
Volkswagen ID Buzz GTX review — the ultimate parentmobile?
What VW has done is take the standard rear-wheel-drive ID Buzz and bolt an extra electric motor to the front wheels, boosting power from 282bhp to 335bhp. Then it updated the looks with high-gloss black external trim, Solna 20in alloy wheels, LED matrix headlights and a new cherry red paint colour.
Interestingly the suspension hasn't been touched, though, so while there may be a little extra weight at the front and pull from the front wheels, the way the Buzz GTX rides over bumps and goes around corners is very similar to the base models. Which is to say, decent if you're expecting it to be like a van but not as sharp and refined as a low-riding family estate.
• Read more expert reviews, news and insights on cars and motoring
Yes it's tall, but the battery pack is in a flat pack under the floor, which means the centre of gravity is low down so the Buzz feels nicely planted on the road. Particularly as it's a very hefty beast — just under three tonnes unladen. But somehow it feels relatively agile and it shakes off potholes and road humps with Taylor Swift-like ease.
The problem is that, as the driver and front passenger sit so far forward in the vehicle — almost over the front wheels — they will feel all those bumps and dips much more than those lording it up in the rear. It's a weird and not always pleasant experience and I reckon it's better in the cheaper model with smaller alloys and deeper tyre sidewalls.
As with the single-motor ID Buzz, you can get the GTX in short-wheelbase (the distance between the front and rear wheels) form with five or six seats (replacing the second row bench seat with two captain's chairs) or a long-wheelbase version with seven seats. Which means if you want the extra performance — and the GTX is definitely nippy, with 0-62mph times of 6.1 and 6.4 seconds respectively — there's no compromise on style and practicality.
Importantly, the longer versions of the ID Buzz, whether GTX or not, get a larger battery with a capacity of 86kWh (up from 79kWh). That means it carries some extra weight, on top of the additional metalwork in the body, and having the front and rear wheels pushed further apart further differentiates the way the long and short versions feel to drive. For me, the shorter model has the more engaging handling, so be sure you definitely need the extra capaciousness of the long-wheelbase model before committing to it.
Whichever model you go for, practicality is where the ID Buzz absolutely excels: there is so much space for all occupants in the cavernous interior where cubbyholes abound, especially in our seven-seat test car. This made it the ideal car for a family camping trip, and we were able to load up all of our gear, including an eight-man tent, multi-hob stove, chairs, table, gazebo, inflatable furniture, sleeping gear and more. It's the first camping trip we've been on where we haven't had to worry about what to take and what to leave behind — we threw everything in, and the Buzz swallowed it all up.
To create even more space, I removed one of the seats from the third row, which is astonishingly easy to do. I didn't even have to consult the owner's manual or one of those 'dullfluencers' you get on YouTube. What's more, a bar on the seat allows it to be carried, though of course it's heavy and cumbersome and therefore a job for one strong person or two less brawny types. It's even simpler to get the seat back in, sliding from the rear and dropping down and into place with a click. It's almost as if the system was designed by someone with a brain.
Making life even easier is that the ID Buzz GTX has powered sliding rear doors on both sides, and the large top-hinged powered tailgate means you can load and unload without getting soaked if it's raining at the campsite. VW also fitted a bike rack to the optional towbar for us, so my children were able to cycle around once we got to the campsite.
I think the kids, aged eleven and nine, were more blown away by this car than I was, in reality. They've been in the five-seat model in Style trim before, and so were already pleased to be see the Buzz again, but the arrival of the seven-seat GTX resulted in fits of wild excitement. So extreme was their ebullience that they wanted to spend the night in it while it was parked outside our house.
I can sort of see why. I was also excited by a Toyota Space Cruiser my dad brought home one day when I was a nipper. Something about the acres of space and rear glass sunroof, possibly. In the GTX it's a fixed glass roof but panoramic, and changes from opaque to clear at the touch of a button.
But my little ones also loved the sliding electric rear windows, and the fact that they had fast USB-C charging ports in the doors and their own digital temperature controls. It might well have been the coolest thing they had ever seen; they were less excited when I surprised them with a trip to Legoland. Though, on reflection, that might have something to do with the reality of Legoland.
It's a decent interior up front, too, with easy Android Auto/Apple CarPlay connectivity and a much improved operating system over the first efforts in VW ID models. Details like the Play/Pause symbols on the accelerator and brake pedals will never not be cool, and the GTX gets the stonking Harman Kardon sound system as standard.
It's not perfect by any means, and the haptic buttons on the steering wheel are a real frustration as it's way too easy to brush them with your palm and change a radio station. And why VW thought it'd be a good idea to have the washer fluid button on the end of the indicator stalk I have no idea. But otherwise the layout is good, the visibility all round lends it the visibility of a greenhouse, and it's very easy to get comfortable for long stints at the wheel.
