Planning application submitted for brownfield site in Penicuik
Following a recent marketing process, Cala Homes (East) has been selected to bring forward proposals seeking to deliver a residential development alongside associated infrastructure and landscaping on the former mill site.
Stephen Faller, Senior Land Manager at Cala Homes (East), said: 'This application represents a significant step in bringing new life to a largely-derelict site.
'As a brownfield site allocated for housing, Pomathorn Mill offers an attractive location for new homes that can help meet local demand and contribute to Midlothian Council's delivery targets'
Cala will hold public consultation events in Penicuik Town hall on 28 August and 2 October, providing local residents with the opportunity to view the proposals and offer feedback. Further details will be made available via a dedicated project webpage ahead of the event.
Stephen Faller added: 'We look forward to working closely with the community and the planning authority to shape a development that complements Penicuik's character and delivers long-term value.'
Cala are nearing the completion of their Belwood Oaks Development in Penicuik, which comprised an overall development of 544 homes. As part of this, Cala delivered 57 affordable homes for Dunedin Canmore and Midlothian Council will be delivering the second phase.
As part of this development, a total of £8.9m has been paid to the local authority to contribute towards Education, Transport and Community infrastructure.
Cala has been involved in several community initiatives to date including working with Penicuik Athletic Boards and Penicuik Harriers as well as sponsoring Cuiken Primary school with a garden donation for a soft play builders' yard for the school.
Further details of the proposals and the upcoming public exhibition will be made available via Cala's dedicated project webpage, which will be launched ahead of the public consultation event.
Like this:
Like
Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
2 days ago
- Reuters
US approves potential sale of rocket system to Bahrain for $500 million
Aug 14 (Reuters) - The U.S. State Department has approved a potential sale of the M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System and related equipment to Bahrain for an estimated cost of $500 million, the Pentagon said on Thursday. The principal contractor for the sale is Lockheed Martin (LMT.N), opens new tab.
Reuters
2 days ago
- Reuters
Tour Championship counts toward career earnings for first time since ‘18
August 14 - However the $40 million prize pool is doled out next week, each player to compete at next week's Tour Championship will earn "official money" in the eyes of the PGA Tour. The entire purse at East Lake Golf Club in Atlanta will be considered "official money," Front Office Sports and others reported this week. It's a departure from how the tour tabulated career earnings from 2019-24. During that time, the FedEx Cup playoffs were contracted from four to three tournaments and the Tour Championship introduced the "starting strokes" staggered start that rewarded players for their standing in the season-long points race. This year, the tour is doing away with that start, so all 30 players to qualify for the Tour Championship will start at even par rather than, say, Scottie Scheffler opening at 10 under par. The leader after 72 holes of stroke play at East Lake will be crowned not only the winner of the Tour Championship but also the FedEx Cup champion. Because of that, the PGA Tour changed how it hands out bonus money for the season-long points race. The winner of the Tour Championship and FedEx Cup will receive $10 million that counts toward that player's official career earnings, rather than a bonus. The change makes the Tour Championship the most lucrative tournament of the season, as the $40 million total prize purse easily outpaces the $25 million on offer at The Players Championship. --Field Level Media
The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
Is Australia supplying weapons to bomb Gaza? Here's what we know about fighter jet parts in the F-35 program
The Australian government has announced it will recognise the state of Palestine, but many politicians and human rights groups are demanding tougher action to end the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The Greens have urged the Albanese government to stop supplying F-35 parts to a global supply chain that can be accessed by Israel, in addition to direct sanctions on senior members of the Netanyahu government. But the federal government denies it is sending weapons to Israel and has criticised 'misinformation' about the F-35s. So what do we know about Australia's role in the supply chain? The Israel Defense Forces has confirmed F-35 planes are used to 'strike terror targets and assist ground forces in very close proximity strikes'. In February last year, a Dutch appeals court found it was likely that F-35s were being used in attacks on Gaza, and a 'clear risk' that parts exported from the Netherlands were 'used in serious violations of international humanitarian law'. Sign up: AU Breaking News email In September, Danish media reported Israel had confirmed an F-35 was used in a missile strike in southern Gaza that killed 90 people and injured hundreds more. Lawyers representing the Palestinian human rights group Al-Haq have previously told a UK court the F-35s have played a critical role in Gaza and linked them to airstrikes that have killed more than 400 people, including 183 children and 94 women. The Israeli government was contacted for comment. More than 75 Australian companies have contributed to the global supply chain for the F-35 program, according to the defence department. More than 700 of the fighter jet's 'critical pieces' are manufactured in Victoria alone, according to the state government. One company, RUAG Australia, is the only global supplier of the F-35's 'uplock actuator system', which allows the jet to quickly open its bay doors and fire missiles while maintaining stealth. Australia also hosts a regional distribution hub for F-35 parts. In April, the defence department said Australian companies have been paid around $5bn for their contributions to the F-35 supply chain so far. This is a relatively small proportion of the overall program. Last year, the US government accountability office said the F-35s would cost 'more than $2tn over several decades'. The global supply chain is coordinated by the F-35's primary manufacturer Lockheed Martin in the US. The fighter jet is used by the US and 19 allies, including the UK, Canada, Australia, Germany, Japan and South Korea. Manufacturers are not contracted to supply parts to one specific nation, such as Israel. Instead, they supply enough parts for large batches of F-35s that are purchased from Lockheed Martin. In July, the Declassified website published a story alleging dual civilian and military use aircraft parts had been sent from Sydney to Tel Aviv. The story cited shipping records that allegedly listed Lockheed Martin as the source of the parts and described them as being for the 'JSF', or the F-35 joint strike fighter. An Australian government spokesperson said it 'does not have a direct bilateral arrangement with the government of Israel in relation to the F-35 program'. 