'He strangled me without asking': The dangers of choking during sex
Warning: This story contains descriptions of sexual assault
"He was on top of me - we were kissing and having sex, then suddenly he put his forearm on my neck and pressed hard with his full weight. I just froze."Rachel* had never slept with the man before. Speaking to the BBC, she says while the sex was consensual, the man began choking her without warning and without her consent - and that was deeply frightening."He just did it like it was normal and it caught me by surprise, so I just went with it," the 26-year-old says. "I didn't lose consciousness, but this numbness came over me and I just waited for it to stop."It happened again a fortnight later, Rachel says, with another man whom she had met on a dating site. Like the previous occasion, there was no discussion about choking beforehand."The actual strangling is a blank in my memory," she says. "His hands were round my neck, and then I disassociated with it until it ended."You go from feeling safe to losing control of the situation. I didn't have sex for a year afterwards because of how it made me feel alienated from my body."Both incidents were distressing for Rachel, who assumes the men who choked her must have seen it in pornography. "It felt like it was - in their minds - just a normal part of sex."A recent government review found porn involving non-fatal strangulation (NFS) was "rife" and that its prevalence online was contributing to choking filtering into some people's sex lives - particularly among young people. The BBC has spoken to women who've experienced choking during sex - both willingly and not - and to experts who say, while it may be more common, it is illegal and highly dangerous.
When someone is strangled, pressure on the neck cuts off the blood supply to the brain, which can lead to feeling dizzy and light-headed. The level of oxygen in the body suddenly drops, while the build-up of carbon dioxide significantly increases. This can cause brain damage or even death.Other risks include loss of consciousness, strokes, seizures, and speech disorders. Choking can also lead to psychological problems such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and contribute to depression. Despite the health risks, a recent survey by the government-funded charity the Institute For Addressing Strangulation (IFAS), suggests strangling is most common in the 16-34 age group, with 35% of respondents reporting they had been choked by a partner during consensual sex. Only half who had experienced it said they had not agreed to being choked.Some 16% of all UK-based respondents (385 out of 2,344) have been strangled once or more during consensual sex, and the data shows a slightly higher proportion of women have experienced it compared with men.Some people who engage in sexual asphyxiation say it intensifies pleasure - like Amanda*, who told the BBC she is regularly strangled by her boyfriend during what she calls rough sex."It gets us both off," the 28-year-old says. "I find the idea of turning him on a turn on, and I trust that he won't go too far and put lots of pressure on."It's an intimate thing with the person you trust the most, so you feel safe."
A quick search on a mainstream adult website, and it takes just seconds to find a series of porn films featuring long sequences of non-fatal strangulation (NFS).The influence of pornography has resulted in strangulation becoming "standard behaviour" according to Prof Hannah Bows, from Durham University's Centre for Research into Violence and Abuse."What we've seen in the last 10 to 15 years is that it's become a glamorised, fantasised and celebrated form of 'normal' sexual encounters," she says.Her conclusions are reinforced by the findings of the porn industry review commissioned by former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. It found content involving NFS was "rife on mainstream platforms", and recommended making, possessing or publishing porn showing women being strangled during sex, a crime. It isn't currently illegal to depict online. The government also said further action is needed to address the findings that graphic strangulation is becoming normalised in real life.
Details of help and support with sexual abuse or violence are available in the UK at BBC Action Line
NFS was made a specific offence in England and Wales in 2022, with a maximum prison sentence of five years. About 700 offenders were sentenced for non-fatal strangulation or suffocation offences between July 2022 and June 2023, crime statistics shared with the BBC show. There are no statistics on the number of people who have died from strangulation while having sex. The latest femicide census shows of the 2,000 women aged 14 or above who had been killed in the UK since 2014, strangulation was used in 550 (27%). Some 372 were strangled by an intimate partner.The National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) warns NFS can be used to control and coerce a partner by using physical strength to create fear - and studies suggest victims are seven times more likely to be murdered by their partner if there had been non-fatal strangulation beforehand.
