King Charles' annual swan census begins on River Thames
Known as "Swan Upping", the five-day census to assess the health of the king's swans began in London on Monday, local time.
One of the monarch's lesser-known titles is Seigneur of the Swans (Lord of the Swans).
According to ancient lore, he or she owns all members of the mute swan species found in Britain's open waters.
Every year, a team of carefully selected oarsmen — Swan Uppers — are tasked with finding the swans on a stretch of the Thames.
When a family is spotted, they shout, "All up!" and the boats quickly surround the birds, marking them and checking for signs of disease or injury.
"It gives us an indication of what's going on throughout the country," said David Barber, who wears a scarlet jacket and a white swan feather in his cap and bears the title of king's swan marker.
Mr Barber has been leading the event for more than 30 years.
He is accompanied by a vet and oarsmen dressed in three colours: red for the king, white for the Worshipful Company of Vintners and blue stripes for the Worshipful Company of Dyers.
The last two are medieval London trade guilds that were granted ownership of some Thames swans in the 15th century.
The census tradition dates back to the 12th century, when swans were considered an important food for royal banquets and feasts.
While swans are now legally protected from hunting, they face threats from disease, pollution, vandalism and cruelty, Mr Barber said.
Their numbers have declined over the past two years, primarily due to outbreaks of avian flu across Britain, according to officials.
Mr Barber said only 86 young swans were found during last year's Swan Upping, which was 45 per cent fewer than the year before that.
But the king's swan marker appeared positive at the end of the event's first day, with a total of 16 young swans recorded.
ABC/Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
a day ago
- News.com.au
‘I would cry': Dating clip sparks etiquette debate
Gen Z is a different breed from their elders, but they're also still pretty big on one type of etiquette. A London local, who goes by the username MissingDevon, posted a video of a group of people recently dining out at a restaurant. The dining layout was a classic booth arrangement, where one person sat on a comfortable, lounge-like chair and the other sat on an ordinary dining chair. If you're the person who gets the regular dining chair, you're also the one who has their back to the comings and goings of a restaurant. So waiters and people are constantly strolling past you. The clip showed a group of couples sitting down to eat, and while two of the men sat in the normal dining chairs, giving the women the more comfortable booths, one woman was sitting in a dining chair with her back to the ongoing bustle of a busy restaurant. MissingDevon posted the video with the caption, 'only a girl could tell you what is wrong in this video', and she seems to have been right. The clip amassed 5 million views and the comment section was filled with young women arguing that the woman should be sitting in a comfortable booth. 'Why is she sitting on the chair?' One asked. 'The princess should be on the couch,' someone else argued. 'I would cry if he made me sit on the chair and he took the booth,' another confessed. 'He has taken the comfy cushion seat, making her sit on the wooden chair, and all the other guys are on chairs,' someone else observed. 'Wrong seat, fella,' another criticised. Interestingly, though, it wasn't unanimous, with others arguing men should sit themselves facing the exits. 'It's common etiquette for the man to always be facing the door,' one argued. 'I think that's correct, so the man can see any danger entering the building first,' one argued. While someone else argued the man in the booth was in the right position because he could observe the entire restaurant and 'protect' his date. 'A man wants to see the entry. It's to see potential danger,' another man argued, but a woman replied and said 'there's no danger' in a cocktail bar. 'Why can't a man be comfy?' Another asked. Others argued it isn't 'that deep' and that no one knows their situation and perhaps the woman prefers the wooden chair. Relationship expert Elizabeth Jane told said that there's actually no wrong or right move in terms of who gets what seat in dating etiquette. 'I think that Gen Z men tend to be more emotionally expressive and are more comfortable with fluidity in gender roles, so taking the booth may not be viewed as ill-mannered, as both may view themselves as equals, and who takes the booth becomes quite irrelevant to them,' she said. 'It may come down to more practical considerations as to who takes the booth. The larger person may feel more comfortable in the booth, which may be larger or more sturdy.' Ms Jane argued that Millennial men may still be 'emotionally evolving,' so they are more keen to stick to traditional gender roles. The relationship expert argued that etiquette norms are still a big part of dating for Gen Z but the standards are shifting. 'I wouldn't say that etiquette norms are dying but rather they are transforming or at least adjusting to more relaxed rules on how a man and a woman should behave, gender roles are beginning to merge,' she said. 'They tend not to get lost in gender roles where they are seeking approval from older generations as to how they should act and what they should say'.
