Trump sets 19% tariff on Thailand, Cambodia after peace deal
Malaysia, which helped broker the ceasefire, was also set at 19%. That's on par with previously announced rates for Southeast Asian neighbours Indonesia and the Philippines.
Earlier this week, the leaders of Thailand and Cambodia agreed to an immediate ceasefire to halt the worst clashes between the two nations in more than a decade, which left more than 40 people.
The truce, however, has been tested with Thailand accusing Cambodian troops of unprovoked firing in violation of the agreement.
The new rates were unveiled alongside Trump's announcement that the US will keep minimum global tariff rates at 10%, lower than earlier threatened floor of 15% or higher, according to a White House statement Thursday.
US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Wednesday night announced in an interview that the US had secured deals with both Thailand and Cambodia but did not provide additional details. Recent days have seen a flurry of deals and tariff demands on partners, announcing an agreement with South Korea that would levy 15% duties on its exports to the US and saying he would impose a 25% rate on goods from India.
In a last-minute bid to avoid a higher punitive tariff, Thailand had offered greater market access for US products by pledging to scrap tariffs on 90% of its goods. It also promised to take non-tariff measures to cut its $46 billion trade surplus by 70% within three years, in addition to tackling the rerouting of goods produced in other countries.
Before the tariff announcement, Finance Minister Pichai Chunhavajira said he expected the US to set a rate similar to its Southeast Asian neighbours, which have seen rates around 20%. The US was Thailand's largest goods export market last year, accounting for about 18% of the country's total shipments.
Clinching a lower US tariff rate is seen as key to insulating Thailand's trade-dependent economy from further downside. Growth is already under pressure from Southeast Asia's highest household debt and sluggish domestic consumption.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bangkok Post
4 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
A Faustian bargain for the Global South
US President Donald Trump's tariff policies have unleashed global economic turmoil and a wave of protectionist measures. While many of his frequently changing tariffs may prove short-lived, their use as geopolitical weapons is poised to reshape international trade for years to come. But the current fixation on Mr Trump's tariffs diverts attention from the larger goal: the US is leveraging its economic power to push for market liberalisation and preferential access for American firms, often at the expense of lower-income countries' development prospects. Today's US-China standoff is a prime example. America's hostile posture toward China has never been just about trade. Rather, it reflects a strategic ambition to preserve US technological dominance. That effort has since become part of a broader campaign to restrict access to advanced technologies across the developing world. The primary tool for achieving this goal has been the imposition of increasingly restrictive intellectual-property (IP) rules that aim to privatise knowledge through patents, copyrights, and industrial designs. This helps explain why the trade agreement with Indonesia includes several provisions designed to limit the country's ability to move up the value chain into knowledge-intensive industries. Tellingly, Indonesia will eliminate 99% of its tariffs on American industrial, food, and agricultural imports, while Indonesian exports to the US will face an average tariff rate of 19%. The immediate impact will be felt most acutely by Indonesian farmers, who must now compete against subsidised US agricultural products. But the longer-term risks lie in the dismantling of non-tariff barriers, which could severely constrain Indonesia's ability to diversify its economy and curtail its access to critical technologies. According to the joint statement announcing the deal, American firms will receive sweeping privileges. Indonesia will remove all content requirements for US-made goods and accept American vehicle-safety and emissions standards, which are far more lenient than its own. It must also recognise Food and Drug Administration approvals for medical devices and pharmaceuticals, exempt US food and agricultural imports from local licensing regimes, and accept US certifications for meat, dairy, and poultry products. Indonesia has also agreed to eliminate tariffs on intangible goods and support a global moratorium on digital customs duties -- issues that remain highly contested within the World Trade Organization. Even more troublesome are the IP provisions: the deal compels Indonesia to resolve key disputes over traditional knowledge, genetic resources, and compulsory licenses. The US is not alone in pursuing this agenda. While Indonesia's concessions are baffling, India's recent trade deal with the UK raises even more questions. Despite being years in the making, the deal has little commercial significance, as bilateral trade accounts for less than 2.5% of either country's exports. Media coverage of the UK-India deal has focused on tariff reductions: 92% of UK exports to India will receive full or partial tariff relief, while up to 99% of Indian exports to the UK will be tariff-free. Optimistic forecasts suggest the agreement could double export volumes in certain sectors: textiles, clothing, and jewellery for India; alcoholic beverages and automobiles for the UK. But as with the US-Indonesia deal, the most consequential element of this agreement is its IP provisions, which tilt the regulatory balance in favour of Western patent holders. For example, the deal promotes the use of "voluntary licences" over compulsory ones, potentially discouraging future price reductions. Another clause endorses the harmonisation of patent standards, opening the door to "evergreening" -- the extension of patents through minor tweaks to existing drugs. It is deeply disturbing that the Indian government has accepted these terms, which jeopardise not only the future of its pharmaceutical industry but also the global supply of affordable drugs. India's willingness to make such concessions to a weakened former colonial power -- one that is no longer a major trading partner -- makes the potential outcome of its trade talks with the European Union and the US all the more alarming. To ensure India's economic future, Prime Minister Narendra Modi must stop cracking down on domestic dissent and start defending India's interests on the global stage. ©2025 Project Syndicate Jayati Ghosh, Professor of Economics at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, is a member of the Club of Rome's Transformational Economics Commission and Co-Chair of the Independent Commission for the Reform of International Corporate Taxation.