Amanda didn't know choking could be an offence in England and Wales, even if done consensually and for pleasure. "I had no idea," she says, "but it's our business and it's our sex life - and it's not like we both haven't talked about it."Her boyfriend agrees: "It's hot. We watch it on porn and so you think, 'if they do it and it works, why not us?' I might be more careful now though."However, Harriet Smailes, from the IFAS, says there is "no safe way to strangle". "We also know that consent for these acts is not always sought in advance, and an individual's ability to provide ongoing consent can be impeded by being strangled." Kama Melly KC, who specialises in prosecuting sexual offence cases, says NFS often occurs as an act of domestic violence, and can be difficult to prove due to a lack of visible injuries, eye witnesses, CCTV or forensic findings."The fact that there can be a loss of consciousness after just a few seconds - that means the victim doesn't have a very clear narrative of events," she adds.Ms Melly says defendants can claim strangulation during sex was consensual, although such a defence is not possible if the victim suffers serious harm. Assistant Commissioner Louisa Rolfe, the NPCC's lead for domestic abuse, wants people to think twice before engaging in sexual asphyxiation."I would say get yourself informed and really understand, because you're not a medical expert," she says. "You may feel that you're doing something that's safe, but all the research and evidence would suggest it's not."It's incredibly dangerous, so think through the consequences."*Names have been changed
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
12 minutes ago
- BBC News
Assisted dying bill due for final Commons debate ahead of crunch vote
Update: Date: 08:55 BST Title: What changes have been made to the assisted dying bill? Content: Oscar BentleyPolitical reporter MPs have made various changes to the assisted dying bill since they first voted on it in November. The main one has been the replacement of the role of a High Court judge in signing off an application for an assisted death with a panel of experts. The panel would contain a senior lawyer, a psychiatrist, and a social worker. Supporters of the bill argue it makes the process stronger by adding 'extra expertise'. The change was made after MPs heard evidence there was a lack of court capacity to deal with assisted death applications. MPs have also passed amendments that would ban healthcare professionals from raising assisted dying with under 18s (under 18s were already unable to access an assisted death in the original bill), banning the advertising of assisted dying, and preventing the automatic investigation of an assisted death to a coroner. The original bill said doctors wouldn't be obligated to take part in an assisted death. But another change made to the bill has expanded this to all healthcare professionals, for example social care workers or pharmacists. It is normal for bills to undergo some change during the legislative process. This is part of the scrutiny given to draft laws by MPs. Update: Date: 08:48 BST Title: A make or break moment for MPs voting on assisted dying Content: Helen CattPolitical correspondent It's been seven months since MPs last voted on this bill as a whole. Then they backed the principle of changing the law. Since then, MPs have been working on the detail of how it would be done. The bill has gone through more than 100 hours of scrutiny in Parliament with plenty of impassioned debate on both sides. Expect more of that today. MPs have been carefully considering their positions and, in some cases, changing them. The vote in a few hours' time will be a make or break moment – as it decides if this attempt to change the law will continue on to the House of Lords, or if it will come to an end. Update: Date: 08:45 BST Title: Get in touch Content: How are you being affected by the issues in this story? You can contact us in the following ways: Update: Date: 08:40 BST Title: Badenoch: I will be voting no Content: Alex PartridgeBBC Westminster Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said the assisted dying bill, due to be voted on in its final stage by MPs, is a 'bad bill' and has 'not been done properly'. On Thursday, Badenoch said she had previously been supportive of the idea but 'this is not how we should do legislation like this' and doesn't believe the 'NHS and other services are ready'. While emphasising that her party has made it a free vote - when MPs can vote according to their conscience, rather than along party line - she says 'I will be voting no and I hope as many Conservative MPs as possible will be supporting me in that'. Update: Date: 08:35 BST Title: Bill now in 'stronger