireland, and the Government, have shown to Gaza, he was 'disappointed to see that the Irish Government continues to ignore the abuse of its airspace in this manner' and, in this way, is 'facilitating the most egregious crimes against humanity'.
