What's protein, why do we need it, and how do you get more?
123RF
Distinguished professor Paul Moughan from The Riddet Institute is an expert in all things protein related.
The Riddet Institute is a Centre of Research Excellence (CoRE) focusing on fundamental and advanced food research. It's hosted by Massey University on the Palmerston North campus.
Dr Moughan answers some questions from the
Country Life
team.
Protein is a very important component for the human body. It's central to body function and therefore to nutrition.
We get proteins from the foods we eat - we don't need protein itself but rather the amino acids that are the building blocks of protein. When we eat protein, it gets broken down to amino acids and it is those that are absorbed.
There are nine essential amino acids. Some foods can supply all nine of those amino acids readily, while others might be deficient in one of those essential amino acids.
Follow Country Life on
Apple Podcasts
,
Spotify
,
iHeart
or wherever you get your podcasts.
The amount of protein we need depends on a persons age and weight. The average adult needs about 0.8 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight - so a person who weighs 80kg needs about 65g of protein per day.
Again though it comes back to the quality of the protein and the amino acids you can get from it. From a lesser quality protein you might need more to get the same benefit. We also need more protein as we age - about 1.5g compared to 0.8g.
Generally there's no such thing as too much protein for most people.
Distinguished professor Paul Moughan from the Riddet Institute.
Photo:
Supplied
There are major differences between proteins.
Consumer information is pretty poor. Looking at the protein content on a product's label is a good starting point but it doesn't speak to the quality of the protein.
As a general rule, animal-based proteins - so milk, dairy- based proteins, egg, meat, fish - are all very high quality. They have all the amino acids you need and they're highly digestible and highly available. Soyabean-based foods like tofu and tempeh are also high quality.
Peas and beans tend to be high in protein but the quality is not always high. A lot of the vegetable-based proteins are less good quality so you would need to consume more of them. Pea and potato-based proteins can be good for vegan or vegetarian diets though.
In the past it didn't matter too much because we generally consumed mixtures of proteins. Now there's a movement worldwide to go away from animal-based proteins more towards vegetable-based proteins and as we do that we need to be more careful. There have been studies of vegan and vegetarian diest which have found people were not meeting their total protein requirements in terms of quality.
Protein quality is going to become more of an issue. When we look at future world food needs, because the world population is growing, it's also ageing, protein is going to become a major consideration.
I personally think it shouldn't be vegetable or animal. It needs to be vegetable and animal. It may be very appropriate to move towards more vegetable-based foods but I think people who completely exclude animal-based foods may well be entering into the territory of nutritional inadequacy and problems with their diet. It's all about balance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
10 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Midday Report Essentials for Tuesday 12th August 2025
health housing 5 minutes ago In today's episode, Critical staff shortages, a siloed culture and serious governance issues have been identified in an inquiry into Canterbury's Mental Health Services - sparked by the murder of a Christchurch woman; While other western nations declare their intention to recognise a Palestinian state, the New Zealand government is being described as a "laggard" for delaying its position on statehood; Farmers, winemakers and tour operators are welcoming the government's announcement of two new work visas to help bring workers into the country - but the hospitality industry says it's been left out in the cold; The Wellington suburb of Newtown is getting a bad rap and has been in the news for all the wrong reasons.