place' after changes, Labour MP says Content: We've just heard from Labour MP Jack Abbott, who says he'll now be voting for the assisted dying bill after originally voting against it back in November. Abbott tells BBC Radio 4's Today programme he joined a committee scrutinising the proposal following the vote last year and he now feels the bill is in a "stronger place" after it underwent a series of changes. Originally, a High Court judge would have to approve each request to end a life but this requirement has now been switched to a three-person panel - whose members, Abbott says, would need to receive training on coercion to ensure applicants are not pushed to undergo the process. The Ipswich MP says the changes are helping widen "the safety net" to ensure Parliament delivers on a "safe and compassionate" bill helping terminally ill people end their life. He adds the vote is likely to be "close". Update: Date: 08:28 BST Title: Labour MP opposing bill over 'lack of safeguards' Content: Josh Fenton-Glynn, the Labour MP for Calder Valley, is planning on voting against the bill and tells the BBC he supports assisted dying in principle, but thinks the bill lacks safeguards to protect against both family and medical coercion. "I'd like to see a good assisted dying bill, but unfortunately this isn't one," he tells BBC Radio 4's Today programme. Asked what concerns him, Fenton-Glynn says his background in social care and local council work means his is aware of the financial pressures caring for people exerts on both relatives and organisations. "I've seen what happens when families are tired and desperate at the end," he says, adding that it often leads them to make poor decisions over paying for care. He also cites concerns from disability rights organisations, who say people with disabilities often "feel pushed into these decisions" they would not already do. Update: Date: 08:24 BST Title: 'The dignity of choice': Why some are backing the bill Content: Dame Esther Rantzen, who has stage four lung cancer, has joined Dignitas in Switzerland Supporters of assisted dying have set out several reasons why they want the bill to be legalised. The Labour MP, Kim Leadbeater, who brought forward the bill said the legislation "would give dying people, under very stringent criteria, choice, autonomy and dignity, at the end of their lives". The Dignity in Dying campaign group said her bill provides the "most detailed, robust proposals" on the issue that "Westminster has ever considered". Chief executive Sarah Wootton said that the fact that every year "up to 650 terminally ill people end their own lives, often in lonely and traumatic ways," proves the need for reform. Broadcaster Dame Esther Rantzen, who has stage-four lung cancer, is another long-standing campaigner for change. "All I'm asking for is that we be given the dignity of choice," she said. Update: Date: 08:21 BST Title: Growing number of MPs changing their mind on assisted dying Content: Labour's Markus Campbell-Savours is among those opposing it The assisted dying bill was supported by 330 MPs last year, passing its first major vote in the House of Commons with a majority of 55 MPs from a wide range of political parties. Since last year, at least a dozen MPs who backed or abstained on the bill had said they were likely to oppose it. On Thursday, a further four Labour MPs said they were switching sides to oppose the bill. Markus Campbell-Savours, Kanishka Narayan, Paul Foster and Jonathan Hinder said the bill had been "drastically weakened" since last year's vote. In a letter to colleagues, they warned that safeguards in the bill were "insufficient" and would "put vulnerable people in harm's way". Read more about the growing number of MPs changing their mind of assisted dying. Update: Date: 08:13 BST Title: Who is Kim Leadbeater, the Labour MP behind the bill? Content: Kim Leadbeater became the Labour MP for Batley and Spen in 2021, after winning a by-election in the constituency by just 323 votes. She is the sister of the constituency's former MP Jo Cox, who was murdered by a right-wing extremist in 2016. She campaigned on issues such as increasing the safety of MPs and tackling online abuse. However, the cause she is now most known for is leading the campaign for assisted dying. Opening the debate on the bill in November, Leadbeater said the legislation "would give dying people, under very stringent criteria, choice, autonomy and dignity, at the end of their lives". She said the current law "is failing people" and MPs have a "duty to do what is right to fix it". "Most people believe, as I do, that we should all have the right to make the choices and decisions we want about our own bodies," she said. Update: Date: 08:04 BST Title: What is the assisted