logo
IRS Direct File will be cancelled if Republican tax bill becomes law

IRS Direct File will be cancelled if Republican tax bill becomes law

The $3.8 trillion Republican tax bill that just passed the House includes a provision to kill off the popular IRS Direct File program, which lets people file their federal income tax returns for free online.
The bill still needs to pass the Senate to become law, but if the bill is enacted as currently written, the Direct File program is slated to be eliminated within 30 days of the law's passage.
The bill also requires the U.S. Treasury Department to create a task force to design a partnership between the IRS and private-sector tax service providers. The task force would need to identify ways to replace any 'free file programs and direct e-file tax return systems.' That includes the IRS Free File program, an existing public-private partnership.
IRS Direct File, which is separate from the Free File program, is a popular free option that offers guidance and support as you fill out your federal income tax return and file your taxes directly with the IRS. Most taxpayers have rated the Direct File program positively: About 90% of taxpayers said their experience was excellent or above average, according to a survey by the General Services Administration of about 11,000 Direct File users in 2024.
On top of that, interest in the program is clear: About 73% of taxpayers said they'd be somewhat or very interested in using Direct File, according to a Tax Policy Center report in March, based on a survey of taxpayers aged 18 to 64.
The Direct File program has been in Republican lawmakers' crosshairs for a while. In December, almost 30 Republican lawmakers sent a letter to President-elect Donald Trump, calling for him to end the Direct File program on his first day in office. Lawmakers in the U.S. House of Representatives introduced legislation last July to end the Direct File program.
Elon Musk, de facto head of the 'Department of Government Efficiency,' or DOGE — also isn't a fan of the program. In February, he posted on social media that the government tech office that developed the Direct File program had been 'deleted.'
Currently, the IRS's Direct File page is still up and running.
Direct File doubled its reach to 25 states for the 2025 tax season, up from 12 states in 2024, the program's pilot year.
An estimated 30 million taxpayers qualify for the Direct File program in 2025, the IRS says. More than 140,000 taxpayers filed their federal tax returns through the Direct File program in 2024.
The Direct File program also expanded to accept more types of tax situations for the 2025 tax season. While taxpayers who used the system in 2024 could claim a handful of tax credits, including the earned income tax credit and the child tax credit, that list expanded for this filing season to include the child and dependent care credit, among others.
However, taxpayers who want to claim other tax credits, such as the American Opportunity Tax Credit for higher education costs, or the tax credit for the costs of adopting a child, won't qualify for Direct File. And if you're hoping to deduct IRA contributions, Direct File doesn't support that. (See the full list of credits and deductions supported by Direct File on this IRS page.)
The Direct File program, now in its second year, allows taxpayers to file their federal tax returns electronically with the IRS. The no-cost tool guides taxpayers through every part of their federal income tax return. Taxpayers can file using a smartphone, computer or tablet.
One of the program's advantages is that, if you have questions as you're working on your return, you can get live support directly from the IRS via chat or phone. IRS representatives can answer basic tax questions and help with technical issues in English and Spanish.
The Direct File program has income limits, as well as limits on the types of income, deductions and credits you can enter on your tax return.
For the 2025 tax season:
—Your income must be less than $200,000 (less than $168,600 if you have more than one employer), and if you're married filing jointly, your spouse's income also must fall below these limits.
—If you're married filing jointly, your combined income must be less than $250,000.
—If you're married and file separately from your spouse, your income must be less than $125,000.
To be eligible for Direct File, your income can come from the following sources:
—W-2 wages
—Social Security income
—Unemployment compensation
—Interest income
—Retirement income (reported on a 1099-R — limited eligibility starts March 2025)
But if you're self-employed, or have business or rental income, you can't use Direct File. Same goes for IRA contributions or distributions: If you have either, you can't use Direct File.
You can use the IRS Direct File program only if you claim the standard deduction — the program isn't available to people who itemize.
But you can claim certain above-the-line deductions: student loan interest, educator expenses and health savings account contributions.
You can't use Direct File if you want to deduct your IRA contributions.
The Direct File program supports the following tax credits in 2025:
—Earned income tax credit
—Child tax credit
—Credit for other dependents
—Child and dependent care credit
—Premium tax credit
—Credit for the elderly or disabled
—Retirement savings contribution credit
However, if you want to claim education credits, credits for energy efficient home upgrades or the adoption expense credit, you can't use the Direct File program.
More taxpayers will have access to the IRS Direct File program in 2025. In 2024, the IRS kicked off the program with only 12 states; that number has expanded to 25 states for the 2025 tax season.
For some of the states that participate in the IRS Direct File program, your federal return information will be transferred automatically to the state tax website, but in some cases you'll have to re-enter your information. Visit this IRS Direct File page to get the details for your state.
Here is a list of the participating states:
Alaska, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming
If you don't qualify for the IRS Direct File program, you may have other options to file your tax return for free.
In addition to Direct File, the IRS offers the Free File program, in which it partners with online tax software providers to provide free federal income tax return filing. Some providers also allow you to file a state income tax return.
For the 2025 tax season, your adjusted gross income must be $84,000 or less to qualify for the Free File program. That AGI applies to any filing status: married filing jointly, single, head of household, etc.
The IRS also offers the Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) program, which provides certified volunteers to prepare basic tax returns if you earn less than $67,000 a year, are disabled, or speak limited English. You can find a site near you by visiting this IRS page.
___
© 2025 Bankrate.com.
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump appears to undercut US proposal to Iran, declaring he won't allow any uranium enrichment
Trump appears to undercut US proposal to Iran, declaring he won't allow any uranium enrichment

