
Security Is Now A Feature, Not An Afterthought
Not long ago, enterprise leaders bought business communications tools the same way they picked office furniture. Something sturdy. Functional. Preferably with lots of integration options and a tolerable price tag. Security? That was IT's headache. Or legal's. Or perhaps, with luck, an auditor's.
But that approach no longer works. Security has migrated from the back office to the boardroom. It's now a product feature, front and center. And in enterprise communications, I've found that it's fast becoming one of the features that matter most. Why?
As founder of an omnichannel business communication company, I've come to believe it's because we're living in a time when customer engagement is not just multichannel—it's multi-risk. Whether you're pinging customers on WhatsApp, verifying users by SMS or pushing two-factor alerts in bulk, you're not just transmitting data. You're transmitting trust. And, in many cases, you're assuming risk on behalf of the customer.
That changes the stakes.
Security As A System Instead Of A Patch
Too many platforms still treat security like a postscript—or, worse, like a damage control strategy. You don't need a reminder of how poorly that can end, but just in case, see the growing list of breaches that have turned household brands into cautionary tales.
Instead of flashy dashboards or volume discounts, more and more tech buyers are asking vendors for penetration test results. They review data flows. They want transparency baked in. And they're right to do so, because in the new era of business communications, I find the real differentiator isn't who can message faster. It's who can message smarter. Securely. Responsibly. Globally.
In other words, we're seeing the rise of communications platforms built like infrastructure, not like apps. The kind of platforms that hold up not just under volume, but under scrutiny. And that's where security—once buried deep in the spec sheet—is finally getting its due.
From Compliance To Competitive Edge
Take ISO/IEC 27001 and GDPR, for instance. Once seen as bureaucratic hurdles, these compliance certificates are now becoming market differentiators. When a vendor says, 'We're compliant,' more and more enterprise buyers are hearing, "We've done the hard work so you don't have to explain a breach to your CISO."
In regulated industries like banking, healthcare and even e-commerce, that message can resonate. Strong data governance is important for reducing vendor risk, building consumer confidence and future-proofing digital growth.
Of course, compliance isn't exciting. Few enterprise leaders are going to brag about their data protection impact assessment at a cocktail party. But for buyers? These certifications can offer something better than buzz: assurance.
These are all reasons why I believe we as enterprise leaders should demand more. Secure communications should be architected, not added. That means encryption at rest and in transit. It means vendor due diligence, real-time anomaly detection and, yes, governance built to survive audits.
But most of all, it means asking better questions, such as:
• "Who has access to the message?"
• "What happens if the user's phone is compromised?"
• "Where is the data stored?"
• And the question nobody likes to ask: "How easily can this be misused?"
Best Practices For Architecting Secure Communications Platforms
If you're building or evaluating a communications platform in today's security-sensitive world, consider these five best practices—not as a checklist, but as a mindset.
1. Treat security like infrastructure, not insurance. Secure communications should be built from the ground up. That means encryption standards shouldn't be an afterthought. Architect for both encryption at rest and in transit—and plan for scale. Your platform should perform just as securely on Day 1 as it does on Day 1,000.
2. Build governance that's audit-proof, not just audit-ready. Don't scramble when a regulator comes knocking. Create a living governance framework: one that outlines data flows, permissions, storage protocols, retention policies and third-party access rules. Document everything, and ensure your framework can stand up to external scrutiny without needing last-minute cleanups.
3. Implement real-time monitoring and anomaly detection. In my experience, most breaches aren't discovered when they happen—they're discovered months later. Real-time anomaly detection, such as alerting for sudden spikes in message volume or unexpected IP geolocation patterns, can flag issues before they become incidents.
4. Conduct continuous vendor due diligence. Too many companies treat vendor vetting as a one-time event. But vendors evolve, and so do their risks. Re-assess critical vendors annually, review their compliance updates, and don't be afraid to ask for recent third-party audit reports. 'Trust but verify' applies here more than ever.
5. Avoid the most common pitfall: over-reliance on tools. Yes, software matters. But so do people and processes. Invest in security training for internal teams. Align cross-functional stakeholders—from legal to engineering—so everyone understands their role in protecting communications. Technology without accountability is just an accident waiting to happen.
