UK announces measures to tighten immigration policies amid rising voter anger
UK Prime Minister
Keir Starmer
on Monday, May 12, revealed a wide-ranging overhaul of the United Kingdom's immigration system. The
Immigration White Paper
, titled Restoring Control over the Immigration System, introduced sweeping changes to work, student, family, and asylum visa routes.
#Operation Sindoor
The damage done at Pak bases as India strikes to avenge Pahalgam
Why Pakistan pleaded to end hostilities
Kashmir's Pahalgam sparks Karachi's nightmare
The reforms have been announced as Starmer's
Labour government
, which won last July in a landslide win, is increasingly under pressure to secure the UK's borders as it faces public disgruntlement and political pushback.
The 82-page paper marked the UK government's formal break from past immigration policies.
He said the previous policies had allowed
net migration
to spiral out of control. Between 2019 and 2023, the net migration in the UK rose from 224,000 to 906,000. This quadrupled and is equivalent to the population of Birmingham.
Starmer said their plan means migration will fall, adding that the UK must end their reliance on cheap labour and rather invest in British workers.
Live Events
Major changes across UK immigration routes
Under the proposed framework, the skilled worker threshold will be raised to a degree-level qualification (RQF 6), BBC reported.
The Immigration Salary List—which enabled recruitment at lower wages—will be scrapped. Moreover, only jobs with long-term shortages and workforce strategies will qualify under the points-based system.
Additionally, a new Labour Market Evidence Group will be assessing sector needs based on data, while employers will be urged to expand domestic training. The UK will be halting new international recruitment for adult social care roles. Visa extensions for those who are already in Britain will be permitted until 2028 during a transition period.
Also Read :
Who is Edan Alexander? American-Israeli hostage set to be freed by Hamas after more than 500 days in Gaza
Students and families affected
The new immigration paper presented will be impacting the international students, who plan to stay in the UK after their education. The post-study stay has been reduced from two years to 18 months. Moreover, the education providers sponsoring overseas students will face stringent compliance rules and possible recruitment caps.
As per local media reports, family and private life immigration rules will also be streamlined, and deportation rules will be revised. Earlier, only those foreign nationals who were sentenced to prison could be deported. However, after new amendments, any immigrant convicted of any offence may face deportation. Crimes like violence against women and girls will likely see stringent exceptions.
Tackling abuse, illegal entry
The UK government also intends to levy new sanctions and visa restrictions on countries that continually misuse the UK's immigration system. Asylum seekers will have tighter conditions if the situation in their home countries do not change and they seek asylum after arrival. Fines for the sponsors of rule-violating migrant workers and students will rise as well.
Also Read :
American Idol 2025 contestants: Who got eliminated in the latest round? No points for guessing
Longer path to citizenship, focus on talent
The settlement qualifying period will double to 10 years and the UK government will be introducing points-based system citizenship, while more details will be released later this year.
Despite overall tightening, the UK seeks to increase access for leading global talent. Science and technology sectors, for example, could be boosted by accelerated entry routes including expansion of the Global Talent visa and other high-skilled schemes.
FAQs
What is the UK Immigration White Paper, and why was it published?
The Immigration White Paper sets out the Labour government's plans to cut net migration, simplify visa categories, and take back control of immigration.
Who will be worst hit by the new immigration regulations?
The reforms will affect foreign workers with low skills (particularly in social care), international students, and potential settlers. Yet, highly skilled professionals in strategic fields can look forward to eased restrictions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
37 minutes ago
- India.com
China begging this Muslim nation to buy its J-10C fighter jet, the country is..., its India's...
China has offered the J-10C fighter jet to Indonesia. (File) China is touting the alleged success of its J-10C fighter jet in the recent India-Pakistan air battle during Operation Sindoor as Beijing is making efforts to sell the multirole fighter to Indonesia, the world's largest Muslim country, which has close diplomatic ties with New Delhi. China offers J-10C fighter jet to Indonesia Addressing a public forum in Jakarta on Wednesday, Donny Ermawan Taufanto, Indonesia's deputy minister of defense, revealed that China had offered the J-10C fighter jet to Indonesia, and stated that the offer was currently under preliminary evaluation, and no technical team has yet been deployed to Beijing for further assessment. 'It is just an offer at the moment,' he said. Tafaunto said the proposal came up during a visit by Indonesian Air Force officials to China, and the Indonesian government is currently examining whether the aircraft meets the country's operational requirements and whether they can be integrated into existing military systems, Bloomberg News reported. China's offer to Indonesia comes at a times when smaller nations are spending more on military hardware due to global conflicts such as the Russia-Ukraine war, the Israel-Hamas war, and the recent tensions between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan. Indonesia 'pragmatic' defense procurement policy under Prabowo As per reports, Indonesia, under President Prabowo Subianto, is making efforts to diversify its defense export chain as part of the country's push towards military modernization. During Prabowo's tenure, Indonesia has explored options for military cooperation with traditional defense partners as well as new countries. Indonesia has partnered with South Korea in the development of the KF-21 supersonic fighter jet, and also recently expressed interest Turkey's 5th-generation 'KAAN' fighter jet project. Additionally, Prabowo has instructed defense officials to re-examine old plans to buy F- 15EX fighter jets from Boeing. Taufanto described Indonesia's defense procurement policy as pragmatic and non-aligned, which gives the country the freedom to ink defense defense agreements with different countries. 