Push to turn promises into protection at UN ocean meet
The third United Nations Ocean Conference is opening as pressure mounts for nations to turn decades of promises into real protection for the sea.
The summit comes as just 2.7 per cent of the ocean is effectively protected from destructive extractive activities, according to the non-profit Marine Conservation Institute.
That's far below the target agreed under the "30x30" pledge to conserve 30 per cent of land and sea by 2030.
Atop this year's agenda is ratification of the High Seas Treaty.
Adopted in 2023, the treaty would for the first time allow nations to establish marine protected areas in international waters, which cover almost two-thirds of the ocean and are largely ungoverned.
"It's the Wild West out there with countries just fishing anywhere without any sort of regulation, and that needs to change," said Mauro Randone, regional projects manager at the World Wildlife Fund's Mediterranean Marine Initiative.
"The high seas belong to everyone and no one practically at the same time, and countries are finally committing to establish some rules."
The ocean is critical in stabilising earth's climate and sustaining life.
It generates 50 per cent of the oxygen we breathe, absorbs about 30 per cent of carbon dioxide emissions and captures more than 90 per cent of the excess heat caused by those emissions.
Without a healthy ocean, experts warn, climate goals will remain out of reach.
The treaty will only come into force once 60 countries ratify it.
As of Monday, just 32 countries had. Advocates hope the conference can build enough momentum to cross the threshold, which would allow for the first official Oceans Conference of Parties.
"Two-thirds of the ocean is areas beyond national jurisdiction - that's half our planet," said Minna Epps, director of global ocean policy at the International Union for Conservation of Nature.
"We cannot possibly protect 30 per cent of the ocean if it doesn't include the high seas."
South Korea, France and the European Union have championed the treaty, but most large ocean nations have yet to ratify it, including the rest of the G20.
Thousands of attendees are expected in Nice - from delegates and heads of state to scientists and industry leaders - but the US has yet to confirm a formal delegation.
Beyond new commitments, the conference highlights the growing gap between marine protection declarations and real-world conservation.
France, the conference co-host, claims to have surpassed the 30 per cent target for marine protection.
But environmental groups say only three per cent of French waters are fully protected from harmful activities such as bottom trawling and industrial fishing.
In 2024 alone, more than 100 bottom-trawling vessels were recorded spending more than 17,000 hours fishing within France's six marine nature parks, according to ocean advocacy group Oceana.
"The government declares these as protected areas, but this is a lie," said Enric Sala, founder of National Geographic Pristine Seas marine reserve project.
"Most of it is political box-ticking. It's all paper parks."
The conference will feature 10 panels on topics such as blue finance, sustainable fisheries and plastic pollution.
Deep-sea mining is expected to feature in broader discussions, while small island states are likely to use the platform to advocate for increased climate adaptation funding.
The outcome of these discussions will form the basis of the Nice Ocean Action Plan - a declaration of voluntary commitments to be adopted by consensus and presented at the UN in New York in July.
"There cannot be a healthy planet without a healthy ocean," said Peter Thomson, UN special envoy for the ocean.
"It's urgent business for us all."
The third United Nations Ocean Conference is opening as pressure mounts for nations to turn decades of promises into real protection for the sea.
The summit comes as just 2.7 per cent of the ocean is effectively protected from destructive extractive activities, according to the non-profit Marine Conservation Institute.
That's far below the target agreed under the "30x30" pledge to conserve 30 per cent of land and sea by 2030.
Atop this year's agenda is ratification of the High Seas Treaty.
Adopted in 2023, the treaty would for the first time allow nations to establish marine protected areas in international waters, which cover almost two-thirds of the ocean and are largely ungoverned.
"It's the Wild West out there with countries just fishing anywhere without any sort of regulation, and that needs to change," said Mauro Randone, regional projects manager at the World Wildlife Fund's Mediterranean Marine Initiative.
"The high seas belong to everyone and no one practically at the same time, and countries are finally committing to establish some rules."
The ocean is critical in stabilising earth's climate and sustaining life.
It generates 50 per cent of the oxygen we breathe, absorbs about 30 per cent of carbon dioxide emissions and captures more than 90 per cent of the excess heat caused by those emissions.
Without a healthy ocean, experts warn, climate goals will remain out of reach.
The treaty will only come into force once 60 countries ratify it.
As of Monday, just 32 countries had. Advocates hope the conference can build enough momentum to cross the threshold, which would allow for the first official Oceans Conference of Parties.
"Two-thirds of the ocean is areas beyond national jurisdiction - that's half our planet," said Minna Epps, director of global ocean policy at the International Union for Conservation of Nature.
"We cannot possibly protect 30 per cent of the ocean if it doesn't include the high seas."
South Korea, France and the European Union have championed the treaty, but most large ocean nations have yet to ratify it, including the rest of the G20.
Thousands of attendees are expected in Nice - from delegates and heads of state to scientists and industry leaders - but the US has yet to confirm a formal delegation.
Beyond new commitments, the conference highlights the growing gap between marine protection declarations and real-world conservation.
