PNG Faces Deadline For Fixing Issues With Money Laundering And Terrorist Financing
Papua New Guinea has five months remaining to fix its anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing systems or face repercussions. Scott Waide, RNZ Pacific PNG correspondent
-Analysis
Papua New Guinea has five months remaining to fix its anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CTF) systems or face the severe repercussions of being placed on the Financial Action Task Force's (FATF) 'grey list'.
The FATF has imposed an October 2025 deadline, and the government is scrambling to prove its commitment to global partners.
Speaking in Parliament, Prime Minister James Marape said Treasury Minister, Ian Ling-Stuckey has been given the responsibility to lead a taskforce to fix PNG's issues associated with money laundering and terrorist financing.
'I summoned all agency heads to a critical meeting last week giving them clear direction, in no uncertain terms, that they work day and night to avert the possibility of us getting grey listed,' Marape said.
'This review comes around every five years.
'We have only three or four areas that are outstanding that we must dispatch forthwith.'
PNG is no stranger to the FATF grey list, having been placed under increased monitoring in 2014 before successfully being removed in 2016.
However, a recent assessment by the Asia Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG) highlighted ongoing deficiencies, particularly in the effectiveness of PNG's AML/CTF regime.
While the country has made strides in establishing the necessary laws and regulations (technical compliance), the real challenge lies in PNG's implementation and enforcement.
The core of the problem, according to analysts, is a lack of effective prosecution and punishment for money laundering and terrorism financing.
High-risk sectors such as corruption, fraud against government programmes, illegal logging, illicit fishing, and tax evasion, remain largely unchecked by successful legal actions. Capacity gaps within key agencies like the Royal Papua New Guinea Constabulary and the Office of the Public Prosecutor have been cited as significant hurdles.
Recent drug hauls have also highlighted existing flaws in detection in the country's financial systems.
The implications of greylisting are far-reaching and potentially devastating for a developing nation like PNG, which is heavily reliant on foreign investment and international financial flows.
Deputy Opposition leader James Nomane warned in Parliament that greylisting 'will severely affect the economy, investor confidence, and make things worse for Papua New Guinea with respect to inflationary pressures, the cost of imports, and a whole host of issues'.
If PNG is greylisted, the immediate economic fallout could be substantial. It would signal to global financial institutions that PNG carries a heightened risk for financial crimes, potentially leading to a sharp decline in foreign direct investment.
Critical resource projects, including Papua LNG, P'nyang LNG, Wafi-Golpu, and Frieda River Mines, could face delays or even be halted as investors become wary of the increased financial and reputational risks.
Beyond investment, the cost of doing business in PNG could also rise. International correspondent banks, vital conduits for cross-border transactions, may de-risk by cutting ties or scaling back operations with PNG financial institutions.
This 'de-risking' could make it more expensive and complex for businesses and individuals alike to conduct international transactions, leading to higher fees and increased scrutiny.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
10 hours ago
- RNZ News
The Panel with Heather Roy and Tim Batt Part 1
Te Aro School teacher Serah Mehrtens reads 'At the Marae' to her class. She says her pupils have not struggled with Māori words in the book. Photo: RNZ / John Gerritsen Tonight, on The Panel, Wallace Chapman is joined by panellists Heather Roy and Tim Batt. First, the Education Minister ordered an almost total ban on Maori words in a series of books used to teach five-year-olds - the panel hears from the Education Institute president. Then, house prices have slumped to their lowest since the Covid-era boom. What's driving the property market down? Coality principle property economist Kelvin Davidson explains.