Washington Post

time30 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Trump appears to undercut US proposal to Iran, declaring he won't allow any uranium enrichment

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Monday appeared to undercut a proposal that was offered by his special envoy to Iran, saying he will insist that Tehran fully dismantle its nuclear enrichment program as part of any deal to ease crushing sanctions. Trump and Steve Witkoff, who is leading the negotiations for the U.S., have repeatedly offered inconsistent public messages about whether Iran would be allowed to retain the capacity to enrich uranium to lower levels for civilian purposes. The Trump administration maintains that it will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. The negotiations have been framed by Trump as both countries' best chance to avoid direct military conflict over Iran's nuclear program. Tehran, which denies seeking a nuclear weapon, has insisted that it will not agree to any deal that fully scraps its enrichment program. 'Under our potential Agreement — WE WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM!' Trump wrote on social media. The White House didn't elaborate on the post. Trump's post comes after media reports that Witkoff's latest proposal to Tehran would allow Iran to retain low levels of enrichment for civilian uses like nuclear medicine and commercial power if it agrees to shut down its heavily protected underground sites for a period of time. The U.S. and Iran have engaged in several rounds of direct nuclear talks for the first time in years. Senior officials — including Witkoff and Trump himself — have said within the last few weeks that Iran would not be able to keep enriching uranium at any level. The proposal, reported by Axios and confirmed by two U.S. officials, called for the creation of a regional consortium to handle uranium enrichment for civilian uses — a plan first studied more than a decade ago in negotiations that led to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. Trump was sharply critical of that agreement — which also allowed set limits on uranium enrichment but permitted Iran to maintain such a capacity — and withdrew the U.S. from it in 2017 during his first term. The officials spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity to discuss private diplomatic negotiations. The International Atomic Energy Agency found that Iran has further increased its stockpile of uranium enriched to near weapons-grade levels since its last update in February, according to a confidential report released by the U.N. nuclear watchdog on Saturday. Iran has maintained that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only, but Iranian officials have increasingly suggested that Tehran could pursue an atomic bomb. 'President Trump has made it clear that Iran can never obtain a nuclear bomb,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement before Trump's post. 'Special Envoy Witkoff has sent a detailed and acceptable proposal to the Iranian regime, and it's in their best interest to accept it. Out of respect for the ongoing deal, the Administration will not comment on details of the proposal to the media.' The proposal that Trump appeared to undercut on Monday evening included significant concessions by the administration certain to anger Israel along with pro-Israel lawmakers in the United States. Several of the main points were essentially the same or very similar to conditions outlined in the 2015 nuclear deal. Early iterations of that agreement negotiated by the Obama administration also suggested the possibility of a regional consortium that would put Iranian uranium enrichment above a certain level under the control of Iran and its neighbors. The idea was scrapped, however, because of Gulf Arab nations' objections and Iranian suspicions of the ultimate aims of the consortium. People who were involved in the 18-month negotiations for the 2015 deal reacted immediately to reports that the Trump administration might allow Iran to continue with an enrichment program at any level, particularly after senior officials repeatedly said Iran would not be able to retain such programs. 'This proposal poses a moment of truth for critics of previous Iran nuclear negotiations/agreements (and) those who have called for a no-enrichment, full-dismantlement deal,' Dan Shapiro, Obama's former ambassador to Israel, wrote on X. 'Will they hold Trump to the same standard?'

Federal officials identify two 'sanctuary cities' in NH
Federal officials identify two 'sanctuary cities' in NH

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Federal officials identify two 'sanctuary cities' in NH

A federal Department of Homeland Security report identified the city of Lebanon and adjacent town of Hanover as the only communities in New Hampshire it identifies as being 'sanctuary' communities for immigrants in the country illegally. The report comes less than two weeks after Gov. Kelly Ayotte signed two bills (SB 62 and HB 511) to outlaw sanctuary city policies in the state and to block local officials from preventing police departments or county jail administrations from reaching cooperative agreements with federal immigration authorities. DHS officials said its report complies with President Donald Trump's executive order titled, 'Protecting American Communities from Criminal Aliens.' The report listed the 35 states and the District of Columbia where at least one community had an ordinance blocking or altering cooperation with federal officials about suspected, illegal immigrants. Maine and New Hampshire are the only states in New England not identified as sanctuary states. In Maine, the sanctuary status exists in two counties and the city of Portland, according to the report. A federal court order created the sanctuary treatment in Rhode Island while officials in Massachusetts, Connecticut and Vermont adopted their own language, DHS officials said. The Franconia Board of Selectmen earlier last month endorsed a sanctuary community ordinance. Ayotte said the bills she signed would nullify that town's actions. Legislative critics charged the legislation would worsen the relationship local law enforcement has with legal immigration advocates in their hometowns and was an unfunded mandate as it could impose unreimbursed costs on communities. The new laws the governor signed take effect Jan. 1 except for one anti-sanctuary city provision that would apply starting in late July. Legislative leaders sent out letters last Friday thanking the sheriffs in Rockingham and Hillsborough Counties for signing so-called Section 287G agreements with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Two other counties, six towns and New Hampshire State Police have applied for their own agreements. klandrigan@