News.com.au
5 days ago
- News.com.au
‘In your hands': Exchange moments before Air India crash
The captain of the doomed Air India flight that killed more than 200 people last month, gave control of the plane to his first officer before takeoff, according to sources citing cockpit recordings from the recovered black boxes. Initial findings from India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) reported that fuel control switches to the engines were moved from the "run" to the "cut-off" position moments before impact. It also included an exchange in which one of the pilots asked the other why the fuel switches had been moved, without identifying the speakers. Two sources familiar with the matter claim that earlier in the recording, Captain Sumeet Sabharwal told First Officer Clive Kunder, 'the plane is in your hands,' Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera reports. It isn't unusual for a First Officer to fly the plane at various points, including take off. But US pilots who have read the initial findings from the AAIB into the crash were cited in The Wall Street Journal on Thursday as saying Mr Kunder would likely have had his hands full flying the plane when the fuel switches were turned off. That meant Captain Sabharwal, who was monitoring, would be more likely to have moved the switches. Captain Sabharwal was a veteran in the industry while Mr Kunder was in his early thirties and still building his career. Air India flight 171 bound for London's Gatwick Airport, crashed in Ahmedabad just 30 seconds into the flight, killing all but one of the 242 people on board and an additional 19 on the ground. India's aviation regulator ordered the country's airlines this week to investigate the locking feature on the fuel control switches of several Boeing models. Air India's inspection of the locking feature on the switches of its existing Boeing 787 aircraft found no issues, an internal communication circulated within the airline said. The order to investigate came after Boeing notified operators that the fuel switch locks on its jets were safe. 'Over the weekend, our engineering team initiated precautionary inspections on the locking mechanism of Fuel Control Switch (FCS) on all our Boeing 787 aircraft,' the airline's flight operations department said in a communication to its pilots. 'The inspections have been completed and no issues were found,' the communication said, noting that it had complied with the regulator's directives. It said all of its Boeing 787-8 aircraft had also undergone 'Throttle Control Module (TCM) replacement as per the Boeing maintenance schedule', adding that the FCS was part of this module. India's AAIB said it was still 'too early to reach any definite conclusions'. It said the investigation's final report would come out with 'root causes and recommendations'. 'We urge the public and the media to refrain from spreading premature narratives that risk undermining the integrity of the investigative process,' it said in a statement. – With AFP
The Advertiser
5 days ago
- The Advertiser
Too soon to decide India crash cause, investigators say
India's aircraft accident investigation body says it's too early to reach any definite conclusions on what led to the deadly Air India plane crash in June that killed 260 people. "We urge both the public and the media to refrain from spreading premature narratives that risk undermining the integrity of the investigative process," Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) chief GVG Yugandhar said, adding the investigation is still not complete. The AAIB statement comes after the Wall Street Journal reported that a cockpit recording of dialogue between the two pilots of the flight indicated the captain cut the flow of fuel to the plane's engines. The newspaper cited people familiar with US officials' early assessment of evidence. The AAIB's preliminary report on the crash on Saturday said one pilot was heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking the other why he cut off the fuel and "the other pilot responded that he did not do so". It did not identify who made those remarks. The two pilots in the flight deck were Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and First Officer Clive Kunder, who had total flying experience of 15,638 hours and 3403 hours, respectively. Kunder, who was flying the plane, asked Sabharwal why he moved the fuel switches to the "cutoff" position seconds after lifting off the runway, according to the Journal report. The newspaper did not say if there was any evidence showing Sabharwal did move the switches, beyond the verbal exchange it cited. But it quoted US pilots who have read the Indian authorities' report as saying that Kunder, the pilot actively flying, likely would have had his hands full pulling back on the Dreamliner's controls at that stage of the flight. The AAIB's preliminary report said the fuel switches had switched from "run" to "cutoff" a second apart just after takeoff. Almost immediately after the plane lifted off the ground, closed-circuit TV footage showed a backup energy source called a ram air turbine had deployed, indicating a loss of power from the engines. The London-bound plane began to lose thrust, and after reaching a height of 200 metres, the jet started to sink. The fuel switches for both engines were turned back to "run", and the plane automatically tried restarting the engines, the report said. But it was too low and too slow to be able to recover, aviation safety expert John Nance told Reuters. The plane clipped some trees and a chimney before crashing in a fireball into a building on a nearby medical college campus, the report said, killing 19 people on the ground and 241 of the 242 on board the 787. In an internal memo on Monday, Air India chief Campbell Wilson said the preliminary report found no mechanical or maintenance faults and