Report: Burnley Close to Hiring Ex-Liverpool Coach
Burnley's Ambitious Move: Matt Beard in Advanced Talks Over Women's Team Role
Statement of Intent from a Club on the Rise
Burnley are showing serious ambition as they prepare for life as a fully professional outfit in the women's game. According to The Guardian, the Clarets are 'in advanced talks with the former Liverpool manager Matt Beard about their women's team's head coach role.'
Advertisement
The potential appointment of Beard, a two-time Women's Super League champion with Liverpool, could be a game-changer for a club currently operating in the third tier of women's football in England. As The Guardian further notes, 'it is understood the club are close to a deal with the 47-year-old in what would be a big statement of intent.'
Beard's Anfield Legacy – Mixed but Meaningful
While Matt Beard's most recent spell at Liverpool ended in February under a cloud of inconsistency, his overall contribution to the club's women's side deserves respect. His second stint included leading Liverpool back into the WSL in 2022, although the momentum stalled this past season. The Reds finished seventh, nine points clear of relegation, yet a considerable 15 points away from European qualification.
Still, Beard's earlier tenure remains his standout contribution. He famously guided Liverpool Women to consecutive WSL titles in 2013 and 2014 – a golden era for the club. That pedigree, combined with recent experience managing a team in transition, makes him a seasoned candidate to lead Burnley into this next chapter.
Burnley's Rise and the Push for Professionalism
Burnley's move to become a fully professional women's team next season marks a significant step forward. It mirrors the broader trend in women's football where clubs are investing in infrastructure and experience to elevate their programmes. Hiring someone of Beard's calibre would be a clear statement that Burnley are not content to merely compete—they intend to challenge.
Advertisement
With clubs like Newcastle United Women and Southampton FC Women already investing heavily in their squads and backroom teams, Burnley seem determined not to be left behind. The pursuit of a proven winner signals a desire to fast-track their ascent.
Our View – Anfield Index Analysis
From a Liverpool supporter's standpoint, Matt Beard's potential move to Burnley is bittersweet. On one hand, his departure marked a natural end to a chapter that wasn't delivering the expected progress. On the other, Beard is a part of Liverpool Women's history, and his achievements—especially those title-winning seasons—should not be forgotten.
For Burnley, this could be a masterstroke. They are preparing for the demands of professionalism, and in Beard they might gain a coach who understands how to build a culture of winning. The WSL is evolving rapidly, and success is no longer purely about resources—it's about long-term planning, recruitment, and leadership. Beard ticks those boxes.
If the deal goes through, many Reds fans will be watching his progress with interest. After all, football is a small world, and the women's game is increasingly interconnected. Beard taking Burnley up the divisions would not only be a story of redemption for him but a reflection of how the ecosystem of English women's football continues to mature.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Liverpool goalkeeper set for loan transfer as defender turns down offer
Liverpool goalkeeper Harvey Davies is close to agreeing a season-long loan move to League Two side Crawley Town. The Reds are set to confirm a new long-term contract for Davies ahead of making the switch. Advertisement The 21-year-old goalkeeper was a regular training with Arne Slot's first team squad last season which was recognised by being awarded a medal during the Premier League trophy presentation after the final game of the campaign at home to Crystal Palace. Davies, who has come through the ranks at the Academy, has been on the bench for the senior side on 18 occasions including seven last term, the most recent of which was for the 3-2 Champions League defeat at PSV Eindhoven in January. READ MORE: Trent Alexander-Arnold 'disappointment' as former Liverpool defender suffers unexpected setback READ MORE: Alexander Isak to Liverpool only realistic on one condition as truth about Newcastle transfer clear Advertisement He has represented Liverpool under-21s in the EFL Trophy and spent the 2023/24 season on loan at Crewe Alexandra in League Two, where he made 32 appearances. James Balagizi, the 21-year-old Reds midfielder who previously had a loan spell at Crawley Town, is having a trial at Swedish side Osters IF. Meanwhile, Liverpool youngster Isaac Moran has turned down the offer of a scholars contract at the Academy and has left the club. The 16-year-old defender made his breakthrough with the U18s last season and has skippered England at youth level.