Bangkok Post
5 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
PM 'has no plan' to quit before ruling
Prommin Lertsuridej, secretary-general to suspended prime minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra, rejected reports which suggest the premier would resign before the Constitutional Court issues a ruling on the leaked recording of her conversation with Cambodian Senate President Hun Sen. Several media reports claimed Ms Paetongtarn is planning to quit as premier before the court hands down the ruling to avoid a guilty verdict in the case. If she steps down early, the case would be aborted, saving her from a political ban that comes with an unfavourable ruling. Responding to questions from the press about the rumour, Dr Prommin said on Monday there was no truth to such reports. "I can confirm that she has no intention to resign at this time," he said. "We are proceeding in strict accordance with the law, and we stand by the legitimacy of our actions." Dr Prommin said Ms Paetongtarn was confident about her prospects, as she had no other intentions but to guide the country away from the security crisis unfolding along the border. He said as the nation's leader, Ms Paetongtarn consulted thoroughly with security agencies, including the military and the National Security Council, before implementing any measures. She made informal calls to individuals outside official channels to help defuse tensions and prevent violent confrontations with Cambodia, Dr Prommin said. "I believe her intention was to act responsibly as the country's leader. Despite being suspended from official duties by the Constitutional Court, she respects the court's authority and awaits its ruling. "She hopes the decision will reflect her commitment and determination to guide Thailand towards peace as swiftly as possible," Dr Prommin said. When asked whether the explanation submitted to the court, if viewed strictly in legal terms, could potentially constitute an ethical breach, Dr Prommin said the facts of the case, surrounding circumstances, and relevant legal provisions had all been carefully considered. He said the written statement had clearly addressed the ethical allegations and cited pertinent legal statutes.
Bangkok Post
5 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Asean's charm offensive in full swing
In what can only be described as a stunning diplomatic move, US President Donald Trump has personally confirmed his attendance at the 47th Asean-related summits on Oct 26-28 in Kuala Lumpur. His early commitment made directly to Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim breaks with protocol and represents a rare gesture of goodwill toward Asean. US presidents typically delay such confirmations until the last minute, often treating Asean events as an afterthought compared to bilateral or multilateral summits with higher strategic returns. Even when confirmed, the level of representation is frequently downgraded. With Mr Trump now expected in town, Malaysia can plan. Beyond the 13th Asean-US Summit, new initiatives and side events can be organised to capitalise on his presence. That said, Mr Trump is always prone to changing his mind. During his first term, Mr Trump's engagement with Asean was spotty at best. He attended only the 5th Asean-US Summit in November 2017 and left the East Asia Summit halfway through. This time, however, he appears to be rewarding Mr Anwar for brokering the Thai-Cambodian ceasefire deal. At a recent press conference, Mr Anwar publicly credited Mr Trump for the initiative. Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai also expressed their gratitude. Asean leaders have since showered Mr Trump with praise, augmenting his ego. After all, "gaining face" is part of Asean's cultural DNA. Mr Trump's decision to attend is an acknowledgement of Asean as a pivotal regional group despite his preference for transactional engagement. The summit is expected to draw numerous heads of state. There would be one-on-one sideline meetings. Russian President Vladimir Putin, who shares decades of personal rapport with Mr Anwar, has been invited to attend the Asean summit. The Malaysian chair also plans to invite other influential guests to Kuala Lumpur. In his second term, having spent considerable time focused on Middle East diplomacy, Mr Trump may finally discover that Asean leaders are more cooperative and more pleasant to deal with. The