India has an important role in the global order, BRICS a powerful voice of Global South: Russian expert Panova
In a conversation with The New Indian Express' Amisha Mohan, the head of the BRICS Expert Council for Russia and W20 Sherpa Victoria Panova discussed the role of BRICS in maintaining unity among its diverse members amid geopolitical tensions, the challenges in achieving gender equality across G20 nations, and more. Excerpts:
India successfully chaired the G20 summit in 2023. How do you think that defined India's readiness to take on a leadership role and shape the future of international cooperation?
India's successful chairmanship of the 2023 G20 Summit highlighted that it's ready to assume a more prominent role in shaping global challenges such as climate change, global health and digital transformation. It has an important role in the global order. The summit's theme, 'One Earth, One Family, One Future', also highlighted India's vision of inclusive global growth. India has both the expertise and interest to promote international cooperation in areas such as renewable energy, digital governance and trade reforms.
Geopolitical tensions are on the rise and shifting alliances are the new norm. How do you see BRICS maintaining unity among its diverse members while advocating for a multipolar world order?
Though there are diverse political systems, BRICS maintains unity through its shared commitment to sovereignty, mutual respect and a multipolar world order. In the face of global tensions and shifting alliances, BRICS emphasizes dialogue and consensus. Diverse voices within the bloc have always acted as a catalyst in fostering inclusive solutions. This is an era of multilateralism and new dynamics and BRICS is a cooperative platform.
As a W20 Sherpa, what do you think are the biggest challenges in achieving gender equality across G20 nations?
The biggest hurdles in achieving gender equality in G20 nations are persistent gender stereotypes, unequal economic opportunities, underrepresentation of women in leadership roles and the burden of unpaid care work. There is lack of transparency in the implementation of policies that protect women's labour rights. Addressing these issues requires coordinated efforts across governments, inclusive policy-making and a shift in societal mindsets.
If we look at Russia, during the times of the Soviet Union, we introduced bills for legal equality, so by law, it is provided that men and women are equal, by opportunities, by possibilities. But of course, different countries have different starting points. That's why in 2015, Women-20 was launched by the Turkish Presidency and was supported by the Russian Federation's Sherpa Svetlana Lukash.
Similarly, a multifaceted approach by different countries has been instrumental in initiating action on women's issues. Groups within the G20, such as W20 and G20 Empower, often propose policy recommendations on women's issues like leadership, equal pay, etc. Moreover, the G20 is implementing tools like the G20 Empower KPI Dashboard to track progress on gender equality metrics and gain insights into measurable outcomes. So, we hope we are coming closer to create an inclusive environment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
G7 is no more than a relic of the past. India should focus more on G20, BRICS
It's worth remembering how the G7 began. A 'fireside chat'-turned-'Library Group' started by US treasury secretary George Shultz in 1970 to address currency turbulence bloomed into G6 five years later. On 15 November 1975, about five months after Indira Gandhi had imposed Emergency in India, leaders of six democracies — the US, UK, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan — met at the Castle of Rambouillet near Paris. By keeping India out, Canada has missed a golden opportunity to reset bilateral ties and make a new beginning for peace and development. The exclusion is not only unfortunate but might prove to be a great setback for the G7's own ambitions, whether it is addressing climate change and global inequality or building cooperation with emerging economies, agendas it has taken up in the last three decades or so. Canada, which took over the G7 presidency from Japan in December 2024, has made a surprising and controversial decision: to exclude India from the upcoming G7 summit. At a time when the world's economic centre of gravity is shifting towards Asia, and when India has proven its leadership on multiple global platforms — including its recent G20 presidency — this move is not just irrational, it may be self-defeating. Today, none of the leaders from the 'Summit of the Six' — James Callaghan (UK foreign secretary), Henry Kissinger (US secretary of state), Gerald Ford (US president), Takeo Miki (Japan prime minister), Helmut Schmidt (German chancellor), Jean Sauvagnargues (French foreign minister), Valery Giscard d'Estaing (French president), and Mariano Rumor (Italian foreign minister) — are alive, and most of the countries no longer dominate the global economy. The G6 became the G7 in 1976 with Canada's inclusion, and the G8 between 1997 and 2013 with Russia onboard— until Russia's suspension after the Crimea annexation in 2014. Collectively, the group expressed concern about their respective economies, donned the mantle of the 'white man's burden' to discharge their responsibilities toward the 'Third World', and decided to meet again. Fifty years later, none of the world's problems have been solved by these countries, and except for the US, the rest are no better off than the countries of the 'poor South.' Also read: India is walking a geopolitical tightrope. It can shape New Delhi's diplomatic power G7's expanding mandate, shrinking impact Over the years, G7 summits have taken on a broad agenda: gender equality, global health, climate change, and sustainable development. In 2021, the UK-led summit committed itself to a 'green revolution' and net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. Germany's 2022 presidency established a 'Climate Club' to implement the Paris Agreement, and the 2023 Hiroshima summit reaffirmed commitment to phasing out fossil fuels. India participated in all these meetings, contributing immensely to the resolution and their implementation. Ironically, it was Donald Trump-led 'G1 within G7' that derailed consensus, dismissing global warming as a 'hoax.' Now, with Trump 2.0 back in the mix and India 3.0 