House panel to consider advancing amended assault weapons ban bill to R.I. House floor
House panel to consider advancing amended assault weapons ban bill to R.I. House floor

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

House panel to consider advancing amended assault weapons ban bill to R.I. House floor

Yellow shirts of Second Amendment supporters frame the view of Rep. Jason Knight, a Barrington Democrat, lead sponsor of the bill to ban assault-style weapons, during a House Committee on Judiciary on Wednesday, March 26, 2025. Knight's amended bill is set for a vote on Tuesday, June 3. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current) After securing a big win at the federal level Monday, Rhode Island's gun safety advocates are hoping the momentum continues at the State House Tuesday when a House panel will consider an amended bill to ban assault-style firearms. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to take up a challenge by gun rights advocates against the state's 2022 law banning firearm magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition. Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha said in a statement he's grateful the court did not overturn the ban. 'As the Rhode Island General Assembly prepares to vote on the assault weapons ban, it is my hope that this office's successful defense of the large-capacity magazine ban inspires our leadership to act, and act boldly,' Neronha said. 'One life lost to gun violence is one too many.' The 15-member House Committee on Judiciary meets Tuesday at 3 p.m. to consider advancing amended legislation sponsored by Rep. Jason Knight, a Barrington Democrat, to the floor for a full vote by the chamber. Knight's bill has support from 38 of the House's 75 members. Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi has previously indicated support for a ban on assault-style weapons. The proposal includes revisions based on feedback from a March 26 Judiciary Committee hearing where hundreds of Second Amendment advocates in yellow T-shirts outnumbered gun safety advocates. Under Knight's bill, assault weapons are defined as semiautomatic rifles, pistols, and shotguns equipped with accessories such as pistol grips, folding stocks, or threaded barrels. The amended version removed bayonet mounts and certain .22 caliber rimfire rifles and Olympic-style target pistols from the definition. The amended legislation now takes effect July 1, 2026, rather than Jan. 1, 2026. Knight said the new date was picked in order to give store owners more time to prepare for the change, and for state and local police to develop a voluntary firearm certification program for assault-style weapons acquired ahead of the ban. Knight's original legislation proposed that grandfathered weapons be registered with state or local police. Weapons acquired ahead of the ban would continue to be exempt from the legislation, but the amended bill also exempts firearms passed down through a family. The amended bill now exempts retired law enforcement officers. That's in addition to active police and members of the armed forces who would be allowed to keep assault-style weapons under the original bill. 'We got rid of one or two things upon reflection we probably did not need,' Knight said in an interview Monday. 'The vast majority of Rhode Islanders want this policy change,' he added, acknowledging two recent polls that found widespread support for banning assault weapons. A University of New Hampshire poll released May 29 found that 55% of the 653 residents surveyed were in favor of banning the sale and manufacture of firearms with 'military-style features.' A February poll conducted for the Rhode Island AFL-CIO found 64% of Rhode Islanders support the ban. Knight has backed legislation to ban assault-style weapons since 2018 — the same year then-Gov. Gina Raimondo established a gun-safety working group after a gunman killed 17 students in Parkland Florida with an AR-15. 'You see random acts of violence that involve multiple victims stepping up,' Knight said. 'It's our responsibility as a legislature to provide public order and safety.' What's not changing in the amended bill: Violators of the proposed ban would face up to 10 years in prison, a fine of up to $10,000 and forfeiture of their assault-style weapon. 'It's a good bill,' Melissa Carden, executive director of the Rhode Island Coalition Against Gun Violence, said in an interview. 'This is really momentous. This is the reason that the coalition was formed, it's been our priority for a really long time.' But Knight's changers are still not enough to appease gun rights advocates, who remain opposed to the proposed ban. 'Their concern is passing a bill for the win, and not reducing gun violence,' Glenn Valentine, president of the Rhode Island Second Amendment PAC, said in a text message Monday. The Gaspee Project, a nonprofit that touts its opposition to progressive and 'special interest' policies on its website, took to social media Friday evening to urge gun owners to keep opposing Knight's legislation. 'This amended version is just as awful as the original,' the group wrote on X. Companion legislation is filed in the Senate by Lou DiPalma, a Middletown Democrat, where the bill has 23 additional sponsors — including Senate President Valarie Lawson. DiPalma's bill was heard by the Senate Committee on Judiciary on May 14 where it was held for further study The bill has not been scheduled for the committee's consideration as of Monday. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store