Otago Daily Times
12 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Netanyahu has 'lost the plot': Luxon
By Tuwhenuaroa Natanahira of RNZ The Prime Minister says the war in Gaza is "utterly appalling" and Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has "lost the plot". Christopher Luxon's comments came on a tense day in Parliament, where Greens co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick was 'named' for refusing to leave the House following a heated debate on the government's plan to consider recognising Palestinian statehood. Speaking to media, Luxon said Netanyahu had "gone too far". "I think he has lost the plot and I think that what we're seeing overnight - the attack on Gaza City - is utterly, utterly unacceptable" he said. Luxon said Israel had consistently ignored pleas from the international community for humanitarian aid to be delivered "unfettered", and the situation was driving more human catastrophe across Gaza. "We are a small country a long way away, with very limited trade with Israel. We have very little connection with the country, but we have stood up for values, and we keep articulating them very consistently, and what you have seen is Israel not listening to the global community at all. "We have said a forcible displacement of people and an annexation of Gaza would be a breach of international law. We have called these things out consistently time and time again. "You've seen New Zealand join many of our friends and partners around the world to make these statements, and he's just not listening," the prime minister said. The government is considering whether it will join other countries like France, Canada and Australia in recognising Palestinian statehood at a UN Leaders Meeting next month. Luxon said recent attacks could "extinguish a pathway" to a two-state solution. "I'm telling you what my personal view is, as a human being, looking at the situation, that's how I feel about." he said. Labour leader Chris Hipkins has called the war an "unfolding genocide", echoing the comments made by former prime minister Helen Clark, who visited the Rafah border crossing between Egypt and the Palestinian territory this week. "She's used the words 'unfolding genocide', and yes, I do agree with that. That's a good description of the situation at the moment." Hipkins said calling it an "unfolding genocide" meant that we were not "appointing ourselves judge and jury" because there was still a case to be heard before the International Court of Justice. "Recognising that there is an unfolding genocide in Gaza is an important part of the world community standing up and saying, we're not going to tolerate it. "We should recognise that there is now a growing acknowledgement around the world that there is an unfolding genocide in Gaza, and I think we should call that for what it is, and the world community needs to react to that to prevent it from happening," Hipkins said.
Otago Daily Times
13 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Swarbrick will have her pay docked for refusing to leave House
Chlöe Swarbrick's comments in the House on Tuesday: By Craig McCulloch of RNZ The Speaker has 'named' Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick for refusing to leave the House. The punishment means the MP had to once again leave the House, and will have her pay docked. Swarbrick was ejected from Parliament yesterday after refusing to withdraw and apologise for comments suggesting coalition MPs grow a spine and sanction Israel over the war in Gaza. At the time, Speaker Gerry Brownlee barred Swarbrick for the rest of the week, unless she apologised when the House sat this afternoon. Swarbrick refused to do so and refused to leave. Brownlee then named her - a punishment handed down by the Speaker for a MP whose conduct is disorderly. Swarbrick had previously said she had already received her punishment, and that worse things had been said by other MPs without the Speaker's intervention. Speaking to his ruling, Brownlee said the difference was previous comments had been interjections, while Swarbrick's comment was made inside a speech. "If you think about the comment that was made, 68 members of this House were accused of being spineless. There has never been a time where personal insults like delivered inside a speech were accepted by this House - and I'm not going to start accepting it." Brownlee asked MPs what standard they expected of themselves. "We have so many threats and other stuff being directed at Members of Parliament. If we don't change the behaviour in here, nothing will change outside." Labour leader Chris Hipkins questioned the precedent of the ruling. "There's not a single instance where a member has been asked to withdraw and apologise the following sitting day, and then named for not doing that." New Zealand First leader Winston Peters also questioned the ruling. "My personal view is I don't agree with a thing Chlöe Swarbrick said at all, but this is a robust House where people have a right to express their views as passionate as they may, within certain rules, but I do not think that eviction was warranted." Peters said there had been many instances of language in the House he had disagreed with, including the use of the c-word earlier in the year. Te Pati Maori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer referred to that in her contribution. "There were many of us that were offended by the c-word, but I do want to be able to assure is that spineless is a word, and it looks like the ruling is a political suppression," she said. Ngarewa-Packer repeated the c-word outright. Speaking to RNZ this morning, Swarbrick said the party had received correspondence from legal experts and the public pointing out "far worse" things had been said by other MPs, where the Speaker had chosen not to intervene. "It just doesn't really wash." Swarbrick said she would prefer Parliament's attention was focused on the "real issues of the day" and re-iterated her call for more action against Israel. "New Zealanders want action, and if our House can come together on the point of sanctioning Israel for its war crimes, then that finally would bring us in line with our legacy of standing for human rights and justice." University of Otago law professor Andrew Geddis told RNZ it was unusual for Swarbrick to be asked to withdraw and apologise, given many MPs had made similar comments in Parliament before without consequence. He said the standard penalty for challenging the Speaker's authority was to be ordered out of the House for one day. A week-long punishment, Geddis said, was inconsistent with other rulings made by Speakers in recent times. "If the Speaker is starting to almost make up the rules as he goes along, he puts at risk the preparedness of other MPs to accord him his authority. "MPs might start asking, 'well, if the Speaker is just going to do their own thing with no regard to precedence, do we really trust them to have that sort of power?'"