France, the conference co-host, claims to have surpassed the 30 per cent target for marine protection.
But environmental groups say only three per cent of French waters are fully protected from harmful activities such as bottom trawling and industrial fishing.
In 2024 alone, more than 100 bottom-trawling vessels were recorded spending more than 17,000 hours fishing within France's six marine nature parks, according to ocean advocacy group Oceana.
"The government declares these as protected areas, but this is a lie," said Enric Sala, founder of National Geographic Pristine Seas marine reserve project.
"Most of it is political box-ticking. It's all paper parks."
The conference will feature 10 panels on topics such as blue finance, sustainable fisheries and plastic pollution.
Deep-sea mining is expected to feature in broader discussions, while small island states are likely to use the platform to advocate for increased climate adaptation funding.
The outcome of these discussions will form the basis of the Nice Ocean Action Plan - a declaration of voluntary commitments to be adopted by consensus and presented at the UN in New York in July.
"There cannot be a healthy planet without a healthy ocean," said Peter Thomson, UN special envoy for the ocean.
"It's urgent business for us all."
The third United Nations Ocean Conference is opening as pressure mounts for nations to turn decades of promises into real protection for the sea.
The summit comes as just 2.7 per cent of the ocean is effectively protected from destructive extractive activities, according to the non-profit Marine Conservation Institute.
That's far below the target agreed under the "30x30" pledge to conserve 30 per cent of land and sea by 2030.
Atop this year's agenda is ratification of the High Seas Treaty.
Adopted in 2023, the treaty would for the first time allow nations to establish marine protected areas in international waters, which cover almost two-thirds of the ocean and are largely ungoverned.
"It's the Wild West out there with countries just fishing anywhere without any sort of regulation, and that needs to change," said Mauro Randone, regional projects manager at the World Wildlife Fund's Mediterranean Marine Initiative.
"The high seas belong to everyone and no one practically at the same time, and countries are finally committing to establish some rules."
The ocean is critical in stabilising earth's climate and sustaining life.
It generates 50 per cent of the oxygen we breathe, absorbs about 30 per cent of carbon dioxide emissions and captures more than 90 per cent of the excess heat caused by those emissions.
Without a healthy ocean, experts warn, climate goals will remain out of reach.
The treaty will only come into force once 60 countries ratify it.
As of Monday, just 32 countries had. Advocates hope the conference can build enough momentum to cross the threshold, which would allow for the first official Oceans Conference of Parties.
"Two-thirds of the ocean is areas beyond national jurisdiction - that's half our planet," said Minna Epps, director of global ocean policy at the International Union for Conservation of Nature.
"We cannot possibly protect 30 per cent of the ocean if it doesn't include the high seas."
South Korea, France and the European Union have championed the treaty, but most large ocean nations have yet to ratify it, including the rest of the G20.
Thousands of attendees are expected in Nice - from delegates and heads of state to scientists and industry leaders - but the US has yet to confirm a formal delegation.
Beyond new commitments, the conference highlights the growing gap between marine protection declarations and real-world conservation.
France, the conference co-host, claims to have surpassed the 30 per cent target for marine protection.
But environmental groups say only three per cent of French waters are fully protected from harmful activities such as bottom trawling and industrial fishing.
In 2024 alone, more than 100 bottom-trawling vessels were recorded spending more than 17,000 hours fishing within France's six marine nature parks, according to ocean advocacy group Oceana.
"The government declares these as protected areas, but this is a lie," said Enric Sala, founder of National Geographic Pristine Seas marine reserve project.
"Most of it is political box-ticking. It's all paper parks."
The conference will feature 10 panels on topics such as blue finance, sustainable fisheries and plastic pollution.
Deep-sea mining is expected to feature in broader discussions, while small island states are likely to use the platform to advocate for increased climate adaptation funding.
The outcome of these discussions will form the basis of the Nice Ocean Action Plan - a declaration of voluntary commitments to be adopted by consensus and presented at the UN in New York in July.
"There cannot be a healthy planet without a healthy ocean," said Peter Thomson, UN special envoy for the ocean.
"It's urgent business for us all."
The third United Nations Ocean Conference is opening as pressure mounts for nations to turn decades of promises into real protection for the sea.
The summit comes as just 2.7 per cent of the ocean is effectively protected from destructive extractive activities, according to the non-profit Marine Conservation Institute.
That's far below the target agreed under the "30x30" pledge to conserve 30 per cent of land and sea by 2030.
Atop this year's agenda is ratification of the High Seas Treaty.
Adopted in 2023, the treaty would for the first time allow nations to establish marine protected areas in international waters, which cover almost two-thirds of the ocean and are largely ungoverned.
"It's the Wild West out there with countries just fishing anywhere without any sort of regulation, and that needs to change," said Mauro Randone, regional projects manager at the World Wildlife Fund's Mediterranean Marine Initiative.
"The high seas belong to everyone and no one practically at the same time, and countries are finally committing to establish some rules."
The ocean is critical in stabilising earth's climate and sustaining life.