You wouldn't send your CFO into a board meeting with half-finished numbers, so don't send your customer messages over half-secure channels. In 2025, security is not a luxury. It's a core feature. And if your communications platform isn't treating it that way, it may be time to shop around.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

CNN
3 hours ago
- CNN
WAPO: Medicare, Medicaid to experiment with covering weight loss drugs
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework. The choices you make regarding the purposes and vendors listed in this notice are saved and stored locally on your device for a maximum duration of 1 year.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Broadcom (AVGO) Stock Rated Buy by Goldman Sachs on AI and M&A Strength
Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ:AVGO) ranks among the . On July 10, Goldman Sachs began coverage of Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ:AVGO) with a Buy rating and a $315 price target. The investment bank pointed to Broadcom's long-term merger and acquisition strategy, which has allowed it to establish a strong franchise position across many infrastructure software areas. According to Goldman Sachs, Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ:AVGO) will continue to dominate the enterprise networking silicon market and use this advantage to gain the lion's share of custom silicon processors for major hyperscalers in the United States. According to the firm, by 2026, artificial intelligence will account for more than 40% of Broadcom's operations, while the company's core infrastructure software division continues to produce consistent, increasing profitability. Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ:AVGO) is a multinational semiconductor company specializing in the design, development, and distribution of a wide range of products. While we acknowledge the potential of AVGO as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. Read More: and Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio


Forbes
6 hours ago
- Forbes
Google Issues 3 Gmail Security Warnings — Fast Action Needed
Not all Google security warnings concern a surge in attacks requiring you to update your Gmail password, or vulnerabilities in the Chrome browser, or even an invisible hacking threat that can erase your Android phone data. Some, as was the case of the three security warnings that dropped in my Gmail inbox from Google just this last week, are less immediately frightening, but require your immediate attention nonetheless. Attacks are out of your control, all you can do is mitigate against the threat they pose, and that's what these new Gmail warnings are all about: putting you back in control of your account security. But you must respond quickly — here's why. Google's Gmail Security Warning Number One The first warning arrived in my Gmail inbox on July 29 and is definitely of the respond immediately variety. 'Your personal info was found on the dark web,' it stated, urging me to review the results. Truth be told, I didn't, and you shouldn't need much persuasion. After all, what's the point of being signed up to Google's dark web reporting if you don't? The information provided by the report can be sorted by such things as emails, passwords, usernames and other data. The most important, of course, being the password entries. As soon as you discover that your credentials have been leaked onto the dark web following a breach of any service, you should immediately change your password. You should also change the password at any other service or platform where you have reused it. This is a Gmail security warning that you must not ignore, and it's just the first of three in as many days that I received. Google's Gmail Security Warning Number Two The second security warning to drop in my Gmail inbox from Google also arrived on July 29 and had the slightly confusing subject of 'Sign into your Google account.' I say confusing, from my perspective as a security wonk and likely yours if you've read any of my, or other security wonks', warnings about phishing emails impersonating Google and asking you to do just that. Opening the email didn't help much, seeing as it consisted largely of a link asking me to sight in and a button doing the same, all tactics employed by hackers looking to compromise your account. I knew it was a genuine communication, however, as I received a copy to an email account that I have as the recovery account for the one the warning referred to, a Gmail address that nobody else would know is connected in this way. And the reason for wanting me to sign in? Yes, it's a new message about an old issue: an inactive Gmail account. 'You're receiving this message because your Google Account has not been used in at least 8 months,' the warning stated, adding that Google might delete activity and data if said account is not used within a two-year period. The reason behind the inactive account policy? They are far more likely to be compromised than an active one, according to Google and other security experts. "Our internal analysis shows abandoned accounts are at least 10x less likely than active accounts to have 2-step verification set up," Ruth Kricheli, a vice president of product management at Google said. Boris Cipot, senior security engineer at Black Duck, confirmed that 'in the event of a data breach, attackers can use your outdated information to gain access to your current accounts or trick you into revealing more.' So, you know what to do if you get this security warning: sign in and save your account. It really is that simple. You don't have to follow the links in the email, in fact I'd suggest for improved security that you don't, rather go directly to the account using your web browser or the Google app. Google's Gmail Security Warning Number Three The final part of this security warning triumvirate arrived a day later, July 30, in the shape of a Gmail message urging me to 'Help strengthen the security of your Google Account.' Now, in a way, this is related to security warning numbers two, in as far as it concerns something that has not been used in a while. But in this case, it's a device rather than an account itself. 'Remove access from devices that you don't use anymore,' the warning continued. In this case it was, as my Gmail message told me, a tiny smartphone called the Unihertz Jelly 2E that had not been 'used in a while,: and, as such, should be removed. 'You should only stay signed in on devices that you use and trust,' the warning said, and that's excellent advice. Each redundant device is just another extension of the potential threat surface as it relates to your Google account and, of course, your Gmail account as part of that. The best mitigation is, as recommended by Google, to run a security checkup that will find such redundant devices and provide a myriad of other personalised security recommendations, including your Gmail settings. You know what to do, maybe don't wait until you get a Gmail security warning email to do it, though: act now and stay secure.