New York Times
29 minutes ago
- New York Times
Mykhailo Mudryk's doping charge explained: Can Chelsea sack him if found guilty and could he appeal?
After provisionally suspending Mykhailo Mudryk in December for a failed drugs test, the English Football Association (FA) has now charged the Chelsea winger for violating its anti-doping regulations. This means Mudryk, who has not played a competitive game of football since the end of November, could now face a maximum penalty of a four-year suspension. Advertisement Although the 24-year-old was in Wroclaw, Poland, to watch Chelsea lift the UEFA Conference League on May 28, he is not with the squad for their ongoing involvement in the FIFA Club World Cup, which is taking place in the United States. In statement released on Wednesday afternoon, the FA said: 'We can confirm that Mykhailo Mudryk has been charged with anti-doping rule violations alleging the presence and/or use of a prohibited substance, in terms of regulations 3 and 4 of The FA's Anti-Doping Regulations. As this is an ongoing case, we are not in a position to comment further at this time.' As per the FA's anti-doping regulations, Mudryk now has 20 days to decide whether to accept the finding and whatever punishments follow, or request a hearing with the FA. Although a four-year ban would be the worst-case scenario for Mudryk, a possible suspension could range anywhere from two years to a month, depending on any mitigating factors. Here, we explain the background to his case — some of which appeared in an article previously published in December — and what happens now. In December, it emerged that a routine drugs test found Mudryk to have — in Chelsea's words — 'an adverse finding' in a urine sample provided by the player. This immediately led to a provisional suspension from Chelsea's first team as they awaited the results of further testing. When urine samples are collected, they are put into two separate containers. The A sample is used for the initial test, and if that comes back positive, they then test the B sample to verify the accuracy of the first result. So, following Mudryk's positive A sample, his B sample was then tested, which verified that he had tested positive for meldonium, a banned substance. The Athletic previously reported that Mudryk returned the positive test for meldonium after being away on international duty in November during a period that saw him feature in Ukraine's Nations League fixtures against Georgia and Albania. Before his positive test became public knowledge, Chelsea head coach Enzo Maresca was asked about Mudryk's absence and simply said he is 'out', or that he was ill, without giving any further reason. Advertisement Neither Mudryk or Chelsea have spoken publicly since the FA announced its decision to charge him on Wednesday. In December, the club issued a statement saying that Mudryk 'has confirmed categorically that he has never knowingly used any banned substances'. In the same statement, the player said: 'This has come as a complete shock as I have never knowingly used any banned substances or broken any rules, and am working closely with my team to investigate how this could have happened.' If the charge is upheld, the player's options would be limited. 'If a ban is imposed, he will have the option to try to reduce the length of the ban by appealing the sanction,' says Dan Chapman, a partner and head of employment and sports law at Leathes Prior. Chapman notes that any appeal by Mudryk would be to the FA, though his legal team may also explore whether they can appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sports (CAS), which is where Paul Pogba had his four-year ban reduced to 18 months. Chapman says that the 'domestic process is reasonably speedy', both in terms of possible sanctions and any appeal. 'Appeals to the European system are complex, even if available, and will take some while,' he adds. 'The thing with Pogba was that he was of an age where the sanction was career-ending and challenging the ban was his only play. If Mudryk feels that he no realistic prospect of overturning any ban, the situation could change. 'Depending on how long the ban is for,' Chapman continues, 'the advice might be that once the FA process has been concluded, he will need to accept the outcome and that he will still have plenty of time to play after the ban ends.' If the FA finds against Mudryk then, unlike the player, Chelsea would have several options. In the standard Premier League contracts that are in place between all players and clubs, there is a definition of gross misconduct, and being found to have taken a prohibited substance falls under the definition, as it does in accordance with FA rules. Advertisement 'The club, on the face of it, would have a relatively open-and-shut case to say the player is guilty of gross misconduct and, if they wanted to, they could terminate the player's contract,' Chapman says. 'They would need to give 14 days' notice to the player in writing if that is what they wanted to do. 