It generates 50 per cent of the oxygen we breathe, absorbs about 30 per cent of carbon dioxide emissions and captures more than 90 per cent of the excess heat caused by those emissions.
Without a healthy ocean, experts warn, climate goals will remain out of reach.
The treaty will only come into force once 60 countries ratify it.
As of Monday, just 32 countries had. Advocates hope the conference can build enough momentum to cross the threshold, which would allow for the first official Oceans Conference of Parties.
"Two-thirds of the ocean is areas beyond national jurisdiction - that's half our planet," said Minna Epps, director of global ocean policy at the International Union for Conservation of Nature.
"We cannot possibly protect 30 per cent of the ocean if it doesn't include the high seas."
South Korea, France and the European Union have championed the treaty, but most large ocean nations have yet to ratify it, including the rest of the G20.
Thousands of attendees are expected in Nice - from delegates and heads of state to scientists and industry leaders - but the US has yet to confirm a formal delegation.
Beyond new commitments, the conference highlights the growing gap between marine protection declarations and real-world conservation.
France, the conference co-host, claims to have surpassed the 30 per cent target for marine protection.
But environmental groups say only three per cent of French waters are fully protected from harmful activities such as bottom trawling and industrial fishing.
In 2024 alone, more than 100 bottom-trawling vessels were recorded spending more than 17,000 hours fishing within France's six marine nature parks, according to ocean advocacy group Oceana.
"The government declares these as protected areas, but this is a lie," said Enric Sala, founder of National Geographic Pristine Seas marine reserve project.
"Most of it is political box-ticking. It's all paper parks."
The conference will feature 10 panels on topics such as blue finance, sustainable fisheries and plastic pollution.
Deep-sea mining is expected to feature in broader discussions, while small island states are likely to use the platform to advocate for increased climate adaptation funding.
The outcome of these discussions will form the basis of the Nice Ocean Action Plan - a declaration of voluntary commitments to be adopted by consensus and presented at the UN in New York in July.
"There cannot be a healthy planet without a healthy ocean," said Peter Thomson, UN special envoy for the ocean.
"It's urgent business for us all."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
12 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Push to turn promises into protection at UN ocean meet
The third United Nations Ocean Conference is opening as pressure mounts for nations to turn decades of promises into real protection for the sea. The summit comes as just 2.7 per cent of the ocean is effectively protected from destructive extractive activities, according to the non-profit Marine Conservation Institute. That's far below the target agreed under the "30x30" pledge to conserve 30 per cent of land and sea by 2030. Atop this year's agenda is ratification of the High Seas Treaty. Adopted in 2023, the treaty would for the first time allow nations to establish marine protected areas in international waters, which cover almost two-thirds of the ocean and are largely ungoverned. "It's the Wild West out there with countries just fishing anywhere without any sort of regulation, and that needs to change," said Mauro Randone, regional projects manager at the World Wildlife Fund's Mediterranean Marine Initiative. "The high seas belong to everyone and no one practically at the same time, and countries are finally committing to establish some rules." The ocean is critical in stabilising earth's climate and sustaining life. It generates 50 per cent of the oxygen we breathe, absorbs about 30 per cent of carbon dioxide emissions and captures more than 90 per cent of the excess heat caused by those emissions. Without a healthy ocean, experts warn, climate goals will remain out of reach. The treaty will only come into force once 60 countries ratify it. As of Monday, just 32 countries had. Advocates hope the conference can build enough momentum to cross the threshold, which would allow for the first official Oceans Conference of Parties. "Two-thirds of the ocean is areas beyond national jurisdiction - that's half our planet," said Minna Epps, director of global ocean policy at the International Union for Conservation of Nature. "We cannot possibly protect 30 per cent of the ocean if it doesn't include the high seas." South Korea, France and the European Union have championed the treaty, but most large ocean nations have yet to ratify it, including the rest of the G20. Thousands of attendees are expected in Nice - from delegates and heads of state to scientists and industry leaders - but the US has yet to confirm a formal delegation. Beyond new commitments, the conference highlights the growing gap between marine protection declarations and real-world conservation. France, the conference co-host, claims to have surpassed the 30 per cent target for marine protection. But environmental groups say only three per cent of French waters are fully protected from harmful activities such as bottom trawling and industrial fishing. In 2024 alone, more than 100 bottom-trawling vessels were recorded spending more than 17,000 hours fishing within France's six marine nature parks, according to ocean advocacy group Oceana. "The government declares these as protected areas, but this is a lie," said Enric Sala, founder of National Geographic Pristine Seas marine reserve project. "Most of it is political box-ticking. It's all paper parks." The conference will feature 10 panels on topics