that all required maintenance had been carried out. The AAIB's preliminary report had no safety recommendations for Boeing or engine manufacturer GE. After the report was released, the US Federal Aviation Administration and Boeing privately issued notifications that the fuel switch locks on Boeing planes are safe, a document seen by Reuters showed, and four sources with knowledge of the matter said. The US National Transportation Safety Board has been assisting with the Air India investigation and its chair Jennifer Homendy has been fully briefed on all aspects, a board spokesperson said. "The safety of international air travel depends on learning as much as we can from these rare events so that industry and regulators can improve aviation safety," Homendy said in a statement. "And if there are no immediate safety issues discovered, we need to know that as well." India's aircraft accident investigation body says it's too early to reach any definite conclusions on what led to the deadly Air India plane crash in June that killed 260 people. "We urge both the public and the media to refrain from spreading premature narratives that risk undermining the integrity of the investigative process," Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) chief GVG Yugandhar said, adding the investigation is still not complete. The AAIB statement comes after the Wall Street Journal reported that a cockpit recording of dialogue between the two pilots of the flight indicated the captain cut the flow of fuel to the plane's engines. The newspaper cited people familiar with US officials' early assessment of evidence. The AAIB's preliminary report on the crash on Saturday said one pilot was heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking the other why he cut off the fuel and "the other pilot responded that he did not do so". It did not identify who made those remarks. The two pilots in the flight deck were Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and First Officer Clive Kunder, who had total flying experience of 15,638 hours and 3403 hours, respectively. Kunder, who was flying the plane, asked Sabharwal why he moved the fuel switches to the "cutoff" position seconds after lifting off the runway, according to the Journal report. The newspaper did not say if there was any evidence showing Sabharwal did move the switches, beyond the verbal exchange it cited. But it quoted US pilots who have read the Indian authorities' report as saying that Kunder, the pilot actively flying, likely would have had his hands full pulling back on the Dreamliner's controls at that stage of the flight. The AAIB's preliminary report said the fuel switches had switched from "run" to "cutoff" a second apart just after takeoff. Almost immediately after the plane lifted off the ground, closed-circuit TV footage showed a backup energy source called a ram air turbine had deployed, indicating a loss of power from the engines. The London-bound plane began to lose thrust, and after reaching a height of 200 metres, the jet started to sink. The fuel switches for both engines were turned back to "run", and the plane automatically tried restarting the engines, the report said. But it was too low and too slow to be able to recover, aviation safety expert John Nance told Reuters. The plane clipped some trees and a chimney before crashing in a fireball into a building on a nearby medical college campus, the report said, killing 19 people on the ground and 241 of the 242 on board the 787. In an internal memo on Monday, Air India chief Campbell Wilson said the preliminary report found no mechanical or maintenance faults and that all required maintenance had been carried out. The AAIB's preliminary report had no safety recommendations for Boeing or engine manufacturer GE. After the report was released, the US Federal Aviation Administration and Boeing privately issued notifications that the fuel switch locks on Boeing planes are safe, a document seen by Reuters showed, and four sources with knowledge of the matter said. The US National Transportation Safety Board has been assisting with the Air India investigation and its chair Jennifer Homendy has been fully briefed on all aspects, a board spokesperson said. "The safety of international air travel depends on learning as much as we can from these rare events so that industry and regulators can improve aviation safety," Homendy said in a statement. "And if there are no immediate safety issues discovered, we need to know that as well." India's aircraft accident investigation body says it's too early to reach any definite conclusions on what led to the deadly Air India plane crash in June that killed 260 people. "We urge both the public and the media to refrain from spreading premature narratives that risk undermining the integrity of the investigative process," Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) chief GVG Yugandhar said, adding the investigation is still not complete. The AAIB statement comes after the Wall Street Journal reported that a cockpit recording of dialogue between the two pilots of the flight indicated the captain cut the flow of fuel to the plane's engines. The newspaper cited people familiar with US officials' early assessment of evidence. The AAIB's preliminary report on the crash on Saturday said one pilot was heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking the other why he cut off the fuel and "the other pilot responded that he did not do so". It did not identify who made those remarks. The two pilots in the flight deck were Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and First Officer Clive Kunder, who had total flying experience of 15,638 hours and 3403 hours, respectively. Kunder, who was flying the plane, asked Sabharwal why he moved the fuel switches to the "cutoff" position seconds after lifting off the runway, according to the Journal