'There is an appeal process available to the player, and we are not talking about an appeal against the drugs finding, but an appeal against the decision of the club to terminate his contract for gross misconduct. 'The player can follow that process, although it is hard to see how any appeal could realistically be successful, if the FA allegations have been upheld.' When Mudryk joined Chelsea in January 2023, he signed an eight-and-a-half-year contract, the last year of which is optional, meaning he could be tied to the club for another six years. But Mudryk would not have the remainder of his contract paid out if he is sacked for gross misconduct. Chelsea would only need to pay him for the 14 days. Another option open to Chelsea, Chapman explains, is that they may decide to keep Mudryk, given his age, potential and remaining contract length. In this scenario, the Premier League side may seek to renegotiate the Ukrainian's contract and put him on a significantly lower wage while he serves the ban. It would still be up to Mudryk, however, to sign a new deal on reduced terms. He may instead fancy his chances as a free agent if the alternative to that is being sacked by the club. If Chelsea opt to sack Mudryk, then Chapman says they could in theory also sue him for damages, which is what they successfully did when they sacked Adrian Mutu in 2004 after he tested positive for cocaine and was handed a seven-month ban. 'That is a very rare step, but that is an option open to them,' adds Chapman. 'They would argue they bought an asset for £80million, he breached the contract, and now the asset is worth virtually nothing. Advertisement 'Not many clubs would ever want to do that because the message you are sending future players is that if you sign for us and things go wrong, then we may sue you. This doesn't tend to happen, but it can. The signs so far, and who knows whether this is a justified position not being privy to the facts, is that Chelsea are being fully supportive of their player.' A prohibited substance, in short. Meldonium is a heart disease drug developed in 1970 in the former Soviet Union. It is designed to combat ischemia, a condition where blood flow is restricted to body tissue, muscles or organs. It boosts metabolism and increases blood flow and, by extension, the exercise capacity of athletes. It was added to the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)'s list of banned substances in January 2016 after its previous inclusion in the agency's monitoring programme the year before. Former Russian tennis player Maria Sharapova had been the most high-profile case of an athlete being banned for using meldonium. A failed drugs test at the 2016 Australian Open led to a two-year ban issued by the International Tennis Federation, with Sharapova accepting she had made 'a huge mistake' in taking the substance. Sharapova told a news conference in Los Angeles she had been given a medicine for 10 years by her family doctor and had been unaware that it had also been known as meldonium, which had been added to WADA's prohibited list in the weeks before her failed test. The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) reduced Sharapova's ban to 15 months in October 2016 after finding that she did not deliberately cheat and that there was no 'significant fault or negligence on her part'. The use of meldonium was not uncommon by Eastern European athletes before its ban, but it was the subject of a doping scandal in 2016 when the Ice Hockey Federation of Russia replaced its under-18s squad with an under-17s team at the World Under-18s Championships due to several players returning positive test results. Philip Buckingham Adverse findings are few and far between and, most commonly, have been due to traces of recreational drugs being discovered. Mutu, goalkeeper Mark Bosnich and one-time England midfielder Jake Livermore were all given suspensions by the FA for testing positive for traces of cocaine, as was the Cardiff winger Nathaniel Mendez-Laing more recently, in 2020. Advertisement Further afield, the use of performance-enhancing drugs is rare but not without precedent. In February, Pogba was banned for four years when found to have taken a doping agent while at Juventus, a suspension that was later reduced to 18 months when an appeal to CAS found the consumption of the drug had not been intentional. He is still without a club. In February 2021, Manchester United goalkeeper Andre Onana, then playing for Ajax, was banned for a year by UEFA after testing positive for furosemide, a diuretic. That was reduced to nine months by CAS after the court accepted Onana's explanation that he had confused the medication — which he said belonged to his wife — with aspirin. On November 4, Oscar Zambrano, the Hull City midfielder, was also given a lengthy ban. Zambrano had returned a positive test last season when playing for his Ecuadorian parent club LDU Quito but had remained eligible to feature until CONMEBOL issued a ban for breaching anti-doping rules. Hull, who had only signed the player on loan, said Zambrano intended to appeal through CAS but the case is not yet listed. Philip Buckingham Doping bans ordinarily fall between two and four years, although appeals can reduce the length of those bans, as was seen in the case of Pogba. 'If we look at what happened with Paul Pogba, his violation and the consequences that followed, that was a lengthy ban,' says Jibreel Tramboo, a sports lawyer at Church Court Chambers. 'I understand the circumstances are different but the point still follows. 'Anti-doping regulations are a strict liability offence. Athletes are fully responsible for substances found in their bodies. It's irrelevant if it's accidental or intentional. If it's there, it's a breach. You could argue a reduced sanction if he can demonstrate no significant fault or negligence in what he's taken but there is arguably no defence.' Philip Buckingham