such as blue finance, sustainable fisheries and plastic pollution. Deep-sea mining is expected to feature in broader discussions, while small island states are likely to use the platform to advocate for increased climate adaptation funding. The outcome of these discussions will form the basis of the Nice Ocean Action Plan - a declaration of voluntary commitments to be adopted by consensus and presented at the UN in New York in July. "There cannot be a healthy planet without a healthy ocean," said Peter Thomson, UN special envoy for the ocean. "It's urgent business for us all." The third United Nations Ocean Conference is opening as pressure mounts for nations to turn decades of promises into real protection for the sea. The summit comes as just 2.7 per cent of the ocean is effectively protected from destructive extractive activities, according to the non-profit Marine Conservation Institute. That's far below the target agreed under the "30x30" pledge to conserve 30 per cent of land and sea by 2030. Atop this year's agenda is ratification of the High Seas Treaty. Adopted in 2023, the treaty would for the first time allow nations to establish marine protected areas in international waters, which cover almost two-thirds of the ocean and are largely ungoverned. "It's the Wild West out there with countries just fishing anywhere without any sort of regulation, and that needs to change," said Mauro Randone, regional projects manager at the World Wildlife Fund's Mediterranean Marine Initiative. "The high seas belong to everyone and no one practically at the same time, and countries are finally committing to establish some rules." The ocean is critical in stabilising earth's climate and sustaining life. It generates 50 per cent of the oxygen we breathe, absorbs about 30 per cent of carbon dioxide emissions and captures more than 90 per cent of the excess heat caused by those emissions. Without a healthy ocean, experts warn, climate goals will remain out of reach. The treaty will only come into force once 60 countries ratify it. As of Monday, just 32 countries had. Advocates hope the conference can build enough momentum to cross the threshold, which would allow for the first official Oceans Conference of Parties. "Two-thirds of the ocean is areas beyond national jurisdiction - that's half our planet," said Minna Epps, director of global ocean policy at the International Union for Conservation of Nature. "We cannot possibly protect 30 per cent of the ocean if it doesn't include the high seas." South Korea, France and the European Union have championed the treaty, but most large ocean nations have yet to ratify it, including the rest of the G20. Thousands of attendees are expected in Nice - from delegates and heads of state to scientists and industry leaders - but the US has yet to confirm a formal delegation. Beyond new commitments, the conference highlights the growing gap between marine protection declarations and real-world conservation. France, the conference co-host, claims to have surpassed the 30 per cent target for marine protection. But environmental groups say only three per cent of French waters are fully protected from harmful activities such as bottom trawling and industrial fishing. In 2024 alone, more than 100 bottom-trawling vessels were recorded spending more than 17,000 hours fishing within France's six marine nature parks, according to ocean advocacy group Oceana. "The government declares these as protected areas, but this is a lie," said Enric Sala, founder of National Geographic Pristine Seas marine reserve project. "Most of it is political box-ticking. It's all paper parks." The conference will feature 10 panels on topics such as blue finance, sustainable fisheries and plastic pollution. Deep-sea mining is expected to feature in broader discussions, while small island states are likely to use the platform to advocate for increased climate adaptation funding. The outcome of these discussions will form the basis of the Nice Ocean Action Plan - a declaration of voluntary commitments to be adopted by consensus and presented at the UN in New York in July. "There cannot be a healthy planet without a healthy ocean," said Peter Thomson, UN special envoy for the ocean. "It's urgent business for us all." The third United Nations Ocean Conference is opening as pressure mounts for nations to turn decades of promises into real protection for the sea. The summit comes as just 2.7 per cent of the ocean is effectively protected from destructive extractive activities, according to the non-profit Marine Conservation Institute. That's far below the target agreed under the "30x30" pledge to conserve 30 per cent of land and sea by 2030. Atop this year's agenda is ratification of the High Seas Treaty. Adopted in 2023, the treaty would for the first time allow nations to establish marine protected areas in international waters, which cover almost two-thirds of the ocean and are largely ungoverned. "It's the Wild West out there with countries just fishing anywhere without any sort of regulation, and that needs to change," said Mauro Randone, regional projects manager at the World Wildlife Fund's Mediterranean Marine Initiative. "The high seas belong to everyone and no one practically at the same time, and countries are finally committing to establish some rules." The ocean is critical in stabilising earth's climate and sustaining life. It generates 50 per cent of the oxygen we breathe, absorbs about 30 per cent of carbon dioxide emissions and captures more than 90 per cent of the excess heat caused by those emissions. Without a healthy ocean, experts warn, climate goals will remain out of reach. The treaty will only come into force once 60 countries ratify it. As of Monday, just 32 countries had. Advocates hope the conference can build enough