'Australia has not supplied weapons or ammunition to Israel since the Israel-Gaza conflict began and not for at least the past five years,' the spokesperson said. Lockheed Martin was contacted for comment on whether F-35 parts were sent from Australia to Israel directly. Parts can only be sourced from nations allied with the US due to national security fears. In 2022, deliveries were briefly suspended when Chinese parts were discovered in an F-35. 'Replacing such suppliers would not be straightforward, as Lockheed would have a limited list of countries from which to source components,' said Kelsey Gallagher, a senior researcher with the Canada-based research institute Ploughshares, who specialises in the F-35 supply chain. 'A country like Australia refusing to transfer F-35 components could have a sizeable impact on the program, given how many individual aircraft they are contracted to supply at once,' Gallagher said. It depends on the parts. Several Australian companies are the sole global supplier for some F-35 parts. If these parts were withheld, there could be a significant short-term impact on repairs and sales. Last year, Lockheed Martin told a US court that one relatively small supplier not providing titanium products, as contracted to do so, would 'cause unavoidable and substantial delays in Lockheed Martin's delivery of F-35 aircraft to the United States, threatening national security and Lockheed Martin's reputation and goodwill'. Josh Paul, a former US state department official who resigned over US arms shipments to Israel, says the impact would be greatest if nations acted together in protest against the killing in Gaza. 'The nature of the [F-35] consortium is that all of the countries would feel the crunch and therefore feel compelled to accept that agreement,' Paul told the ABC. Gallagher said most of the contracts between Lockheed Martin and small companies, including subcontractors in Australia, were not public and it was difficult to make claims with certainty. But he referred to a 2025 Lockheed Martin corporate document that told suppliers their 'timely performance is a critical element' of their contracts. 'Logically, a subawardee failing to supply parts following a contract signing could only be seen as a breach of that contract, whatever the reason,' Gallagher said. In 2023, Lockheed Martin sued US-based subcontractor Howmet for failing to deliver F-35 components after a contract dispute. The matter was settled out of court and Howmet continues to supply parts. Gallagher said Lockheed Martin faces financial penalties from the US department of defence for failing to deliver jets on time. 'It could then follow that Lockheed would pass those penalties onto subcontractors that have some part in the delays,' Gallagher said. So far, no country has withdrawn from the F-35 supply chain. But several companies have taken action to reduce or cut the supply of new military equipment to Israel. Germany has stopped exporting material that could be used by Israel during its military operations in Gaza. Germany is the second largest arms supplier to Israel after the US. Australia's defence minister, Richard Marles, says Australia cannot announce similar action to Germany as it does not directly supply arms to Israel. Regarding the F-35 parts, he said on Sunday: 'That is a multilateral arrangement with supply chains that are organised by Lockheed Martin in the United States and have multiple suppliers in respect of all of those supply chains.' The German company Rheinmetall produces fuselages for the global F-35 supply chain. These contributions have not been stopped. In September, the UK suspended most relevant arms export licences for use in Israel. Some nations think so, but this is difficult to independently substantiate. When the UK suspended arms export licenses, it gave a carve-out to the F-35 program, saying international peace and security required that it was not disrupted. The UK is the second largest supplier of parts after the US. The UK government told a court that suspending exports to the F-35 program would have impacted the battle to prevent Russia from occupying Ukraine, as the F-35 was a central pillar of Nato. The Australian government is required to make similar judgments before awarding export licences for parts used in the F-35. It must consider 12 criteria, including the balance between human rights concerns and national security and foreign policy considerations. Under the arms trade treaty, which Australia is a party to, providing weapons to a group involved in armed conflict can lead to criminal liability if the equipment is used to commit war crimes. In January last year, the international court of justice ruled the claim of genocide in Gaza was 'plausible'. The Greens senator David Shoebridge says component parts are considered weapons and Australia is therefore breaching international law. But Donald Rothwell, an international law expert at the Australian National University, says he would 'not be as decisive' as Shoebridge in his interpretation of international law. Rothwell said being definitive was difficult as 'there can be so many component parts of weapons'. 'Some component parts may have been exported to Israel for civilian use but then utilised for weapons,' Rothwell says. 'I would take the view, though, that Australian exports that are component weapon parts, and which are exported to the IDF, are contributing to the Israeli military campaign in Gaza.' Paul told the ABC last week that Australia's supply of components and parts to the F-35 fighter jets, which have been used by Israel, constitutes 'directly the facilitation of war crimes'. During a recent court hearing, the UK government acknowledged its supply of F-35 components for potential use in Israel was in breach of its own arms export control laws. Around 15% of the F-35's parts, including ejection seats, are made in the UK. The Australian Centre for International Justice, a non-profit legal centre, says Australia's role in the supply chain 'raises grave concerns that Australian parts and components are involved in the atrocities we have seen unfold in Gaza'. Amnesty International Australia's Mohamed Duar has said 'the lack of transparency surrounding Australia's defence exports has made it extremely difficult to determine the extent of our involvement in the commission of genocide and war crimes'. Human Rights Watch was among 232 civil society organisations who urged nations involved in the F-35 supply chain to 'immediately halt all arms transfers to Israel'. Marles says Australia does not supply weapons to Israel and has complained about 'misinformation' regarding exports, arguing it has 'raised tensions in this country, which is deeply destabilising for Australia's social cohesion'. Marles says Australia has contributed to the F-35 program for decades as part of a multi-lateral agreement with Lockheed Martin in the US, rather than Israel directly. The foreign affairs minister, Penny Wong, has also described Australia's contributions to the supply chain as 'non-lethal in nature'.