Thai-Cambodian truce only materialised because of the region's diplomatic resilience, led by a Muslim leader mediating between two Buddhist-majority countries. For Mr Trump, this is a rare political opportunity that could bolster his resume for a Nobel Peace Prize nomination. To leave his mark on Asean, however, Mr Trump must surpass the record of his predecessor and political rival, President Barack Obama, who during his two terms (2008–2016) became one of the region's most popular Western leaders. Mr Obama attended seven Asean summits. Most memorably, during the 37th Asean Summit in Kuala Lumpur in 2015, he personally invited all Asean leaders to a special and stand-alone US-Asean summit at Sunnylands, California, in February 2016. That event was pulled together in just three months, which was amazingly fast by diplomatic standards. It also marked the first time that the US formally recognised Asean centrality in its official documents. Mr Trump could eclipse Mr Obama's Asean legacy through three straightforward steps. First of all, he could serve as the leading guarantor of peace and stability in the region. Branding himself the "President of Peace", Mr Trump could build on the Thai-Cambodian truce and offer his hand in other regional flashpoints. But it must be an Asean-led process. Secondly, he should revive the special US-Asean summit he had planned in Las Vegas during his first term but had to cancel due to Covid-19. The idea of gathering Asean leaders in Las Vegas -- a city with casinos -- holds a unique allure. It could be a soft-power spectacle to reinvigorate US-Asean ties. Finally, Mr Trump should restart the Young Southeast Asian Leaders Initiative, the signature Obama-era program connecting over 60,000 young leaders across Asean and its dialogue partners. The initiative was shelved after his administration gutted USAID. Mr Trump can flip the script by relaunching it under a new name -- perhaps "Trump's Young Southeast Asian Leadership Initiative". If Mr Trump achieves these three goals, he could easily surpass Mr Obama's standing in Southeast Asia. A few well-placed words in Bahasa Malayu -- such as madani (civilised), terima kasih (thank you), and apa khabar (how are you) --would go a long way. Mr Obama endeared himself to Indonesians with similar linguistic gestures. And yes, lowering US tariffs -- still a steep 19% for Malaysia, Thailand, Cambodia, and the Philippines -- before arriving would not hurt either. With five months remaining in his Asean chairmanship, Mr Anwar must act swiftly to consolidate the bloc's credibility in crisis management. Top priority would be to make tangible progress on the four-and-a-half-year Myanmar quagmire. With renewed moral authority, Asean under Mr Anwar can engage more effectively with all Myanmar stakeholders to push for substantive progress for the Asean Five-Point Consensus. Myanmar's junta has announced plans to hold elections between late December and early January as part of its exit strategy. However, the international community has widely condemned the move as a facade to legitimise military rule. At the upcoming summit, the Asean chair can press for a more inclusive process, urging the junta to broaden participation. At the same time, dialogue among all parties must begin, though they remain deeply out of sync. Nay Pyi Taw, for its part, believes it can still hold the elections, which will reportedly cover 267 of Myanmar's 330 townships, roughly 80% of the country. It will rely on locally manufactured electronic voting machines. Resistance forces, however, reject the elections and still remain active in rural battlefields. Here, the Asean chair can enlist major powers -- particularly the US, China, India, and Russia -- to help push all parties toward dialogue and an eventual ceasefire. These dialogue partners and Asean will be essential in guaranteeing Myanmar's stability in the future. The recent ceasefire agreement between Myanmar and armed ethic groups was no mere optics as it was a carefully calibrated diplomatic moment. It helps demonstrate that Asean is not just a talk shop. Given the current fractured geopolitical landscape, the October summit is shaping up to be one of the most consequential in Asean history. The chair must use the opportunity presented by Mr Trump's presence and other global leaders to secure firm commitments that will reinforce Asean's strategic autonomy for years to come.
