logo

Ex-lawyer convicted over charges for cheating company director of more than $8 million

Straits Times08-08-2025
SINGAPORE - A former lawyer has been convicted for tricking a director of two companies into dispersing more than $8 million into his own company following a trial.
On Aug 8, Then Feng, 43, was convicted of all 16 charges he was fighting. This includes cheating, forgery and charges under the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act.
Then, who is out on a $450,000 bail, will return to court on Oct 24 to give his mitigation plea . He will also be sentenced on the same day.
The crux of the trial was to determine if Then had misrepresented to Mr Andrew Ling Hui, the director of Providence Asset Management and 5 and 2, into believing that Mr Ling was procuring services from and dealing with Walkers, an international law firm.
The lawyer was then employed by Walkers and had learnt that his firm was going to launch an affiliated corporate and fiduciary services firm in 2015 named Walkers Professional Services in the Cayman Islands.
In June 2015, Then incorporated a company of the same name in the British Virgin Islands without his company's knowledge.
He admitted to basing the entire branding of his firm, from the name to its logo, on that of Walkers' business – but insisted that he had set up the firm at the time without any intention of it being associated with Walkers.
Sometime in 2018, Then told Mr Ling that Walkers could provide escrow services for cryptocurrency transactions. He added that those services would be done with a bank account under Walkers Professional Services.
The prosecution's closing submissions pointed out that Mr Ling had believed the services would be rendered to him by Walkers, the international law firm, and not Then's personal company.
In April 2018, Then and Mr Ling agreed to buy a foreign bank together.
Under the agreement, Then told Mr Ling that Walkers would provide escrow services for the transaction, and that monies provided for the acquisition would be held in a bank account controlled by Walkers.
To that end, Mr Ling arranged for various payments amounting to more than $8 million to be made to what he believed was Walkers' bank accounts, but he had unknowingly wired the money to Then's company.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Tan Pei Wei said Then had also given Mr Ling documents with a logo that is 'indiscernible' from the logo used by Walkers.
In his defence, Then said he had incorporated a firm named after Walkers' business due to his 'quirky key sense of humour', and it was done in 'good fun'.
He added that he had meant for the branding of his company to be a 'tongue-in-cheek insider thing', and that the company would only be known to his friends and close business associates.
But the prosecution said Then had only got to know Mr Ling two months prior to telling him about the firm, and that Mr Ling could scarcely be considered Then's close friend or business partner at the point.
DPP Tan said it was also unbelievable that an accomplished corporate lawyer, such as Then, would have found the arrangement amusing as it was fraught with risk for both himself and his firm.
To that end, she pointed out that Then had concealed the existence of his identically-named firm from his company, as he was on the verge of being made partner at the law firm and was aware of the problems his incorporated company could pose to him .
In fact, Then was later terminated from the law firm after his incorporated company was discovered by another partner at Walkers.
The prosecution added that while the defence had sought to impugn Mr Ling's credibility, Mr Ling had been candid and forthright on the stand and consistent with the evidence he had provided in terms of the communication between the pair.
On the other hand, DPP Tan said Then had been 'dishonest, evasive and disingenuous' on the stand. His explanations concerning the use of an identical name and logo for his own firm with Walkers' business was also described as being 'fundamentally absurd'.
If found guilty of forgery for the purpose of cheating, Then can be jailed for up to 10 years and fined for each charge.
He can receive the same punishment for each count of cheating and dishonestly inducing a delivery of property.
He can be jailed for up to 10 years, fined up to $500,000 or both for each charge under the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HSA partners with nightlife businesses to display 'Vaping is Prohibited' signs, public urged to report offenders
HSA partners with nightlife businesses to display 'Vaping is Prohibited' signs, public urged to report offenders

AsiaOne

time6 hours ago

  • AsiaOne

HSA partners with nightlife businesses to display 'Vaping is Prohibited' signs, public urged to report offenders

Patrons at nightlife venues will soon see "Vaping is Prohibited" signs displayed at entrances and within premises. In a press release on Aug 16, the Health Sciences Authority (HSA) announced that it is partnering with the Singapore Nightlife Business Association (SNBA) to step up efforts against vaping at nightlife establishments. The signs will carry QR codes linking directly to HSA's online reporting portal, enabling patrons and staff to report any illegal use or supply of e-vaporisers. Nightlife venues have also been urged to deny entry to patrons found carrying or consuming e-vaporisers. "Working with industry partners like SNBA helps strengthen ground-level deterrence and is an important part of HSA's strategy to combat illegal vaping," said Adjunct Professor (Dr) Raymond Chua, HSA Chief Executive Officer. "Vaping has no place in daily life, including Singapore's nightlife entertainment scene." SNBA president Danny Loong said the association is committed to working closely with HSA to ensure nightlife venues remain safe and compliant with the law, while safeguarding the health of patrons and staff. The use, purchase and possession of e-vaporisers are banned under the Tobacco (Control of Advertisements and Sale) Act, with offenders liable to fines of up to $2,000. Importing, distributing, or selling of e-vaporisers and their components carry heavier penalties — a fine of up to $10,000, jail of up to six months, or both for a first offence. Repeat offenders will face a fine of up to $20,000, jail of up to 12 months, or both. Recent raids highlight vaping concerns The announcement follows a joint enforcement operation on Friday (Aug 15), where HSA and the Singapore Police Force (SPF) officers raided entertainment establishments. During the islandwide operations from Friday night to Saturday morning, 115 people aged 17 to 61 were caught for e-vaporiser related offences. More than 280 e-vaporisers and components were seized, along with eight pods suspected to contain etomidate, a substance classified as a poison under the Poisons Act. [[nid:720920]]