RNZ News
10 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Hospital radiology services suffering surging demand, lack of investment report shows
The report was produced by APEX which is the union representing over 1500 Medical Imaging Technologists and 350 sonographers. Photo: 123RF A new report has slammed the state of the country's hospital radiology services saying inadequate staff numbers and a lack of investment is 'unravelling' the sector. The report from APEX - the union representing over 1500 Medical Imaging Technologists (MIT) and 350 sonographers - showed 102,446 patients on radiology waiting lists nationwide (as of March 2026) with over half of the country's departments reporting inadequate staffing levels. The report based on a national survey of APEX members and data obtained through Official Information Act requests said more than 44 percent of MIT staff surveyed said they were working with broken, outdated, or unsafe equipment. APEX national secretary Dr Deborah Powell told RNZ the report outlined how deeply the sector "had fallen into disarray". "Understaffed and exhausted teams, working with broken equipment are finding it impossible to provide safe and timely services as demand for medical imaging surges," Powell said. She said waiting lists were growing "across the board" - even for people with conditions requiring urgent attention. "In Auckland... acute or urgent scans people are on the waiting list - which is pretty much unheard of really. If you're acute or urgent you get straight in but we're now seeing a waiting list growing for those sorts of patients," Powell said. She said the revelation the health system had spent over $100 million outsourcing radiology services to private providers in the last year was at the core of the problem. "It seems to be easier to pay the cost of outsourcing than get our staffing and machinery fixed in-house. If that money had been reinvested in sufficient staff and sufficient equipment then we believe we would've achieved far more than that and in a far more cost effective way," Powell said. Five hospitals - Taranaki, Bay of Plenty, Auckland, Capital & Coast and Hutt - reported MIT staffing level as approaching crisis point. "Our people are exhausted, they're burnt out. Patients are not getting the service they want. They're getting frustrated [and] sometimes they take it out on staff. So we are seeing our people leaving the public sector and going and working for the private sector. That's a double whammy. "We are getting to the point where our guys are just so tired they can't keep doing this - the risk of mistakes goes up - and the only option is to outsource which in actual fact exacerbates our problem," Powell said. She said Te Whatu Ora needed to lift the current hiring freeze, implement a national plan for the replacement of technology and redirect funding diverted to outsourcing back into the public system. Te Whatu Ora has been approached for comment. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
40 minutes ago
- RNZ News
National health plan fails to meet Auditor-General's expectations
The Auditor-General says the plan developed by Health New Zealand did not meet his expectations for a costed plan. Photo: Unsplash / RNZ The Auditor-General says the country's nationwide health plan for the next two years is not up to his expectations. He says it lacks important details, including the basic costs of services. Health NZ is in charge of putting out a plan through to 2027 that shows how public health services will be delivered, and the cost. But Auditor-General John Ryan, in a letter at the back of the 85-page plan , said it did not do this. "The plan developed by Health New Zealand does not meet my expectations for a costed plan," he said after auditing it. This meant he was unable to offer an opinion on whether the plan provided a reasonable basis for delivering public services to improve health. A bill before Parliament removes the need for future plans to go to the Auditor-General. "I expected the plan to provide a clear explanation of how the actions have been selected and prioritised, and how the actions will contribute to the achievement of the desired improvements and targets. The plan does not do this," Ryan wrote. "I expected the plan to be based on clear and reasonable assumptions about health needs and the expected quantity of service demand, the resources needed to provide those services, and the forecast cost of those resources. The plan does not do this." The plan should describe how investment and service changes would achieve the right outcomes, laying out what assumptions and trade-offs were expected, but it did not. Health NZ has an out. In the plan, it said it had been expected to take six years - or two three-year planning cycles - to fully develop systems to ensure full costings and budgets for its core services. The 2024-27 plan indicated its processes were not there yet. "It is not costed to the level of traceability and integration between the financials, activities, and desired improvements expected from a fully mature New Zealand Health Plan," it said. The plan was submitted to Ryan by the former commissioner Dr Lester Levy and deputy commissioners of health in May. Levy now chairs the new board of HNZ. The plan is titled, "Timely access to quality health care." Levy said in the foreword it "outlines actions to deliver better health outcomes for all New Zealanders". He does not mention it is not mature or properly costed; this is mentioned on page 44. Levy oversaw a reset at the beleaguered agency after a financial meltdown in 2024 set it on a path towards a $1.7 billion deficit , following primarily a mess-up over how many nurses it had and what they would cost; spending cuts reined that back to just over a billion by mid-2025. It said it prioritised protecting frontline services while it made cuts. It aims to break even in 2026-27. The plan said to understand what services were costing, it now had a financial procurement info system in place to track spending; plus it was bringing in a nationwide agreements and payments system. It had changed how it budgeted, to base budgets on what it wanted to do, rather than the other way around. "This change of approach will place service delivery for our patients front-and-centre, allow more accurate service planning for the year ahead, and help us to identify where cost and/or productivity improvements need to be made to meet our activity targets within budget." The Healthy Futures (Pae Ora) Amendment Bill repeals the requirement for future such health plans to be audited by the Auditor-General. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
