logo
Navigating the complexities of insurance claims in South Africa

Navigating the complexities of insurance claims in South Africa

IOL News21-07-2025
Explore real-life stories of insurance claim disputes in South Africa, highlighting the challenges faced by policyholders and the importance of understanding your rights.
Image: SAPS
It seems that everyone has a story to tell about insurance companies seemingly trying to get out of settling claims.
One recent one involved someone who was hijacked. If that isn't traumatic enough, the jacker then went on a joy ride around the Alexandra township, near Sandton in Johannesburg, completely writing off the car before stripping it bare.'
There was no car left to recover. And the only reason it was recovered was because she phoned the tracking company. The insurance company had insisted that she use a policy-mandated tracking device.
To use a tired cliché, to add insult to injury, that person's insurance company tried to argue that the car was written off instead of forcefully stolen. Many policies have a clause saying that you have to give permission for someone else to drive your car, and this statement looked suspiciously like the insurance company trying to get out of paying her.
There are two obvious things wrong with this. The first is that the accident wouldn't have happened had the car not been hijacked, while the insured also argued back that permission was given. Through coercion. At knife point. A point confirmed with a broker.
Yet, Jaco Rupping, COO and shareholder at ASI Financials, says: 'In South African contract and insurance law, consent obtained through intimidation or threat of harm is not true consent'.
Another example I have heard is when an insurance company refuted a claim from a homeowner to fix damage because a wall had fallen over. In this instance, the company argued that they had never inspected the structure. The same structure, they never asked to look at.
Then there is the case of a laptop that was insured for replacement value under all risks and was accidentally damaged beyond economic repair. Laptops are fairly mission-critical, and it took a week for the insurance company to start actually working on the claim after the laptop was inspected. Twice: once by their service provider and once by the client's.
When the insured lost her temper with the insurance company, they insisted they needed to get a quote first, which had somehow recently become policy and was, despite the device being insured, in line with common sense, for replacement value. The claim was eventually paid out, two weeks after being lodged.
Rupping says turnaround times in claim assessments should always be reasonable. 'In this case, once a device has been confirmed beyond economic repair by both the client and the insurer's external assessor, it would be expected that the insurer act without undue delay,' he notes.
There are likely many more similar stories out there.
However, Hannes Bester, Manager of Adjudication at the National Financial Ombud Scheme, tells Personal Finance that the ombud hasn't seen 'a significant number of overturns on declined claims'. This, says Bester, may be attributed to most insurers conforming to principles of treating customers fairly.
The Ombud's 2024 annual report shows that most of the complaints resolved during the year were about motor vehicle insurance, which was followed by issues related to homeowners' insurance, and then other types of complaints, including house contents.
Rupping says many of the complaints stem not from outright 'rip-offs', but rather from breakdowns in communication, mismatched expectations, or poor claims handling from both parties.
'That being said, insurers have a legal and ethical obligation to act in good faith, and clients are fully within their rights to escalate claims they believe are being unfairly denied or unreasonably delayed,' he says.
Bester explains that an insurer can decline a claim if the insured is in breach of a condition or warranty entrenched in the policy agreement. Other reasons for declining a claim include an exclusion in a policy that will result in cover being denied for that sort of claim.
As an example: 'The policyholder is involved in an accident, and he was driving the vehicle whilst intoxicated. The policy agreement specifically excludes cover if the driver is under the influence of alcohol.' Bester says that, under these circumstances, the insurer can decline the claim. The same would go for if the damage was caused by a lack of maintenance or if premiums weren't paid, for example, he says.
Rupping notes that: 'Insurers are entitled and, in fact, obligated to investigate the circumstances of a loss'.
Bester says, in instances where claims are denied, consumers should first engage with the insurance company's complaints department. 'If this proves to be unsuccessful, the insured may explore other forums such as obtaining legal advice with a view to litigate,' or approach the ombud, he says.
PERSONAL FINANCE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US tariffs will test South Africa's economic resilience
US tariffs will test South Africa's economic resilience