And here we come to the crunch point: how far the ID Buzz GTX goes on a charge. The shorter model, with the 79kWh battery, has an official range of 262 miles, while the seven-seater I tested, with its extended wheelbase and larger battery, is quoted at 280 miles. Not figures that will impress the EV-agnostics, and as ever those lab test efficiency figures are just the stuff of dreams; in the real world on long motorway runs you're more likely to need to stop every couple of hundred miles. Even more frequently if you're towing the maximum 1,600kg possible with the GTX LWB.
I have to report that my charging experience was a doddle, though. I managed to plug in at a supermarket near the campsite in the New Forest and go from 50 to 100 per cent charge during the 33 minutes I was inside the shop, thanks to charging at up to 200kW. VW quotes a figure of 10-80 per cent in 30 minutes, or 26 minutes for the shorter GTX. But while that was stress free, as usual the cost of using public rapid chargers caused my pulse to race… at 72p per kWh for the chargers at that Sainsbury's, half-filling the battery set me back £28. Charge at home and you'll pay somewhere around a tenth as much, on average. Maybe much less at night.
And speaking of prices, as you've probably guessed the ID Buzz GTX itself doesn't come cheap. The seven-seat version costs upwards of £68,045, which is eight and a half grand more than the regular seven-seater, and the shorter GTX will set you back £67,535. I'm sure many of you reckon that's a significant amount of money to pay, and I can't argue except to say that there aren't many new cars that can do 0-62mph in about six seconds and carry seven people plus luggage.
What's more, if you can afford a new one, you will find that the ID Buzz GTX is the sort of car that is impossible to drive without raising a smile. Its retro-modern looks absolutely hit the spot while the versatility and its easy-to-drive nature definitely fit the Type 2 ethos, though with a good dose of spice. More important, though, if you want to score maximum dad or mum points then this is the family bus to get.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
BYD Sealion 7 vs Tesla Model Y: Which mid-size SUV is best?
You can hardly move for new mid-size electric SUVs in 2025. The category has become the de facto battleground for the world's car makers and, for years now, the Tesla Model Y has topped sales charts. The planet's best-selling car is the obvious benchmark against which all newcomers are measured. One of the latest hopefuls seeking to challenge Tesla's dominance, the BYD Sealion 7 arrives from China with more than a hint of the Model Y about it. Tesla built its reputation on a minimalist, software-first approach, prioritizing range, efficiency and charging network. Chinese battery and automotive giant BYD takes a more traditional route, focusing on premium materials, lavish interior design and a feature-rich experience from the moment you step inside. Families and company car drivers making the switch to electric have a decision to make. Can the Sealion 7's build quality and luxurious cabin justify a higher price tag against the newly refined and more affordable Model Y? We've compared both cars to find out. How we tested and compared We've driven both the Tesla Model Y and BYD Sealion 7 extensively on a variety of roads in the UK and abroad. Close attention is paid to performance and handling when navigating around town centres, along country roads and at motorway speeds. As well as assessing ride quality, we put their infotainment systems through their paces and tested the practicality of their back seats and boot capacity. Specs Independent rating: 6/10 Independent rating: 9/10 Pros: Now rides better, super quiet, the best tech, efficient Cons: Still a firm ride, others do quality better, no Apple CarPlay or Android Auto Price range: £44,990 to £60,990 Battery size: 75kWh Maximum claimed range: 387 miles Miles per kWh: 4.4v Maximum charging rate: 250kW Battery, range and charging Winner: Tesla Model Y – it goes further on a smaller, more efficient battery and is backed by a convenient charging network The BYD Sealion 7 enters the arena with a larger top-spec battery at 91.3kWh, but only manages a maximum claimed range of 312 miles from it. The Sealion 7's 230kW peak charging speed is respectable, but that shorter range means that overall efficiency is just average. In contrast, the newly updated Tesla Model Y offers a maximum range of 387 miles from a smaller and lighter 75kWh battery. The charging speed is roughly similar at a peak of 250kW, but the Model Y benefits from Tesla's greatest asset: the Supercharger network. The car's navigation leads you to the best charger for any given journey and automatically preconditions the battery before you arrive, a value-add that BYD can't match. Performance and