&w=3840&q=100)
Google loses appeal in antitrust battle with Fortnite maker
The unanimous ruling issued Thursday by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals delivers a double-barrelled legal blow for Google, which has been waylaid in three separate antitrust trials that resulted in different pillars of its internet empire being declared as domineering scofflaws monopolies since late 2023.
The unsuccessful appeal represents a major victory for video game maker Epic Games, which launched a legal crusade targeting Google's Play Store for Android apps and Apple's iPhone app store nearly five years ago in an attempt to bypass exclusive payment processing systems that charged 15 per cent to 30 per cent commissions on in-app transactions.
The jury's December 2023 rebuke of Google's app store for Android-powered smartphones began a cascade of setbacks that includes monopoly judgements against the company's ubiquitous search engine last year and the technology underlying its digital ad network earlier this year.
Although not as lucrative as Google's search engine or ad system, the Play Store for Android apps has long been a gold mine that generated billions of dollars in annual revenue by taking a 15 per cent to 30 per cent cut from in-app transactions funnelled through the company's own payment processing system.
Following a month-long trial, a nine-person jury determined that Google had rigged its system to thwart alternative app stores from offering better deals to consumers and software developers.
That verdict resulted in US District Judge James Donato ordering Google to tear down digital walls shielding the Play Store from competition, triggering the company's appeal to overturn the jury's finding and void the judge's mandated shakeup.
But a three-judge panel that heard Google's appeal in February rejected its lawyers' contention that Donato erred by allowing the case to be determined by a jury that deviated from the market definition outlined by another federal judge who mostly sided with Apple in Epic's case against the iPhone maker's app store.
Epic's lawsuit "was replete with evidence that Google's anticompetitive conduct entrenched its dominance, causing the Play Store to benefit from network effects," the judges wrote in the decision.
Unless Google can extend the enforcement delay placed on Donato's order issued last October, the company will have to begin an overhaul that includes making the Play Store's entire library of more than 2 million Android apps available to would-be rivals and also help distribute the alternative options.
Google has argued that the required revisions will raise privacy and security risks by exposing consumers to scam artists and hackers masquerading as legitimate app stores.
But Epic's lawyers have ridiculed Google's warnings about the changes as scare tactics in a desperate attempt to protect the fortunes of its corporate parent Alphabet Inc.
Although Epic fell short in its attempt to have the iPhone's app store declared a monopoly, that case resulted in a judge issuing an order that required Apple to surrender exclusive control over the payment processing of in-app transactions and allow links to alternative systems without collecting a commission.
Besides being hit with Donato's order, Google still faces further trouble ahead that could leave an even bigger dent in its finances.
As part of the effort to address Google's illegal monopoly in search, a federal judge is weighing a proposal by the US Justice Department that would require the sale of its Chrome web browser and ban the multibillion dollar deals that company has been making with Apple and others to lock-in its search engine as the main gateway to the internet.
Google is also facing a proposed breakup of its advertising technology as part of the countermeasures to its monopoly in that business. A trial on that proposal is scheduled to begin in September.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
2 minutes ago
- India Today
Google DeepMind launches Genie 3, a 3D world model that could help build human-like AI
Google DeepMind has announced Genie 3, the latest version of its AI 'world' model that can create 3D spaces where both humans and AI agents can move and interact in real time. The new model aims to deliver longer and more realistic experiences, with the ability to remember where objects are placed even if you look away and return models like Genie are designed to generate digital environments based on a prompt, much like video game worlds, except here, everything is built by AI instead of manually created 3D assets. These environments can be used for purposes such as learning, entertainment, and training robots or AI Genie 3, Google says interaction time has increased to a few minutes, a big jump from the 10–20 seconds possible in Genie 2. The system can now keep visual details in memory for about a minute. That means if you walk away from something like a chalkboard or a wall with paint and then look back, the details will remain as they were. The model also produces worlds at 720p resolution and runs at 24 frames per second. A new feature called 'promptable world events' allows users to change conditions inside the world — such as altering the weather or adding new characters, simply by typing a earlier Genie 2, launched in December, could build interactive spaces from just an image, but it had short interaction times and struggled with stable visuals. Other attempts in the industry have faced similar challenges, sometimes creating changing or distorted imagery that made the experience less 3 will not be open to the public right away. DeepMind is rolling it out as a limited research preview for a small set of academics and creators to study possible risks and decide on safety measures. Interaction features will also be restricted for now, and readable text inside the generated worlds will mostly appear only if it's part of the initial prompt. Google says it may expand access to more testers in the future. The world models team working on Genie 3 is led by a former co-lead of OpenAI's Sora video generation project.- Ends
The Hindu
2 minutes ago
- The Hindu
U.S. agency approves OpenAI, Google, Anthropic for federal AI vendor list
OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini and Anthropic's Claude have been added to a list of approved AI vendors, the U.S. government's central purchasing arm said on Tuesday, as the Trump administration aims to boost AI's use by federal agencies. Tuesday's approvals by the General Services Administration (GSA) are part of a new AI blueprint released on July 23 that aims to loosen environmental rules and vastly expand AI exports to allies, in a bid to maintain the U.S. edge over China in the technology. The GSA's step means the approved AI tools will be available for government agencies to use on a platform with contract terms in place. Federal agencies will explore 'a wide range of AI solutions, from simple research assistants powered by large language models to highly tailored, mission-specific applications,' the GSA said. The GSA added it is focused on AI models 'that prioritize truthfulness, accuracy, transparency, and freedom from ideological bias.' U.S. President Donald Trump has called the AI race the fight that will define the 21st century. His administration's AI plan, which includes some 90 recommendations, also calls for the export of U.S. AI software and hardware, and a crackdown on state laws deemed too restrictive to let AI flourish. It is a marked departure from former President Joe Biden's 'high fence' approach that limited global access to coveted AI chips. The Biden administration last year required federal agencies using AI to adopt 'concrete safeguards' on its use and to monitor, assess and test AI's impacts on the public. Biden also signed an executive order aimed at promoting competition, protecting consumers and ensuring AI was not used for misinformation, a measure that was rescinded by Trump.