report. The newspaper did not say if there was any evidence showing Sabharwal did move the switches, beyond the verbal exchange it cited. But it quoted US pilots who have read the Indian authorities' report as saying that Kunder, the pilot actively flying, likely would have had his hands full pulling back on the Dreamliner's controls at that stage of the flight. The AAIB's preliminary report said the fuel switches had switched from "run" to "cutoff" a second apart just after takeoff. Almost immediately after the plane lifted off the ground, closed-circuit TV footage showed a backup energy source called a ram air turbine had deployed, indicating a loss of power from the engines. The London-bound plane began to lose thrust, and after reaching a height of 200 metres, the jet started to sink. The fuel switches for both engines were turned back to "run", and the plane automatically tried restarting the engines, the report said. But it was too low and too slow to be able to recover, aviation safety expert John Nance told Reuters. The plane clipped some trees and a chimney before crashing in a fireball into a building on a nearby medical college campus, the report said, killing 19 people on the ground and 241 of the 242 on board the 787. In an internal memo on Monday, Air India chief Campbell Wilson said the preliminary report found no mechanical or maintenance faults and that all required maintenance had been carried out. The AAIB's preliminary report had no safety recommendations for Boeing or engine manufacturer GE. After the report was released, the US Federal Aviation Administration and Boeing privately issued notifications that the fuel switch locks on Boeing planes are safe, a document seen by Reuters showed, and four sources with knowledge of the matter said. The US National Transportation Safety Board has been assisting with the Air India investigation and its chair Jennifer Homendy has been fully briefed on all aspects, a board spokesperson said. "The safety of international air travel depends on learning as much as we can from these rare events so that industry and regulators can improve aviation safety," Homendy said in a statement. "And if there are no immediate safety issues discovered, we need to know that as well." India's aircraft accident investigation body says it's too early to reach any definite conclusions on what led to the deadly Air India plane crash in June that killed 260 people. "We urge both the public and the media to refrain from spreading premature narratives that risk undermining the integrity of the investigative process," Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) chief GVG Yugandhar said, adding the investigation is still not complete. The AAIB statement comes after the Wall Street Journal reported that a cockpit recording of dialogue between the two pilots of the flight indicated the captain cut the flow of fuel to the plane's engines. The newspaper cited people familiar with US officials' early assessment of evidence. The AAIB's preliminary report on the crash on Saturday said one pilot was heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking the other why he cut off the fuel and "the other pilot responded that he did not do so". It did not identify who made those remarks. The two pilots in the flight deck were Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and First Officer Clive Kunder, who had total flying experience of 15,638 hours and 3403 hours, respectively. Kunder, who was flying the plane, asked Sabharwal why he moved the fuel switches to the "cutoff" position seconds after lifting off the runway, according to the Journal report. The newspaper did not say if there was any evidence showing Sabharwal did move the switches, beyond the verbal exchange it cited. But it quoted US pilots who have read the Indian authorities' report as saying that Kunder, the pilot actively flying, likely would have had his hands full pulling back on the Dreamliner's controls at that stage of the flight. The AAIB's preliminary report said the fuel switches had switched from "run" to "cutoff" a second apart just after takeoff. Almost immediately after the plane lifted off the ground, closed-circuit TV footage showed a backup energy source called a ram air turbine had deployed, indicating a loss of power from the engines. The London-bound plane began to lose thrust, and after reaching a height of 200 metres, the jet started to sink. The fuel switches for both engines were turned back to "run", and the plane automatically tried restarting the engines, the report said. But it was too low and too slow to be able to recover, aviation safety expert John Nance told Reuters. The plane clipped some trees and a chimney before crashing in a fireball into a building on a nearby medical college campus, the report said, killing 19 people on the ground and 241 of the 242 on board the 787. In an internal memo on Monday, Air India chief Campbell Wilson said the preliminary report found no mechanical or maintenance faults and that all required maintenance had been carried out. The AAIB's preliminary report had no safety recommendations for Boeing or engine manufacturer GE. After the report was released, the US Federal Aviation Administration and Boeing privately issued notifications that the fuel switch locks on Boeing planes are safe, a document seen by Reuters showed, and four sources with knowledge of the matter said. The US National Transportation Safety Board has been assisting with the Air India investigation and its chair Jennifer Homendy has been fully briefed on all aspects, a board spokesperson said. "The safety of international air travel depends on learning as much as we can from these rare events so that industry and regulators can improve aviation safety," Homendy said in a statement. "And if there are no immediate safety issues discovered, we need to know that as well."