momentum to cross the threshold, which would allow for the first official Oceans Conference of Parties. "Two-thirds of the ocean is areas beyond national jurisdiction - that's half our planet," said Minna Epps, director of global ocean policy at the International Union for Conservation of Nature. "We cannot possibly protect 30 per cent of the ocean if it doesn't include the high seas." South Korea, France and the European Union have championed the treaty, but most large ocean nations have yet to ratify it, including the rest of the G20. Thousands of attendees are expected in Nice - from delegates and heads of state to scientists and industry leaders - but the US has yet to confirm a formal delegation. Beyond new commitments, the conference highlights the growing gap between marine protection declarations and real-world conservation. France, the conference co-host, claims to have surpassed the 30 per cent target for marine protection. But environmental groups say only three per cent of French waters are fully protected from harmful activities such as bottom trawling and industrial fishing. In 2024 alone, more than 100 bottom-trawling vessels were recorded spending more than 17,000 hours fishing within France's six marine nature parks, according to ocean advocacy group Oceana. "The government declares these as protected areas, but this is a lie," said Enric Sala, founder of National Geographic Pristine Seas marine reserve project. "Most of it is political box-ticking. It's all paper parks." The conference will feature 10 panels on topics such as blue finance, sustainable fisheries and plastic pollution. Deep-sea mining is expected to feature in broader discussions, while small island states are likely to use the platform to advocate for increased climate adaptation funding. The outcome of these discussions will form the basis of the Nice Ocean Action Plan - a declaration of voluntary commitments to be adopted by consensus and presented at the UN in New York in July. "There cannot be a healthy planet without a healthy ocean," said Peter Thomson, UN special envoy for the ocean. "It's urgent business for us all." The third United Nations Ocean Conference is opening as pressure mounts for nations to turn decades of promises into real protection for the sea. The summit comes as just 2.7 per cent of the ocean is effectively protected from destructive extractive activities, according to the non-profit Marine Conservation Institute. That's far below the target agreed under the "30x30" pledge to conserve 30 per cent of land and sea by 2030. Atop this year's agenda is ratification of the High Seas Treaty. Adopted in 2023, the treaty would for the first time allow nations to establish marine protected areas in international waters, which cover almost two-thirds of the ocean and are largely ungoverned. "It's the Wild West out there with countries just fishing anywhere without any sort of regulation, and that needs to change," said Mauro Randone, regional projects manager at the World Wildlife Fund's Mediterranean Marine Initiative. "The high seas belong to everyone and no one practically at the same time, and countries are finally committing to establish some rules." The ocean is critical in stabilising earth's climate and sustaining life. It generates 50 per cent of the oxygen we breathe, absorbs about 30 per cent of carbon dioxide emissions and captures more than 90 per cent of the excess heat caused by those emissions. Without a healthy ocean, experts warn, climate goals will remain out of reach. The treaty will only come into force once 60 countries ratify it. As of Monday, just 32 countries had. Advocates hope the conference can build enough momentum to cross the threshold, which would allow for the first official Oceans Conference of Parties. "Two-thirds of the ocean is areas beyond national jurisdiction - that's half our planet," said Minna Epps, director of global ocean policy at the International Union for Conservation of Nature. "We cannot possibly protect 30 per cent of the ocean if it doesn't include the high seas." South Korea, France and the European Union have championed the treaty, but most large ocean nations have yet to ratify it, including the rest of the G20. Thousands of attendees are expected in Nice - from delegates and heads of state to scientists and industry leaders - but the US has yet to confirm a formal delegation. Beyond new commitments, the conference highlights the growing gap between marine protection declarations and real-world conservation. France, the conference co-host, claims to have surpassed the 30 per cent target for marine protection. But environmental groups say only three per cent of French waters are fully protected from harmful activities such as bottom trawling and industrial fishing. In 2024 alone, more than 100 bottom-trawling vessels were recorded spending more than 17,000 hours fishing within France's six marine nature parks, according to ocean advocacy group Oceana. "The government declares these as protected areas, but this is a lie," said Enric Sala, founder of National Geographic Pristine Seas marine reserve project. "Most of it is political box-ticking. It's all paper parks." The conference will feature 10 panels on topics such as blue finance, sustainable fisheries and plastic pollution. Deep-sea mining is expected to feature in broader discussions, while small island states are likely to use the platform to advocate for increased climate adaptation funding. The outcome of these discussions will form the basis of the Nice Ocean Action Plan - a declaration of voluntary commitments to be adopted by consensus and presented at the UN in New York in July. "There cannot be a healthy planet without a healthy ocean," said Peter Thomson, UN special envoy for the ocean. "It's urgent business for us all."