out, can the G7's green agenda survive? Patronising rhetoric, no real support The G7's agenda of connecting with emerging economies and adopting an inclusive approach has often rung hollow. Italy included an 'African Segment' in the 2001 summit, but without serious financial commitments and steps to resolve issues of poverty and migration. African leaders left disappointed, questioning the G7's sincerity. In contrast, India, during its G20 presidency, successfully pushed for the African Union—representing 55 African countries—to become a permanent G20 member. Who, then, is more relevant and committed to inclusive global development: the G7 or the G20? The 2021 G7 summit in London also introduced the Global Minimum Tax (15 per cent), aiming to rewrite international tax rules and discourage multinational corporations from taking undue advantage of lower taxes in smaller or developing economies. This again faced serious objections, with critics arguing that the G7 had no democratic legitimacy to act as the captain of the global economy. India: From Bandung to BRICS India's global economic role didn't begin yesterday. New Delhi has emerged as the fulcrum of Asian economic development since hosting the 1947 Asian Relations Conference and leading the Bandung Conference in 1955, where the foundation of the Non-Aligned Movement was laid. Now, it has positioned itself at the centre of South-South Cooperation. The successful Indian presidency of the G20 followed by its developmental agenda with IBSA (India-Brazil-South Africa) are proof of India's unique leadership position in the geo-economic dynamics of Asia and South Asia. It has also championed inclusive global governance in a way that the G7 often only gestures toward. Time to re-evaluate the relevance of G7 The economic, political, and cultural divides of the 1950s and 1960s are out of syllabus, phased out of academic discourse due to globalisation and rapid rise of 'Southern' economies. Between the 19th and the 21st century, there was a total metamorphosis that has left several centuries-old theories, perceptions and ideas redundant. The old binaries of the Cold War — East vs West, North vs South — have blurred into insignificance in the face of a new and emerging global economic order, necessitating a new approach to the contemporary history of global economic development. The G7, once seen as the anchor of global economic stability, is no more than a relic of the past today. India would do well to invest its diplomatic energy elsewhere: G20, BRICS, IBSA, and regional platforms that better reflect the world as it is, not as it was. Let the G7 gently go into oblivion — and take the outdated and irrelevant worldview it represents with it. Seshadri Chari is the former editor of 'Organiser'. He tweets @seshadrichari. Views are personal. (Edited by Prashant)
Hans India
6 hours ago
- Hans India
Birla highlights India's resilient growth at BRICS Parl Forum
Brasilia: Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on Thursday reiterated India's strong support for a fair and rule-based global trading system — one that genuinely addresses the needs and aspirations of the Global South — at 11th BRICS Parliamentary Forum in Brasilia. Addressing the working session on 'BRICS Parliamentary Action in Search of New Paths for Economic Development', Birla appreciated the Parliament of Brazil for successfully organising the event and thanked them for their hospitality. 'Today, the BRICS group has emerged as a formidable force in the global economic landscape. It represents nearly 45 per cent of the population and contributes 40 per cent to the global GDP based on the purchasing power parity. Despite global challenges, BRICS nations have made inspiring progress in the realm of economic development. India believes that to further strengthen this progress, we must enhance trade investment and financial cooperation,' he said. 'We are concerned that representation of developing countries in key international institutions, and such imbalances hinder global equity and sustainable development. Therefore, BRICS countries must collectively make concrete efforts to enhance participation in such institutions,' Birla added.
Hindustan Times
7 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
‘India must resist hybrid cars and adapt to EVs': Amitabh Kant
India must resist the temptation of intermediary technologies like hybrid cars and instead leapfrog directly into adopting electric vehicles (EVs), much like it did during the smartphone revolution, said India's G20 Sherpa Amitabh Kant on World Environment Day on Thursday. 'Opting for hybrids is like returning to typewriters in an era of artificial intelligence and smartphones. We should never do that,' said Kant, the former CEO of NITI Aayog. He was speaking at the release of a report by the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) and IIT Roorkee that assesses life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs), hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), and battery electric vehicles (BEVs). While transport contributes about 14% to Delhi's pollution load, Kant emphasised the city's multi-source pollution crisis. From stubble burning and industrial emissions to power generation and the widespread domestic use of traditional methods of cooking and heating such as biomass or dungcake burning during winter, Delhi faces a compound challenge. 'From October to December, Delhi becomes the most polluted capital city in the world. Over 80% of the population breathes air worse than India's national ambient air quality standards. It cuts life expectancy by over six years,' he said. He advocated for a winter-specific government scheme for universal LPG coverage to reduce pollution from biomass burning in homes. 'Universal LPG access in Delhi-NCR during winter could be transformative,' he said. Kant said that around 30% of air pollution in Delhi is caused by power plants and industries in NCR. He said that of 12 power plants in the region, only seven out of 36 units have flue gas torrefaction and dry sorbent injection systems installed. 'Of these, 75% of these are run by NTPC. That must change,' he said. Kant added that 4,068 brick kilns in the region contribute nearly 8% of pollution. 'These must be converted to zigzag technology,' he said, calling for a broader shift toward electric boilers for small and medium industries, integrated with rooftop solar.