drive When it comes to performance, both the BYD Sealion 7 and Tesla Model Y offer a snappy 0-62mph time of 4.5 seconds and more than enough instant acceleration for any situation. BYD is so proud of that figure it puts it on the badge on the boot. Although performance is the same, the difference is in how they behave on the road. Our full BYD Sealion 7 review describes the ride as an unsatisfying combination of 'wallowy and firm'. The mid-size SUV leans through corners and can feel bouncy, but it's also firm over potholes, with unresponsive steering that fails to live up to the sporty performance figures. This is where the new and updated Model Y pulls ahead. The biggest flaw of the original car – its harsh ride – has been addressed. Our full Tesla Model Y review calls it 'far more composed over bumps' and a 'much more mature, even luxurious car.' While still firm, the Model Y is no longer uncomfortable and a lot more pleasant to drive, giving it an edge over the BYD. Interior and practicality Winner: BYD Sealion 7 – for its superior materials and premium cabin Here's where the Sealion 7 lands its most convincing punches. Stepping inside, the cabin feels genuinely premium, with high-quality, posh materials and an intricate, flowing design. The build quality is impressive and passenger space is excellent, especially in the rear. The Tesla Model Y's minimalist cabin has been subtly upgraded with more comfortable seats and better materials, but it can't match the traditional luxury or lavish feel of the BYD. For buyers who value plushness and smart design, the Sealion 7 has the clear advantage. In terms of practicality, both of these mid-size SUVs are evenly matched. The BYD has a slightly bigger 520-litre boot and a 58-litre frunk, and holds a healthy 1,789 litres with the seats folded down. The Tesla officially lists its boot size as 854 litres, though that's measured to the roof. Measure to the window-line like most brands and you get something nearer to Sealion 7. Fold down the seats and the Model Y boasts a total cargo volume of 2,138 litres. Price and value Winner: Tesla Model Y – it's cheaper to buy across all trim levels while offering significantly more range Undercutting the market leader on price is a proven strategy for any challenger brand, so it's odd that BYD has chosen to do the opposite. The entry-level Sealion 7 starts at £46,990, a full £2,000 more than the entry-level Tesla Model Y at £44,990, despite the Tesla offering more range for the money. The price gap only widens as you add more kit. The top-spec, all-wheel-drive Sealion 7 Excellence is priced at a hefty £58,990, whereas the new Model Y Long Range All-Wheel Drive seems cheap by comparison at just £51,990. For your extra £7,000, the BYD gives you significantly less driving range, too. While BYD does offer a longer six-year vehicle warranty compared to Tesla's four, it's not enough to overcome a fundamental shortcoming in price and performance – the value proposition is not in the Sealion 7's favour. Technology and infotainment Winner: Tesla Model Y – Tesla is renowned for its slick and integrated user experience, but BYD isn't far behind in terms of intuitive software. Compatibility with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto give the Sealion 7 an undeniable usability boost, too BYD has equipped the Sealion 7 with a showstopping 15.6in rotating touchscreen that's crisp, responsive and supports both Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. With clever usability touches and a brilliant Dynaudio sound system, it's an excellent standalone piece of kit. The Tesla Model Y sticks to its minimalist principles with a single 15.4in screen that controls everything. It still doesn't offer Apple CarPlay or Android Auto, which will be a deal-breaker for some. However, its strength lies in its neatly integrated software ecosystem. The native navigation, seamless link to the Supercharger network and the best-in-class smartphone app give drivers a hassle-free user experience. The addition of a new 8in screen for rear passengers is another advantage over the BYD. The verdict: BYD Sealion 7 vs Tesla Model Y The BYD Sealion 7 would be a compelling rival to the Tesla Model Y, but it's scuppered out of the gate by its pricing strategy. It's a spacious and well-built SUV with a premium-feeling interior and some excellent technology – in a vacuum, the Sealion 7 is an impressive car. But in a market dominated by the Model Y, the Sealion 7 is edged out by the Tesla in too many key areas. The Sealion 7 is more expensive, has less range, is less efficient and offers a less composed driving experience than its main rival. The 2025 update puts the Tesla Model Y back at the top of its game. It may not have the luxury feel of the BYD's cabin, but it's the superior EV and the more rewarding and economical car to own and drive.