HSA partners with nightlife businesses to display 'Vaping is Prohibited' signs, public urged to report offenders, Singapore News
HSA partners with nightlife businesses to display 'Vaping is Prohibited' signs, public urged to report offenders, Singapore News

AsiaOne

time6 hours ago

  • AsiaOne

HSA partners with nightlife businesses to display 'Vaping is Prohibited' signs, public urged to report offenders, Singapore News

Patrons at nightlife venues will soon see "Vaping is Prohibited" signs displayed at entrances and within premises. In a press release on Aug 16, the Health Sciences Authority (HSA) announced that it is partnering with the Singapore Nightlife Business Association (SNBA) to step up efforts against vaping at nightlife establishments. The signs will carry QR codes linking directly to HSA's online reporting portal, enabling patrons and staff to report any illegal use or supply of e-vaporisers. Nightlife venues have also been urged to deny entry to patrons found carrying or consuming e-vaporisers. "Working with industry partners like SNBA helps strengthen ground-level deterrence and is an important part of HSA's strategy to combat illegal vaping," said Adjunct Professor (Dr) Raymond Chua, HSA Chief Executive Officer. "Vaping has no place in daily life, including Singapore's nightlife entertainment scene." SNBA president Danny Loong said the association is committed to working closely with HSA to ensure nightlife venues remain safe and compliant with the law, while safeguarding the health of patrons and staff. The use, purchase and possession of e-vaporisers are banned under the Tobacco (Control of Advertisements and Sale) Act, with offenders liable to fines of up to $2,000. Importing, distributing, or selling of e-vaporisers and their components carry heavier penalties — a fine of up to $10,000, jail of up to six months, or both for a first offence. Repeat offenders will face a fine of up to $20,000, jail of up to 12 months, or both. Recent raids highlight vaping concerns The announcement follows a joint enforcement operation on Friday (Aug 15), where HSA and the Singapore Police Force (SPF) officers raided entertainment establishments. During the islandwide operations from Friday night to Saturday morning, 115 people aged 17 to 61 were caught for e-vaporiser related offences. More than 280 e-vaporisers and components were seized, along with eight pods suspected to contain etomidate, a substance classified as a poison under the Poisons Act. [[nid:720920]]

Almost 3,000 Malaysian government employees caught taking bribes from 2015-2025
Almost 3,000 Malaysian government employees caught taking bribes from 2015-2025

Independent Singapore

timea day ago

  • Independent Singapore

Almost 3,000 Malaysian government employees caught taking bribes from 2015-2025

MALAYSIA: Nearly 3,000 government employees in Malaysia were caught taking bribes over the past 10 years, the country's Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform), Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said, told the country's lawmakers on Friday (Aug 15). The Minister said in a written parliamentary reply that, based on data from the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), between 2015 and June 30, 2025, there were 4,896 arrests recorded for accepting bribes and 1,689 for giving bribes, for a total of 6,585 cases. 'Of the cases involving the acceptance of bribes, 2,965 involved public servants, followed by 1,101 private sector employees, 119 government-linked company (GLC) workers, 680 members of the public, and 31 politicians. For cases involving the giving of bribes, 47 involved public servants, followed by 511 private sector employees, 64 GLC workers, 1,061 members of the public, and six politicians,' she said. As the question asked involved a breakdown of bribe givers and recipients by race and age, as well as by career, she provided the following information. By far, Malays had the most cases of receiving bribes, 3,690, while the Chinese had 494 cases, the Indians had 263 cases, and other ethnic groups had 449 cases. When it came to giving bribes, the Chinese topped the list with 630 cases, followed by Malays with 390 cases, and Indians with 151 cases. Other ethnic groups had a total of 518 cases. Among the cases of receiving bribes over the past decade, 2,603 cases involved persons aged 40 years and younger, 2,097 were aged between 41 and 60, and 196 were aged 61 and older. As for cases of giving bribes, 981 were 40 years old and below, 622 were aged between 41 to 60, and 86 were 61 years old and above. In the latest Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), Malaysia ranks 57th out of 180 countries. Singapore, meanwhile, is third on the Index. Interestingly, while Singapore is first on the list among countries in Southeast Asia, Malaysia comes in second despite the large gap in their rankings. Last November, Azam Baki, the chief of MACC, said that 44 per cent of the arrests made by the anti-corruption agency involved civil servants. According to a report in Free Malaysia Today , Cuepacs, an umbrella group for civil service unions, said that there have been civil servants who were 'forced' to receive bribes due to pressure from certain parties. Abdul Rahman Nordin, Cuepacs' secretary-general, had made this remark when he commented on Malaysia's rank in the Corruption Perceptions Index. /TISG Read also: Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission under scrutiny over decision to let DBKL investigate Afdlin Shauki corruption allegations

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store