Perth Now
13 hours ago
- Perth Now
Push to turn promises into protection at UN ocean meet
The third United Nations Ocean Conference is opening as pressure mounts for nations to turn decades of promises into real protection for the sea. The summit comes as just 2.7 per cent of the ocean is effectively protected from destructive extractive activities, according to the non-profit Marine Conservation Institute. That's far below the target agreed under the "30x30" pledge to conserve 30 per cent of land and sea by 2030. Atop this year's agenda is ratification of the High Seas Treaty. Adopted in 2023, the treaty would for the first time allow nations to establish marine protected areas in international waters, which cover almost two-thirds of the ocean and are largely ungoverned. "It's the Wild West out there with countries just fishing anywhere without any sort of regulation, and that needs to change," said Mauro Randone, regional projects manager at the World Wildlife Fund's Mediterranean Marine Initiative. "The high seas belong to everyone and no one practically at the same time, and countries are finally committing to establish some rules." The ocean is critical in stabilising earth's climate and sustaining life. It generates 50 per cent of the oxygen we breathe, absorbs about 30 per cent of carbon dioxide emissions and captures more than 90 per cent of the excess heat caused by those emissions. Without a healthy ocean, experts warn, climate goals will remain out of reach. The treaty will only come into force once 60 countries ratify it. As of Monday, just 32 countries had. Advocates hope the conference can build enough momentum to cross the threshold, which would allow for the first official Oceans Conference of Parties. "Two-thirds of the ocean is areas beyond national jurisdiction - that's half our planet," said Minna Epps, director of global ocean policy at the International Union for Conservation of Nature. "We cannot possibly protect 30 per cent of the ocean if it doesn't include the high seas." South Korea, France and the European Union have championed the treaty, but most large ocean nations have yet to ratify it, including the rest of the G20. Thousands of attendees are expected in Nice - from delegates and heads of state to scientists and industry leaders - but the US has yet to confirm a formal delegation. Beyond new commitments, the conference highlights the growing gap between marine protection declarations and real-world conservation. France, the conference co-host, claims to have surpassed the 30 per cent target for marine protection. But environmental groups say only three per cent of French waters are fully protected from harmful activities such as bottom trawling and industrial fishing. In 2024 alone, more than 100 bottom-trawling vessels were recorded spending more than 17,000 hours fishing within France's six marine nature parks, according to ocean advocacy group Oceana. "The government declares these as protected areas, but this is a lie," said Enric Sala, founder of National Geographic Pristine Seas marine reserve project. "Most of it is political box-ticking. It's all paper parks." The conference will feature 10 panels on topics such as blue finance, sustainable fisheries and plastic pollution. Deep-sea mining is expected to feature in broader discussions, while small island states are likely to use the platform to advocate for increased climate adaptation funding. The outcome of these discussions will form the basis of the Nice Ocean Action Plan - a declaration of voluntary commitments to be adopted by consensus and presented at the UN in New York in July. "There cannot be a healthy planet without a healthy ocean," said Peter Thomson, UN special envoy for the ocean. "It's urgent business for us all."
Sydney Morning Herald
14 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Morrison's award makes a mockery of King's Birthday honours
If we ever needed a reminder as to what a farce the (so-called) King's Birthday awards have become, it's when Australia's most inept prime minister ever, Scott Morrison, gets a gong for his 'key role in the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal' (' Scott Morrison receives highest King's birthday honour ', June 9). Surely this is a joke. Morrison cancelled the deal for French submarines, costing the country $830 million; then the Albanese government was obliged to pay a further $800 million as a deposit to the US for Morrison's AUKUS deal. My guess, and that of many commentators more expert than me, is that we will never see an AUKUS submarine flying an Australian flag, and given the belligerence of Donald Trump to (former) allies, we shouldn't hold our breath for a refund of the deposit. So well done ScoMo, your incompetence has cost us $1.63 billion. Martyn Yeomans, Sapphire Beach Part of Morrison's citation for his elevation to the highest rank in our awards system was for eminent services to parliament. Tony Abbott, he of Sir Prince Philip notoriety, appointed Scott Morrison to social services in 2014. Morrison announced he would be the 'welfare cop on the beat', but later as PM he presided over robo-debt. During COVID he left the heavy lifting to the state premiers, he was too slow rolling out the vaccines – 'it's not a race' – and he appointed himself, in secret, to several ministries. He did not hold a hose when his Hawaiian holiday coincided with the devastating fires in 2019. I wonder what Michael Towke, Morrison's rival in the electorate of Cook, thinks of all this. The honours system is farcical and this is perhaps the most egregious example (' Honouring Scott Morrison makes a mockery of awards system ', June 9). Time to shut it down. David Maguire, Kellyville The administration of the Australian honours system seems determined to damage the renown of its awards, especially by its apparent policy of giving a companionship to former prime ministers, irrespective of whether it is deserved or not. Hence, Scott Morrison received one despite the scarifying report of the robo-debt royal commission, the ill-timed holiday in Hawaii and the multiple-portfolio scandal. This is notwithstanding his overwhelming rejection by the voters and the condemnation by the parliament. The whole system needs an urgent review. John Carmody, Roseville I thought it was April Fool's Day when I read the Herald this morning. 