Auto Express
10 minutes ago
- Auto Express
Car Deal of the Day: a family-friendly Renault Captur for just £161 a month
Smart looks inside and out Easy to drive; strong standard kit list Just £160.85 a month With the spotlight firmly on Renault's reimagined electric cars like the retro 4 and 5, it's easy to forget models like the Captur. This Renault Clio-based SUV has been around for a while, but it still stacks up well against the competition, thanks to great tech, efficient powertrains, and, judging by this deal, excellent value for money. Leasing Options is offering the baby high-riding Renault for a measly £160.85 a month right now. This two-year deal only requires a £2,280.19 initial payment to get the things moving, while mileage is limited to 5,000 miles a year. Just over £17 extra a month, though, allows this limit to be raised to 8,000 a year if you need. Advertisement - Article continues below This deal is for the entry-level Evolution trim, which, rather impressively, gets you 17-inch diamond-cut alloys, a 10.4-inch touchscreen with a Google-based operating system, a rear-view camera, and automatic climate control. Under the bonnet lies one of Renault's 1.0-litre petrol engines. Admittedly, this isn't the quickest engine around, with 0-62mph taking a very leisurely 14 seconds. But, on the plus side, it's smooth enough, and the six-speed manual gearbox is a delight to use. Fuel economy, meanwhile, stands at nearly 48mpg. While speed isn't on the Captur 1.0 Tce's side, comfort most certainly is. It's a very soft-riding car, giving a cosseting ride. At cruising speeds, the Captur belies its size and feels very refined; it's also super-quiet at higher speeds. Thanks to a refresh last year, the exterior neatly covers the Captur's age, and the interior is nicely modern too thanks to an overhauled infotainment set-up. The Car Deal of the Day selections we make are taken from our own Auto Express Find A Car deals service, which includes the best current offers from car dealers and leasing companies around the UK. Terms and conditions apply, while prices and offers are subject to change and limited availability. If this deal expires, you can find more top Renault Captur leasing offers from leading providers on our Renault Captur page. Check out the Renault Captur deal or take a look at our previous Car Deal of the Day selection here… Find a car with the experts Electric cars driven until they die: the truth about EV range Electric cars driven until they die: the truth about EV range Five EVs under £24k have joined Dacia's Spring on the UK market. How far can you go on a budget? We find out New Citroen C5 Aircross SUV undercuts the Volkswagen Tiguan by a huge £7k New Citroen C5 Aircross SUV undercuts the Volkswagen Tiguan by a huge £7k Citroen's revamped flagship C5 Aircross SUV is available to order now with hybrid or electric power Car Deal of the Day: Polestar 4 is a head-turning EV for a super cool price Car Deal of the Day: Polestar 4 is a head-turning EV for a super cool price The 'car with no rear window' is looking seriously cheap on lease right now. It's our Deal of the Day for July 28


Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
European stocks end at over one-week low; beverage makers hurt by US tariffs
July 31 (Reuters) - European shares closed at a more than one-week low on Thursday, as investors were disappointed by a series of corporate reports from the likes of Sanofi and Ferrari, while beverage makers slid as they were faced with a 15% U.S. tariff. Earnings were in full swing in Europe this week as traders gauged the impact U.S. tariffs were likely to have on corporate performance for the rest of the year. The pan-European STOXX 600 index (.STOXX), opens new tab finished 0.75% lower, with Italian stocks (.FTMIB), opens new tab underperforming the most in major markets with a 1.5% decline. Italian luxury carmaker Ferrari ( opens new tab slid 11.7% - marking its biggest one-day drop since its listing nine years ago. The stock also weighed on the broader STOXX automobile sector (.SXAP), opens new tab which was down nearly 4%. The sports-car maker maintained its annual forecasts and said that it will reduce the price compensation it introduced earlier on some cars sold in the U.S., once the U.S.-EU trade deal was effective. However, analysts mulled if the company can sustain its high profitability. Drugmaker Sanofi ( opens new tab also dropped 7.8% after reporting lower-than-expected earnings, but said that the impact from U.S. tariffs could be manageable. "When we think about sectors like automotives, pharma and consumer discretionary names — the risk is these sectors are particularly vulnerable to US tariffs," said Craig Cameron, portfolio manager and research analyst at Templeton Global Investments. "So we're consciously deciding to lean away from them and focus more on utilities, industrials, and financials that are largely domestically driven and insulated from tariffs." Euro zone banks (.SX7E), opens new tab continued their upward momentum, adding 0.7% on Thursday and have significantly outperformed the broader market in July. The sector logged monthly gains of 49%, compared with the STOXX's 7.6% rise. The sector also got a boost on the day after Societe Generale ( opens new tab raised its annual profit target sending its shares up 6.9%, while BBVA ( opens new tab added 7.9% after second-quarter net profit beat expectations. Dashing hopes for beverage makers, European diplomats said that wine and spirits exports from the bloc will now face U.S. tariffs until a different deal is agreed in talks expected to continue in the autumn. The broader STOXX food and beverage sector closed 2.6% lower and was further weighed by a 11.6% slump in Anheuser-Busch InBev ( opens new tab after the beer giant reported a fall in volumes. Also pressuring equities, the yield on the short-term 2-year German bond rose to touch its highest since April as money markets pared back their bets on upcoming European Central Bank interest rate cuts. They now reflected a 50% chance of an additional 25-basis-point easing move by the end of the year. In the UK, energy giant Shell (SHEL.L), opens new tab gained 1.1% after beating profit expectations for the quarter.