logo
S&P 500 and Nasdaq composite pull back from their all-time highs

S&P 500 and Nasdaq composite pull back from their all-time highs

NEW YORK — A modest pullback for U.S. stocks Friday eased the market from all-time highs and left major stock indexes on Wall Street in the red for the week.
The S&P 500 closed 0.3% lower a day after setting a record high. The benchmark index's loss for the week followed two straight weekly gains.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 0.6%, and the Nasdaq composite gave up 0.2% after drifting between small gains and losses much of the day. The tech-heavy index was coming off its own all-time high on Thursday.
The selling capped an uneven week in the market as Wall Street kept an eye on the Trump administration's rollout of new tariff threats against trading partners like Canada and looked ahead to the upcoming corporate earnings reporting season.
President Donald Trump said in a letter Thursday that he will raise taxes on many imported goods from Canada to 35%, deepening the rift between the longtime North American allies. The letter to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is an aggressive increase to the top 25% tariff rates that Trump first imposed in March.
The move was the latest bid by the White House to use threats of higher tariffs on goods imported into the U.S. in hopes of securing new trade agreements with countries around the globe, even historically close trading partners like Canada.
The administration had initially set Wednesday as a deadline for countries to make deals with the U.S. or face heavy increases in tariffs. But with just two trade deals announced since April, one with the United Kingdom and one with Vietnam, the window for negotiations has been been extended to Aug. 1.
Trump also floated this week that he would impose tariffs of as much as 200% on pharmaceutical drugs and place a 50% tariff on copper imports, matching the rates charged on steel and aluminum.
The initial rollout of Trump's tariff policies in the spring roiled financial markets. But Wall Street has been relatively stable in recent weeks, with stocks steadily rising to record levels That suggests the market has mostly adjusted to the unpredictability of Trump's rapidly shifting tariffs. Some market watchers, however, aren't so sure.
The market's response to Trump's tariff escalation this week 'has been surprisingly muted. Markets appear to believe that Trump will again back down,' Paul Ashworth, chief North America economist at Capital Economics, wrote Friday. 'We are not so sure.'
Despite the uncertainty around tariffs, Wall Street has already come to accept a 'base case' of 10% tariffs across the board, said Eric Teal, chief investment officer at Comerica Wealth Management.
'To the extent that this gets extended, I think the market has priced a lot of that in,' he said.
Trade policy aside, the market is now set to shift at least some of its focus on companies due to report quarterly earnings over the next few weeks.
On Friday, Levi Strauss jumped 11.3% after the jeans maker easily beat Wall Street's sales and profit targets and raised its full-year forecast, despite expecting higher costs from tariffs.
PriceSmart climbed 5.3% a day after the warehouse club operator delivered solid third-quarter results and said it's looking into expanding into Chile.
Earnings season shifts into high gear next week with JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo and Citigroup among the big banks due to report their results on Tuesday.
Shares in financial and health care sector companies were the biggest weights on the market Friday.
Visa fell 2.2% and Gilead Sciences dropped 4.3%.
Several airline stocks lost ground a day after encouraging quarterly results from Delta Air Lines set off a rally in the sector. Delta slipped 0.2%, United fell 4.3% and American gave up 5.6%.
Elsewhere in the market, shares of T-Mobile closed 0.2% lower after the Justice Department announced Thursday that it would not prevent the company from closing on its proposed $4.4 billion acquisition of U.S. Cellular. That deal, announced more than a year ago, had come under antitrust scrutiny from the Justice Department under President Joe Biden's administration.
U.S. Cellular shares rose 3.6%.
Shares in aviation company Red Cat Holdings jumped 26.4% after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued orders aimed at ramping up production and deployment of drones.
All told, the S&P 500 fell 20.71 points to 6,259.75. The Dow dropped 279.13 points to 44,371.51, and the Nasdaq slipped 45.14 points to 20,585.53.
Bond yields rose. The yield on the 10-year Treasury rose to 4.42%, from 4.34% late Thursday.
European stock indexes closed broadly lower following a mostly lower finish in Asian markets.
Meanwhile, bitcoin climbed to another all-time high Friday, briefly eclipsing $118,000 before easing back to around $117,901, according to Coindesk.
Bitcoin's price jump came amid bullish momentum across risk assets and coincides with Nvidia's surge to a $4 trillion valuation. It also comes days before the U.S. Congress' Crypto Week on July 14, where lawmakers will debate a series of bills that could define the regulatory framework for the industry.
Veiga writes for the Associated Press.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russia's Frozen $245 Billion Can Pay for Ukraine's Arms
Russia's Frozen $245 Billion Can Pay for Ukraine's Arms