'Scott Morrison awarded the Companion of the Order of Australia', the highest honour possible, noting his 'honourable service to the public and the parliament.' They must be joking. Whoever decides these awards is totally out of touch with reality. Bill Jackson, Noosaville Scott Morrison only managed to steer Australia through the COVID years because he followed the expert and timely advice of the many nameless and faceless public servants who toiled in the background. Where are their awards and honours? Rowena Penniment, Earlwood A gong for Morrison for leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic. Hardly. Any leadership came from chief medical officers and the premiers of NSW and Victoria. It's hardly the Peoples' Choice – no one even wanted to shake the bloke's hand. Andrew Smith, Lane Cove Scott Morrison certainly belongs in a rogues' gallery, which sadly the Order of Australia is becoming. Rob Mills, Riverview Scott Morrison's inclusion is an injustice to other honours recipients. Paul Lau, Dolls Point Orders of Australia have been awarded to such champions as the late Alan Bond, so why would anyone want to be part of this cohort? Groucho Marx got it right when he famously quipped 'I don't care to belong to a club that accepts people like me as members.' Joe Weller, Mittagong At high school there was a kid in my class named James Dick Peter Bernard Hoffburn Hohenzollern Holland Ledger. His name won the admiration of every classmate. But that can't compare to winning an AM in the birthday honours list, though, for Britta Sylvia Regli-Baronin Ungern-Sternberg von Purkel. Well done. Go girl. Peter O'Brien, Randwick Birthday suits us Brigitte McLaughlin expresses the hope that newly arrived Australian citizens will reject the idea of having a king and celebrating his birthday (' Let's stop this royal birthday farce ', June 9). I have taught English to newly arrived immigrants and refugees for many years, and found after living under despots, communists and other uncivil governments, most are very relieved and happy to be ruled by a benign monarch – and very pleased to have a rest from classes for a day, as am I. Heather Johnson, West Pennant Hills Brigitte McLaughlin questions the relevance of celebrating the monarchy with a public holiday. Both the King's Birthday and the Australia Day public holidays are representative of a bygone Australia. As a proud multicultural sovereign nation, the significance of celebrating public holidays should reflect who we are and who we aspire to be. C'mon Albo, it's time to move forward. John Anderson, Macmasters Beach A law unto himself In response to the LA protests against deportations, Donald Trump's press secretary Karoline Leavitt said: 'The Trump administration has a zero tolerance policy for criminal behaviour and violence, especially when that violence is aimed at law enforcement officers trying to do their jobs' (' Marines on high alert after Trump sends National Guard to Los Angeles ', June 9). This clearly does not apply to those riotous invaders of The Capitol in support of Trump in 2021, who violently set upon police officers. These offenders were subsequently pardoned by Trump himself. What we are now witnessing in Los Angeles is a collapse of order beyond anything we've seen in (most of) our lifetimes. Gary Stowe, Springwood On a quiet Monday holiday Australians watching coverage of the LA riots on Channel 9 were shocked to see a video of a national guardsman shooting a reporter in the leg while she was recording a news clip with a news anchor (' Nine reporter caught up in LA protests ', June 9). She was standing away from other people and was clearly a member of the press, yet the soldier deliberately took aim and fired – on air! Yes, it was a rubber bullet, but how has it come to this? Polite words fail me. This is deeply, I mean very deeply, disturbing footage, and will no doubt be watched widely. The collective outcry from 25 million Australians won't take long to cross the Pacific. Andrew Cohen, Glebe It would be laughable if it weren't so serious that the current American president, a convicted felon himself, twice impeached as president and facing eight criminal charges, should be calling up the National Guard to put down legal protest in Los Angeles under the false assertion that such protest is illegal. It doesn't get crazier. Bill Young, Killcare Heights A quick question to Truthful Donald if I may: 'Where were the National Guard and Marines on January 6, 2021 when your insurrectionists stormed and damaged the Capitol building? Usurping and ignoring court authority, using the military against your citizens, denying them due process – is it only fools who cannot see where this is going?' Bob Macfarlane, Mirrabooka Gazans not to blame A justification sometimes offered for Israel's destruction of Gaza is that residents of the Gaza Strip freely elected the terror group Hamas. However, a poll by Arab Barometer conducted just before October 7 found that, if there had been an election at that time, the Hamas candidate was likely to receive less than 25 per cent of the vote. Furthermore, Gaza's population is extremely young, so the majority of the population wasn't born or old enough to vote when Hamas came to power in 2006. After the murder of a young couple outside a Jewish museum in Washington, DC, as well as the horrific attack on Jews in Boulder, Colorado, Senator Chuck Schumer asserted 'Collective blame is traditionally one of the most nasty, dangerous forms of antisemitism.' Collective punishment should also be condemned when it is inflicted upon Palestinians. Terry Hansen, Milwaukee (USA) The Middle East conflict would be a simple one to resolve if only your headline 'Hamas alone has the power to bring Gaza lasting peace' were true (Letters, June 9). Lasting peace is the critical term and the current violence must be seen in a historical continuum. It must be remembered that Hamas was supported by a previous Netanyahu government to create disunity in the Palestinian liberation movement. History also shows that successive Israeli governments have made it clear they have no intention of allowing a Palestinian state. The Palestinians, just like the Israelis, need a partner who is genuine in their desire for a just and lasting resolution to this conflict, but the current Israeli policy aimed at demoralising and cowering the population into submission through constant bombing and controlled starvation is the opposite of what peacemaking looks like. The actions of Hamas have contributed to havoc in Gaza, but so have the actions of anonymous pilots who drop bombs on schools and hospitals. Blaming one side might suit the narrative of the absolutists, but it ignores historical realities. Alexander Lane, Thornleigh Slow change For the first time in a long time, Labor has a clear mandate to implement its policies of 