IOL News

timean hour ago

  • IOL News

US tariffs will test South Africa's economic resilience

The US accounts for 5–6% of South Africa's citrus exports ($100 million annually), supporting 35 000 jobs. The US tariffs are a stress test for South Africa's economic resiliency, says the writer. Image: Doctor Ngcobo / Independent Newspapers On August 1, 2025, the United States will impose a 30% tariff on select South African exports, a move the Trump administration frames as a corrective to "trade imbalances" but which South Africa decries as a unilateral overreach. President Cyril Ramaphosa has rejected the US justification, noting that 77% of U.S. goods enter South Africa duty-free, with an average tariff of just 7.6%. Yet, the policy threatens to derail South Africa's fragile economic recovery, destabilise global supply chains, and escalate protectionist tensions worldwide. This article examines the tariff's sectoral impacts, systemic risks to multilateral trade, and strategic responses to mitigate the fallout. Sectoral impacts: Automative sector South Africa's automotive sector, a beneficiary of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), faces existential risk. Reuters reported that the US absorbed 6.5% of South Africa's vehicle exports (worth $1.8 billion in 2024) and is a critical market for manufacturers like BMW and Ford. The 30% tariff could force plant closures and mass layoffs, eroding a sector contributing 5.2% to GDP. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Agriculture Citrus: The U.S. accounts for 5–6% of South Africa's citrus exports ($100 million annually), supporting 35 000 jobs. Tariffs may cede market share to Chile and Peru. Wine: Producers are scrambling to redirect stock or absorb price shocks, but the U.S. market's premium margins are irreplaceable. Macadamia Nuts and Grapes: High-value perishables face logistical hurdles in pivoting to new markets swiftly. Textile The textile sector may lose competitiveness in the U.S., while aluminium exports face a $534.5 million risk, with 24.6% going to the U.S. Furthermore, the South African Reserve Bank warns of 0.3% GDP contraction and 100,000 job losses. Fiscal strain from reduced export revenues and a weaker rand. The tariffs will disrupt global logistics: Freight bottlenecks: A pre-tariff rush to ship goods to the U.S. has already caused 6–10-week delays on routes like China and South Africa. Cost inflation: U.S. consumers will pay more for South African goods, while businesses face redundant inventory and working capital crunches. BRICS Retaliation: The U.S. has threatened an additional 10% tariff on BRICS-aligned nations, politicising Erosion: Unilateral tariffs bypass dispute mechanisms, undermining multilateralism. South Africa may expand its exports by increasing trade with markets in the EU and Asia. AfCFTA: Boosting intra-African trade as a buffer. The Latest developments: The trade deal reached today (27 July 2025) between the United States and the European Union will ease tariff barriers and improve market access between the two economies. For South Africa, this development could have significant ramifications. First, EU exporters may displace South African goods in U.S. markets, particularly in competitive sectors like wine, citrus, and manufactured components. Second, the EU may divert more of its exports to the U.S., limiting the space for South African exports to expand into Europe. Unless offset by diplomatic interventions and aggressive trade diversification, this deal risks marginalising South Africa in both the U.S. and EU markets simultaneously. To navigate the crisis, South Africa must leverage trade finance tools: Export Credit Facilities: Bridge cash flow gaps for exporters facing margin compression. Risk Mitigation: Insurance products to hedge against payment delays and demand shocks. Market Diversification: Enter new markets (e.g., EU, ASEAN). Local Substitution: Support domestic production to replace costly U.S. imports. Conclusion: The U.S. tariffs are a stress test for South Africa's economic resilience. While the short-term pain is inevitable, strategic diplomacy, trade finance innovation, and market diversification could transform this threat into an opportunity for long-term resilience. The world will watch whether South Africa and the global trading system can adapt without fracturing further. About the Author : Nyaniso Qwesha, MBA, is a trade finance consultant with expertise in global commerce and risk management. He advises clients on trade policy, market access, and financial solutions in emerging economies.

'Mother of all' Uber strikes set to cripple South Africa
'Mother of all' Uber strikes set to cripple South Africa