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
England dropping Pope would be 'remarkable'
England v India - first Test Venue: Headingley Dates: 20-24 June Time: 11:00 BST Coverage: Ball-by-ball radio commentary on BBC Radio 5 Sports Extra and BBC Sounds. In-play video clips and text commentary on the BBC Sport website and app. Today at the Test on BBC iPlayer and BBC Two each night. Advertisement England dropping Ollie Pope for Jacob Bethell would have been "remarkable" after the batter scored 171 against Zimbabwe last month, says captain Ben Stokes. Choosing between vice-captain Pope and 21-year-old Bethell was the major selection decision for England before the first Test against India on Friday at Headingley. England opted to retain Pope at number three, despite Bethell impressing in that position after being given his debut in New Zealand last year. "The 'big selection' [idea] did not come from us," Stokes said. "It would be remarkable to choose someone else if their last knock was a 170, and that's pretty much all I need to say on that." Advertisement Bethell's opportunity at number three came when Pope stood in as wicketkeeper during Jamie's Smith paternity leave and moved down the order. Bethell scored half-centuries in each of the three Tests in New Zealand but then missed the Test against Zimbabwe because he was playing in the Indian Premier League. Pope went back to the position he has held since Stokes took over as captain in 2022 - he averages 43.06 at first drop despite also returning a series of low scores - against Zimbabwe and scored his seventh Test hundred in the role. "In this day and age it's very tough to not see all that kind of speculation and stuff around it just because of how easily accessible things are. You don't even have to go and hunt for it to see it these days," Stokes said of Pope. Advertisement "But I think scoring 170 in his last Test match has sort of shown how well he's handled that extra scrutiny." England have had 'honest conversations' around style With an Ashes series in Australia to follow in the winter, the start of the much-anticipated five-match series against India signals the beginning of a run of 10 Tests which will define Stokes' reign as captain. Stokes, though, was keen to refute any suggestion England would have an eye on Australia while playing India. "We will come to that when we come to that but for us right now it's about focusing on these five games that we've got coming up against India," he said. Advertisement The series also comes at an intriguing time for Stokes and coach Brendon McCullum with England having won four and lost four of their past eight matches. With their aggressive approach, they have reached remarkable highs - there were notable victories in their first year in charge against New Zealand, India and Pakistan - but series wins against West Indies, Sri Lanka and New Zealand over the past 12 months have also been interspersed with awful defeats. Stokes says the squad have had "honest conversations" about how to improve. "I don't think defensive frame of mind is the right way of saying it," Stokes said. Advertisement "I think it's just being smarter in those situations when it's obvious that the opposition is on top of us at that moment and they have got the upper hand on us. "'What do we need to do to wrestle that momentum back towards us so then we can start putting the pressure back onto them?'." Teams to play for Anderson-Tendulkar trophy The teams will play for the new Anderson–Tendulkar Trophy, named after legendary former players James Anderson and Sachin Tendulkar. The trophy replaces the Pataudi Trophy, named after the Pataudi family. "It's a fabulous feeling," Tendulkar told the BBC. "When I got to know about the honour, I was ecstatic. Advertisement "I remember sharing this with my family and also spoke to Pataudi family as well. "I feel it's a reflection of what, not just me, but Jimmy and I have been able to contribute to our nation in Test cricket and it's all about Test cricket, which is the most challenging format." Anderson said: "It's pretty surreal. "You don't start playing cricket for things like this to happen, but when they do happen it's lovely, especially alongside Sachin. "I've not only played against him quite a few times, but growing up, watching him, seeing him play for Yorkshire as well, it's just an incredible feeling and I'm very honoured to be a part of it."