'values-based capitalism', as Jim Chalmers likes to call it (' PM's vision not clear to the rest of us ', June 9). Sean Kelly is a little sceptical of Labor's reformist intentions being too small, but given the reticence of the Australian electorate to embrace change of any kind, remembering the 2019 defeat and the failure of the Voice referendum, it is understandable that Labor treads carefully. Albanese judged the public mood perfectly to achieve Labor's comprehensive demolition job in the election, so he is not likely to risk his political capital on revolutionary change despite the temptation. Labor aims to be the 'natural' government of Australia and that requires reformist stealth, rather than risky revolution. Max Redmayne, Drummoyne Relief for the wealthy The Coalition's financial spokesman James Paterson's opposition to extra tax on superannuation balances of more than $3 million clearly highlights old Liberal ideologies and goes some way in explaining the burgeoning disconnect they have with modern Australia, especially younger voters (' Coalition backs tax reform, with a catch ', June 9). Superannuation should not be used as a tax haven. That was not its intended purpose. There are, unfortunately, many other ways in which the wealthy can achieve tax minimisation. This new tax affects less than 1 per cent of Australians and will be used for budget repair and to fund government initiatives. What stands out with Paterson's party is that they implemented the horrific robo-debt policies attacking so many of the most vulnerable, despite overwhelming evidence of the need, and they refused to fully fund public schools, while refusing to implement policies and work with the states to address the crippling cost of housing. Paterson is right when he says there is a need for a discussion on broader tax reform, however opposing this change shows the Coalition is still determined to entrench wealth at the expense of the broader community. Craig Jory, Albury NDIS rip-off I write in response to your great editorial (' Ministers must make hard decisions on the NDIS ', June 9). It is the middle tiers of governance who are, unreasonably, blowing out the NDIS budget. As a participant, I required a physiotherapist assessment. I found one in my local area and booked an appointment. I had a thorough physical examination and received a full written assessment for $350. I was then instructed by my support co-ordinator to obtain another from the provider he gave. This home assessment was very quick and did not assess all my physical difficulties. The written report was incorrect, according to my GP, chiropractor and specialist, even though that second physio appointment and report cost more than $1200. Herein lies the rip-off – the profiteering that has encumbered the NDIS with outrageous costs. The government needs to look closely at these middle-merchants to reduce the unnecessary expenditure for the NDIS. Then the funds will be going to the correct recipients – the participants. Marina Solar, Leichhardt A special lottery has been mentioned as a potential source of funds for the conservation of built heritage. Why not a major national lottery to support the NDIS at the same time that rational service provision is being assured? It's not as if it would be the first time. If memory serves, a lottery contribution sustained a progressive disability support system in Western Australia for years. We are a nation of gamblers. Let's put that characteristic to good use. Tom Mangan, Woy Woy Bay Needless cruelty When the chief veterinarian in the greyhound industry wrote to Racing NSW revealing the 'treatment of dogs is barbaric and the industry unsustainable', the government announced an inquiry (' Greyhound industry under fire ', June 9). This was followed immediately by Premier Minns saying whatever the outcome of the inquiry, greyhound racing would not be banned. This is an industry that has shown time and again it is not fit for purpose, both by its treatment of the dogs and the behaviour of the people who run it. It has already been banned once by the NSW government and is banned in most countries. It exists mainly for gambling, and it should be banned again for good. Janine Burdeu, Mona Vale Make crime pay The tech companies don't seem to care that the 'post and boast' videos on their platforms are fuelling a teenage crime wave (' The moment NSW's youth crime wave shocked top police officer ', June 9). Perhaps if they were fined for every such video posted it might prod their conscience. Money, they understand. Paul Doyle, Glenbrook Driving change It had been some time since I had driven to Sydney via the M1 motorway, and I was shocked this week to see the black diesel soot covering the face of the once beautiful honey-coloured Sydney sandstone on the large cuttings through the mountains. It made me wonder whether our lungs were also being coated in a similar manner by these exhaust pollutants. It's no wonder that many European cities have banned these vehicles due to their effects on the health of people, buildings and the environment. Roll on electric vehicles. George Aungle, Wyee Point Stamp it out In response to the article on engaging police to crackdown on the tobacco black market, I'm with the police (' Tobacco war call up angers police officers ', June 9). Yes, it's a crime and, properly resourced, they should deal it. However, we could start with simpler methods to curb these outlets by restricting the number of tobacco and vape shops disguised as 'convenience stores', particularly near schools. Locals in our area have been warned by the new awning sign that a tobacconist is getting ready to open not even 30 metres away from the local primary school. This will make four in our immediate vicinity. Perhaps the first step to acting against this nefarious teen-targeted industry is limiting the number of outlets. Second, restricting outlets within a two-kilometre radius of schools. I don't understand why the government isn't fighting this scourge with more force. And the worn down 'what can we do' attitude of locals is similarly disheartening. Georgie Greer, North Balgowlah Pay to play I agree that there's a lot of good in golf (' Golf influencers get the kids teeing off ', June 9) but at $30 and upwards for 18 holes, and golf club prices through the roof, it's hardly the working-class game I played at school. Jeff Apter, Keiraville Training school Maybe more dog owners should be watching Dogs Behaving Very Badly, in which the trainer frequently refers to the behaviour of the owner rather than the dog. Patricia Spooner, North Turramurra