Bloomberg

time7 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Russia's Frozen $245 Billion Can Pay for Ukraine's Arms

The mood in Kyiv early this year was upbeat. Many hoped a new US president dedicated to 'peace through strength' would produce a more robust American approach to ending Russia's invasion. Few believed Donald Trump would be duped into handing over Ukraine's best negotiating cards by Vladimir Putin's professions of peace. Yet it happened, and the effect on Ukrainian morale has been devastating. Now, finally, there's a glimmer of hope. In his comments from the White House on Monday, Trump made it clear that the worst possible outcome for Ukraine — a US refusal to go on supplying air defense and other critical weapons — has been avoided. But as always with Trump, there are conditions. He will continue sending Kyiv weapons only if other nations pay for them. And although he threatened Russia with 100% secondary tariffs, these would take effect only after 50 days, giving Putin the rest of the summer to press his offensive with impunity.

Homeland Security is removing protections that kept some Afghans from deportation

time8 minutes ago

Homeland Security is removing protections that kept some Afghans from deportation

WASHINGTON -- Temporary measures that allowed nearly 12,000 Afghans to work in the U.S. and be protected from deportation are expiring Monday as part of the Trump administration's efforts to make more people eligible for removal from the country. The Department of Homeland Security in May said it was ending Temporary Protected Status for 11,700 people from Afghanistan in 60 days. That status had allowed them to work and meant the government couldn't deport them. The number of Afghans protected by TPS is relatively small compared to the overall number of Afghans — about 180,000 — who have fled Afghanistan and come to the U.S. since the Taliban retook control of the country in 2021. It's also not clear how many of those 11,7000 covered by TPS have applied for or received other forms of protection like asylum that would keep them from being deported after Monday. But the removal of the protective status for Afghans has struck a chord with many advocates and volunteers because of the suggestion that it is safe for Afghans — many who helped the U.S. during its two-decade long war there — to go home. 'Since so many of those losing their protections served alongside U.S. forces, we should honor that service by upholding our promise to provide safety and ensure that they have an opportunity to thrive here. We urge Congress to protect Afghans by providing them permanent status – a commitment that is long overdue," Jennie Murray, President and CEO of the National Immigration Forum, said in a news release Monday. At the time that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem ended the temporary protected status for Afghans, the department wrote in the decision that the situation in their home country was getting better. 'The Secretary determined that, overall, there are notable improvements in the security and economic situation such that requiring the return of Afghan nationals to Afghanistan does not pose a threat to their personal safety due to armed conflict or extraordinary and temporary conditions,' according to the May announcement. Temporary Protected Status can be granted by the Homeland Security secretary to people of various nationalities who are in the United States. They can't be deported and can work legally but they don't have a pathway to citizenship. The status is inherently precarious because it is up to the Homeland Security secretary to renew the protections regularly — usually every 18 months. The first Trump administration tried to remove many of these temporary protected statuses but was largely foiled by the courts. This time around, the Trump administration has moved even more aggressively to remove the protections, thus making more people eligible for removal from the country. The administration has pushed to remove temporary protected status from people from seven countries with Venezuela and Haiti making up the biggest chunk of the hundreds of thousands of people losing their protections. Critics say that successive administrations essentially rubber-stamped these renewals regardless, and people covered by what's supposed to be a temporary status end up staying in the United States for years. CASA, a nonprofit immigrant advocates group, sued the administration over the TPS revocation for Afghans as well as for people from Cameroon - those expire August 4. A federal judge last Friday allowed the lawsuit to go forward but didn't grant CASA's request to keep the protections in place while the lawsuit plays out.