The South African

time4 hours ago

  • The South African

'Mother of all' Uber strikes set to cripple South Africa

The National E-Hailing Federation of South Africa (NEFSA) has issued a warning that a nationwide strike by e-hailing drivers is imminent, as frustration over poor working conditions, shrinking earnings, and alleged government inaction reaches a boiling point. Speaking on behalf of NEFSA, President Elijah Uhuru Lekgowane confirmed that national coordination is underway to stage what he described as 'the mother of all protest actions' against the e-hailing industry's major players – including Uber and Bolt. 'Drivers can't continue under the current circumstances,' Lekgowane said. 'We've seen a 35% slashing of fares since 2016, and now drivers are being deactivated without due process. This is unsustainable.' The strike action, expected to roll out across multiple provinces, follows threats of a shutdown in Johannesburg, where local e-hailing drivers have already signaled plans to take their vehicles off the roads this month. At the heart of their grievances are low fare rates, high commission percentages, and vehicle deactivation policies that drivers say are crippling their livelihoods. Lekgowane said many drivers are forced to work excessively long hours, often sleeping in their cars, just to make ends meet. NEFSA has issued a list of urgent demands, including: Immediate restructuring of the pricing index Halt to unjust deactivations and threats against protestors Review of vehicle age restrictions, which force drivers to retire cars still under finance Greater transparency and accountability from e-hailing platforms Government intervention and regulation 'Right now, we are running a charity and can't afford it anymore,' Lekgowane added. 'If we can't make earnings, these companies shouldn't make profits either. It's as simple as that.' NEFSA has also directed sharp criticism at the South African government, accusing it of turning a blind eye – or worse, colluding – with global e-hailing companies at the expense of local workers. 'Our government seems to be conniving and conspiring with these companies,' Lekgowane said. 'They allow these platforms to operate unchecked while our members suffer.' The federation says this upcoming strike differs from previous protests in that it will be nationally coordinated, with provincial leaders convening soon to finalise action plans. 'Previously, provinces acted alone. This time, we're united,' said Lekgowane. 'We won't say the strike is tomorrow, but what I can guarantee is: it's coming.' With the potential for mass service disruptions, commuters in major cities like Johannesburg, Cape Town, Durban, and Pretoria are being urged to make alternative transport arrangements. E-hailing services like Uber and Bolt have become a cornerstone of urban mobility in South Africa, providing a flexible option for millions of users – especially as the cost of owning a car rises. Yet, as demand grows, drivers say they are bearing the cost of platform growth without sharing in the profits. A national coordinating committee is scheduled to meet soon to confirm the strike date, logistics, and scale of participation. If NEFSA's warnings hold true, South Africa could be facing one of its largest e-hailing protests to date. 'This is not just about drivers,' said Lekgowane. 'It's about fairness, dignity, and survival.' Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

'Nandipha Magudumana' spotted in another country in viral video
'Nandipha Magudumana' spotted in another country in viral video

The South African

time4 hours ago

  • The South African

'Nandipha Magudumana' spotted in another country in viral video

A South African beauty queen visiting New York has been mistaken for criminally accused celebrity aesthetics doctor, Nandipha Magudumana. In a viral video, Mbali Dlamini – a former Miss SA finalist and reigning Miss Charm 2024 – has been compared to the former businesswoman. Ironically, Nandipha – who is being held in custody at a Kroonstad correctional centre – is accused of helping her co-accused Thabo Bester escape prison in 2022. The alleged couple are currently facing charges of orchestrating his 2022 prison escape, defrauding the public, and violating multiple bodies. In a viral TikTok video, model and beauty pageant queen Mbali Dlamini posted a vlog about visiting New York. The content creator vlogged parts of her trip, where she appeared walking in the streets of the popular city. Social media users were shocked at her unhappy resemblance to Nandipha Magudumana, the aesthetics doctor. Some genuinely believed that the woman in the clip was the criminally accused doctor… @nomfundodondala: 'The justice system has failed us!' @nkosi85lemenz: 'Magudumana new country, new life!' @ 'Corruption in SA? Yoh!' Mbali Dlamini responded to the comments, appealing to South Africans to stop comparing her to Nandipha Magudumana. @_mbalidlamini First vlog, really nervous 😭💀😂 ♬ original sound – Queen of Earth 🌎👑 It's likely not the first time Mbali Dlamini has been compared to Nandipha Magudumana. With her slim frame, sophisticated sense of style, and high cheekbones, the beauty queen is surely a doppelganger to the Last year, the Strategic Brand Communication graduate and model from Newcastle in KwaZulu-Natal won the title of Miss Charm 2024. In 2019 – the year Zozibini took the crown – she was even named a Miss SA finalist. Meanwhile, Nandipha Magudumana, Thabo Bester, and their co-accused are facing charges of orchestrating his 2022 prison escape, defrauding the public, and violating multiple bodies. Earlier this month, they appeared at the Free State High Court for a pre-trial hearing, which has been postponed to 19 September. Their trial is set to begin on 10 November at the Bloemfontein High Court. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store