'If we feel that this aircraft performs well, meets our requirements and the price is also reasonable, then why not? We are not bound by any alliance, we can buy weapons from any country – even China,' he stated. China touts J-10C 'success' in Indo-Pak air battle Meanwhile, China is touting the purported 'success' of its J-10C fighter jets during the recent India-Pakistan military confrontation. Taking advantage of the speculations surrounding the alleged 'success' of J-10C fighter, a two-part documentary was aired on China's state-run CCTV, which delved in to the origins of the aircraft and its 'battle-tested' capabilities. The documentary claimed that the J-10CE (export variant) achieved its 'first victory' in the recent war. The move was not only to promote China's military technology but also an attempt to strengthen its position in the global arms market. Pakistan claims J-10C downed Indian Rafales Pakistan has claimed that its air force shot down several Indian Air Force (IAF) fighter jets, including the French Rafale jets, using Chinese-made J-10C fighter jets during the aerial battle that took place on the night of May 7 when Indian armed forces launched Operation Sindoor against terror infrastructures inside the enemy country. Speaking in the country's Parliament, Pakistan Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, Ishaq Dar, claimed, without proof, that the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) shot down several Indian jets, including three Rafales, using J-10C fighter jets and Chinese PL-15E missiles. However, Pakistan's claims have been vehemently refuted by India as 'rumors' and 'misinformation'. Indian Defence Ministry and Air Force officials clarified that reports of losses were exaggerated, though CDS General Anil Chauhan has confirmed some air losses in a recent interview.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
India would not have conducted strikes without convincing evidence, Shashi Tharoor replies to question from his journalist son
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Congress MP Shashi Tharoor , leading a multi-party delegation to the US, was on Thursday asked a question by his journalist son regarding whether government interlocutors sought evidence of Pakistan's culpability in the Pahalgam attack to which he replied India would not have conducted Operation Sindoor without convincing evidence."That shouldn't be allowed. This is my son," Tharoor said laughing, during an interaction at the Council on Foreign Relations when his son Ishaan Tharoor, global affairs columnist with the Washington Post, stood up to ask him a question."Ishaan Tharoor, Washington Post. Definitely asking a question in a personal capacity. Mostly to say hi before you go off to your next engagement," Ishaan said."I'm curious though, on this tour you've been on various countries in the Western Hemisphere. Have any of your government interlocutors asked you to show evidence of Pakistan's culpability in the initial attack? And what do you say to the repeated Pakistani denials of having any hand in the initial attack?" Ishaan asked."I'm very glad you raised this, Ishaan. I didn't plant it. I promise you. This guy does this to his dad," Tharoor replied amid laughter from the audience."Very simply, no one had any doubt, and we were not asked for evidence, but media have asked, and so you are speaking for your tribe, and that in two or three places, media asked this question," the Congress leader said."Let me say very clearly that India would not have done this without convincing evidence," Tharoor said."I can assure you, India is not the kind of country that would undertake a military operation without a very solid basis for doing so. This was not some random terror attack. I must say, our government counts 24 terrorist attacks in the course of last year emanating from Pakistan, but none of them required this kind of response," he said."We dealt with them. We either got the terrorists or killed them, minimal damage, a very little loss of life. We dealt with it. This showed all the hallmarks of a sophisticated, planned, deliberate operation with reconnaissance, with intelligence work, with a modus operandi worked out this cynical exercise of asking people their religion, shooting them between the eyes," he said India has had a 37-year pattern of repeated terror attacks from Pakistan accompanied by repeated denials."Americans haven't forgotten that Pakistan allegedly didn't know where Osama bin Laden was until he was found in a Pakistani safe house right next to an army camp in a cantonment city," he the Mumbai attacks , Tharoor said they denied having anything to do with it, but one of the terrorists was caught alive; his name, his identity, his address in Pakistan, everything was revealed, and he disclosed where he was trained."The US intelligence, as well as ours, recorded the voice of a Pakistani handler giving minute-by-minute instructions to the killers in Mumbai... So, we know what Pakistan is all about," he added."They will dispatch terrorists. They will deny they did so until they're caught with red hands," he said that minutes after the Pahalgam attack happened, a group called the Resistance Front claimed credit. "Who are the Resistance Front? They're a well-known proxy front of the Lashkar-e-Taiba , a banned terrorist organization," he added.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
‘Had told Congress to wait until delegations return': Supriya Sule on NCP(SP) missing from INDIA letter for Parliament session on Operation Sindoor
After the NCP (SP) chose not to join the INDIA bloc in its demand for a special Parliament session on the Pahalgam terrorist attack and Operation Sindoor, the Opposition party's MP Supriya Sule said on Thursday that she had requested the Congress to wait until the multi-party delegations returned before calling the bloc's meetings to discuss the matter. Sixteen Opposition parties have written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi demanding a special Parliament session. 'My party's stand was that there was no need for a debate when Operation Sindoor was still underway. Pawar Saheb always said that on matters of foreign affairs and national security, one has to back the government of the day,' Sule said while addressing a press conference in Mumbai upon her return after leading a multi-party delegation to Qatar, Ethiopia, Egypt, and South Africa. 'How can I be seen demanding a special session of Parliament and a debate while putting forth my country's point of view abroad at the same time. I said we will question the government over the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor when Parliament's monsoon session begins… I had spoken to the decision-making people within the Congress to wait until all multi-party delegations return from abroad before calling the meeting,' she said, adding that she had conveyed that she would attend the INDIA bloc meetings after her return. Sule said the Opposition would seek answers from the government on internal security issues during the monsoon session of Parliament. 'This (INDIA) is an alliance of parties. Just because I have a different view on some issue does not mean I think those with different views are wrong. We are in a democracy and each party has its own views,' she said. In the wake of Operation Sindoor, the government sent multi-party delegations to different countries to highlight Pakistan's continued support for terrorism and India's response. Sule called her tour productive and said the leadership of all four countries–Qatar, South Africa, Egypt, and Ethiopia–had expressed strong solidarity with India and condemned all acts of terrorism. The four countries also praised the de-escalation in the standoff, she said.
