Top Treasury official retires over DOGE request for access to payment systems
David Lebryk, a top Treasury Department nonpolitical career official, retired on Friday after clashing with Elon Musk allies over government payment systems, a source familiar with the matter told The Hill on condition of anonymity.
The Washington Post first reported on Lebryk's departure, citing people with knowledge of the matter. Upon his inauguration, President Trump had appointed Lebryk acting Treasury secretary while nominee Scott Bessent was waiting to be confirmed.
Lebryk's retirement follows a dispute over a request from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which Musk oversees, for access to the payment system that Treasury officials use to disburse funds.
The Post reported that a small number of career officials at Treasury have control over the systems, which are run by the Bureau of the Fiscal Service. Lebryk was previously first commissioner of the bureau.
The systems control $6 trillion annually, distributed as Social Security, Medicare, salaries for federal workers, payments to government contractors, payments to grant recipients and tax refunds.
Lebryk served in the Treasury Department for three decades and was appointed the fiscal assistant secretary in 2014, which is the most senior career position at the agency.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
41 minutes ago
- CNN
Social Security won't be able to pay full benefits in 2034 if Congress doesn't act
Social Security will not be able to fully pay monthly benefits to tens of millions of retirees and people with disabilities in 2034 if lawmakers don't act to address the program's pending shortfall, according to an annual report released Wednesday by Social Security's trustees. The combined Social Security trust funds – which help support payments to the elderly, survivors and people with disabilities – are expected to be exhausted in 2034, one year earlier than previously forecast, according to the trustees' annual report. At that time, payroll tax revenue and other income sources will only be able to cover 81% of benefits owed. The deterioration in the forecast stems from several factors, including a law passed by Congress last year that increased benefits for certain workers and the trustees' assumption that it will take longer for the nation's fertility rate to recover from historically low levels. Average earnings are expected to grow somewhat more slowly over the coming decade, according to the report. Medicare's fiscal outlook also worsened. Its hospital insurance trust fund, known as Medicare Part A, is expected to be able to cover scheduled inpatient hospital benefits until 2033, compared to 2036 in last year's report from the program's trustees. At that time, Medicare will only be able to pay 89% of total scheduled Part A benefits, which also cover hospice care, short-term skilled nursing facility services and home health services following hospitalizations. The program's trustees project that Medicare's trust fund will be drained sooner because of increased medical spending in 2024, which also raised the forecast for future expenditures. Plus, the trustees raised their assumed growth level of inpatient and hospice services in coming years.
Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Social Security's Potential Insolvency Date Moves Up One Year
WASHINGTON—With an aging U.S. population and a smaller share of American workers who pay into it, Social Security could become unable to pay full retirement and disability benefits in 2034, one year earlier than reported last year, the program's trustees said Wednesday. The Social Security outlook worsened for several reasons, according to the report. Notably, in a bipartisan vote, Congress changed benefit formulas in a way that is providing more money to certain public-sector workers, including many teachers, firefighters and police officers.
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Senate version of 'big beautiful' bill calls for $6,000 senior 'bonus'
The Senate version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act includes a temporary enhanced deduction for seniors ages 65 and up. The House of Representatives also proposed such a tax break in its text, calling it a "bonus." Notably, the Senate is calling for a deduction of up to $6,000 per qualifying individual. The House included a $4,000 deduction. The senior "bonus" is in lieu of the elimination of taxes on Social Security benefits that President Donald Trump pitched on the campaign trail. The Republicans' tax bill is being done through reconciliation, a process that generally prohibits changes to Social Security. The White House has said the proposed deduction is a "historic tax break" for seniors. The full deduction amount would be available to individuals with up to $75,000 in modified adjusted gross income, and $150,000 if married and filing jointly. More from Personal Finance:'SALT' deduction in limbo as Senate Republicans unveil tax planHow Senate GOP 'no tax on tips' proposal differs from House plan Senate tax bill includes $1,000 baby bonus in 'Trump accounts' Notably, the Senate version calls for a faster 6% phase-out rate for incomes above those thresholds, compared to the House version's 4% phase-out rate, according to Alex Durante, senior economist at the Tax Foundation. The faster phase-out means the full $6,000 benefit is lost more quickly, said Howard Gleckman, senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. For people who would be eligible for the full proposed senior deduction, the Senate's $6,000 version is more generous, he said. "It really depends on where you are on the income distribution," Gleckman said, with middle-income taxpayers poised to benefit most. In the House version, the proposed senior deduction would be available to taxpayers whether they take the standard deduction or itemize their tax returns. There are not many taxpayers in the income ranges for the deduction who itemize their returns, Gleckman said. To qualify for the break, all individual taxpayers and spouses, if filing jointly, would need to have Social Security numbers. The temporary senior deduction would be in place for tax years 2025 through 2028. The House of Representatives passed its version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act on May 22. Both chambers will have to agree on the changes before it is sent to Trump's to sign. "I think it's pretty clear, since this was in both bills, that there's going to be a version of a senior deduction," Durante said. Eliminating taxes on Social Security benefits would have been a more expensive provision, he said. Tax-free Social Security benefits would have benefited higher-income people most, according to Gleckman. Currently, Social Security benefits are taxed based on a formula known as combined income — the sum of adjusted gross income, nontaxable interest and half of Social Security benefits. Up to 85% of Social Security benefits are taxed for single taxpayers with combined income above $34,000 and joint filers with more than $44,000. Meanwhile, up to 50% of benefits are taxed for individuals with $25,000 to $34,000 in combined income and for couples with between $32,000 and $44,000. In contrast, the proposed senior "bonus" would not benefit high-income taxpayers and instead focuses on middle-income taxpayers with incomes less than $75,000 if single or $150,000 if married. "It's better because it helps the people who need the help more," Gleckman said.
