BBC World Service to cut 130 jobs in savings plan
The BBC World Service has announced it will cut 130 jobs as part of a plan to save around £6m in the next financial year.
Planned cost-saving measures include closing posts in the UK and internationally as well as roles in BBC Monitoring, a division which reports and analyses news from media around the world.
The World Service was given a funding boost by the government as part of the autumn Budget, but financial pressures and the previous two-year freeze in the licence fee means the corporation's projected total deficit will increase to £492 million for the 2024/25 financial year.
Despite the cuts, it said it will continue to provide journalistic coverage across its 42 language services.
Jonathan Munro, global director and deputy chief executive of BBC News, said: "While the result of the latest grant-in-aid funding settlement means we are able to maintain all of our existing language services, we were clear it would not stave off difficult decisions in order to remain globally competitive and meet our savings requirements.
"These changes will ensure we operate effectively with the resource we have, creating the most impact for audiences internationally."
The BBC added that the service is "operating in a highly competitive global media environment" which has "international news providers investing billions in state-backed media that sees increased competition for staff, platforms and frequencies, and audiences".
The broadcaster said it will "continue to counter disinformation, provide emergency services in times of crisis and report from all corners of the globe".
As part of the Budget in October, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced that the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) settlement for the next financial year "provides an increase in funding to the BBC World Service, protecting existing foreign language service provision and its mission to deliver globally trusted media, in support of the UK's global presence and soft power".
The BBC World Service is predominantly funded by the UK licence fee and has received a grant of £104.4 million from the FCDO in previous years.
In October, ahead of the Budget, the BBC revealed a raft of cost-saving plans, including the axing of in-depth interview show HARDtalk and reducing more than 100 news roles at the broadcaster.
HARDtalk, which is broadcast from Monday to Thursday, is set to shut in March 2025 after nearly three decades on air.
Culture secretary rules out funding BBC from taxes
How much is the BBC licence fee and what does it pay for?
TV licence fee to rise by £5 to £174.50 in 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Spending review is ‘settled', says Downing Street
The spending review is 'settled', Downing Street has said, after the Home Office was the last department locked in budget negotiations. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to announce funding increases for the NHS, schools and defence along with a number of infrastructure projects on Wednesday, as she shares out some £113 billion freed up by looser borrowing rules. But other areas could face cuts as she seeks to balance manifesto commitments with more recent pledges, such as a hike in defence spending, while meeting her fiscal rules that promise to match day-to-day spending with revenues. On Monday morning, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper was the last minister still to reach a deal with the Treasury, with reports suggesting greater police spending would mean a squeeze on other areas of her department's budget. Speaking to reporters on Monday afternoon, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'The spending review is settled, we will be focused on investing in Britain's renewal so that all working people are better off. 'The first job of the Government was to stabilise the British economy and the public finances, and now we move into a new chapter to deliver the promise and change.' The Government has committed to spend 2.5% of gross domestic product on defence from April 2027, with a goal of increasing that to 3% over the next parliament – a timetable which could stretch to 2034. Ms Reeves' plans will also include an £86 billion package for science and technology research and development. Last week the Chancellor admitted that she had been forced to turn down requests for funding for projects she would have wanted to back, amid the Whitehall spending wrangling. Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan's office is concerned that Wednesday's announcement will include no new funding or projects for London. The mayor had been looking to secure extensions to the Docklands Light Railway and Bakerloo line on the Underground, along with the power to introduce a tourist levy and a substantial increase in funding for the Metropolitan Police. A source close to the mayor said on Monday that ministers 'must not return to the damaging, anti-London approach of the last government', adding this would harm both London's public services and 'jobs and growth across the country'. They said: 'Sadiq will always stand up for London and has been clear it would be unacceptable if there are no major infrastructure projects for London announced in the spending review and the Met doesn't get the funding it needs. 'We need backing for London as a global city that's pro-business, safe and well-connected.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


CNET
42 minutes ago
- CNET
Nab the HP OmniBook X Flip 16-Inch Touchscreen Laptop for $550, Today Only
Even with tariffs raising prices on a number of items, including electronics, you don't have to spend wild amounts of cash to get a solid laptop. This capable HP laptop has a generously sized 16-inch LED touchscreen display with 1,920x1,200 resolution and 400 nits of brightness, making this an excellent laptop deal for those on a budget. Best Buy has slashed the price of the HP OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 laptop down to just $550 right now. That's a massive $400 savings on its original price. The only catch? This one-day deal will end tonight or when stock runs dry, so we recommend getting your order in soon to lock-in this price. This laptop has an AMD Ryzen AI 5 processor, AMD Radeon 840M graphics, 16GB of RAM and 512GB of SSD storage, which should be plenty to cover all the basics and keep you productive whether you're using this laptop for work, school or scrolling and streaming. It also gets up to 21 hours of battery life per charge, depending on usage. Hey, did you know? CNET Deals texts are free, easy and save you money. And the 2-in-1 design means you can use it as a regular laptop or folded flat like a tablet, making it even more versatile. Note that this model does weigh in at over four pounds, which is the trade of for such a sizeable screen. If you're looking for something a little more portable or are looking for more storage, there is also a 1TB 14-inch model on sale. If you have a similar device you don't mind parting with, you may also be able to snag additional trade-in savings, too. Why this deal matters This deal knocks over 40% off the list price of this 2-in-1 laptop with ample storage and memory for most people. While you may want to opt for a model with stronger specs if you're a creative or a gamer, this is a pretty great option for most people looking for a large touchscreen for under a grand.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What salary sacrifice changes could mean for your pension