This Secret Dividend Formula Crushed Stocks In The ‘Lost Decade'
This Secret Dividend Formula Crushed Stocks In The ‘Lost Decade'

Forbes

time12 minutes ago

  • Forbes

This Secret Dividend Formula Crushed Stocks In The ‘Lost Decade'

Lost decade text on Business chart background 3d rendering Tariffs. Inflation. Soaring interest rates. The financial press, of course, blares about all of them—day in and day out. Truth is, they have to do this to get your attention. But it's also unhealthy to your portfolio, as investing based on the headlines leads to traps like trading too much, selling at the bottom and buying at the top. (This is why we focus on high-yield closed-end funds and aim to hold long term. This lets us tune out the headlines and 'automatically' reinvest our 8%+ average payouts in corners of our portfolio that are on sale at any given time. We'll see this strategy in action below.) If you ever need to remind yourself of just how short-term the media's focus can be, I recommend two things: Over the last 32 years, which is the furthest back my charting software goes, stocks have risen about 10.7% annualized. Going back a century doesn't move that figure much, cutting it slightly to 10.4% annualized. In other words, ignoring the headlines and diligently saving and investing pretty much guarantees a strong return if you hold long enough. But What About Downturns? Of course, stocks can, and do, fall in the short term—and 'short term' can sometimes be quite a while. Note in the chart above that the S&P 500 was actually higher in 2000 than it was in 2010. This was the so-called 'lost decade'—the worst 10-year span for US stocks in nearly 100 years. This points to the importance of going beyond stocks, to assets like real estate investment trusts (REITs) and corporate bonds, which can trade opposite stocks and help smooth out some of those down periods. To see what I'm getting at here, consider a 7.9%-paying REIT CEF, the Cohen and Steers Total Return Realty Fund (RFI), during that 'lost decade.' We hold RFI in CEF Insider because of its strong track record and ability to sustain our income (and portfolio) when stocks fall. Also, note that this happened even with the 2008 subprime-mortgage crisis, which of course hit real estate hard. In part, that's due to RFI's strong management. It's also partly due to the fund's high yield, which let shareholders 'cash out' some of their investment in the form of regular payouts they could then invest elsewhere. This part is key to our strategy and another valuable benefit of diversification: We can periodically take profits (and in the case of CEFs, high dividends) from one investment and put them in another. If both have strong long-term prospects—like US stocks and REITs—we put ourselves in a very good long-term position by doing so. RFI Leads the REIT Pack Strong management and that high yield are why RFI has crushed the popular REIT index fund over the long haul. Now, the natural move here is to buy RFI and then combine it with stocks. Many people would do this by mixing RFI with something like the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY)—the popular S&P 500 index fund. It's not a bad strategy. But it only gets you a 4.6% average yield between these two funds, since SPY pays so little. That's why we CEF investors look to options like the 8.5%-yielding Adams Diversified Equity Fund (ADX) and the 7.3%-yielding Liberty All-Star Growth Fund (ASG) instead. This duo gives us exposure to plenty of S&P 500 names, like Microsoft (MSFT), JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and Visa (V). And, when matched with RFI, we get a 7.9% average dividend yield across all three funds, in addition to REIT diversification. Over the last 25 years these three funds have had similar performance, with ADX closely tracking SPY and ASG significantly outperforming until recently (and bear in mind that with these two CEFs, we're getting much of our return as dividends). ASG's late dip is largely because part of the fund's portfolio is devoted to tech-focused smaller-cap stocks, and those are still recovering from a sharp selloff in 2021. So, over the long term, we can consider both of these CEFs to be good replacements for the S&P 500, with the added bonus of ASG being a bit underpriced now, due to that small-cap tech lag. Over the last 25 years, ADX and ASG have returned 7.2% yearly on average, in the ballpark of the S&P 500's 7.9% (since we're starting in 2000, at the peak of the dot-com bubble, our compounded annualized growth rate is lower than the 10.4% average stocks have had over the last century). RFI's 10.3% annualized return in that time has meant strong outperformance and an offset that both secures our three-fund portfolio's income stream and its total return. This is why our CEF Insider portfolio holds stocks, bonds, REITs, municipal bonds and funds from other sectors and asset classes. By doing so, we can transfer profits and dividends from one to the other when one group is oversold (and there's usually at least one that is at any given time!). That's much better than we're likely to do by putting all of our eggs in one basket with something like SPY. An added bonus? We get to ignore the headlines, too. Michael Foster is the Lead Research Analyst for Contrarian Outlook. For more great income ideas, click here for our latest report 'Indestructible Income: 5 Bargain Funds with Steady 10% Dividends.' Disclosure: none

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store