Indian Express
2 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Why Trump's tariff threats to India over purchase of Russian oil mark just another chapter in US hegemony
US President Donald Trump's trade war, which began with the aim of fixing the trade deficit with partner countries, has entered a new phase of economic coercion, with India in the eye of the storm. To force Russia into signing a peace deal with Ukraine and India to agree to stiff US terms in the ongoing trade talks, Trump on Monday widened the tariff war to achieve geopolitical goals by warning India of additional tariffs for profiting from sales of Russian oil amid the Ukraine war. While New Delhi has called the targeting of India over the purchase of Russian oil 'unjustified and unreasonable' and vowed to take 'all necessary measures' to safeguard its 'national interests and economic security', Indian exporters are in a fix, scrambling to retain access to the US — their most valuable export market, accounting for nearly 20 per cent of India's total outbound shipments. Globally, experts on trade and geopolitics have said the new tariff threats by the US directed at India could undermine 25 years of US-India relations. Trump's latest threats to India follow the American President's multiple blunt remarks over India's association with the BRICS grouping, Apple's manufacturing operations in India, and, topping it all, the invitation extended to Pakistan's Army Chief to the White House weeks after the Pahalgam attack and later offering a lower 19 per cent tariff to Pakistan. However, using economic coercion to achieve geopolitical goals has been a longstanding American policy and is only expanding under Trump. A working paper titled 'Asphyxiation by Sanctions: Harm, Fear and Smog' by former Reserve Bank of India governor Urjit R. Patel calls the US the 'hegemonic sanctioner', arguing that India should view the emerging international financial architecture around BRICS and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) as a 'risk mitigant' and a rational response to the ever-expanding sanctions regime. India's sharp response to Trump's coercion on Monday comes after the US for decades sanctioned multiple countries for exporting oil, complicating New Delhi's strategy to diversify its energy imports. Over the years, the US has sanctioned oil exports from Venezuela, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Sudan and Syria. India resumed oil imports from Venezuela in 2023, after a three-year pause, only after the US eased sanctions on the country. Patel's paper said out of 1,325 global sanctions since 1949, 486 have been imposed by the US, which currently administers over 30 sanctions programmes — making it responsible for 'three times as many sanctions as any other country or international body'. Moreover, US-led sanctions have surged in recent decades, partly due to the collapse of the Soviet Union, the paper said. Patel wrote that the US has 'pioneered secondary sanctions on an industrial scale', often in coordination with allies such as the G7 grouping and the EU, forming a 'posse'. These extraterritorial sanctions are enforced to impede economic and commercial activity by third countries that would not otherwise violate a primary sanctioner's rules, he said. The former RBI Governor wrote that the effectiveness and reach of US secondary sanctions are heavily reliant on the centrality of the American financial system and the US dollar's status as the global numeraire and principal currency for settling cross-border transactions. However, the overuse of the US dollar correspondent banking network as a 'switch' on payments has prompted many countries to explore alternatives — a trend that could undermine the dollar's dominance, he warned. Patel said the US economic sanctions have imposed a significant burden on emerging economies such as India. The hegemonic position of the US means that its sanctions, particularly secondary ones, cause 'collateral damage' to third countries — economic losses that are especially severe for emerging economies and often 'underappreciated' by the sanctioners. Patel, who has also served as a Director at the Bank for International Settlements, argues that the imposition of sanctions by hegemonic powers often occurs without adequate public debate or transparency regarding their costs. Unlike wars, where human and financial costs are evident, the 'cost-benefit of sanctions, counter sanctions and secondary sanctions is a black box — the layered and complex scope is a mystery to most'. The paper also pointed out that US sanctions, particularly on Iran, have directly affected Indian investments. The development and operation of Iran's Chabahar Port, which involves Indian investment, faced 'a hard break' due to initial US sanctions and had 'limited operations' after the US reintroduced sanctions in 2018. Even after India signed a 10-year agreement to develop and operate the port in 2024, the US State Department issued a warning about 'the potential risk of sanctions' for deals with Iran, creating significant uncertainty and hampering progress. In another example, Patel highlights that Indian public sector oil companies have accumulated unpaid dividend income of around $900 million from their upstream 'oil equity' investments in Russia. This non-receipt of income is directly attributed to 'payment channel-related prohibitions by the US and the EU', he says, adding that this financial loss 'inter alia, affects investments by Indian oil companies and the government's budgetary revenue'. While a trade deal is yet to be finalised between the two countries, several measures already announced by Trump have begun to affect India. Indian officials have indicated that the US is unwilling to negotiate sectoral tariffs — such as those on steel and automobiles — which have already impacted nearly $5 billion worth of Indian exports. Evan A. Feigenbaum, Vice President for Studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said on Monday that US-India relations may now become a political football, especially in New Delhi. He warned that the core understandings that enabled closer ties may be at serious risk, as New Delhi had largely assumed Washington would take political risks to strengthen the relationship — something Trump has not done and clearly will not do. Feigenbaum added that the split in relations is further underscored by Trump's effusive praise for Islamabad and recent engagement with Pakistan's army and government — developments that raise obvious concerns in New Delhi. 'The United States was roiled by India's ties to Iran, Myanmar, and later Russia. Trump and his administration are now moving to sanction and tariff India over its oil trade with Russia. This significantly shifts the bar for bilateral relations,' he said.