The government has insisted recent reports indicating that it is considering changes to salary sacrifice pension schemes are "purely speculative". It comes off the back of research published by HMRC in May that suggested the government was exploring reducing the tax and national insurance advantages by changing pension contribution schemes for workers. While the research was commissioned by the Conservative government in 2023, the timing of its publication raised eyebrows because of it's proximity to Rachel Reeves's spending review on 11 June. The spending review is when Reeves will lay out all government departments' budgets for the coming years. It could also be a strong indication as to whether the government will need to announce any increase to taxes later this year in the autumn statement. Experts have told Yahoo News why the prospect of targeting salary sacrifice schemes would be so appealing for the government - and who would most likely miss out. A salary sacrifice scheme is a formal agreement between an employee and employer in which the employee agrees to reduce their gross salary in exchange for a non-cash benefit - like a bicycle through the Cycle to Work scheme - provided by the employer. In turn, as the employee pays for this through their salary, they not only pay less income tax, but their employer pays lower national insurance (NI) on the person's remaining take home-pay. As national insurance is one of the main revenue streams for the government, this means that when an employee enrols in a scheme, the Treasury misses out on the extra tax. When you use salary sacrifice for your pension, you agree to take a lower salary, and your employer pays the 'sacrificed' amount directly into your pension. Like with any other salary sacrifice, because your official salary is lower, both you and your employer pay less in NI, and you pay less income tax on your earnings. Salary sacrifice schemes are very popular, with 70% of UK pension schemes using them as the default method for contributions. If the salary sacrifice scheme was limited or cut for pensions, the government could remove or limit these tax and NI savings. For example, you and your employer might have to pay NI on the amount you sacrifice, or there could be a cap on how much salary can be sacrificed before the benefits are lost. "Salary sacrifice along with income tax relief makes it very attractive to save into a pension," Stuart Price, Partner and Actuary at Quantum Advisory told Yahoo News. "For a lower rate tax payer £1 invested only costs them 72p, and for a high rate tax payer £1 invested only costs them 58p. "If the provision of salary sacrifice is removed and hence national insurance relief is no longer provided these numbers increase to 80p for a lower rate tax payer and 60p for a higher rate tax payer," he added. By removing or scaling back the tax and National Insurance (NI) exemptions that benefit employees and employers benefit from through salary sacrifice, the government could boost its revenue. 'Salary sacrifice along with the annual allowance often appear top of the list of options when the government needs to save money," Helen Morrissey, head of retirement analysis at Hargreaves Lansdown told Yahoo News. The move would therefore be an attractive prospect for HMRC because it would generate "significant income". "I would expect that they would be in favour of the removal of salary sacrifice on pensions," John Mullaly, a group risk and healthcare consultant from actuary Cartwright Employment Awards, told Yahoo News. This may be even more significant as the government is just days away from its spending review, the process the government uses to set all departments' budgets for future years. 'The government may be tempted to turn its eye to salary sacrifice... particularly given the amount it costs in lost national insurance revenue," Martin Willis, a partner at independent consultancy Barnett Waddingham explained to Yahoo News. While the government might benefit, employees earning the least would be the hardest hit. "High earners may be insulated from any potential shift; the real impact would be on lower and moderate earners - particularly those using salary sacrifice to top up pension contributions," Waddingham said. The move could also be an additional blow for businesses after the government's hike on national insurance rates for employers in the last Budget. "Removing it now could disproportionately affect basic rate taxpayers and employers who've only just faced a rise in national insurance costs," Willis added. Morrissey echoes this. "At a time when employers are battling higher wage and NI bills, salary sacrifice might be seen as one way of reducing these costs – making changes will add an extra burden to struggling employers.' While both employees and employers benefit from salary sacrifice arrangements, Mullaly said employers "do not pocket all of the savings." "Quite often they use it to fund additional benefits to be used to attract and retain employees," he added. Additionally, if salary sacrifices adversely affect pension pots, savers could be discouraged from putting away enough into their pension — which is unwelcome news when the figure for a comfortable retirement continues to rise. According to the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association (PLSA), to live a comfortable retirement in the UK, the estimated annual retirement income needed in 2025 is around £43,100 a year. "There does seem to be a trend of focusing on increasing tax revenue at the expense of all other considerations, rather than focusing on the underlying social reasons for having things like a pension," Price said. "The result of all of this is less money will be saved by employees towards their pension. Not a great thing when as a nation we are nowhere near saving enough for our retirement." Added to this, the change in uptake could affect how and where pension funds invest their money. "Many of the largest pension funds invest in our high streets, shopping centres and other real estate," Mullaly explained. "With many high streets already under threat, any reduction in investment is only going to make the situation in this area worse." While salary sacrifice reduction may be a highly attractive prospect for the government, it is clear that it would be far from popular. The Society of Pension Professionals has already warned the government against salary sacrifice changes, writing in a statement that it would affect earners "very selectively". Added to this, there would be some serious logistical hurdles to tackle to implement it. Firstly, Willis said implementing these reforms after the new financial year has started "would likely be far from straightforward". "Currently, salary sacrifice reward structures are set by employers, so implementing changes could be very messy, especially when it comes to capturing salary decisions for new hires or changes mid-year," he told Yahoo News. "Today salary sacrifice is largely used to support improved pension saving, and is limited since the system was already tightened in 2017." A government spokesperson said: 'These claims are totally speculative. HMRC regularly commissions independent research on all aspects of the tax system, and this research was commissioned under the previous government. 'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible which is why, at last autumn's Budget, we protected working people's payslips and kept our promise to not raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee national insurance or VAT."