dying bill? Content: The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill,, external was introduced by Labour MP Kim Leadbeater. It proposes letting terminally ill people end their life if they: Once an application has been approved, the patient would have to wait 14 days before proceeding. A doctor would prepare the substance being used to end the patient's life, but the person would take it themselves. The bill defines the co-ordinating doctor as a registered medical practitioner with "training, qualifications and experience" at a level to be specified by the health secretary. It does not say which drug would be used. It would be illegal to coerce someone into declaring they want to end their life, with a possible 14-year prison sentence. Update: Date: 07:57 BST Title: MPs set to vote on assisted dying bill Content: The bill was put forward by Labour MP Kim Leadbeater Welcome to our live coverage, as the assisted dying bill returns to the Commons for its third reading, and a vote which could either see it fail or move to its next stage in the House of Lords. The assisted dying bill is a proposed law that would allow some terminally-ill adults expected to die within six months to seek help to end their own life in England and Wales. In November, MPs voted in favour of the bill, meaning it had moved a step closer to becoming law. Since then, the bill has been making its way through the House of Commons to be scrutinised, discussed and amended. If passed in the Commons, the bill will go through five stages in the House of Lords and further rounds of voting. If it is not approved, the bill will not go on to become law, making today a decisive moment for this landmark legislation. Some amendments are expected to be voted on first this morning, before a debate on the bill as a whole begins. We'll bring you the key developments from the debate in the Commons, so stay with us.
Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Pro-Palestine protesters 'break into Brize Norton and damage two military planes with red paint' in huge security breach
Pro-Palestine protesters have claimed responsibility for breaking into RAF Brize Norton and damaging two military planes in a shocking breach of security. Palestine Action said two of its activists infiltrated Britain's largest RAF base and sprayed red paint into the engines of two Airbus Voyager aircraft before escaping without being caught. Shocking footage shared by the group this morning shows protesters storming across the RAF runway in Oxfordshire on electric scooters. The bodycam footage then shows them spraying red paint into the turbine engines of the air-to-air refuelling tankers which the RAF say are 'vital for enhancing the operational reach and flexibility of Britain's military air power'. Palestine Action claim to have used repurposed fire extinguishers to spray the paint, while they say they caused further damage with crowbars. The activists said they sprayed red paint across the runway and left a Palestine flag behind before fleeing the base undetected. The alleged protest will raise huge questions over security at the RAF base at a time when the world is teetering on the brink with war raging in the Middle East and state threats from both Russia and Iran. Brize Norton is the largest RAF base in the country with approximately 5,800 service members, 300 civilian staff and 1,200 contractors. Voyagers, described as a 'petrol station in the sky', can carry up to 109 tonnes of fuel and are used to refuel fighter and compatible heavy aircraft. RAF Brize Norton hold a core fleet of nine voyagers, while five others are available for commercial use but can be recalled for military purposes. The RAF is reportedly planning to send Voyager aircraft to the Middle East as the conflict between Israel and Iran escalates. One of the Voyagers, which has a Union Jack on its tail, has previously been used to transport prime ministers and Royal Family members to engagements abroad. A Palestine Action spokesperson said: 'Despite publicly condemning the Israeli government, Britain continues to send military cargo, fly spy planes over Gaza and refuel US/Israeli fighter jets. 'Britain isn't just complicit, it's an active participant in the Gaza genocide and war crimes across the Middle East. 'By decommissioning two military planes, Palestine Action have directly intervened in the genocide and prevented crimes against the Palestinian people.'
BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
Dundee trials for Magennis & McDermott
Dundee have taken former Kilmarnock, Hibs and St Mirren player Kyle Magennis, 26, and fellow midfielder Tommy McDermott on trial. (The Courier, external - subscription required)Read the rest of Friday's Scottish gossip.
